Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jbycho

Department of Justice opens criminal investigation into NY AG Letitia James

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, nobody said:

So 5 countries!@$@$

Can someone get Hunter a sainthood already.  I probably committed three criminal acts on my way to work this morning.  This admitted drug user with questionable ties to multiple companies and art deals is a damn choir boy.  

They should make a movie about this guy.  Although it might be too unbelievable even for Hollywood.

Pfft, he’s probably classifiable as a scumbag. Slept with his widowed sister in law. Worked for a corrupt oligarch. Didn’t pay his taxes. He testified in front of Congress that he was a drug addict. They never got him for perjury that’s for sure. But you didn’t ask about any of that, you wanted to know about the investigations of him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Pfft, he’s probably classifiable as a scumbag. Slept with his widowed sister in law. Worked for a corrupt oligarch. Didn’t pay his taxes. He testified in front of Congress that he was a drug addict. They never got him for perjury that’s for sure. But you didn’t ask about any of that, you wanted to know about the investigations of him.

On the flip side, Letitia James has apparently basically bought homes for 2 different family members.  Very generous of her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

On the flip side, Letitia James has apparently basically bought homes for 2 different family members.  Very generous of her.

Whats crazy is right now the Trump administration could prosecute Burisma, Zlochevsky & other board members. But why bother with all that corruption. Yes by all means, go get the lady who helped her niece instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Whats crazy is right now the Trump administration could prosecute Burisma, Zlochevsky & other board members. But why bother with all that corruption. Yes by all means, go get the lady who helped her niece instead.

Allegedly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another EDVA senior prosecutor fired or transferred.

Fifth EDVA prosecutor fired, this one the no. 2 in the office.

>>Cleary, with years of prosecutorial and trial experience, had served in the administrations of Republican leadership in Virginia before joining the federal prosecutors’ office in Alexandria, Virginia, this year.

She then served in the US attorney position for about three days, before Trump installed Halligan, his former personal attorney and a lawyer with no criminal trial experience. Cleary, at the time, was moved to become the office’s first assistant — essentially the top prosecutor’s job under Halligan.<<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, edjr said:

 

No clue who this guy is but he’s showing up on my x feed vomiting an unlimited supply of incorrect statements

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Which criminal Niece testified before the grand jury? 

None before the grand jury that indicted James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Good article summarizing a lot of the arguments I made.  You don’t have to take my word for it @jonnyutah

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-justice-department-s-dangerously-weak-case-against-letitia-james

Oh and apparently the guy @edjr posted the video from was a convicted fraudster, lol.  Also an idiot it seems.

Molly Roberts the libtard political hack writer says what? 😆

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

None before the grand jury that indicted James

Which criminal niece testified before the grand jury?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, jonnyutah said:

It wouldnt even result in a 500 fine. 

But this is the DA that brought a case forward where the lender said they werent defrauded and that they used their own evaluations, which is also never prosecuted. 

So this is about payback and restoring order. And, yes, I am totally OK with that. 

Best case scenario: Nobody gets prosecuted.

Worst case scenario: only one side gets prosecuted.

If I can't have the best case, I definitely dont want the worst case.  

Even if I agreed with you about Trump being wrongly prosecuted I still wouldn’t be OK with this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Even if I agreed with you about Trump being wrongly prosecuted I still wouldn’t be OK with this. 

This presidency is hurting you so much. I'm loving it because it's awesome for what I voted for. Screw the liberals and put this country back on track to being great again. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Even if I agreed with you about Trump being wrongly prosecuted I still wouldn’t be OK with this. 

You only say this because you dont think he was wrongly prosecuted. 

Because no way your position is "I like it best when just my side is prosecuted to the exact strictest letter of the law even if it is not the way it is applied under normal circumstances"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

James did not prosecute Trump criminally for any individual criminal acts.

James charged Trump Org. - Trump Org faced sanctions & fines. Trump never faced jail time via James.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jonnyutah said:

You only say this because you dont think he was wrongly prosecuted. 

Because no way your position is "I like it best when just my side is prosecuted to the exact strictest letter of the law even if it is not the way it is applied under normal circumstances"

No, that is not my position but then I don’t quite play sides the way you do. If “my side” does something wrong then I want my side punished for that wrong. I don’t want them punished for something else and I don’t want the other side to commit the same wrong. That just makes it worse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, jonnyutah said:

Which criminal niece testified before the grand jury?

The one living in the house in question testified before a grsnd jury in Norfolk, but not in Alexandria.

Any comment on the lawfare article other than something about the author being a liberal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatabouting to the “criminal nieces” just shows that people are realizing that James has a legitimate defense to the actual charges 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Whatabouting to the “criminal nieces” just shows that people are realizing that James has a legitimate defense to the actual charges 

No she doesn't, it's all fabricated. None of it matches up. Do the work 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

No she doesn't, it's all fabricated. None of it matches up. Do the work 

The charges appear to be fabricated, I agree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TimHauck said:

The one living in the house in question testified before a grsnd jury in Norfolk, but not in Alexandria.

Any comment on the lawfare article other than something about the author being a liberal?

You could just answer that you dont know.

I dont read lawfare. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×