Republicans introduce amendment so trump can get third term

[Strike 5,975]

3 minutes ago, edjr said:

If you guys want to make this official, you have both sent me money before. Make it so!

You would be my choice to hold the cash but no odds.  What a poosey move.  They think he's gonna be a dictator until you call them out them they admit they really only think it's a 3% chance.  And that's through TDS colored glasses.  The reality is it's still 0.

[edjr 6,876]

Just now, Strike said:

You would be my choice to hold the cash but no odds.  What a poosey move.  They think he's gonna be a dictator until you call them out them they admit they really only think it's a 3% chance.  And that's through TDS colored glasses.  The reality is it's still 0.

Whatever you guys want. Either way

[thegeneral 3,549]

Just now, supermike80 said:

And there's the unreasonable.   Welp, we got both sidez now

You don’t think it’s worth asking what is the process for this type of thing at the WH?

[thegeneral 3,549]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

You would be my choice to hold the cash but no odds.  What a poosey move.  They think he's gonna be a dictator until you call them out them they admit they really only think it's a 3% chance.  And that's through TDS colored glasses.  The reality is it's still 0.

I explained it all out. Nowhere did I say this is what will happen. Just shut it  If you don’t want the bet just say so! 

[supermike80 2,070]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

You don’t think it’s worth asking what is the process for this type of thing at the WH?

Absolutely positively not.  There are so many other things to worry about.

Trump is going to get awarded or elected a third term.  THAT is far more concerning than construction at the White House.   Do you really care that much?  

[thegeneral 3,549]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

You would be my choice to hold the cash but no odds.  What a poosey move.  They think he's gonna be a dictator until you call them out them they admit they really only think it's a 3% chance.  And that's through TDS colored glasses.  The reality is it's still 0.

If it’s zero percent I’m giving you a free hundy.

Dont be a

[thegeneral 3,549]

Just now, supermike80 said:

Absolutely positively not.  There are so many other things to worry about.

Trump is going to get awarded or elected a third term.  THAT is far more concerning than construction at the White House.   Do you really care that much?  

They have shitloads of committees. Once they get the government open, yes this is something those fockers can do. They make good cash, amazing benefits. Some dickhole tearing down a goat chunk of the WH and placing a structure there that is like twice the size of the WH, yea I’d like to know the process is. Call me old fashion!

[supermike80 2,070]

Just now, thegeneral said:

They have shitloads of committees. Once they get the government open, yes this is something those fockers can do. They make good cash, amazing benefits. Some dickhole tearing down a goat chunk of the WH and placing a structure there that is like twice the size of the WH, yea I’d like to know the process is. Call me old fashion!

Awesome!!  What's the end goal?  Maybe impeachment?  Jail time?   What are you looking for out of this?

[BrahmaBulls 913]

20 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

And what happened between Biden being declared the winner and Jan 20?  Peaceful?

No he did NOT leave the office peacefully, shut up moron.

No riot on Jan 6

No one dumber than you.

[Strike 5,975]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

If it’s zero percent I’m giving you a free hundy.

Dont be a

Nope.  You said there was a much larger than 0% chance he'd go for a third term.  Then you admitted you really only think it's 3%.  What a focking joke.  

[thegeneral 3,549]

Just now, supermike80 said:

Awesome!!  What's the end goal?  Maybe impeachment?  Jail time?   What are you looking for out of this?

To have processes in place for how this happens. Is that unreasonable?

[supermike80 2,070]

Just now, thegeneral said:

To have processes in place for how this happens. Is that unreasonable?

And I ask again..>ok...There isn't a process.  First of all if that's true, then Trump did nothing wrong of course.  Second, if there is a process, and Trump didn't follow it..What is your end goal?  Removal from office?   

[Strike 5,975]

What happened to Trailmix, the thread starter?  Banned?

[Ron_Artest 2,144]

9 minutes ago, Strike said:

You would be my choice to hold the cash but no odds.  What a poosey move.  They think he's gonna be a dictator until you call them out them they admit they really only think it's a 3% chance.  And that's through TDS colored glasses.  The reality is it's still 0.

If you're saying the chance is zero then the odds don't matter.

[thegeneral 3,549]

Just now, Strike said:

Nope.  You said there was a much larger than 0% chance he'd go for a third term.  Then you admitted you really only think it's 3%.  What a focking joke.  

0% means it cannot happen. 3% is infinitely larger than 0%.

