Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Ainsley

Ainsley's Week 8 Projections

Recommended Posts

QB

 

1 Leftwich,Byron

2 McNabb,Donovan

3 Brunell,Mark

4 Collins,Kerry

5 Culpepper,Daunte

6 Favre,Brett

7 Palmer,Carson

8 Brees,Drew

9 Green,Trent

10 Frerotte,Gus

 

 

RB

 

1 Jordan,LaMont

2 Dillon,Corey

3 Brown,Ronnie

4 Tomlinson,LaDainian

5 Jones,Thomas

6 Jones,Julius

7 McGahee,Willis

8 Williams,Carnell

9 Holmes,Priest

10 Barber,Tiki

11 Davis,Stephen

12 Droughns,Reuben

13 Portis,Clinton

14 Davis,Domanick

15 Westbrook,Brian

 

 

WR

 

1 Smith,Jimmy

2 Owens,Terrell

3 Moss,Santana

4 Galloway,Joey

5 Boldin,Anquan

6 Smith,Steve

7 Houshmandzadeh,TJ

8 Moss,Randy

9 Johnson,Keyshawn

10 Bryant,Antonio

11 Driver,Donald

12 McCardell,Keenan

13 Kennison,Eddie

14 Muhammad,Muhsin

15 Chambers,Chris

16 Lewis,Greg

17 Horn,Joe

18 Curtis,Kevin

19 Moulds,Eric

20 Gabriel,Doug

 

 

TE

 

1 Gates,Antonio

2 McMichael,Randy

3 Troupe,Ben

4 Miller,Heath

5 Graham,Daniel

6 Mangum,Kris

7 Martin,David

8 Smith,LJ

9 Shockey,Jeremy

10 Heap,Todd

 

 

Complete projections can be found HERE.

 

 

Updated 10/29/05 @ 12:36 PM EST.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No Chad Johnson? vs Green Bay at home? But TJ 7th? I'm sure it was an honest mistake :angry:

 

WR

 

1 Smith,Jimmy

2 Owens,Terrell

3 Moss,Santana

4 Galloway,Joey

5 Boldin,Anquan

6 Smith,Steve

7 Houshmandzadeh,TJ

8 Johnson,Keyshawn

9 Bryant,Antonio

10 Driver,Donald

11 Gabriel,Doug

12 Stallworth,Donte

13 McCardell,Keenan

14 Kennison,Eddie

15 Muhammad,Muhsin

16 Chambers,Chris

17 Lewis,Greg

18 Curtis,Kevin

19 Moulds,Eric

20 Hakim,Az-Zahir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm...still no love for Rudi. And CJ nowhere in the top 20. Link to the rest not yet working, so I can't see where you have him, but I figure he's good for a score.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm...still no love for Rudi. And CJ nowhere in the top 20. Link to the rest not yet working, so I can't see where you have him, but I figure he's good for a score.

CJ is WAY down there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I think the Chad Johnson omission was purposeful. Green Bay has consistently and effectively limited the #1 receiver. Given that TJ Houshmandzadeh is a very viable option in that case, it's very realistic that he will be the receiver with the bigger game.

 

Chad Johnson was virtually taken out of the game by Ike Taylor last week, so it is not inconceivable. Just my thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, I think the Chad Johnson omission was purposeful.  Green Bay has consistently and effectively limited the #1 receiver.  Given that TJ Houshmandzadeh is a very viable option in that case, it's very realistic that he will be the receiver with the bigger game.

 

Chad Johnson was virtually taken out of the game by Ike Taylor last week, so it is not inconceivable.  Just my thoughts.

Acreed.

 

Though I still think the call on his TD catch was complete BS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude get that humble pie made up and ready for Sunday... Chad Johnson is gonna biotch slap the GB Slackers so bad... He's gonna put 3 check marks up on "NO" in his locker after this week... Ainsley you need to contact me, I need some of the stuff your gettin for myself :mad: MB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I sure hope you know what you're talking about, Ainsley, as I have Lamont, LT, and Jimmy Smith - all high on your rankings. I'm counting on them to pull me through another Bulger-less week. Hopefully you're wrong about CJ, though I think it's a valid point other posters have been making about GB shutting down opposing teams' #1 WRs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, I think the Chad Johnson omission was purposeful. Green Bay has consistently and effectively limited the #1 receiver. Given that TJ Houshmandzadeh is a very viable option in that case, it's very realistic that he will be the receiver with the bigger game.

 

Chad Johnson was virtually taken out of the game by Ike Taylor last week, so it is not inconceivable. Just my thoughts.

Not really, if that TD wouldn't of been called back, he would had a 100+ and a TD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, I think the Chad Johnson omission was purposeful.  Green Bay has consistently and effectively limited the #1 receiver.  Given that TJ Houshmandzadeh is a very viable option in that case, it's very realistic that he will be the receiver with the bigger game.

 

Chad Johnson was virtually taken out of the game by Ike Taylor last week, so it is not inconceivable.  Just my thoughts.

Not really, if that TD wouldn't of been called back, he would had a 100+ and a TD.

Um.

 

The touchdown was called back, because he wasn't in bounds. But that really wasn't the point. 47 yards came on one catch on a drive that was played against the "prevent nothing" defense, when the outcome was already determined. I know, for fantasy you'll take that, but do you honestly think that Green Bay will be playing a prevent because they're up by 3 TDs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where is Steven Jackson on that list? Not even top-15?

I unfortunately agree not having SJAX on the list .... I too think he might be in for a bad day against Jags. :shocking:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why McNabb is always high on the list .. been very subaverage past few weeks. I probably will play Delhomme against Minn instead.

 

Either receivers are not getting open or McNabb isn't seeing the field very well (he sure does have a ton of time .. line playing well). He does throw a lot maybe giving enough opportunites to grant a high ranking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm not sure why McNabb is always high on the list .. been very subaverage past few weeks. I probably will play Delhomme against Minn instead.

 

Either receivers are not getting open or McNabb isn't seeing the field very well (he sure does have a ton of time .. line playing well). He does throw a lot maybe giving enough opportunites to grant a high ranking.

I have him tossing 53 balls. :blink: That should answer your question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, I think the Chad Johnson omission was purposeful. Green Bay has consistently and effectively limited the #1 receiver. Given that TJ Houshmandzadeh is a very viable option in that case, it's very realistic that he will be the receiver with the bigger game.

 

Chad Johnson was virtually taken out of the game by Ike Taylor last week, so it is not inconceivable. Just my thoughts.

Dan, you hit the nail right on the head. :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 Lewis,Greg

 

After the hit he took last Sunday...he might be afraid to even suit up this week!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to pop in and acknowledge that you seem to have one of the more accurate projections out of the weekly projection crew.

 

Last week I thought you were wrong about Rod Smith and Brunnell. You ended up being spot on with Brunnell and pretty far off with Rod Smith.

 

This week however I think Rod Smith will have a good day against the Igg's and I really like your Jimmy Smith projection. He should have a huge day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Julius Jones at 6. I totally agree! :thumbsdown:

 

 

Seriously, are all the other lower ranked RBs that are actually going to PLAY just going to lose fumbles repeatedly?

 

 

 

JJ =  :bench:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where is Steven Jackson on that list?  Not even top-15?

I unfortunately agree not having SJAX on the list .... I too think he might be in for a bad day against Jags. :thumbsup:

Jacksonville is much better against the pass than the run.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where is Steven Jackson on that list?  Not even top-15?

I unfortunately agree not having SJAX on the list .... I too think he might be in for a bad day against Jags. :first:

Jacksonville is much better against the pass than the run.....

Just ask the Steelers... :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow.. get away from the crack pipe when ur doing you projections.

 

NO CHAD JOHNSON?

NO TOM BRADY?

NO LARRY FITZGERALD?

 

LEFTWHICH AT #1??

 

DILLON MAY NOT EVEN PLAY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your projections are right, I get my ass kicked this week - thanks!

I agree. Ainsley, move L.Jordan and L.Tomlinson down in the rankings please! :first:

Jordan lost his starting left guard. Does that help?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your projections are right, I get my ass kicked this week - thanks!

I agree. Ainsley, move L.Jordan and L.Tomlinson down in the rankings please! :lol:

Jordan lost his starting left guard. Does that help?

Probably not. :first:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wow.. get away from the crack pipe when ur doing you projections.

 

NO CHAD JOHNSON?

NO TOM BRADY?

NO LARRY FITZGERALD?

 

LEFTWHICH AT #1??

 

DILLON MAY NOT EVEN PLAY

I'll eat my crow Sunday night if I am wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No Fitzgerald in the top 20 is a flawed list. :bench:

Any wideout can get shut down on any given Sunday. Just look at Boldin last week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ainsley: What makes you confident in JJ and Cadillac? Local talk radio here doesn't sound promising for the 'lac to play this week. Gruden's tone during his comments this afternoon sounded very dismal. Tuna didn't sound very positive about JJ playing this week either.

 

Props for going out on a limb. I hope you're wrong about Al Harris, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ainsley: What makes you confident in JJ and Cadillac? Local talk radio here doesn't sound promising for the 'lac to play this week. Gruden's tone during his comments this afternoon sounded very dismal. Tuna didn't sound very positive about JJ playing this week either.

 

Props for going out on a limb. I hope you're wrong about Al Harris, though.

Injuries are what makes this so tough. Assuming they would play, this is where I rank them. Nobody in their right mind thought Moss was going to suit up last week and he still managed to haul in a TD. I make it a rule to give any player listed as questionable or better on the injury report the benefit of a doubt. I cannot discount a player simply because it is speculated he will not play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ainsley: What makes you confident in JJ and Cadillac? Local talk radio here doesn't sound promising for the 'lac to play this week. Gruden's tone during his comments this afternoon sounded very dismal. Tuna didn't sound very positive about JJ playing this week either.

 

Props for going out on a limb. I hope you're wrong about Al Harris, though.

Injuries are what makes this so tough. Assuming they would play, this is where I rank them. Nobody in their right mind thought Moss was going to suit up last week and he still managed to haul in a TD. I make it a rule to give any player listed as questionable or better on the injury report the benefit of a doubt. I cannot discount a player simply because I am really really strung out on the hash pipe.

Fixored :lol: MB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ainsley: What makes you confident in JJ and Cadillac? Local talk radio here doesn't sound promising for the 'lac to play this week. Gruden's tone during his comments this afternoon sounded very dismal. Tuna didn't sound very positive about JJ playing this week either.

 

Props for going out on a limb. I hope you're wrong about Al Harris, though.

Injuries are what makes this so tough. Assuming they would play, this is where I rank them. Nobody in their right mind thought Moss was going to suit up last week and he still managed to haul in a TD. I make it a rule to give any player listed as questionable or better on the injury report the benefit of a doubt. I cannot discount a player simply because I am really really strung out on the hash pipe.

Fixored :shocking: MB

If CJ finishes in the top 20 WRs this week, you can have my sig all of next week. :bandana:

 

 

I get yours if CJ doesn't make the cut though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×