Woke Rachel Zegler makes new career move after humiliating Snow White box office bomb

[TimHauck 2,600]

32 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

 It was only after Dinklage's remarks and the community backlash that they went back to the table and CGI'd dwarves in and made those 7 previous characters now "Bandits".  The story was changed to do that - it was never part of the original story to have dwarves AND bandits.

In any event, you're revising history to try and prove a "MAGA Overreaction" point that was not just "MAGA" because Dinklage made remarks about it and I guarantee you that Dinklage is NOT "MAGA". 

Lol.  You’re the one that’s revising history and just straight making stuff up.  Please provide a link that that’s what happened.  That’s what MAGA thinks happened because they saw a photo.

Dinklage’s comments were in January 2022. It’s clear that his comments are actually saying that he doesn’t like the fact that dwarves are in the movie at all:

You’re progressive in one way, but then you’re still making that f*cking backward story about seven dwarfs living in a cave together? What the f*ck are you doing, man?

 

So if anything, the 7 “diverse” people would have been a better response to his criticism because then it wouldn’t be stereotyping dwarves.  All signs point to that those people were always “bandits” from the beginning, but MAGA jumped to conclusions yet again.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

7 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Lol.  You’re the one that’s revising history and just straight making stuff up.  Please provide a link that that’s what happened.  That’s what MAGA thinks happened because they saw a photo.

Dinklage’s comments were in January 2022. It’s clear that his comments are actually saying that he doesn’t like the fact that dwarves are in the movie at all:

You’re progressive in one way, but then you’re still making that f*cking backward story about seven dwarfs living in a cave together? What the f*ck are you doing, man?

 

So if anything, the 7 “diverse” people would have been a better response to his criticism because then it wouldn’t be stereotyping dwarves.  All signs point to that those people were always “bandits” from the beginning, but MAGA jumped to conclusions yet again.

This is been rehashed ad nauseam I'm not going to go back and do your homework for you because you're more interested in grabbing the anonymous talking points on x instead of doing the hard work.

It's all there for you to research if you're interested. The form does have a history function but you can also go online as well.

[Engorgeous George 2,123]

Flipping the channels this weekend I came across a Rachel Zegler vehicle, a movie entitled Y2K.  I watched for 5 minutes.  Terribly bad, but she was kind of cute.  So bad it would have been a career ender for most folks.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

1 minute ago, Engorgeous George said:

Flipping the channels this weekend I came across a Rachel Zegler vehicle, a movie entitled Y2K.  I watched for 5 minutes.  Terribly bad, but she was kind of cute.  So bad it would have been a career ender for most folks.

I don't think she's that good looking. Her eyebrows are dangerously close to meeting and her attitude and pretentiousness just makes her an ugly ugly person.

[Engorgeous George 2,123]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I don't think she's that good looking. Her eyebrows are dangerously close to meeting and her attitude and pretentiousness just makes her an ugly ugly person.

She's young and therefor has little perspective.   I am grateful I was not provided a platform and my beliefs broadcast and recorded when I was that age.  Of course she sought that platform and to broadcast her beliefs so she must bear the consequences of her actions.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

5 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

She's young and therefor hasw little perspective.   I am grateful I was not provided a platform and my beliefs broadcast and recorded when I was that age.  Of course she sought that paltform and to broadcast her beliefs so she must bear the consequences of her actions.

Yeah she's young and stupid, but she's still an adult.

[TimHauck 2,600]

10 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

This is been rehashed ad nauseam I'm not going to go back and do your homework for you because you're more interested in grabbing the anonymous talking points on x instead of doing the hard work.

It's all there for you to research if you're interested. The form does have a history function but you can also go online as well.

Well apparently there was a whole thread about it which got deleted, so not sure what if any proof was in there.  Here is the thread about that one being deleted - 

I do vaguely remember the discussion, but IIRC, the “proof” was all stuff like this article, which was just a bunch of skyscreaming from conservatives based on a picture, with no proof that those people were actually replacing the dwarves.  TBH I think I even fell for it initially.

https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/disneys-live-action-snow-white-under-fire-for-replacing-seven-dwarfs/
 

In fact, in October 2023 you even said a tweet shared by @Reality from Benny Johnson “appears to be a complete fabrication.” And that “They literally just released a trailer for it yesterday or the day before.  The only thing they've done is moved it to 2025 now, instead of 2024. I couldn't find any links, but maybe you have some?“

 

No surprise that @Reality was once again reading from his script without doubting anything he’s told.  But I don’t see any links after that.  In fact even searching the words “Snow White” from you only returns 3 total results all in the last month.

