***Geek Club Playoff Game 2008***

[HenryChinaski 1]

So what's up with this?

 

Why hasn't someone added my name to first place?

 

[ZeroTolerance 584]

So what's up with this?

 

Why hasn't someone added my name to first place?

 

Adding now, not sure how it was left off to begin with.

[spottedowl 1]

Adding now, not sure how it was left off to begin with.

 

You also forgot about the pinning thing. I'm going to bed because I have to be at work in 5 hours. See if you can get it done by the time I return.

[HenryChinaski 1]

Standings:

 

1. Henry Chinaski - 93

2. $epphori$ - 87

3. Let Da Big Dog Eat - 86

4. MisanthropicAnthropoid - 84

5t. Me_2006 / ToledoLurch - 78

7t. Big Blue 06 / jerryskids / t.j - 73

10t. Eagles Green / varsity - 72

12. gratefulted - 71

13. Hurricane Ditka - 70

14. spottedowl - 68

15t. parrot / the card says moops - 67

17. Eviloutsider - 66

18t. Brown Eyed Girl / hellothere / Walter34 - 65

21. ZeroTolerance - 64

22t. cgod / Rattlesnake / swirvenirvin - 62

25. nzoner - 54

26. Eawer - 43

 

Chinaski is a beast.

 

Oh and how the fock did someone manage to score 43?

[jerryskids 6,805]

Chinaski is a beast.

 

Oh and how the fock did someone manage to score 43?

It's a marathon and not a sprint. Many of us saved a lot of our key players for teams likely to move on. It's called strategery. But enjoy your temporary lead.

[HenryChinaski 1]

It's a marathon and not a sprint. Many of us saved a lot of our key players for teams likely to move on. It's called strategery. But enjoy your temporary lead.

 

Temporary?

 

The only players that I lost were Santonio Holmes, Chris Cooley and both of my Kickers.

 

I see that you still have one of your kickers left, maybe he can help you with that 20 point deficit.

[ZeroTolerance 584]

You also forgot about the pinning thing. I'm going to bed because I have to be at work in 5 hours. See if you can get it done by the time I return.

If I could pin threads I would. Kind of up to the fuhrer.

[jerryskids 6,805]

Temporary?

 

The only players that I lost were Santonio Holmes, Chris Cooley and both of my Kickers.

 

I see that you still have one of your kickers left, maybe he can help you with that 20 point deficit.

Good job completely missing my point.

[cgod 0]

More like last place

[HenryChinaski 1]

Good job completely missing my point.

 

Yeah no kidding.

 

You obviously missed my point as well.

 

Both of my kickers are already eliminated - that's a good thing.

 

We both have similar players left, obviously I do understand.

[t.j 35]

Who is everyone picking in their Geek Club Playoff Game 2008 Smack Talk Fantasy League?

I was leaning towards, HenryChinaski, but he lost a lot of value for referring to himself in the third person, so I'm probably going to go jerryskids.

[ZeroTolerance 584]

2007 game's top scorers:

 

Westbrook - 44 (2 games)

New England - 43 (3)

Brady - 41 (3)

Chicago - 38 (3)

Gostkowski - 38 (3)

Manning - 36 (4)

Gould - 31 (3)

[Let Da Big Dog Eat 40]

Slow your roll here cowboys. I am fockin' scary with what I have left:

Sea D: Potential Favre meltdown. Low scoring game in the cold..... (and, I am a Pack fan but this is FF)

NYG D: Sack fest potential. TO hurting.

MJD: They gonna run it and he gets ALL GL carries. And, if Jax wins............

LT: He could explode for 4 TD's easy.

Romo: Not many picked him but, he's likely to get to a SB scoring fest.

Jennings: Will get at least one long one and play next week as well and do the same.

Brady: Enough said.

Clark: Really a WR with Marv gone. Gonna be a big factor the next 2 weeks.

 

GL to all.

[$epphori$ 118]

Brady NE

Farve GB

LT SD

Jacobs NYG

Wayne IND

Owens DAL

***Cooley WAS***

***Miller PIT***

***Bryant TB***

Brown SEA

Jags Def

***Titans Def***

 

 

Looking Good......

