Parents call out unfairness as trans pitcher throws shutout in Minnesota softball state quarterfinals

[jbycho 754]

31 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Another way Gaines is bigoted is her insistence on calling trans girls “he.”   You don’t even have to say “she,” just use their name, even only their last name.   Insisting on saying “he” is just being a dbag because you feel like it.

And if the response is “no one should have to participate in their mental illness,” then it’s acknowledging that this “cause” isn’t just about sports.

He is a he. Are you this stupid? 

Yep. 

[Strike 5,538]

27 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Another way Gaines is bigoted is her insistence on calling trans girls “he.”   You don’t even have to say “she,” just use their name, even only their last name.   Insisting on saying “he” is just being a dbag because you feel like it.

And if the response is “no one should have to participate in their mental illness,” then it’s acknowledging that this “cause” isn’t just about sports.

Simple question for you:  Am I a bigot if I refuse to call someone a "they" or a "them" because I recognize that those words convey a plural meaning and I refuse to use words that don't make sense simply because someone wants me to? 

[jbycho 754]

 

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

Simple question for you:  Am I a bigot if I refuse to call someone a "they" or a "them" because I recognize that those words convey a plural meaning and I refuse to use words that don't make sense simply because someone wants me to? 

No. When you pretend change your sex, you get to make up a new English dictionary. And it needs to be recognized as such.

Those are the rules. 

[Mike Hunt 282]

Without a doubt this has been one of the biggest quandary's  for the Dem party.

 

Every logical person knows that men should not compete against women in physical sporting events. Majority of Dem voters also believe that.

Dems are supposed to be for "women's rights"  Yet for some reason they won`t take a stand on this.  Makes no sense at all.

Being trans has nothing to do with being gay.  The gay just like their own sex whatever it is.  Trans think they are sex they are not.

No woman who thinks she is a man as yet to compete and dominate a male sport. That will never happen.  Yet males can easily dominate bio women's sports. How is that fair to women?

[TimHauck 2,867]

32 minutes ago, Strike said:

Simple question for you:  Am I a bigot if I refuse to call someone a "they" or a "them" because I recognize that those words convey a plural meaning and I refuse to use words that don't make sense simply because someone wants me to? 

If you call them their name, no.

[Strike 5,538]

Just now, TimHauck said:

If you call them their name, no.

What?  We're talking pronouns here.  Just like Riley Gaines.  Thanks for the non answer though. 

[jbycho 754]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

What?  We're talking pronouns here.  Just like Riley Gaines.  Thanks for the non answer though. 

If a guy with testicular cancer decides to call himself a woman, does that make the cancer go away? 

[TimHauck 2,867]

15 minutes ago, Strike said:

What?  We're talking pronouns here.  Just like Riley Gaines.  Thanks for the non answer though. 

I literally said in my earlier post that people can say their name instead of their non-preferred pronouns.

[Strike 5,538]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I literally said in my earlier post that people can say their name instead of their non-preferred pronouns.

Let me rephrase.  Someone tells me to call them "they" and I call them "he" because I refuse to use they.  Am I a bigot?

[jerryskids 6,792]

26 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

If you call them their name, no.

Her objective is to emphasize that he is a he.  Again, why would she not do this?

[jbycho 754]

14 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I literally said in my earlier post that people can say their name instead of their non-preferred pronouns.

He's a he. 

[TimHauck 2,867]

18 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Her objective is to emphasize that he is a he.  Again, why would she not do this?

Because that’s going beyond just trying to make women’s sports fair.  That’s the response of the “trans is a mental illness” crowd.

[jbycho 754]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Because that’s going beyond just trying to make women’s sports fair.  That’s the response of the “trans is a mental illness” crowd.

Trans IS a mental illness. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,100]

8 minutes ago, jbycho said:

Trans IS a mental illness. 

That's not even something that can be refuted. 

[TimHauck 2,867]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

That's not even something that can be refuted. 

So you acknowledge Gaines’ argument isn’t just about sports then?

[jbycho 754]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So you acknowledge Gaines’ argument isn’t just about sports then?

