dogcows 1,323 Posted December 31, 2025 8 minutes ago, jerryskids said: Quoting this to see how it ages. I am looking forward to it. The dominoes are already falling rapidly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,223 Posted December 31, 2025 1 minute ago, dogcows said: I am looking forward to it. The dominoes are already falling rapidly. I thought the message was "this is old news! Investigations and prosecutions are under way!" Now it's fake news? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,323 Posted December 31, 2025 14 minutes ago, TimHauck said: I didn’t say “how did they know to get in this way,” I said how did they know to look inside a wall for documents, which no one else would want anyway. I think it’s a safe bet there’s fraud happening in the video. But if he visited like 10 places, I’d guess maybe 2 were frauds (the Learing Center might be my prime suspect). Not good, but that’s far different than claiming any place that didn’t want to talk to him, or most Somalians, are frauds. It wasn’t you that said it about the tweet, it was the tweet itself to be clear… I don’t think the documents were behind a wall… that was how he got in. Unless I misread something? The CBS News video showed filing cabinets as the target of the alleged thief. As for why…? Police haven’t released motive yet. But based on voicemail threats received by Nokomis, the vandal was apparently motivated by Tricky Nicky’s video, so he was probably trying to get what he thought was evidence of fraud. I have seen no evidence yet that any place Nick visited is currently perpetrating fraud. But for the sake of argument, let’s say 2 are. How bad a “journalist” is somebody who is wrong 80% of the time? Even the weatherman has a better record. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,323 Posted December 31, 2025 7 minutes ago, jerryskids said: I thought the message was "this is old news! Investigations and prosecutions are under way!" Now it's fake news? Whatever dude you can win as many semantic arguments with me as you want. Maybe it will make you feel better when you’re eating crow over how badly some 23-year-old nitwit duped you. #winning Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,480 Posted December 31, 2025 7 minutes ago, dogcows said: It wasn’t you that said it about the tweet, it was the tweet itself to be clear… I don’t think the documents were behind a wall… that was how he got in. Unless I misread something? The CBS News video showed filing cabinets as the target of the alleged thief. As for why…? Police haven’t released motive yet. But based on voicemail threats received by Nokomis, the vandal was apparently motivated by Tricky Nicky’s video, so he was probably trying to get what he thought was evidence of fraud. I have seen no evidence yet that any place Nick visited is currently perpetrating fraud. But for the sake of argument, let’s say 2 are. How bad a “journalist” is somebody who is wrong 80% of the time? I mean I know MAGA’s are dumb, but I really doubt any would want to commit a crime for the purpose of proving someone else committed a crime. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,323 Posted December 31, 2025 2 minutes ago, TimHauck said: I mean I know MAGA’s are dumb, but I really doubt any would want to commit a crime for the purpose of proving someone else committed a crime. You didn’t hear about the Pizzagate guy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,223 Posted December 31, 2025 16 minutes ago, dogcows said: Whatever dude you can win as many semantic arguments with me as you want. Maybe it will make you feel better when you’re eating crow over how badly some 23-year-old nitwit duped you. #winning Semantics? I stated exactly what happened. Did you forget your position from this morning already? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,305 Posted December 31, 2025 This shouldn’t be a partisan issue but we have the Dems simping for the somali grifters 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dogcows 1,323 Posted December 31, 2025 2 minutes ago, HellToupee said: This shouldn’t be a partisan issue but we have the Dems simping for the somali grifters Lock up all the fraudsters. But don’t falsely accuse people either, especially if you base the accusations on their national origin. Easy, you’d think we could all agree on both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,553 Posted 8 hours ago 12 minutes ago, HellToupee said: This shouldn’t be a partisan issue but we have the Dems simping for the somali grifters Who? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,480 Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, dogcows said: Your tweet above about “how did they know to get in this way” ignored the video report from the local news showing that the vandal tried multiple ways to get into the building. It included images of the doors damaged in the process. In the press conference, the manager says: ”the suspect came in from the back kitchen and also destroyed the wall to come in. As he came in, he broke the wall from Family Dollar.” Not sure where those are in relation to each other, but even if the damage is in multiple possible points of entry, that doesn’t prove that it wasn’t staged of course (and why does he say “he”?). And if there was a real burglary, it’s also possible that the Family Dollar was the target and not the daycare. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,480 Posted 5 hours ago Quality Learing Center appeared to have kids, but take a look at some of these violations: https://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&dDocName=LLO_462322 o On May 9, 2022, when the DHS licensors asked a staff person for his/her name, the staff person left the classroom and came back with a name written on a piece of paper. The DHS licensors asked if the name written on the paper was the staff person’s name, and s/he confirmed that it was. The DHS licensors went into another classroom and the staff person working in that classroom told the DHS licensors his/her name was the same name as the staff person from the previous classroom. Through a review of the individual’s driver’s license, the DHS licensors verified that the name belonged to the staff person in the second classroom, not the staff person in the previous classroom. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites