OTC late round recievers

[Kitsnow 0]

Troy Williamson Had "vision problems" and now he still has a new QB. They say his Vision problems are fixed but it's hard.

 

Michael Clayton, He's had a hard time last two years But now they have Garcia and Galloway isn't getting any younger.

 

Ronald Curry. Athletic Former QB who has stretched it often to the point of injury. He did well end of last season but had a hard time finding the endzone. There is also the injury worries.

 

 

Which Egg is gold and Which ones are rotten?

[harken34 0]

Troy Williamson claims he had a vision problem. But as a Vikings fan, I think it was more a stone hands problem.

[remote controller 143]

Curry is the top wideout on the Raiders, and the top wideout in the NFL over the last 5 or 6 games of the season last year. (research by Fumble) He headlines this list in a walk. He is available damn near at will in the draft, and a great value.

Clayton might be just the receiver Garcia needs, as I don't see him hitting Galloway long often. he too is available almost at will in drafts this season.

Willaimson- supposedly has improved eyesight. I just don't see the Qb situation as being stable and feel this will really be hit and miss all season. For his cost in the draft, I'd rather have the other two.

[NCNickNasty 0]

I like Curry, but wouldn't touch the other 2.

 

 

edit to say: And I had Clayton his rookie year.

[adam smitty 0]

1 Curry

.

..

.

 

.

.

..

.

.

.

2 Clayton

3 Williamson

[football_scooter 0]

Curry is the top wideout on the Raiders, and the top wideout in the NFL over the last 5 or 6 games of the season last year. (research by Fumble) He headlines this list in a walk. He is available damn near at will in the draft, and a great value.

Clayton might be just the receiver Garcia needs, as I don't see him hitting Galloway long often. he too is available almost at will in drafts this season.

Willaimson- supposedly has improved eyesight. I just don't see the Qb situation as being stable and feel this will really be hit and miss all season. For his cost in the draft, I'd rather have the other two.

 

Isn't Jerry Porter still in Oakland?

 

Talent-wise he blows Curry off the map.

 

Also, what is "OTC"?

[Parja 0]

They say his Vision problems are fixed but it's hard.

 

 

Huh? What's hard?

[Dan 66]

Isn't Jerry Porter still in Oakland?

 

Talent-wise he blows Gabriel off the map.

 

Also, what is "OTC"?

 

On The Clock

[Belushi 9]

Curry by a mile. He can be an every-week starter in most leagues. Look at the numbers he put up with Walters at QB. With improved talent at QB, I doubt he'll do much worse.

 

Clayton isn't worth drafting IMO. I expect Stovall to make a push for his job this year.

 

Williamson is intriguing, just because the Vikes don't have any other receivers. If he can develop a rapport with Jackson, he could be a WR3. Someone's going to have to catch the ball in Minny. He's worth a late-round flyer.

[football_scooter 0]

On The Clock

 

If that's the case, the OP needs to think of something else instead of biting my feature, and executing it poorly to boot.

 

When I created "On the Clock" as a running feature around here, I chose that name because someone already had one of a similar nature with a different name. I had to promise to make it significantly different than the existing one and I did so.

 

Weak.

[OrangeSoda 2]

I like Curry as well...I noticed his hot streak early, and told my buddy to pick him up as i was was already out of the playoff picture...he went on to win our league.

 

I think you might be under-valuing Curry as most savvy owners will have him pegged as a late round pick if you want him; i would recommend taking him in the 6th round so. He's a better option there then some aging wideouts would be, or any other scrub.

[remote controller 143]

Isn't Jerry Porter still in Oakland?

 

Talent-wise he blows Curry off the map.

 

Also, what is "OTC"?

Check out Curry's production the last four games of the season. #4 receptions for 342 yards. This lead the league over that timespan. Porter is there, and he has the tools, but I don't see him ever being in the leadership role. Curry works hard, has respect from his fellow players, and is a fine receiver in his own accord. He will catch many more passes than Porter, though Porter will likely catch more Td's. Given the choices we had above, I feel Curry was by far the best choice. How do you stack the 3 up?

[Dan 66]

Check out Curry's production the last four games of the season. #4 receptions for 342 yards. This lead the league over that timespan. Porter is there, and he has the tools, but I don't see him ever being in the leadership role. Curry works hard, has respect from his fellow players, and is a fine receiver in his own accord. He will catch many more passes than Porter, though Porter will likely catch more Td's. Given the choices we had above, I feel Curry was by far the best choice. How do you stack the 3 up?

 

I think Curry finishes with the best stats. I also think that he goes roughly where you're putting him, remote. My concern, though, is that he is not going to be worth that lofty draft position. Jamarcus Russell is likely to be throwing to him from day one, and I don't think that helps his numbers. He may be #1 in Oakland, but that still is probably not worth a 6th round pick. NOTE: I'm not a Jamarcus Russell fan, either, so take that for what it's worth. He is a rookie, however, so buyer beware.

 

After that, Michael Clayton is my choice. I like his potential, disappointed though it has been to this point, largely. I think he has this year to turn it around. Garcia is a legitimate QB; not awesome, but he'll get the ball to the kid, and he had better get open and catch the rock, or he's finished, I'm afraid.

[football_scooter 0]

Whatever, you stole that idea from my Marvin Harrison vs Antonio Gates thread from last year, but you never mention that and no one knows I inspired the idea, along with someone else I'm told. All you can claim is the name: "On the Clock", other than that this idea is simply a question of a draft scenerio. I think it's a good question from the original poster.

 

This is a flat out lie.

 

I did not steal anything from anyone. Miller_Time used to run a pinned feature here at FFT comparing two players of similar value at the same position.

 

He announced that he was not going to be continuing that feature, and I stepped up and created "On the Clock" with the extreme sensitivity that I would NOT rip off Miller_Time's idea. I honored the request because it was the respectful thing to do - it was pinned, and I was asked if I wanted to make it a regular thing.

 

So indeed - it is quite disrespectful that someone would flat out bite my topic title for a running topic that I created. I couldn't care less if he does a comparison topic - have the focking courtesy to think up your own title/theme.

[Gepetto 1,519]

This is a flat out lie.

 

I did not steal anything from anyone. Miller_Time used to run a pinned feature here at FFT comparing two players of similar value at the same position.

 

He announced that he was not going to be continuing that feature, and I stepped up and created "On the Clock" with the extreme sensitivity that I would NOT rip off Miller_Time's idea. I honored the request because it was the respectful thing to do - it was pinned, and I was asked if I wanted to make it a regular thing.

 

So indeed - it is quite disrespectful that someone would flat out bite my topic title for a running topic that I created. I couldn't care less if he does a comparison topic - have the focking courtesy to think up your own title/theme.

 

Now you know how I felt when you got to start OTC (I give you credit for the name of course) inspiration based on my Marvin Harrison vs Antonio Gates thread. And that's the truth.

[football_scooter 0]

Now you know how I felt when you got to start OTC (I give you credit for the name of course) inspiration based on my Marvin Harrison vs Antonio Gates thread. And that's the truth.

For the last time: You had NOTHING to do with it. Nothing. Many have done comparison topics. As a feature I told you where the inspiration came from, and it was not you. It was MT. Period, end of discussion.

 

Just shut up and quit stalking me already you lying spastic freak. Can anyone really be this focking pathetic that they have to lie about something as retarded as this?

[Mike FF Today 763]

Guys,

 

We're done. If you want to contine to argue with each other take it to email. If you continue it here your accounts will be removed.