wiffleball 4,796 Posted October 12, 2007 Coulter: We want 'Jews to be perfected' WASHINGTON (CNN) – Conservative commentator and best-selling author Ann Coulter may find herself in the midst of a controversy for comments Monday suggesting America would be better if everyone was Christian. Asked by CNBC host Donny Deutsch what the U.S. looks like in her dreams, Coulter said it would look like the Republican National Convention in 2004 "People were happy,” she said, according to a transcript provided to CNN by CNBC. “They're Christian. They're tolerant . They defend America." (Video: Watch Coulter's comments on CNBC) When Deutsch responded, "It would be better if we were all Christian?" Coulter said "Yeah." Deutsch, himself Jewish, continued to press Coulter on her remarks, asking, "We should just throw Judaism away and we should all be Christians then?" "Yeah," Coulter responded, adding "Well, it's a lot easier. It's kind of a fast track." "You can't possibly believe that," Deutsch responded. “You can’t possibly. You’re too educated.” "Do you know what Christianity is?" Coulter replied. "See, we believe your religion, but you have to obey. We have the fast track program." Later in the interview Deutsch asked Coulter if she doesn't want any Jews in the world, Coulter responded, "No, we think — we just want Jews to be perfected, as they say." "Wow, you didn't really say that, did you," Deutsch said. "Yeah, no,” Coulter replied. “That’s what Christianity is. We believe the Old Testament, but ours is more like Federal Express. You have to obey laws. We know we're all sinners." Deutsch said he was personally offended... " cnn.com She had to be drunk when she did this interview. Had to be. Can't for the life of me figger out the FedEx concept. What? Jews get to heaven 3-5 business days after they die, but Christians can get there by 10:00 the next morning (extra charge for weekends & holidays)? This crazy ###### has said some wild things in the past, but geez... Between her and Imawhakjob, not exactly a good time to be Jewish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Saturday Night Beaver 2 Posted October 12, 2007 I focking hate her and that annoying voice of hers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,796 Posted October 12, 2007 I focking hate her and that annoying voice of hers. She's seriously somebody I'd love to grudgefuck. I mean, face down on the floor, fistfulls of her mangy mane in my fist, ram the living chit out of her until her cervix bleeds, grudgefuck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted October 12, 2007 Deutsch said he was personally offended... What a focking deutsch bag. You interview someone that says controversial things. And you are offended? Fock you. You don't have the right to be offended. And maybe you shouldn't have done the interview at all, since you didn't do your homework and know who you were interviewing. Die, deutsch bag. Die. Also, a basic principle of Christianity is to convert nonbelievers to Christianity so that the non-believes have a chance at rewards in the afterlife. It's done out of concern, not out of some kind of prejudice or selfishness. Coulter didn't say anything that any other religious person may have said. Also, I don't like Coulter at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,796 Posted October 12, 2007 What a focking deutsch bag. You interview someone that says controversial things. And you are offended? Fock you. You don't have the right to be offended. And maybe you shouldn't have done the interview at all, since you didn't do your homework and know who you were interviewing. Die, deutsch bag. Die. Also, a basic principle of Christianity is to convert nonbelievers to Christianity so that the non-believes have a chance at rewards in the afterlife. It's done out of concern, not out of some kind of prejudice or selfishness. Coulter didn't say anything that any other religious person may have said. A basic premise of FUNDAMENTALIST EVANGELICAL Christianity. There's a huge difference. You're not going to find a lot of Lutherans & Methodists running around telling Jews they need to be perfected. They MIGHT however, offer them a casserole of some kind. And, I'm pretty sure you don't surrender your right to be offended simply by interviewing controversial people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted October 12, 2007 And, I'm pretty sure you don't surrender your right to be offended simply by interviewing controversial people. I strongly believe that no one has the right to be offended. If something is said to hurt your feelings, go fock yourself. Everyone has the right to say whatever tasteless things they want. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,796 Posted October 12, 2007 I strongly believe that no one has the right to be offended. If something is said to hurt your feelings, go fock yourself. Everyone has the right to say whatever tasteless things they want. I think you've twisted a general board consensus. Every body has the right to be offended. It's a basic natural reaction. You can't show a picture of a toddler getting sodomized and tell people they can't be internally offended by it. However: NOBODY has the right to NOT be offended. You may not like the words that I use, but you can't file a focking lawsuit just b/c your wittle sensibilities were hurt. In this case, Deitz can certainly say "I'm personally offended by what you said", but if he then files a freaking lawsuit claiming he deserves damages because he was offended, well then he can just piss the fock right off. I think we're actually on the same page here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted October 12, 2007 I think we're actually on the same page here. Same general neighborhood. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boz/BoFan 0 Posted October 12, 2007 Double D is such a puss on this. Is it an offensive thing to say, phuck no, is it a selfish and closed minded thing, absolutely. If somebody walks up to me and says "you need to convert to devil worship to be perfect", Id laugh my hairy ballz off and tell em to get lost, I would not be OFFENDED. Double D was painfully trying to make a story out of this. Thanks Dems, now everbodzy can be a victim!!!! CHEERS! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 12, 2007 Deutsch has had Coulter on before and she said some fairly controversial stuff, so the idea that he didn't do his homework or know how she is off-track. He was probably just surprised that even she would sink her shameless attention whooring to this level. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heavy-set 39 Posted October 12, 2007 she is as irrelevant as it gets. she will pop off at the mouth every couple months just get some ink or when she has a book coming out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,796 Posted October 12, 2007 she is as irrelevant as it gets. she will pop off at the mouth every couple months just get some ink or when she has a book coming out I think so too. I'm definitely getting the whole "Look at me!" vibe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted October 12, 2007 Deutsch has had Coulter on before and she said some fairly controversial stuff, so the idea that he didn't do his homework or know how she is off-track. He was probably just surprised that even she would sink her shameless attention whooring to this level. It was unprofessional for him to say he was offended. Now he wants to use the same "look at me" strategy by playing the role of a victim. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 12, 2007 It was unprofessional for him to say he was offended. Now he wants to use the same "look at me" strategy by playing the role of a victim. She wants to do away with his religion. Why is he not allowed to be offended by that? TV hosts are allowed to be offended just like anyone else. And I didn't read the link but I don't see how he's "playing the role of a victim"? He's not arranging protest marches or sueing her for mental anguish, he just said he was offended. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted October 12, 2007 Nothing that "lady" says suprises me. Oh and by the way, have you seen her hands....good god there huge, like aliens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted October 12, 2007 A basic premise of FUNDAMENTALIST EVANGELICAL Christianity. There's a huge difference. You're not going to find a lot of Lutherans & Methodists running around telling Jews they need to be perfected. They MIGHT however, offer them a casserole of some kind. And, I'm pretty sure you don't surrender your right to be offended simply by interviewing controversial people. But the interviewer is now part of the story. He was personally offended. And a journalist, interviewer, whatever should not become part of the story. Let Coulter hang herself. Why did the interviewer have to make a comment? I support his right to say what he wants, but it was an effort to inject his name into the spotlight, most likely to gain exposure and maybe parlay his increased fame into better occupational opportunities. Coulter used the media to get exposure, and now the interviewer is using Coulter's controversy for the same. Just say "no comment" for your professional integrity sake, so idiots like me aren't questioning your motives. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 12, 2007 But the interviewer is now part of the story. He was personally offended. And a journalist, interviewer, whatever should not become part of the story. Let Coulter hang herself. Why did the interviewer have to make a comment? I support his right to say what he wants, but it was an effort to inject his name into the spotlight, most likely to gain exposure and maybe parlay his increased fame into better occupational opportunities. Coulter used the media to get exposure, and now the interviewer is using Coulter's controversy for the same. Just say "no comment" for your professional integrity sake, so idiots like me aren't questioning your motives. I don't think Deutsch has ever made any pretense about being a journalist. He has a talk show, they talk, he talks. They have their views, he has his views. It almost sounds like you think no one in the media should ever disagree with anything anyone says? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted October 12, 2007 I don't think Deutsch has ever made any pretense about being a journalist. He has a talk show, they talk, he talks. They have their views, he has his views. It almost sounds like you think no one in the media should ever disagree with anything anyone says? To be honest, I've heard of the guy until today. Meh, whatever. This topic is starting to bore me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 12, 2007 Meh, whatever. This topic is starting to bore me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,796 Posted October 12, 2007 I don't think Deutsch has ever made any pretense about being a journalist. He has a talk show, they talk, he talks. They have their views, he has his views. It almost sounds like you think no one in the media should ever disagree with anything anyone says? One of the most obvious symptoms of the blurring of journalism and commentary. People think these guys are 'journalists'. They're not. Nobody seems to have a problem when OReally or Beck or anybody else says something is wrong or offensive, this isn't any different. Oreally (for example) is a journalist like I'm a marathon runner. He went from hosting "Inside Edition" to Faux. If I want information on Kato Kaelins' life, I'll turn to Bill. Political or moral insight? Not so much. People think if a guy's (any guy) got a suit and tie and a TV show, he's a friggin genius. Truth is, any of them is one step removed from a game show host. BIG difference between journalists and commentators. But to hear folks speak, they don't know one from the other anymore. Easy to see how that happened. Our newsnets used to be a lot of news and a little commentary. Now it's just the opposite. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted October 12, 2007 She's as nutty as a fruitcake. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Uncle Leo 16 Posted October 13, 2007 This world would be a better place without a-holes like Coulter. I want to drop-kick this biatch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 13, 2007 A basic premise of FUNDAMENTALIST EVANGELICAL Christianity. There's a huge difference. You're not going to find a lot of Lutherans & Methodists running around telling Jews they need to be perfected. They MIGHT however, offer them a casserole of some kind. That's because Lutherans and Methodists don't believe the Bible. Jesus offended the Jews too...that's why they had him killed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rattlesnake 0 Posted October 13, 2007 She's seriously somebody I'd love to grudgefuck. I mean, face down on the floor, fistfulls of her mangy mane in my fist, ram the living chit out of her until her cervix bleeds, grudgefuck. I was thinking something similar, but I think she needs a good throat-pounding. Dumbass b1tch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flashover 0 Posted October 13, 2007 I agree she needs a good grudgefock but I wouldn't do it. I don't bang chicks that have a testicles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,334 Posted October 13, 2007 Didn't he retire from UFC? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Me_2006 14 Posted October 13, 2007 How can you honestly say "I can't believe Coulter said this"? Seriously. Explain that to me. Is there anything this woman could say that's honestly THAT shocking? It's what she does. Even people who are fairly on the right (i.e.-me) think she's nuts. It's like saying "Wow, Howard Stern has gone too far!" It's the same principle. She's just talking about politics and not strippers, and with the way things are going lately, there's really not much difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 13, 2007 She's seriously somebody I'd love to grudgefuck. I mean, face down on the floor, fistfulls of her mangy mane in my fist, ram the living chit out of her until her cervix bleeds, grudgefuck. Weren't you the one mocking Coulter's statement about tolerance? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flashover 0 Posted October 13, 2007 The thing is she continues to be a key speaker at a lot of Republican events. They really need to distance themselves from hateful, bigoted people like Coulter(Rush & O'Reilly can be included too). This is just another reason why the Republican party has gone down the tubes. Having people like Coulter represent your party to the degree she does really shows how out of touch with the American people the Republican party is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,768 Posted October 13, 2007 Ann Coulter is a performance artist. She says "controversial" things to get attention and therefore sell her column and her books - that's it. I doubt she believes most of what she says. She's a drag queen impersonating a fascist. You should treat Ann the same way you'd treat any precocious child; ignore her and she'll go away. The only thing that bothers me about Ann are the redneck focktools who don't get the joke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 13, 2007 Ann Coulter is a performance artist. She says "controversial" things to get attention and therefore sell her column and her books - that's it. I doubt she believes most of what she says. She said that Jews should convert to Christianity. Jesus said the same thing. I'm not sure what's news here, aside from the confusing reference to FedEX. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DAVID RUFFIN 2 Posted October 13, 2007 She said that Jews should convert to Christianity. Jesus said the same thing. I'm not sure what's news here, aside from the confusing reference to FedEX. LINK Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted October 13, 2007 That skeletor ###### makes me yawn every time she drops an outrageous statement like that. I'm not a Rosie O'donnel fan, but I would love to see her eat her. And I don't mean that sexually Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 14, 2007 LINK Find the Old Testament and go to the right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 14, 2007 The thing is she continues to be a key speaker at a lot of Republican events. They really need to distance themselves from hateful, bigoted people like Coulter(Rush & O'Reilly can be included too). This is just another reason why the Republican party has gone down the tubes. Having people like Coulter represent your party to the degree she does really shows how out of touch with the American people the Republican party is. I would like to see where she has been the "Key" speaker at a lot of Republican events. Has she spoken at any Republican National Conventtion like the hateful, bigoted Al Sharpton did at the DNC in 2004? http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/c...pton2004dnc.htm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,768 Posted October 14, 2007 She said that Jews should convert to Christianity. Jesus said the same thing. I'm not sure what's news here, aside from the confusing reference to FedEX. I'm sure that's Ann Coulter's line too, but you and I both know she only said this to be offensive and therefore get attention, since pissing people off is her only talent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TyCobb 0 Posted October 15, 2007 I'm sure that's Ann Coulter's line too, but you and I both know she only said this to be offensive and therefore get attention, since pissing people off is her only talent. Well, to a point I agree. I would say it's not an either/or situation, but a both/and one with Coulter. In my opinion, she says what she really believes, but she also says it so as to achieve the maximum reaction. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 15, 2007 I'm sure that's Ann Coulter's line too, but you and I both know she only said this to be offensive and therefore get attention, since pissing people off is her only talent. Since "pissing people off" is your only talent, and she has made millions doing just that I would say she is more intelligent than you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites