Parents call out unfairness as trans pitcher throws shutout in Minnesota softball state quarterfinals

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

19 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Imagine a woman not knowing what a woman is. Oh wait, liberals put one on the supreme court. 

SCIENCE 🪡 

[seafoam1 3,017]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

SCIENCE 🪡 

Yep. And she is put in position to possibly make serious decisions on woman's rights to kill their children. Even though she doesn't know what a woman is. 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Yep. And she is put in position to possibly make serious decisions on woman's rights to kill their children. Even though she doesn't know what a woman is. 

Liberal Men's periods have all synced up. 

[TimHauck 2,859]

6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Here is the description:

Such discussions usually conclude that they do NOT conflict, in my experience.  But I always enjoy a good metaphysics discussion.   

I mean I’m not sure how believing someone was born via divine intervention and later rose from the dead doesn’t conflict with science, but OK.  (maybe his birth story would be a better analogy to the trans debate because biology).

[seafoam1 3,017]

5 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Liberal Men's periods have all synced up. 

Absolutely. They were given the time and date to do so a while back.

[seafoam1 3,017]

On 6/17/2025 at 7:33 PM, TimHauck said:

I mean I’m not sure how believing someone was born via divine intervention and later rose from the dead doesn’t conflict with science, but OK.  (maybe his birth story would be a better analogy to the trans debate because biology).

What does that have to do with a guy thinking he can become a girl and have babies that he would probably want to abort?

[TimHauck 2,859]

On 6/12/2025 at 6:38 PM, TimHauck said:

No, I said call them by their actual name and not a pronoun.  She doesn’t even have to use “she”

 

On 6/12/2025 at 7:05 PM, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

GTFO.  Pronouns are used as a basic form of communication.   That's like asking you to only breath for 30 seconds out of every minute in order not to offend anyone with your bad breath.

People don't have the time or energy to entertain every woke retard and mentally ill moron demands.  F@ck all you @sshole language police. 

YOU are the minority, not us.  You keep telling us it's "not a big deal" and "they are a small portion of the population" so let's ignore them completely because "it's not a big deal".

 

On 6/19/2025 at 8:58 AM, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Hmmm...well said.

I would say that for #4, I would call them by their actual name than by any preferred pronoun because I don't want to play those games.  

 

On 6/19/2025 at 9:05 AM, TimHauck said:

This is what I suggested in the other thread.

Would you do this even if they “changed” their name?

 

23 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Sure, I expect they would.  

 

23 hours ago, TimHauck said:

That’s nice of you (seriously).  I’m sure some would say that’s “playing into their mental illness”

 

22 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I don't see it that way. Lots of same names are used for both girls and guys. That I don't have a problem with at all.

Hey @EternalShinyAndChrome, 

Are you schizophrenic or something? The first two quotes are from earlier in this thread. When I suggested calling a trans person by their name, you told me to GTFO.  But then in the SCOTUS thread, you said you would call them by their name even if they changed it?
 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Hey @EternalShinyAndChrome, 

Are you schizophrenic or something? The first two quotes are from earlier in this thread. When I suggested calling a trans person by their name, you told me to GTFO.  But then in the SCOTUS thread, you said you would call them by their name even if they changed it?
 

I said GTFO for those suggesting or implying to call them by their fake pronouns, not their name.  HTH. 

[TimHauck 2,859]

Here’s Gaines expanding her target and making fun of gay people, using it as an insult to Keith Olbermann.  (Of course I know @TBayXXXVII will say something stupid like “if you think that’s making fun of gay people, you’re the one whose mind goes to that!”)

https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1941678751655317928

in case she deletes it as she often does:

Your weird obsession with me is unhealthy. May I suggest finding a girlfriend (though boyfriend may be more likely) or a hobby to occupy you from constantly thinking about a happily married, 7-months-pregnant woman?

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Here’s Gaines expanding her target and making fun of gay people, using it as an insult to Keith Olbermann

Who cares what she said, it's words. 

The point is what matters. Trannys have no place in Women's sports, locker rooms or bathrooms. 

Why is that hard for Dems to understand? 

[TimHauck 2,859]

6 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Who cares what she said, it's words. 

The point is what matters. Trannys have no place in Women's sports, locker rooms or bathrooms. 

Why is that hard for Dems to understand? 

That back and forth had nothing to do with trannies.  It was actually about Riley falling into the trap of thinking that being critical of Israel is anti-Semitic 

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

That back and forth had nothing to do with trannies.  It was actually about Riley falling into the trap of thinking that being critical of Israel is anti-Semitic 

Who cares, you're giving her the attention she seeks. 

