palestinian riots outside synagogue

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

4 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

I'm expecting it if Trump wins.

Kinda like the Liberal BLM riots or Jan 6th where only an innocent girl was killed, a conservative?

[seafoam1 3,018]

2 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

I'm expecting it if Trump wins.

Seriously. A cop killed a black criminal unjustifiably for the 1st time that year, the cop went to jail, and the liberals erupted into massive violence killing people and causing immense damage to everything in many cities in this country. They hate Trump way worse  than than that. Buckle up.

[TimHauck 2,868]

1 hour ago, Strike said:

 

Wait, Wut?   The Fair Housing Act applies to real estate in foreign countries?  Link?

https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/advertising_and_marketing#_What_Is_Prohibited?

It also applies where the advertisement itself violates the Act, even if the property being advertised may be exempt from the provisions of the Act

 

gonna go out on a limb and say advertising “the best Anglo neighborhoods in Israel” would be a violation

[seafoam1 3,018]

9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/advertising_and_marketing#_What_Is_Prohibited?

It also applies where the advertisement itself violates the Act, even if the property being advertised may be exempt from the provisions of the Act

 

gonna go out on a limb and say advertising “the best Anglo neighborhoods in Israel” would be a violation

I do like anglo.

[TimHauck 2,868]

3 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

 

One of these dudes appears to be the guy that ended up “bloodied.”  I’m sure he did nothing wrong

 

 

[Strike 5,538]

40 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/advertising_and_marketing#_What_Is_Prohibited?

It also applies where the advertisement itself violates the Act, even if the property being advertised may be exempt from the provisions of the Act

 

gonna go out on a limb and say advertising “the best Anglo neighborhoods in Israel” would be a violation

You think that supports your assertion?  Find me a legal analysis from a credible source that says that applies to real estate in foreign countries.

[TimHauck 2,868]

23 minutes ago, Strike said:

You think that supports your assertion?  Find me a legal analysis from a credible source that says that applies to real estate in foreign countries.

Yes, I do think it supports my assertion.  The last time I looked up legal documents for you you complained that you couldn’t read a 2 page document, so I’ll pass on doing your research for you.

[Strike 5,538]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Yes, I do think it supports my assertion.  The last time I looked up legal documents for you you complained that you could t read a 2 page document, so I’ll pass.

You didn't post a legal doc.  I didnt even ask for one.  Just post a credible source making the argument.  If it's a valid argument I'm sure one exists.  But I haven't seen one person even make that claim so I'm skeptical.  And if I refused to read a 2 page doc there was more to it than I couldn't be bothered.  How about a link so we can the REAL reason I chose not to read it, assuming I did decline to do so.  That isn't my M.O.

[TimHauck 2,868]

6 minutes ago, Strike said:

You didn't post a legal doc.  I didnt even ask for one.  Just post a credible source making the argument.  If it's a valid argument I'm sure one exists.  But I haven't seen one person even make that claim so I'm skeptical.  And if I refused to read a 2 page doc there was more to it than I couldn't be bothered.  How about a link so we can the REAL reason I chose not to read it, assuming I did decline to do so.  That isn't my M.O.

You said the text was too small for your old eyes

[Strike 5,538]

15 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You said the text was too small for your old eyes

Again, link?  I get it though.  You have to be vague about all this stuff because anytime I get you to be specific you make a fool of yourself. Fair enough.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I said whoever started the violence should be prosecuted.  It’s not clear who that was.

Wait, are you @The Real timschochet?

[TimHauck 2,868]

50 minutes ago, Strike said:

Again, link?  I get it though.  You have to be vague about all this stuff because anytime I get you to be specific you make a fool of yourself. Fair enough.

 

On 11/27/2022 at 12:37 PM, Strike said:

Holy fock.  I doubt this guy " Aaron Kheriaty, MD ", whoever the fock that is, is one of the plaintiffs.  Can you support that assertion?  The lawsuit Fauci was deposed in was initiated by the states of Louisiana and Missouri. 

 

On 11/27/2022 at 12:54 PM, TimHauck said:

Sure, are the court documents tweeted out by the Missouri AG sufficient enough for you?

 

Gonna admit you were wrong (again)?

 

 

On 11/27/2022 at 2:42 PM, Strike said:

1)  The document in the tweet you quoted says State of Missourri vs. Joe Biden, so I have no idea WTF you're talking about.  I didn't read the entire document since the plaintiffs are the first thing listed and it's very small and difficult to read.  Please quote specifically where it says this Dr guy is a plaintiff.