[Strike 5,975]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

If you're saying the chance is zero then the odds don't matter.

Of course they do.  Don't be dumb.

[Strike 5,975]

Just now, thegeneral said:

0% means it cannot happen. 3% is infinitely larger than 0%.

Don't be as dumb as Artest.

[thegeneral 3,549]

Just now, supermike80 said:

And I ask again..>ok...There isn't a process.  First of all if that's true, then Trump did nothing wrong of course.  Second, if there is a process, and Trump didn't follow it..What is your end goal?  Removal from office?   

I have never said he should be removed for this, it should be looked at.

This guy caused all this by lying about what he was going to do. This is his doing. 

[Ron_Artest 2,144]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Of course they do.  Don't be dumb.

How so?

What about this.  I'll bet you that you eat an elephant within the next hour.  Just give me 1,000,000:1 odds.  You wouldn't take that bet?

[Strike 5,975]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

How so?

What about this.  I'll bet you that you eat an elephant within the next hour.  Just give me 1,000,000:1 odds.  You wouldn't take that bet?

10X banned alias making dumb analogies.   

[supermike80 2,070]

Just now, thegeneral said:

I have never said he should be removed for this, it should be looked at.

This guy caused all this by lying about what he was going to do. This is his doing. 

I know..Im asking you.   You said there should be an investigation.   So the natural follow up question to that is to ask what would you like the end result of that investigation to reveal?   We are going to spend tax payer money on this, which some of you are so opposed to when it comes to immigration.  So there is an investigation, and it is found Trump didn't follow process.  What next?  What would make you happy?   Or do you jus want that known so he can't win a third term election?

[Ron_Artest 2,144]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

10X banned alias making dumb analogies.   

This is your crutch when you lose an argument.

The truth is you don't agree that there is a 0% chance, or else you would take the bet.  Everyone can see this.

If I said there is a 0% chance of something happening, I would bet it regardless of the odds, anyone would.

[thegeneral 3,549]

5 minutes ago, Strike said:

Don't be as dumb as Artest.

I explained my POV on this. I responded when you asked if anyone wanted some action. I set my terms. You say 0% so I’m gifting you one hundred American dollars here.

[Strike 5,975]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

This is your crutch when you lose an argument.

This might make sense if I has lost the argument but I didn't. And your analogy is dumb because I have 100% control over what I eat as opposed to betting on what someone else might do.  Apples and Oranges.

[Ron_Artest 2,144]

Just now, Strike said:

This might make sense if I has lost the argument but I didn't. And your analogy is dumb because I have 100% control over what I eat as opposed to betting on what someone else might do.  Apples and Oranges.

So you admit there is a non zero chance that he pulls some shenanigans, correct?

[Strike 5,975]

Just now, thegeneral said:

I explained my POV on this. I responded when you asked if anyone wanted some action. I set my terms. You say 0% so I’m gifting you one hundred American dollars here.

That's fine.  But you've admitted even you only think there's a 3% chance of Trump trying for a third term.  Given your bias the reality is likely much lower.  It's not even worth arguing over a 3% difference of opinion.  You've pretty much made my point.

[thegeneral 3,549]

1 minute ago, supermike80 said:

I know..Im asking you.   You said there should be an investigation.   So the natural follow up question to that is to ask what would you like the end result of that investigation to reveal?   We are going to spend tax payer money on this, which some of you are so opposed to when it comes to immigration.  So there is an investigation, and it is found Trump didn't follow process.  What next?  What would make you happy?   Or do you jus want that known so he can't win a third term election?

These people are getting paid regardless. This should be on their docket if you ask me. I don’t think a prez should just be able to do a project of this magnitude at the WH without some process. I assume there is one, is that the case?

I don’t know what would come out of the findings. Would have to think about that. No I don’t think you remove someone but you find out how this works and is this the way we want this done. How it’s paid for, etc.

[Strike 5,975]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

So you admit there is a non zero chance that he pulls some shenanigans, correct?

There is always a non zero percent chance someone else will do something.  I can only guarantee MY actions and even that isnt always 100%, although it is for me eating an elephant in the next hour.  You guys are acting like the odds are HIGH that Trump will try to go for a third term.  I've got The General admitting he really only thinks it's 3%, a differential between he and I not even worth arguing over.  What's your percentage?