So yes, please link confirmation that the 7 diverse folks were replacing the dwarves.  Because all I see is evidence the bandits and dwarves were 2 separate groups.

[TimHauck 2,600]

Here’s an article from 2022 confirming Disney was looking for “voice actors” for the “magical creatures.”  AKA they were always going to be CGI.

https://www.thewrap.com/snow-white-peter-dinklage-disney-response/

@EternalShinyAndChrome, will you admit you were wrong?

[jbycho 580]

12 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Here’s an article from 2022 confirming Disney was looking for “voice actors” for the “magical creatures.”  AKA they were always going to be CGI.

https://www.thewrap.com/snow-white-peter-dinklage-disney-response/

@EternalShinyAndChrome, will you admit you were wrong?

You are always wrong. Go get another shot. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

57 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Here’s an article from 2022 confirming Disney was looking for “voice actors” for the “magical creatures.”  AKA they were always going to be CGI.

https://www.thewrap.com/snow-white-peter-dinklage-disney-response/

@EternalShinyAndChrome, will you admit you were wrong?

I wasn't wrong. 

You really think that exactly SEVEN Bandits were there simply because they weren't going to replace the SEVEN dwarves?  Just happened to be SEVEN bandits, but just a coincidence?   

Reports AFTER the fact - especially by Disney of all sources - of what has went on is simply revisionist history.   These are the same guys that told you this movie only cost 270 million dollars.  It cost 270 million dollars at the END of 2023 and they did more reshoots and CGI'd the dwarves after that.  This movie's budget is between 300-320 million dollars at least.

Everybody reporting on this who has seen the movie all indicate the dwarves feel shoe-horned in.  Hmmm...as if they were, wait a minute.....A LAST MINUTE ADDITION!!!

[TimHauck 2,600]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I wasn't wrong. 

You really think that exactly SEVEN Bandits were there simply because they weren't going to replace the SEVEN dwarves?  Just happened to be SEVEN bandits, but just a coincidence?   

Reports AFTER the fact - especially by Disney of all sources - of what has went on is simply revisionist history.   These are the same guys that told you this movie only cost 270 million dollars.  It cost 270 million dollars at the END of 2023 and they did more reshoots and CGI'd the dwarves after that.  This movie's budget is between 300-320 million dollars at least.

Everybody reporting on this who has seen the movie all indicate the dwarves feel shoe-horned in.  Hmmm...as if they were, wait a minute.....A LAST MINUTE ADDITION!!!

There weren’t even 7 bandits, people cropped the picture lolololol.

And the link I just provided was from 2022 before the picture went viral.

But you are welcome to prove me wrong with something other than “people are saying.”  Unlike most here I admit when I’m wrong.

 

[jbycho 580]

17 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

There weren’t even 7 bandits, people cropped the picture lolololol.

And the link I just provided was from 2022 before the picture went viral.

But you are welcome to prove me wrong with something other than “people are saying.”  Unlike most here I admit when I’m wrong.

 

More liberal logic. 

"Prove my idiocy wrong else I'm right." 

[TimHauck 2,600]

2 minutes ago, jbycho said:

More liberal logic. 

"Prove my idiocy wrong else I'm right." 

I proved I was right, @EternalShinyAndChrome just doesn’t believe it

[jbycho 580]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I proved I was right, @EternalShinyAndChrome just doesn’t believe it

Go get another shot. You have always been wrong. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

I proved I was right, @EternalShinyAndChrome just doesn’t believe it

You did not.  You just went searching for Disney propaganda that fit your "MAGA Overreaction" assertion and you found it!

[TimHauck 2,600]

37 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You did not.  You just went searching for Disney propaganda that fit your "MAGA Overreaction" assertion and you found it!