2)  Saying I doubt someone is a plaintiff and asking for supporting evidence wouldn't make me "wrong" if he were.  And certainly wouldn't make me "wrong" AGAIN since you've never shown me to be wrong in the past.  EVER    It would mean I questioned it and you provided evidence.  I'm truly curious but again you fall short. 

 

On 11/27/2022 at 3:06 PM, TimHauck said:

Strike: can you show me where it lists Dr. Kheriaty as a plaintiff?

Also Strike: I see that you shared a list of the plaintiffs, but I didn’t read it.

lol, literally can’t make this stuff up, gotta love the GC.

Also lol at “it’s very small.”  Are you 80 years old?

 

On 11/27/2022 at 3:36 PM, Strike said:

Wow, what a d*ck.  Yes, looking at a couple pages of a legal document embedded in a tweet on a 14" laptop screen with 56 year old eyes is difficult.  The link only has a couple of pages of the document and I don't see where it lists a bunch of individuals.  I see at the top of the doc where it says the lawsuit is the state of Missouri against Joe Biden.  Post a link to the actual PDF so I can open it in a proper PDF reader, or specify WHERE in the document it has this list of plaintiffs you claim it does.  Otherwise, STFU.

 

On 11/27/2022 at 3:45 PM, TimHauck said:

JFC.  It’s 2 f’ing pages.  But if you insist, footnote #2 where it says “plaintiffs”…

BTW, I guess your 56-year old brain is also forgetting about the North Dakota teenager killed by crazy lib thread where I most recently proved you wrong…

 

[TimHauck 2,868]

9 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

Wait, are you @The Real timschochet?

You called me a scumbag

[seafoam1 3,018]

Liberals are sick.

[Strike 5,538]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1)  The "last time"  you posted legal docs for me was a year and a half ago?  I doubt it. 

2)  Yes, now we see the issue.  You posted some teeny a$$ tweet with some docs in it.  That's not posting legal docs.  I have no idea where those docs came from, even if I could read them.  And apparently I was reading this forum on my laptop in the basement at the time and yes, my eyesight ain't great so I'm not gonna read some little a$$ tweet you found.  What are you, @squistion?

3)  I asked for a link to the thread, not for you to cherry pick a bunch of posts.   Why not just post the link I requested?  Would be easier for you as well.

4)  Do you have a link to some legal analysis that suggests the FHA applies to real estate in foreign countries yet?  Should be easy to find.  Or are you just making sh*t up?

 

[RLLD 4,230]

8 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

Liberals are sick.

These people are not "liberals" they are Marxist Terrorists.   They are filth.   The liberals tolerate them because their cause is something liberals have latched on to in order to feed their pursuit for political power.   Not unlike their brethren in 1930's Germany....they tolerate the hate because it suits them......

[TimHauck 2,868]

6 hours ago, Strike said:

1)  The "last time"  you posted legal docs for me was a year and a half ago?  I doubt it. 

2)  Yes, now we see the issue.  You posted some teeny a$$ tweet with some docs in it.  That's not posting legal docs.  I have no idea where those docs came from, even if I could read them.  And apparently I was reading this forum on my laptop in the basement at the time and yes, my eyesight ain't great so I'm not gonna read some little a$$ tweet you found.  What are you, @squistion?

3)  I asked for a link to the thread, not for you to cherry pick a bunch of posts.   Why not just post the link I requested?  Would be easier for you as well.

4)  Do you have a link to some legal analysis that suggests the FHA applies to real estate in foreign countries yet?  Should be easy to find.  Or are you just making sh*t up?

 

1).  Yeah, probably

2).  “Some little ass tweet I found” was from the attorney general that was filing the lawsuit

3).  I posted our entire convo, but if you insist, here’s the link to you saying you couldn’t read a 2 page document:

Uh, ever heard of zooming in?  I guess you really are old.

4). I posted the HUD link saying it applies to properties not covered by the Act.  You don’t think HUD would care about an event in America advertising “the best Anglo neighborhoods”?

[TimHauck 2,868]

@Maximum Overkill here was an example of me talking negatively of Hasidic Jews only.

And oddly enough yet another example of @Strike refusing to admit he was wrong (twice, once about the topic of this thread and once about his claim about a previous thread). lol.