 

Standings:

 

1. Henry Chinaski - 93

2. $epphori$ - 87

3. Let Da Big Dog Eat - 86

4. MisanthropicAnthropoid - 84

5t. Me_2006 / ToledoLurch - 78

7t. Big Blue 06 / jerryskids / t.j - 73

10t. Eagles Green / varsity - 72

12. gratefulted - 71

13. Hurricane Ditka - 70

14. spottedowl - 68

15t. parrot / the card says moops - 67

17. Eviloutsider - 66

18t. Brown Eyed Girl / hellothere / Walter34 - 65

21. ZeroTolerance - 64

22t. cgod / Rattlesnake / swirvenirvin - 62

25. nzoner - 54

26. Eawer - 43

[t.j 35]

Slow your roll here cowboys. I am fockin' scary with what I have left:

Sea D: Potential Favre meltdown. Low scoring game in the cold..... (and, I am a Pack fan but this is FF) Hawks D plays a lot worse on the road

NYG D: Sack fest potential. TO hurting. Cowboys only gave up 1 sack in each game vs NYG

MJD: They gonna run it and he gets ALL GL carries. And, if Jax wins............ I like MJD and picked him, but I think he's done most of his damage already...

LT: He could explode for 4 TD's easy. Against the Colts? Seriously?

Romo: Not many picked him but, he's likely to get to a SB scoring fest. If NYG has a sack fest, Romo ain't goin' nowhere!

Jennings: Will get at least one long one and play next week as well and do the same. So much for that low scoring game in the cold I guess

Brady: Enough said. Picked by many

Clark: Really a WR with Marv gone. Gonna be a big factor the next 2 weeks. Apparently Marv isn't gone

 

GL to all.

 

comments inline

[jerryskids 6,805]

Yeah no kidding.

 

You obviously missed my point as well.

 

Both of my kickers are already eliminated - that's a good thing.

 

We both have similar players left, obviously I do understand.

You did well with the Jags and Seahawks defenses, and Jacobs, last week. Kudos for that. My point is that, objectively, none of them are expected to be playing after this week. I have MBIII as one of my RBs, he has 0 so far, does he suck? But if the Cowboys make it to the SB, and he blows up over that time, he will exceed Jacobs' output. Basically, you can't tell from the first week how the end game will play out. HTH

[$epphori$ 118]

doesn't matter...I am going to win it all anyhow

[t.j 35]

You did well with the Jags and Seahawks defenses, and Jacobs, last week. Kudos for that. My point is that, objectively, none of them are expected to be playing after this week. I have MBIII as one of my RBs, he has 0 so far, does he suck? But if the Cowboys make it to the SB, and he blows up over that time, he will exceed Jacobs' output. Basically, you can't tell from the first week how the end game will play out. HTH

 

That's a pretty long-winded way to say, "It's only week 1!"

[Big Blue 06 195]

Bumpers.

[HenryChinaski 1]

You did well with the Jags and Seahawks defenses, and Jacobs, last week. Kudos for that. My point is that, objectively, none of them are expected to be playing after this week. I have MBIII as one of my RBs, he has 0 so far, does he suck? But if the Cowboys make it to the SB, and he blows up over that time, he will exceed Jacobs' output. Basically, you can't tell from the first week how the end game will play out. HTH

 

It's all good.. I was just having fun, not being too serious.

[jerryskids 6,805]

That's a pretty long-winded way to say, "It's only week 1!"

Yeah, what t.j said!@#

[$epphori$ 118]

with both my kickers, Def and TE's eliminated now..Still have both WR's and RB's and Favre and Brady with 3 TD's each...I'm looking damn good.

[$epphori$ 118]

i must be in 1st place for sure

[ZeroTolerance 584]

Standings

 

1. Eviloutsider - 178 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/New York)

2. Let Da Big Dog Eat - 177 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/New York)

3. $epphori$ - 176 (Brady/Favre/Tomlinson/Jacobs)

4. ToledoLurch - 175 (Maroney/Jennings/Gates/New York)

5. Me_2006 - 173 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/New York)

6. Eagles Green - 169 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

6. varsity - 169 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

8. MisanthropicAnthropoid - 164 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/Burress)

9. gratefulted - 158 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jacobs/Green Bay)

9. the card says moops - 158 (Brady/Favre/Burress/San Diego)

11. parrot - 156 (Brady/Favre/Tomlinson/New York)

12. cogd - 155 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

12. swirvenirvin - 155 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

14. Hurricane Ditka - 154 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Tynes)

15. Walter34 - 153 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Shockey)

16. Henry Chinaski - 151 (Tomlinson/Jacobs/Moss/Lee)

16. Rattlesnake - 151 (Brady/Favre/Burress/San Diego)

18. Big Blue 06 - 148 (Favre/Brady/Tomlinson/Burress)

19. jerryskids - 147 (Favre/Tomlinson/Moss/Burress)

20. Brown Eyed Girl - 137 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Tynes)

21. hellothere - 136 (Brady/Tomlinson/Burress/Green Bay)

22. t.j - 135 (Brady/Driver/Burress/San Diego)

23. spottedowl - 134 (Favre/Tomlinson/Burress/Moss)

24. nzoner - 133 (Favre/Tomlinson/Moss/Boss)

25. Eawer - 127 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/Wayne)

26. ZeroTolerance - 123 (Brady/Tomlinson/Burress/Crosby)

[t.j 35]

Rrrgh! Driver and Burress are letting Jennings and Toomer do all the work!

