Clintons refuse to testify

[MDC 8,269]

12 minutes ago, Strike said:

It's always about Trump 

The OP’s first post mentions … TRUMP!    

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

14 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Well, the thread is supposed to be that Bill and Hillary don’t wanna help these victims and how our board liberals are unsurprisingly silent about it. But yes, they’ve hiJacked it to make it about Trump. I’ll let you determine the mental diagnosis of that.

Lock up bill Clinton.  I don't give a fock about bill Clinton.  Indict him,. prosecute him, ruin his life.

Everything needs to be released.  Trump has to stop covering it up, by law.

[cyclone24 1,975]

7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Lock up bill Clinton.  I don't give a fock about bill Clinton.  Indict him,. prosecute him, ruin his life.

Everything needs to be released.  Trump has to stop covering it up, by law.

Just goes to narrative. I wish you guys would just be honest about it. You don’t care about Bill you don’t care about the victims you don’t care about Epstein. You just really hope Trump is in there and I’m not even quite sure why. To hope to get him out of office? It’s just truly bizarre behavior. Like what a weird convoluted way to try to get yourselves power back.

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

28 minutes ago, Nomad99 said:

They were all about "believe the victims".....until they started saying Trump didn't do anything......then the switched to "The victims are lying"!!!

No one has said that the survivors are lying, and there are over 1k of them, and don't pretend that all 1k of them said that Trump didn't do anything.

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

8 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Just goes to narrative. I wish you guys would just be honest about it. You don’t care about Bill you don’t care about the victims you don’t care about Epstein. You just really hope Trump is in there and I’m not even quite sure why. To hope to get him out of office? It’s just truly bizarre behavior. Like what a weird convoluted way to try to get yourselves power back.

Your problem is you tell everyone what they think when you don't know sh1t.

I support the survivors.  There is a law signed by every lawmaker except one, and the law states that the DOJ has to release the Epstein files, and they are breaking the law.  You don't care.  You support the cover up.  You're on the side of the pedos.  I'm on the side of the survivors.

[MDC 8,269]

19 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Just goes to narrative. I wish you guys would just be honest about it. 

I spelled it out for you a page ago:

Want me to draw you a picture?

[cyclone24 1,975]

11 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Your problem is you tell everyone what they think when you don't know sh1t.

I support the survivors.  There is a law signed by every lawmaker except one, and the law states that the DOJ has to release the Epstein files, and they are breaking the law.  You don't care.  You support the cover up.  You're on the side of the pedos.  I'm on the side of the survivors.

I base it off of your reactions. You guys won’t shut up about Trump being these Epstein files, but when a liberal has to testify that could actually help them not one of you have said a word. Now lie to me and tell me if it was a republican, you guys wouldn’t have two or three threads on it already. That’s the whole point. You say you care, but you really only care about Trump because there are victims of sexual assault in your neighborhood probably within several square blocks. You don’t care about them at all. And don’t lie to me and say you do. It’s the whole point. 

[Strike 6,149]

33 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Lock up bill Clinton.  I don't give a fock about bill Clinton.  Indict him,. prosecute him, ruin his life.

Everything needs to be released.  Trump has to stop covering it up, by law.

Sorry but you're so full of sh*t.  You only say it because you know it won't happen.  And even if you're being truthful, that's how you feel NOW.  Because you no longer need him.  That's how you libs operate.  You fight and fight things and then, AFTER THE FACT, pretend like that's how you felt all along.  In 5-10 years you'll be telling us you never wanted trannies in women's sports too.

[Strike 6,149]

17 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Your problem is you tell everyone what they think when you don't know sh1t.

I support the survivors.  There is a law signed by every lawmaker except one, and the law states that the DOJ has to release the Epstein files, and they are breaking the law.  You don't care.  You support the cover up.  You're on the side of the pedos.  I'm on the side of the survivors.

The problem with this is you ONLY started caring about the survivors within the last year or so.  Where are your posts making these same demands over the last decade?

[MDC 8,269]

5 minutes ago, Strike said:

That's how you libs operate.  You fight and fight things and then, AFTER THE FACT, pretend like that's how you felt all along.  

Like how the GC MAGA crowd were all on board for releasing the files a year ago and stopped caring once Father told them to move on?  

[Strike 6,149]

4 minutes ago, MDC said:

Like how the GC MAGA crowd were all on board for releasing the files a year ago and stopped caring once Father told them to move on?  

I'd like them released but that has nothing to do with the Clinton's testifying, and nothing to do with Artest's fake outrage.

[Hardcore troubadour 16,245]

51 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

She hasn't told anyone what she knows

Why didn’t the prosecutor in her case interview her? 

[Hardcore troubadour 16,245]

1 hour ago, cyclone24 said:

Well, the thread is supposed to be that Bill and Hillary don’t wanna help these victims and how our board liberals are unsurprisingly silent about it. But yes, they’ve hiJacked it to make it about Trump. I’ll let you determine the mental diagnosis of that.

Napoleon complex? TDS ? Both? 

[cyclone24 1,975]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

I'd like them released but that has nothing to do with the Clinton's testifying, and nothing to do with Artest's fake outrage.

I mean past being good gossip of who is there this pretending to care is just hilariously disingenuous

 

 

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

1 hour ago, cyclone24 said:

Well, the thread is supposed to be that Bill and Hillary don’t wanna help these victims and how our board liberals are unsurprisingly silent about it. But yes, they’ve hiJacked it to make it about Trump. I’ll let you determine the mental diagnosis of that.

This thread backfired on you because you thought the libs would all defend Clinton.  When that didn't happen you threw a hissy fit.

You're on the pedo side, deal with it.

[cyclone24 1,975]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

This thread backfired on you because you thought the libs would all defend Clinton.  When that didn't happen you threw a hissy fit.