There weren’t even 7 bandits, people cropped the picture 

[TimHauck 2,600]

@EternalShinyAndChrome, do you think Dinklage’s criticism was about not having actual little people play the dwarves?

[TimHauck 2,600]

2 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You did not.  You just went searching for Disney propaganda that fit your "MAGA Overreaction" assertion and you found it!

Also, the only thing I was “searching” for was reviews of the movie, found that dude with 2M YouTube subscribers (I’d assume you know him considering you claim to be a movie expert), and despite absolutely trashing the movie he pointed out that the Bandits were completely separate from the dwarves - and the male love interest was one of them (which made 8 total, but being a straight white male many of the anti-woke commenters cropped him out of the photo), more evidence that they were planned to be in the movie the whole time.  

So I just thought it was funny to see yet another example of MAGA being duped by fake news.

[Herbivore 1,115]

8 hours ago, jbycho said:

 

6 posts of good ole Herbi you not caring. 

Dumb ass liberals at work. Who's next up? #2 Tim idiot? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yeah, I enjoyed the banter

[Strike 5,185]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Also, the only thing I was “searching” for was reviews of the movie, found that dude with 2M YouTube subscribers (I’d assume you know him considering you claim to be a movie expert), and despite absolutely trashing the movie he pointed out that the Bandits were completely separate from the dwarves - and the male love interest was one of them (which made 8 total, but being a straight white male many of the anti-woke commenters cropped him out of the photo), more evidence that they were planned to be in the movie the whole time.  

So I just thought it was funny to see yet another example of MAGA being duped by fake news.

You can't possibly believe that they weren't going to have little people in the movie.   Otherwise, why would they have had to "consult" with the dwarf community AFTER Peter Dinklage's comments and BEFORE they made their announcement about the "magical creatures" or whatever the fock they replaced the midgets with?

https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/peter-dinklage-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-backlash-little-people-1234695983/

https://www.thewrap.com/snow-white-peter-dinklage-disney-response/

They could have just come right out and said "Peter we're not putting little people in the move" but they didn't. 

[TimHauck 2,600]

1 hour ago, Strike said:

You can't possibly believe that they weren't going to have little people in the movie.   Otherwise, why would they have had to "consult" with the dwarf community AFTER Peter Dinklage's comments and BEFORE they made their announcement about the "magical creatures" or whatever the fock they replaced the midgets with?

https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/peter-dinklage-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-backlash-little-people-1234695983/

https://www.thewrap.com/snow-white-peter-dinklage-disney-response/

They could have just come right out and said "Peter we're not putting little people in the move" but they didn't. 

This post makes zero sense.

You start by saying “you can’t possibly believe that they weren’t going to have little people in the movie”

But end by saying “they could have just come right out and said we’re not putting little people in the movie.”

Do you mean they should have responded to Dinklage that they’re “not NOT putting little people in the movie”?

If so, newsflash, pretty much all of MAGA really thought they weren’t putting little people in the movie (well except for one), and thought Disney “replaced” the dwarves with the “7 diverse people,” as @EternalShinyAndChrome calls them.  And he STILL thinks that was the plan.  I did too originally but now realize the 7 diverse people were separate from the dwarves all along.   In fact the second link you shared, which I already shared earlier, is proof of that.

To be clear, Dinklage’s comments came out when there weren’t really specific details known yet other than some of the cast.   So he was basically mad the movie was being made at all, and was just working off the assumption that dwarves would be involved.  In fact he even said this: 

“He would enthusiastically support a more sensitive retelling of the 85-year-old film with a "cool, progressive spin on it" but wasn't otherwise convinced“

There is no evidence Disney changed anything based on Dinklage’s comments in particular since the rumors of the reshooting came out almost 2 years after his comments, and their response at the time even makes it seem like they had already been “consulting with members of the dwarfism community.” 

[Strike 5,185]

32 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

This post makes zero sense.

You start by saying “you can’t possibly believe that they weren’t going to have little people in the movie”

But end by saying “they could have just come right out and said we’re not putting little people in the movie.”

Do you mean they should have responded to Dinklage that they’re “not NOT putting little people in the movie”?