[thegeneral 3,549]

7 minutes ago, Strike said:

That's fine.  But you've admitted even you only think there's a 3% chance of Trump trying for a third term.  Given your bias the reality is likely much lower.  It's not even worth arguing over a 3% difference of opinion.  You've pretty much made my point.

I said I don’t think he’d do this, but I didn’t think he’d do any of the bullshet in 2020. People stepped in and stopped him. That was some crazy stuff.

This wouldn’t be a discussion with any other prez in my lifetime…you know why? Because this one is a scumbag.

You seem to agree because you won’t take my bet

[Ron_Artest 2,144]

7 minutes ago, Strike said:

There is always a non zero percent chance someone else will do something.  I can only guarantee MY actions and even that isnt always 100%, although it is for me eating an elephant in the next hour.  You guys are acting like the odds are HIGH that Trump will try to go for a third term.  I've got The General admitting he really only thinks it's 3%, a differential between he and I not even worth arguing over.  What's your percentage?

OK well thanks for at least backing off your 0% claim.

I would say it's much higher than 3%.  Chances are he tries to stay?  High if it's a democrat that wins, like 75%.  Probably small if a republican wins.  That he succeeds?  Maybe 10%.

But history tells us he's a sore loser, so would expect that to continue.,

[thegeneral 3,549]

Just now, Ron_Artest said:

OK well thanks for at least backing off your 0% claim.

I would say it's much higher than 3%.  Chances are he tries to stay?  High if it's a democrat that wins, like 75%.  Probably small if a republican wins.  That he succeeds?  Maybe 10%.

But history tells us he's a sore loser, so would expect that to continue.,

Here you go @Strike better odds at Ron’s sportsbook.

Thats two open bets!

[thegeneral 3,549]

12 minutes ago, Strike said:

There is always a non zero percent chance someone else will do something.  I can only guarantee MY actions and even that isnt always 100%, although it is for me eating an elephant in the next hour.  You guys are acting like the odds are HIGH that Trump will try to go for a third term.  I've got The General admitting he really only thinks it's 3%, a differential between he and I not even worth arguing over.  What's your percentage?

I would say the odds are much greater than 3% of this and you eating an elephant in the next hour.

Sounds like a move!

[Strike 5,975]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

OK well thanks for at least backing off your 0% claim.

I would say it's much higher than 3%.  Chances are he tries to stay?  High if it's a democrat that wins, like 75%.  Probably small if a republican wins.  That he succeeds?  Maybe 10%.

But history tells us he's a sore loser, so would expect that to continue.,

You think there's a 10% chance he serves a third term?

[Ron_Artest 2,144]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

You think there's a 10% chance he serves a third term?

It's been a while since I took a probability class, but 50% chance he loses and then 10% chance he stays in power after that, that would be a 5% chance I think.

[seafoam1 3,401]

5 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

OK well thanks for at least backing off your 0% claim.

I would say it's much higher than 3%.  Chances are he tries to stay?  High if it's a democrat that wins, like 75%.  Probably small if a republican wins.  That he succeeds?  Maybe 10%.

But history tells us he's a sore loser, so would expect that to continue.,

 

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I would say the odds are much greater than 3% of this and you eating an elephant in the next hour.

Sounds like a move!

I hope you dopes can boast that you were right on this one and Trump stays in office for a third term. That would be awesome.  

[Ron_Artest 2,144]

Polymarket has Trump running for a 3rd term at 7%

[thegeneral 3,549]

1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

 

I hope you dopes can boast that you were right on this one and Trump stays in office for a third term. That would be awesome.  

Spoken like a member of Congress from Pigsnout Co, Oklahoma or any number of other districts sadly.

[Strike 5,975]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

It's been a while since I took a probability class, but 50% chance he loses and then 10% chance he stays in power after that, that would be a 5% chance I think.

What?  You need to clarify your numbers.  You're just pulling numbers out of your butt with no explanation where they're coming from.  When you say 50% chance he loses you're suggesting he's running again which I don't think you are since he can't run again.  But even thinking there's a 5% chance he succeeds in serving a third term is nuts.  

[seafoam1 3,401]

1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

Spoken like a member of Congress from Pigsnout Co, Oklahoma or any number of other districts sadly.

I drove through Oklahoma once. Nice place. 

Watch out for the tornados though. 

[thegeneral 3,549]

3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

I drove through Oklahoma once. Nice place. 

Watch out for the tornados though. 

I like the fine people of Oklahoma. Some congressman trying to keep his cushy gig at all costs…not so much.