Presidential Debate Tonight!

[thegeneral 2,912]

Germany getting in on the fact checking now

 

[5-Points 3,390]

39 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

No, real evidence from someone would be enough....so far we have nothing but people on X saying things.

That doesn't cut it

Harris could be on video having dinner with her best friend, the head of ABC, and being handed a folder with the words DEBATE QUESTIONS on it and you'd say "we don't know that the folder actually contained the debate questions."

 

[Sean Mooney 1,938]

6 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Harris could be on video having dinner with her best friend, the head of ABC, and being handed a folder with the words DEBATE QUESTIONS on it and you'd say "we don't know that the folder actually contained the debate questions."

 

No that would be sufficient too.

I'm asking for actual evidence. Your evidence is "there are reports of..." and "this whistleblower went to the Black Insurrectionest on X and dropped this bombshell."

 

[TrailGuy 552]

These allegations of knowing the debate questions are funny.

It's the classic Trump way of handling adversity.  If Trump wins, everything was fair.  If Trump loses, it was rigged, the other side cheated, it's a scam, a fraud.  He has done this his entire life and you cultists buy it hook line and sinker.

We also didn't need to see the questions before the debate we all knew what they were gonna be.  Inflation, economy, Ukraine, fracking, flip flop positions, etc.  Harris didn't even answer many of the questions.

[MDC 7,132]

1 minute ago, TrailGuy said:

It's the classic Trump way of handling adversity.  If Trump wins, everything was fair.  If Trump loses, it was rigged, the other side cheated, it's a scam, a fraud. 

He’s have said it was rigged if he won too.

[TrailGuy 552]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

He’s have said it was rigged if he won too.

He said that the Biden CNN debate was rigged beforehand.  After he beat the crap out of Biden he said how wonderful and fair CNN was.

[seafoam1 2,803]

3 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

These allegations of knowing the debate questions are funny.

It's the classic Trump way of handling adversity.  If Trump wins, everything was fair.  If Trump loses, it was rigged, the other side cheated, it's a scam, a fraud.  He has done this his entire life and you cultists buy it hook line and sinker.

We also didn't need to see the questions before the debate we all knew what they were gonna be.  Inflation, economy, Ukraine, fracking, flip flop positions, etc.  Harris didn't even answer many of the questions.

It's the classic pimpledoosh whining incessantly about Trump. 10 years and counting. 

[thegeneral 2,912]

18 hours ago, Horseman said:

No notebook required, you're the left version of seafoam.

This was way over the line, pal!

[5-Points 3,390]

4 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

No that would be sufficient too.

I'm asking for actual evidence. Your evidence is "there are reports of..." and "this whistleblower went to the Black Insurrectionest on X and dropped this bombshell."

 

I have no evidence because, as far as I know, there hasn't been a smoking gun uncovered. 

What I do have is common sense and a decent memory. I've seen all the buIIshit the dems have done to try to keep from having to defeat Trump at the ballot box. Up to and including trying to blow his head off on live television. 

Did you consider the Steele Dossier sufficient evidence of Trump/Russia collusion? 

[Sean Mooney 1,938]

6 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

I have no evidence because, as far as I know, there hasn't been a smoking gun uncovered. 

What I do have is common sense and a decent memory. I've seen all the buIIshit the dems have done to try to keep from having to defeat Trump at the ballot box. Up to and including trying to blow his head off on live television. 

Did you consider the Steele Dossier sufficient evidence of Trump/Russia collusion? 

So you have feelings? 

No I did not consider it sufficient evidence of collusion. 

[5-Points 3,390]

4 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

So you have feelings? 

No I did not consider it sufficient evidence of collusion. 

It's called a hunch. Many a crime has been solved based on a hunch. 

[Sean Mooney 1,938]

12 hours ago, 5-Points said:

It's called a hunch. Many a crime has been solved based on a hunch. 

A hunch doesn't really hold water until there is real evidence. 

[5-Points 3,390]

2 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

A hunch doesn't really hold water until there is real evidence. 

I'm right on this. You don't have to believe me. It's ok. 

[squistion 1,952]

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1834962824390496723

The day after Trump spread anti-immigrant lies at the debate, the leader of the neo-Nazi group Blood Tribe took to his Telegram channel to take credit for 'pushing Springfield into the public consciousness.'

Another member of the hate group agreed: "This is what real power looks like." https://nbcnews.com/tech/internet/trump-neo-nazis-pushed-false-claims-haitians-part-hate-campaign-rcna170796

[Sean Mooney 1,938]

4 hours ago, 5-Points said:

I'm right on this. You don't have to believe me. It's ok. 

Do I have to believe "Black Insurrectionist" on Twitter?

[5-Points 3,390]

28 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Do I have to believe "Black Insurrectionist" on Twitter?

Nope. Just don't be afraid to believe your own eyes. Be cautious about your ears, though. 

[edjr 6,578]

 

[Sean Mooney 1,938]

4 minutes ago, edjr said:

 

Again- there are so many inaccuracies in the stuff posted it is hard to take seriously. But yes- I guess they could have taken this story to a person who had like 120,000 followers on X and now this guy with 139,000 followers on YouTube is joining in.