If so, newsflash, pretty much all of MAGA really thought they weren’t putting little people in the movie (well except for one), and thought Disney “replaced” the dwarves with the “7 diverse people,” as @EternalShinyAndChrome calls them.  And he STILL thinks that was the plan.  I did too originally but now realize the 7 diverse people were separate from the dwarves all along.   In fact the second link you shared, which I already shared earlier, is proof of that.

To be clear, Dinklage’s comments came out when there weren’t really specific details known yet other than some of the cast.   So he was basically mad the movie was being made at all, and was just working off the assumption that dwarves would be involved.  In fact he even said this: 

“He would enthusiastically support a more sensitive retelling of the 85-year-old film with a "cool, progressive spin on it" but wasn't otherwise convinced“

There is no evidence Disney changed anything based on Dinklage’s comments in particular since the rumors of the reshooting came out almost 2 years after his comments, and their response at the time even makes it seem like they had already been “consulting with members of the dwarfism community.” 

My post males perfect sense.  Your stance as usual is idiotic.

[TimHauck 2,600]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

My post males perfect sense.  Your stance as usual is idiotic.

To clarify, you think:

 

You can't possibly believe that they weren't going to have little people in the movie.
….

They could have just come right out and said "Peter we're not putting little people in the move" but they didn't. 

 

Makes perfect sense?

I’d suggest re-reading them, letting me know which way you meant, and apologizing.

 

[TimHauck 2,600]

21 hours ago, TimHauck said:

@EternalShinyAndChrome, do you think Dinklage’s criticism was about not having actual little people play the dwarves?

Bump.  Curious in particular what you think Dinklage’s criticism actually was@EternalShinyAndChrome

[jbycho 580]

16 hours ago, Strike said:

My post males perfect sense.  Your stance as usual is idiotic.

He is consistent that way. 

[TimHauck 2,600]

23 hours ago, TimHauck said:

To clarify, you think:

 

You can't possibly believe that they weren't going to have little people in the movie.
….

They could have just come right out and said "Peter we're not putting little people in the move" but they didn't. 

 

Makes perfect sense?

I’d suggest re-reading them, letting me know which way you meant, and apologizing.

 

Bump for @Strike also.  Will he at least admit one of these is a typo?

[Strike 5,185]

12 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Bump for @Strike also.  Will he at least admit one of these is a typo?

No.  This forum isn't a reading comprehension class.  If you don't understand my meaning, I'm ok with that. 

[TimHauck 2,600]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

No.  This forum isn't a reading comprehension class.  If you don't understand my meaning, I'm ok with that. 

Lololol you literally wrote 2 sentences with the complete opposite meaning.  Please, read them again and let me know which one was a typo.  I promise not to say it’s a gotcha, I really just want to understand what point you’re trying to make.

[Strike 5,185]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Lololol you literally wrote 2 sentences with the complete opposite meaning.  Please, read them again and let me know which one was a typo.  I promise not to say it’s a gotcha, I really just want to understand what point you’re trying to make.

And you literally posted the FIRST and LAST sentences from my post as a "gotcha."  The stuff in the middle explains things.  Again, sorry if your need for a "gotcha" is overriding the reading comprehension skills you were taught as a child, but I'm ok with that. 

[TimHauck 2,600]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

And you literally posted the FIRST and LAST sentences from my post as a "gotcha."  The stuff in the middle explains things.  Again, sorry if your need for a "gotcha" is overriding the reading comprehension skills you were taught as a child, but I'm ok with that. 

And in my earlier reply I wrote what I thought you were trying to say as well as my response to that.  

Do you disagree that pretty much all of MAGA thought the dwarves were replaced with the “7 diverse people”?  It seems your point is that “of course they were going to have dwarves!” while forgetting the widespread conservative outrage when the picture of the non-dwarves went viral.

[seafoam1 2,799]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Do you disagree that pretty much all of MAGA thought the dwarves were replaced 

WTF? 

[TimHauck 2,600]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

WTF? 

@EternalShinyAndChrome still thinks that’s what happened 

[seafoam1 2,799]

20 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

@EternalShinyAndChrome still thinks that’s what happened 

I'm laughing you are obsessed with this.