You're on the pedo side, deal with it.

Good try but no. I never expect you to defend Clinton. I’m making fun of you liberals because as usual the hypocrisy to say you are for the victims, but won’t call out the Democrat that’s in pools with these girls and was there is exactly the point I’ve made all along….

 

 

[Nomad99 869]

58 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

No one has said that the survivors are lying, and there are over 1k of them, and don't pretend that all 1k of them said that Trump didn't do anything.

OK Francie.

[Grace Under Pressure 266]

Keep spinning MAGA.

"Hey fellow cult MAGAs, I did a thing about the Clintons!! Am I in good cult standing now?"

Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein were best friends for decades, and they raped underaged girls. Deflect all you want. 

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

22 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Good try but no. I never expect you to defend Clinton. I’m making fun of you liberals because as usual the hypocrisy to say you are for the victims, but won’t call out the Democrat that’s in pools with these girls and was there is exactly the point I’ve made all along….

 

 

I've called out Clinton and I'd call out any piece of sh1t in these files which is something you won't do.  You defend the pedos.

[Strike 6,149]

 

[Strike 6,149]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I've called out Clinton and I'd call out any piece of sh1t in these files which is something you won't do.  You defend the pedos.

Links that predate Trump being President?

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

Just now, Strike said:

Links that predate Trump being President?

Go find them yourself.  I voted against Clinton twice, same with Obama.  Nice try.

[Strike 6,149]

5 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Go find them yourself.  I voted against Clinton twice, same with Obama.  Nice try.

This has nothing to do with who you voted for, but nice deflection.   Typical.

[cyclone24 1,975]

33 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I've called out Clinton and I'd call out any piece of sh1t in these files which is something you won't do.  You defend the pedos.

Lol we don’t even know who they are!!

OK, run down the list. Who are they? That absolutely 100% are for sure pedophiles besides Epstein and Maxwell? Go.

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

2 hours ago, cyclone24 said:

Lol we don’t even know who they are!!

OK, run down the list. Who are they? That absolutely 100% are for sure pedophiles besides Epstein and Maxwell? Go.

You know why we don't know?  Because Trump won't release the files.

[cyclone24 1,975]

6 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

You know why we don't know?  Because Trump won't release the files.

Ohhhhhhh thats it. Well, when you have the files, why didn’t you release them? I mean, you’re the leakiest administration the history of the world and you couldn’t figure out a way to leak Trump or anybody else that was in it?
This is where your argument just falls apart. OK, let’s say there is a ring. There’s a bunch of celebrities the problem you running into every single time is great. How are you gonna prove it? Because if you roll names out there with no proof, they’re going to sue you. This is not that difficult to understand.

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

1 minute ago, cyclone24 said:

Ohhhhhhh thats it. Well, when you have the files, why didn’t you release them? I mean, you’re the leakiest administration the history of the world and you couldn’t figure out a way to leak Trump or anybody else that was in it?
This is where your argument just falls apart. OK, let’s say there is a ring. There’s a bunch of celebrities the problem you running into every single time is great. How are you gonna approve it? Because if you rolls out there with no proof, they’re going to sue you. This is not that difficult to understand.

What?  I don't have the files, dummy.  I don't work in the admin.  Are you talking about Biden?  Biden was probably covering up the pedos too, fock him. Fock Biden.

No one is suing me.  The survivors want the files released.  The law requires it.  Trump is breaking the law and covering up the child rape ring and you support it and defend this behavior.  Time to look in the mirror.

[dogcows 1,441]

4 minutes ago, cyclone24 said:

Ohhhhhhh thats it. Well, when you have the files, why didn’t you release them? I mean, you’re the leakiest administration the history of the world and you couldn’t figure out a way to leak Trump or anybody else that was in it?
This is where your argument just falls apart. OK, let’s say there is a ring. There’s a bunch of celebrities the problem you running into every single time is great. How are you gonna approve it? Because if you rolls out there with no proof, they’re going to sue you. This is not that difficult to understand.

Starting to think they might want to check the files for Iowa State fans…

[cyclone24 1,975]

2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

What?  I don't have the files, dummy.  I don't work in the admin.  Are you talking about Biden?  Biden was probably covering up the pedos too, fock him. Fock Biden.

No one is suing me.  The survivors want the files released.  The law requires it.  Trump is breaking the law and covering up the child rape ring and you support it and defend this behavior.  Time to look in the mirror.

No, the law doesn’t require it. This nonsensical vote on it did it. There’s no law that says oh yeah let’s just release all unnamed the victims and potential criminals to the public for their consumption before in trials or convictions.
 

I’m not defending anything. I just don’t really care about the story. Is it bad it happened? Of course stop acting like you’re leading for victims. You could do that in your hometown. Let me know when you do.

[cyclone24 1,975]

2 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Starting to think they might want to check the files for Iowa State fans…

We fock cows, not kids

[Ron_Artest 2,769]

1 minute ago, cyclone24 said:

No, the law doesn’t require it. This nonsensical vote on it did it. There’s no law that says oh yeah let’s just release all unnamed the victims and potential criminals to the public for their consumption before in trials or convictions.
 

I’m not defending anything. I just don’t really care about the story. Is it bad it happened? Of course stop acting like you’re leading for victims. You could do that in your hometown. Let me know when you do.

Oh yes there is a law my ignorant friend.

Here is the law:

H.R.4405 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Epstein Files Transparency Act | Congress.gov | Library of Congress https://share.google/VwyA0Ma3N9C2BoDMb

Trump is violating the law by covering up the child trafficking.

You are defending these actions.  You support child sex trafficking.

Ok so you don't care about it, but you started a thread about it and can't stop posting in it.