[Let Da Big Dog Eat 40]

Rrrgh! Driver and Burress are letting Jennings and Toomer do all the work!

Care to give me any more crap now that you are down by 42 rookie?

[swirvenirvin 25]

Standings

 

1. Eviloutsider - 178 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/New York)

2. Let Da Big Dog Eat - 177 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/New York)

3. $epphori$ - 176 (Brady/Favre/Tomlinson/Jacobs)

4. ToledoLurch - 175 (Maroney/Jennings/Gates/New York)

5. Me_2006 - 173 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/New York)

6. Eagles Green - 169 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

6. varsity - 169 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

8. MisanthropicAnthropoid - 164 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/Burress)

9. gratefulted - 158 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jacobs/Green Bay)

9. the card says moops - 158 (Brady/Favre/Burress/San Diego)

11. parrot - 156 (Brady/Favre/Tomlinson/New York)

12. cogd - 155 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

13. Hurricane Ditka - 154 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Tynes)

14. Walter34 - 153 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Shockey)

15. swirvenirvin - 152 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

16. Henry Chinaski - 151 (Tomlinson/Jacobs/Moss/Lee)

16. Rattlesnake - 151 (Brady/Favre/Burress/San Diego)

18. Big Blue 06 - 148 (Favre/Brady/Tomlinson/Burress)

19. jerryskids - 147 (Favre/Tomlinson/Moss/Burress)

20. Brown Eyed Girl - 137 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Tynes)

21. hellothere - 136 (Brady/Tomlinson/Burress/Green Bay)

22. t.j - 135 (Brady/Driver/Burress/San Diego)

23. spottedowl - 134 (Favre/Tomlinson/Burress/Moss)

24. nzoner - 133 (Favre/Tomlinson/Moss/Boss)

25. Eawer - 127 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/Wayne)

26. ZeroTolerance - 123 (Brady/Tomlinson/Burress/Crosby)

 

 

Me and Cgod have the exact same team so something needs to be fixed

[$epphori$ 118]

 

Boith QB's and both RB's can it get any better than that

[ZeroTolerance 584]

Me and Cgod have the exact same team so something needs to be fixed

Typo under Witten in your column, corrected.

[jerryskids 6,805]

Oh good, I still have Moss and Burress left.

[t.j 35]

Care to give me any more crap now that you are down by 42 rookie?

 

Sure:

• I was right on pretty much all of my comments. Hawks defense was pathetic, 3 sacks is not a sack fest, MJD did nothing as I expected, did LT get 4 TDs? I lost count at 0, Romo sucked and now your unique QB is out, Brady is still picked by many, only ones I was wrong about were Clark and Jennings. In fact, I wasn't even wrong about Jennings if you look at my comment for him.
  
• Now you're down to 1 RB who is injured and facing a defense that just shut down FT/MJD, 1 QB that everyone has, 1 WR, and 1 D. Enjoy finishing 5th, I'm sure that will be gratifying for you.
  
• You don't know the meaning of the word "rookie"
  

[$epphori$ 118]

Standings

 

1. Eviloutsider - 178 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/New York)

2. Let Da Big Dog Eat - 177 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/New York)

3. $epphori$ - 176 (Brady/Favre/Tomlinson/Jacobs<<<<<<<<<<<<< WINNER 4 SURE

4. ToledoLurch - 175 (Maroney/Jennings/Gates/New York)

5. Me_2006 - 173 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/New York)

6. Eagles Green - 169 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

6. varsity - 169 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

8. MisanthropicAnthropoid - 164 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/Burress)

9. gratefulted - 158 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jacobs/Green Bay)

9. the card says moops - 158 (Brady/Favre/Burress/San Diego)

11. parrot - 156 (Brady/Favre/Tomlinson/New York)

12. cogd - 155 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

12. swirvenirvin - 155 (Brady/Tomlinson/Grant/Burress)

14. Hurricane Ditka - 154 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Tynes)

15. Walter34 - 153 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Shockey)

16. Henry Chinaski - 151 (Tomlinson/Jacobs/Moss/Lee)

16. Rattlesnake - 151 (Brady/Favre/Burress/San Diego)

18. Big Blue 06 - 148 (Favre/Brady/Tomlinson/Burress)

19. jerryskids - 147 (Favre/Tomlinson/Moss/Burress)

20. Brown Eyed Girl - 137 (Brady/Tomlinson/Jennings/Tynes)

21. hellothere - 136 (Brady/Tomlinson/Burress/Green Bay)

22. t.j - 135 (Brady/Driver/Burress/San Diego)

23. spottedowl - 134 (Favre/Tomlinson/Burress/Moss)

24. nzoner - 133 (Favre/Tomlinson/Moss/Boss)

25. Eawer - 127 (Tomlinson/Grant/Moss/Wayne)

26. ZeroTolerance - 123 (Brady/Tomlinson/Burress/Crosby)

[ZeroTolerance 584]

Standings:

 

1. $epphori$ - 209 (Brady, Jacobs)

2. the card says moops - 206 (Brady, Burress)

3. ToledoLurch - 203 (Maroney, New York)

4. Rattlesnake - 199 (Brady, Burress)

5. Eviloutsider - 198 (Brady, New York)

6. Let Da Big Dog Eat - 196 (Brady, New York)

7. Eagles Green - 194 (Brady, Burress)

7. varsity - 194 (Brady, Burress)

9. t.j - 190 (Brady, Burress)

10. parrot - 187 (Brady, New York)

11. Me_2006 - 185 (Moss, New York)

12. Big Blue 06 - 184 (Brady, Burress)

13. gratefulted - 182 (Brady, Jacobs)

14. MisanthropicAnthropoid - 181 (Moss, Burress)

15. cgod - 180 (Brady, Burress)

15. swirvenirvin - 180 (Brady, Burress)

17. Hurricane Ditka - 177 (Brady, Tynes)

18. jerryskids - 175 (Moss, Burress)

19. Henry Chinaski - 172 (Jacobs, Moss)

20. Walter34 - 164 (Brady, Shockey)

21. hellothere - 163 (Brady, Burress)

22. spottedowl - 162 (Burress, Moss)

23. Brown Eyed Girl - 160 (Brady, Tynes)

24. ZeroTolerance - 154 (Brady, Burress)

25. nzoner - 149 (Moss, Boss)

26. Eawer - 139 (Moss, New York)

[t.j 35]

Wow, thanks for the quick update.

 

Those in red are eliminated from 1st-place contention based on having the same lineup as someone else with more points:

 

Standings:

 

1. $epphori$ - 209 (Brady, Jacobs)

2. the card says moops - 206 (Brady, Burress)

3. ToledoLurch - 203 (Maroney, New York)

4. Rattlesnake - 199 (Brady, Burress)

5. Eviloutsider - 198 (Brady, New York)

6. Let Da Big Dog Eat - 196 (Brady, New York)

7. Eagles Green - 194 (Brady, Burress)

7. varsity - 194 (Brady, Burress)

9. t.j - 190 (Brady, Burress)

10. parrot - 187 (Brady, New York)

11. Me_2006 - 185 (Moss, New York)

12. Big Blue 06 - 184 (Brady, Burress)

13. gratefulted - 182 (Brady, Jacobs)

14. MisanthropicAnthropoid - 181 (Moss, Burress)

15. cgod - 180 (Brady, Burress)

15. swirvenirvin - 180 (Brady, Burress)

17. Hurricane Ditka - 177 (Brady, Tynes)

18. jerryskids - 175 (Moss, Burress)

19. Henry Chinaski - 172 (Jacobs, Moss)

20. Walter34 - 164 (Brady, Shockey)

21. hellothere - 163 (Brady, Burress)

22. spottedowl - 162 (Burress, Moss)

23. Brown Eyed Girl - 160 (Brady, Tynes)

24. ZeroTolerance - 154 (Brady, Burress)

25. nzoner - 149 (Moss, Boss)

26. Eawer - 139 (Moss, New York)

[Let Da Big Dog Eat 40]

Sure:

• I was right on pretty much all of my comments. Hawks defense was pathetic, 3 sacks is not a sack fest, MJD did nothing as I expected, did LT get 4 TDs? I lost count at 0, Romo sucked and now your unique QB is out, Brady is still picked by many, only ones I was wrong about were Clark and Jennings. In fact, I wasn't even wrong about Jennings if you look at my comment for him.
  
• Now you're down to 1 RB who is injured and facing a defense that just shut down FT/MJD, 1 QB that everyone has, 1 WR, and 1 D. Enjoy finishing 5th, I'm sure that will be gratifying for you.
  
• You don't know the meaning of the word "rookie"
  

Let's see, at the time you typed it you were 23 and I was 2 out of 26. You've moved up a bunch, I have dropped some but your comments were still rather ignorant given your standing at the time. It's been an odd post season which is the only reason you are even in the top half. And, my comments were about what could happen based on matchups. I was happy to have a QB who was unique and likely to make the SB. You also had LT, so what's your point there? I was wrong for picking him but you were somehow correct? I guess I was stupid for picking Brady yet you were somehow a genius for also picking him...... Jennings had the biggest day (off the top of my head) of any WR in the playoffs..........I won't research it as this means next to nothing to me. Seems far more important to you.

 

You are only in the top half because the Gmen (Burress) had a good day today. When he was not expected by anyone to even be playing today.

[t.j 35]

Let's see, at the time you typed it you were 23 and I was 2 out of 26. You've moved up a bunch, I have dropped some but your comments were still rather ignorant given your standing at the time. It's been an odd post season which is the only reason you are even in the top half. And, my comments were about what could happen based on matchups. I was happy to have a QB who was unique and likely to make the SB. You also had LT, so what's your point there? I was wrong for picking him but you were somehow correct? I guess I was stupid for picking Brady yet you were somehow a genius for also picking him...... Jennings had the biggest day (off the top of my head) of any WR in the playoffs..........I won't research it as this means next to nothing to me. Seems far more important to you.

 

You are only in the top half because the Gmen (Burress) had a good day today. When he was not expected by anyone to even be playing today.

 

Actually no, I don't have LT. And even if I did, I wouldn't have been saying something stupid like, "He could get 4 TDs easy" when he has to play the Colts and then Pats.

 

I didn't say I was a genius for picking Brady.

 

That's nice that Jennings had a big day... but you'll notice that I never said anything negative about Jennings.

 

"Big Dog", here's a helpful little recap, since you missed the point: You posted that what your team had left was "focking scary" and then post glowing reports of each guy's potential. I look at your team, find it to be not scary at all, most of your individual player comments to be highly unlikely, some downright ridiculous. So I countered them point-by-point. You see, my philosophy is that a poster's individual points should stand on their own.

I don't even care where I sit in the standings. I simply thought your initial bragging was over-the-top and senseless. I never said my own team was anything great, I simply disagreed with your player-by-player boasts on your team and I trashed them accordingly, and was proven right on the vast majority of them.

Then you proceeded call me a rookie, which, like the rest of the things you said in this thread, made no sense. It will now be satisfying to watch Burress send me ahead of you in the standings, after you missed my original point and got your panties in a bunch.

[Let Da Big Dog Eat 40]

Actually no, I don't have LT. And even if I did, I wouldn't have been saying something stupid like, "He could get 4 TDs easy" when he has to play the Colts and then Pats.

 

I didn't say I was a genius for picking Brady.

 

That's nice that Jennings had a big day... but you'll notice that I never said anything negative about Jennings.

 

"Big Dog", here's a helpful little recap, since you missed the point: You posted that what your team had left was "focking scary" and then post glowing reports of each guy's potential. I look at your team, find it to be not scary at all, most of your individual player comments to be highly unlikely, some downright ridiculous. So I countered them point-by-point. You see, my philosophy is that a poster's individual points should stand on their own.

I don't even care where I sit in the standings. I simply thought your initial bragging was over-the-top and senseless. I never said my own team was anything great, I simply disagreed with your player-by-player boasts on your team and I trashed them accordingly, and was proven right on the vast majority of them.

Then you proceeded call me a rookie, which, like the rest of the things you said in this thread, made no sense. It will now be satisfying to watch Burress send me ahead of you in the standings, after you missed my original point and got your panties in a bunch.

 

And, you miss my point entirely. Based on the status of things at the time, the matchups and the expectations, I liked my chances. That is all I said. And, you sitting 23 out of 26 you trashed me. I have been in the hunt since day 1. You on the other hand needed an injured WR from a team that no one expected to play more than one game to be in the hunt. Fock off.

[$epphori$ 118]

[Ravens 03 0]

Who won?

[$epphori$ 118]

Who won?

 

I almost have...I'll wrap it up two Sundays from now.