[TimHauck 2,859]

6 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Who cares, you're giving her the attention she seeks. 

Yeah it’s funny when she calls out others for doing that, right?  (First Biles, now Olbermann, surely others in between)

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

That back and forth had nothing to do with trannies.  It was actually about Riley falling into the trap of thinking that being critical of Israel is anti-Semitic 

Kind of like when you're critical of trans you're transphobic.  GTFO.

[TimHauck 2,859]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Kind of like when you're critical of trans you're transphobic.  GTFO.

Strawman alert!

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Strawman alert!

That's not a strawman.  I would expect YOU to know the difference since you're Tim "Strawman" Hauck, but you're so desperate for a "gotcha" you can't even get your logic straight.

Try again.

[TimHauck 2,859]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

That's not a strawman.  I would expect YOU to know the difference since you're Tim "Strawman" Hauck, but you're so desperate for a "gotcha" you can't even get your logic straight.

Try again.

A straw man argument is a logical fallacy where someone misrepresents an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack or refute. Instead of addressing the actual argument, the person creates a distorted version and argues against that instead.

 

You think she’s just “critical” of trans, lol.  She thinks they shouldn’t exist.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,099]

27 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

A straw man argument is a logical fallacy where someone misrepresents an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack or refute. Instead of addressing the actual argument, the person creates a distorted version and argues against that instead.

 

You think she’s just “critical” of trans, lol.  She thinks they shouldn’t exist.

Yeah, you completely misread and misinterpreted my post. 

Whether you did that by design or inadvertently - not a good look.  I wasn't talking about her.  I was talking about liberals in general, dumb@ss.

Again, you're so desperate for a "gotcha" you completely abandon all logic, facts and, apparently, reading skills. 

[TimHauck 2,859]

23 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, you completely misread and misinterpreted my post. 

Whether you did that by design or inadvertently - not a good look.  I wasn't talking about her.  I was talking about liberals in general, dumb@ss.

Again, you're so desperate for a "gotcha" you completely abandon all logic, facts and, apparently, reading skills. 

Why were you taking about “liberals in general” when we were talking about Riley Gaines?  Moving the goalposts alert!

[Hardcore troubadour 15,416]

I would expect that liberals will be running as far away as they can from this issue this coming election cycle. It’s a big loser at the polls. 

[seafoam1 3,017]

All liberals have left at the polls is abortion. Killing kids is their strong suit. Now that's something to be really proud of. 

[Strike 5,538]

6 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Here’s Gaines expanding her target and making fun of gay people, using it as an insult to Keith Olbermann.  (Of course I know @TBayXXXVII will say something stupid like “if you think that’s making fun of gay people, you’re the one whose mind goes to that!”)

https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1941678751655317928

in case she deletes it as she often does:

Your weird obsession with me is unhealthy. May I suggest finding a girlfriend (though boyfriend may be more likely) or a hobby to occupy you from constantly thinking about a happily married, 7-months-pregnant woman?

What gay person did she make fun of?

[TimHauck 2,859]

29 minutes ago, Strike said:

What gay person did she make fun of?

Any gay person that doesn’t appreciate when being called gay is used as an insult 

[Strike 5,538]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Any gay person that doesn’t appreciate when being called gay is used as an insult 

How did she insult gay people?

[TimHauck 2,859]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

How did she insult gay people?

“Smells stinky bait.  Swims away”

[Strike 5,538]

8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

“Smells stinky bait.  Swims away”

IOW, you can't articulate how she insulted gays.  Gotcha

[seafoam1 3,017]

8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

“Smells stinky bait.  Swims away”

Translation: "I don't know. I''m just saying stupid things."

You go girl.

[TimHauck 2,859]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

IOW, you can't articulate how she insulted gays.  Gotcha

Do you agree the premise of her post was to insult Olbermann?

[Strike 5,538]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Do you agree the premise of her post was to insult Olbermann?

Sorry pal.  Don't answer a question with a question.

[TimHauck 2,859]

10 minutes ago, Strike said:

Sorry pal.  Don't answer a question with a question.

Her entire post was meant as an insult to Olbermann (unless you think calling him “obsessed” and “unhealthy” isn’t an insult either).  In it, she implied he was gay.  Thus, she was using calling him gay as an insult.

This isn’t rocket science, but I know you already knew everything I said above and are just being intentionally obtuse.

[Strike 5,538]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Her entire post was meant as an insult to Olbermann (unless you think calling him “obsessed” and “unhealthy” isn’t an insult either).  In it, she implied he was gay.  Thus, she was using calling him gay as an insult.

This isn’t rocket science, but I know you already knew everything I said above and are just being intentionally obtuse.

So wrong on so many counts.  First, she was responding to his insulting post directed at her   And the point of her post was asking him to stop being obsessed and stalking her, much like you on this message bored are with some of us who have made you look foolish.  It's people like you that are the reason some of us won't post personal information like we used to 10 years ago here.  Next, since when is being gay a negative?  Apparently you haven't gotten over your bigotry towards gay people.  You need to look inside, not at Riley Gaines.

[TimHauck 2,859]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

So wrong on so many counts.  First, she was responding to his insulting post directed at her   And the point of her post was asking him to stop being obsessed and stalking her, much like you on this message bored are with some of us who have made you look foolish.  It's people like you that are the reason some of us won't post personal information like we used to 10 years ago here.  Next, since when is being gay a negative?  Apparently you haven't gotten over your bigotry towards gay people.  You need to look inside, not at Riley Gaines.

Being gay shouldn’t be a negative.  But Riley Gaines used it as such.  It’s okay if you are blinded by your bias and don’t see that, I literally predicted exactly what people like you and @TBayXXXVII would say. Congrats, you’re a sheep.

[jerryskids 6,790]

7 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Here’s Gaines expanding her target and making fun of gay people, using it as an insult to Keith Olbermann.  (Of course I know @TBayXXXVII will say something stupid like “if you think that’s making fun of gay people, you’re the one whose mind goes to that!”)

https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1941678751655317928

in case she deletes it as she often does:

Your weird obsession with me is unhealthy. May I suggest finding a girlfriend (though boyfriend may be more likely) or a hobby to occupy you from constantly thinking about a happily married, 7-months-pregnant woman?

That's almost as compelling as a SuppressedNews tweet.

Confirmation bias, may I introduce you to TimHauck?   

[TimHauck 2,859]

10 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

That's almost as compelling as a SuppressedNews tweet.

Confirmation bias, may I introduce you to TimHauck?   

C’mon Jerry, I know you’re more honest than @Strike.  Are you really gonna try to argue she wasn’t calling Olbermann gay as an insult?

[Strike 5,538]

20 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Being gay shouldn’t be a negative.  But Riley Gaines used it as such.  It’s okay if you are blinded by your bias and don’t see that, I literally predicted exactly what people like you and @TBayXXXVII would say. Congrats, you’re a sheep.

Your ascribing negativity to it says more about you than it does Riley Gaines.  Just out of curiosity, and this is a tangent, but what do you think of Olbermann constantly stalking Riley Gaines?

[TimHauck 2,859]

Just now, Strike said:

Your ascribing negativity to it says more about you than it does Riley Gaines.  Just out of curiosity, and this is a tangent, but what do you think of Olbermann constantly stalking Riley Gaines?

I was “ascribing negativity to it,” because she was.  Again, unless your contention is that her calling him “obsessed” and “unhealthy” isn’t negative?

As @Maximum Overkill correctly pointed out, he’s just giving her the attention she wants.

[Strike 5,538]

Just now, TimHauck said:

I was “ascribing negativity to it,” because she was.  Again, unless your contention is that her calling him “obsessed” and “unhealthy” isn’t negative?

As @Maximum Overkill correctly pointed out, he’s just giving her the attention she wants.

He is obsessed.  Olbermann has a habit of getting obsessed with individuals.  That's why he's a laughingstock and has been fired from 10 different networks.  That's not a negative.  That's a fact.  I notice you're ignoring my query as to your thoughts about his obsession with Riley Gaines.  Is it your contention that he's NOT obsessed with her, or are you just OK with it?

[TimHauck 2,859]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

He is obsessed.  Olbermann has a habit of getting obsessed with individuals.  That's why he's a laughingstock and has been fired from 10 different networks.  That's not a negative.  That's a fact.  I notice you're ignoring my query as to your thoughts about his obsession with Riley Gaines.  Is it your contention that he's NOT obsessed with her, or are you just OK with it?

I “responded” to you.

I really don’t give a sh1t about Olbermann, he’s irrelevant.

[Maximum Overkill 1,988]

5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Yeah it’s funny when she calls out others for doing that, right?  (First Biles, now Olbermann, surely others in between)

Sorry, I had to shoot one of my bird dogs. 

Nobody cares about any of those people, especially mentally deranged Oberman. 

 

[Strike 5,538]

7 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I “responded” to you.

I really don’t give a sh1t about Olbermann, he’s irrelevant.

So all that matters is if Riley Gaines insults Olbermann.  What he does is irrelevant?  Got it.