This guy doesn't get the fact that liberal acceptance of this mental health issue is causing harm to female athletes and ruining women's sports. 

He's trying so hard to win something in this discussion it's killing him. 

[Strike 5,538]

49 minutes ago, Strike said:

Let me rephrase.  Someone tells me to call them "they" and I call them "he" because I refuse to use they.  Am I a bigot?

But for @TimHauck 

[TimHauck 2,867]

50 minutes ago, Strike said:

Let me rephrase.  Someone tells me to call them "they" and I call them "he" because I refuse to use they.  Am I a bigot?

I wouldn’t necessarily say that alone makes you a bigot, but yes that is a bigoted response.  If your reason is proper grammar, you should tell them that you won’t call a singular person a plural word so you will call them he or she and they need to pick one.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

Trannies   

[jbycho 754]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I wouldn’t necessarily say that alone makes you a bigot, but yes that is a bigoted response.  If your reason is proper grammar, you should tell them that you won’t call a singular person a plural word so you will call them he or she and they need to pick one.

Timhack is definitely a bigot. He doesn't hold true to science for his own causes. 

[Strike 5,538]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I wouldn’t necessarily say that alone makes you a bigot, but yes that is a bigoted response.  If your reason is proper grammar, you should tell them that you won’t call a singular person a plural word so you will call them he or she and they need to pick one.

Uh, no.  I'll call them what I want.  It may be rude but it isn't bigoted.  That's the problem with you libs.  You turn everything in to a social issue, either racism or sexism or some other ist/ism and it shuts down intelligent discourse.  It's actually possible to disagree with someone without that person being a racist/sexist/nazi or whatever your slight of the week is.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,100]

16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So you acknowledge Gaines’ argument isn’t just about sports then?

WTF are you talking about? 

No one is playing your pretzel logic strawman games.  Time to move on. 

[TimHauck 2,867]

Just now, Strike said:

Uh, no.  I'll call them what I want.  It may be rude but it isn't bigoted.  That's the problem with you libs.  You turn everything in to a social issue, either racism or sexism or some other ist and it shuts down intelligent discourse.  It's actually possible to disagree with someone without that person being a racist/sexist/nazi or whatever your slight of the week is.

A name is pretty harmless.  Not calling them the name they want to be called is an indication that you’re not really looking for “intelligent discourse.”

I’m sure many of the same people saying “I will call them a he because biology!” would disagree if someone told them God isn’t real.

And again, keep in mind Gaines didn’t just call the high school kid a man, she called the high school kid a “predatory” man.  She is a bigot.

[Strike 5,538]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

A name is pretty harmless.  Not calling them the name they want to be called is an indication that you’re not really looking for “intelligent discourse.”

I’m sure many of the same people saying “I will call them a he because biology!” would disagree if someone told them God isn’t real.

And again, keep in mind Gaines didn’t just call the high school kid a man, she called the high school kid a “predatory” man.  She is a bigot.

Are you retarded?  My comment about "intelligent discourse" was pertaining to YOU and your ilk always resorting to the ism/ist card.  It shuts down intelligent discourse between YOU and ME when you call me a racist/sexist/Nazi/etc......That comment had NOTHING to do with what name/pronoun I choose to call a heshe. 

Your God analogy doesn't hold water because it's not based on science and the English language. 

 

[TimHauck 2,867]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Are you retarded?  My comment about "intelligent discourse" was pertaining to YOU and your ilk always resorting to the ism/ist card.  It shuts down intelligent discourse between YOU and ME when you call me a racist/sexist/Nazi/etc......That comment had NOTHING to do with what name/pronoun I choose to call a heshe. 

Your God analogy doesn't hold water because it's not based on science. 

 

My point is it is bigoted to insist on calling someone their non-preferred pronouns.  In particular because like I said originally which you whined about for some reason, there are ways to use neither their preferred pronouns nor their non-preferred pronouns.

God isn’t based on science. That’s the joke.

[jbycho 754]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

My point is it is bigoted to insist on calling someone their non-preferred pronouns.  

No. It isn't. If a person identifies as a gerbil, I'm not going to call them a gerbil. And that is not bigoted. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,100]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

My point is it is bigoted to insist on calling someone their non-preferred pronouns.  In particular because like I said originally which you whined about for some reason, there are ways to use neither their preferred pronouns nor their non-preferred pronouns.

God isn’t based on science. That’s the joke.

Your "point" is wrong on so many levels and is simply an example of the woke left's "if you don't agree with me, you're a bigot if not The Devil himself" dogma.  Congratulations, you're in a cult.  

[Strike 5,538]

10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

My point is it is bigoted to insist on calling someone their non-preferred pronouns.  In particular because like I said originally which you whined about for some reason, there are ways to use neither their preferred pronouns nor their non-preferred pronouns.

God isn’t based on science. That’s the joke.

No it isn't.  We'll just have to agree to disagree on that.  But again, your side having to call anyone you disagree with an ism/ist is a discussion killer. 

[TimHauck 2,867]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Your "point" is wrong on so many levels and is simply an example of the woke left's "if you don't agree with me, you're a bigot if not The Devil himself" dogma.  Congratulations, you're in a cult.  

You can call someone the name they want to be called and still not agree with them.  You can even call them something that’s neither the name they want to be called nor the name you want to call them.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,423]

Pygmy

[jbycho 754]

23 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You can call someone the name they want to be called and still not agree with them.  You can even call them something that’s neither the name they want to be called nor the name you want to call them.

I can also NOT call someone the name they want to be called because I know it's mental illness that I would be contributing to if I did. 

[jerryskids 6,792]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Because that’s going beyond just trying to make women’s sports fair.  That’s the response of the “trans is a mental illness” crowd.

No it's not.  Her entire argument is that the competitor is a man.  To call him "she" is to validate him as a woman.

So she should say, "it's unfair for her to compete with women"?  Dumb

You are wrong on this, just stop.

[TimHauck 2,867]

11 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

No it's not.  Her entire argument is that the competitor is a man.  To call him "she" is to validate him as a woman.

So she should say, "it's unfair for her to compete with women"?  Dumb

You are wrong on this, just stop.

No, I said call them by their actual name and not a pronoun.  She doesn’t even have to use “she”

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,100]

26 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No, I said call them by their actual name and not a pronoun.  She doesn’t even have to use “she”

GTFO.  Pronouns are used as a basic form of communication.   That's like asking you to only breath for 30 seconds out of every minute in order not to offend anyone with your bad breath.

People don't have the time or energy to entertain every woke retard and mentally ill moron demands.  F@ck all you @sshole language police. 

YOU are the minority, not us.  You keep telling us it's "not a big deal" and "they are a small portion of the population" so let's ignore them completely because "it's not a big deal".

[seafoam1 3,017]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

GTFO.  Pronouns are used as a basic form of communication.   That's like asking you to only breath for 30 seconds out of every minute in order not to offend anyone with your bad breath.

People don't have the time or energy to entertain every woke retard and mentally ill moron demands.  F@ck all you @sshole language police. 

Well put. 

[jerryskids 6,792]

48 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No, I said call them by their actual name and not a pronoun.  She doesn’t even have to use “she”

She doesn't have to, but using "he" helps make her point.  Tell me if you see this or not.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

2 hours ago, jbycho said:

Timhack is definitely a bigot. He doesn't hold true to science for his own causes. 

@TimHauck hates Black people.  He says slavery was bad but segregation is ok, not racist 

[seafoam1 3,017]

4 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

@TimHauck hates Black people.  He says slavery was bad but segregation is ok, not racist 

He's consistent with all liberals being racist. 

[TimHauck 2,867]

15 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

She doesn't have to, but using "he" helps make her point.  Tell me if you see this or not.

I’ll agree that if she used “she” it would hurt her point.

But I don’t agree that using “he” helps it.

[jerryskids 6,792]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I’ll agree that if she used “she” it would hurt her point.

But I don’t agree that using “he” helps it.

Do you agree that a reasonable person could think using "he" helps her point?