RLLD 4,143 Posted December 1, 2009 I am working on a bid for this property, talking it over with the wife. The twit who bought it overpaid nicely and is apparently having some trouble, has it listed for $1.2, half the asking price from two years ago. I am thinking of an offer in in 800k range..... Rink Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rusty Syringes 478 Posted December 1, 2009 Does it come with a tooth-whitening center? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,143 Posted December 1, 2009 Does it come with a tooth-whitening center? Why must you hide your love for me? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,083 Posted December 1, 2009 This begs the question... Which is more unethical? Selling a home which is overpriced? Buying a home for less than market value because the seller is in a financial pinch? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted December 1, 2009 Does the hot tub have a "poop filter?" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rusty Syringes 478 Posted December 1, 2009 Why must you hide your love for me? I'd love you more if your teef didn't look like a dehydrated person's urine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,143 Posted December 1, 2009 This begs the question... Which is more unethical? Selling a home which is overpriced? Buying a home for less than market value because the seller is in a financial pinch? Excellent question. However, let's keep in mind that "market value" is the price at which the home actually sells, so to suggest that because person A overpaid for it that person B should as well is a tough sell. The problem during the fraud of recent years being that people bought at the monthly payment, and ignored the total cost. Creating the current financial horror. I prefer to have the total cost and monthly payment coincide. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DuckStupid 40 Posted December 1, 2009 Excellent question. However, let's keep in mind that "market value" is the price at which the home actually sells, so to suggest that because person A overpaid for it that person B should as well is a tough sell. The problem during the fraud of recent years being that people bought at the monthly payment, and ignored the total cost. Creating the current financial horror. I prefer to have the total cost and monthly payment coincide. hop hop hop dance dance dance Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeshushu 51 Posted December 1, 2009 From that angle it looks like Tiger Wood's house. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RicemanX 20 Posted December 1, 2009 GODDAMNITTT!!! $850k gets you THAT?! http://www.homesforsaleinlosgatos.com/defa...=0&l=390931 THAT is what you get for 850k in the bay... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,083 Posted December 1, 2009 GODDAMNITTT!!!$850k gets you THAT?! http://www.homesforsaleinlosgatos.com/defa...=0&l=390931 THAT is what you get for 850k in the bay... Ha ha $850,000 in Northern Minny Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dolphin-g 0 Posted December 1, 2009 Ha ha $850,000 in Northern Minny Or you could get this in Westport CT FOR 30M http://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-...6880_1107764541 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bert 1,128 Posted December 1, 2009 Excellent question. However, let's keep in mind that "market value" is the price at which the home actually sells, so to suggest that because person A overpaid for it that person B should as well is a tough sell. The problem during the fraud of recent years being that people bought at the monthly payment, and ignored the total cost. Creating the current financial horror. I prefer to have the total cost and monthly payment coincide. Fred Astaire would be jealous. This property in under valued and you are a greedy POS for taking advantage of these people and not offering $1.4. People like you are destroying the economy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
buffalobillsffl2003 0 Posted December 1, 2009 850k starter home nearby. http://property.buffaloniagarahomes.com/pr...perty_type=RES# Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giants Fan 85 Posted December 2, 2009 My Mom has 5 acres just outside Tucson. It's got 2 houses, with 4 structures and a lot of trees, for being out in the desert. Mountain views. They spent like $350k building one of the houses. Entire property recently surveyed at $300k. They don't care. Means the taxes are cheap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shotsup 832 Posted December 2, 2009 My Mom has 5 acres just outside Tucson. It's got 2 houses, with 4 structures and a lot of trees, for being out in the desert. Mountain views. They spent like $350k building one of the houses. Entire property recently surveyed at $300k. They don't care. Means the taxes are cheap. Too bad she had to do black guys to get that house Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,143 Posted December 2, 2009 Fred Astaire would be jealous. This property in under valued and you are a greedy POS for taking advantage of these people and not offering $1.4. People like you are destroying the economy. Not really, though that is a precious view of the situation. As it is now well known that the real estate market was in a huge bubble, and the correction is still under way, there is a rather real potential that the value of the property could perhaps drop below even my offer, we know its not worth anything close to what is being asked for it. Assigning an accurate value to an asset is in the best interests of everyone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bert 1,128 Posted December 2, 2009 Assigning an accurate value to an asset is in the best interests of everyone. Hhhhhmmmm. Isn't what the governement does with all items in a socialist economy??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,143 Posted December 2, 2009 Hhhhhmmmm. Isn't what the governement does with all items in a socialist economy??? Yes, I think so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bert 1,128 Posted December 2, 2009 Yes, I think so. So this is what you want? Price controls? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,143 Posted December 2, 2009 So this is what you want? Price controls? I never said any such thing, left to itself the free market is rather adept at controlling costs and prices. In fact it wasn't until the government stepped in with its community reinvestment act, repealed Glass-Seagal, lowered interest rates and allowed bankruptcy reform that things truly got out of hand. The market ran rather well for decades, with small bubbles here and there, but it was not until the government took its socialist stance that things went badly. Accurate asset prices became something of a joke, with both real estate and stocks spiraling into obscene bubbles, resulting in what we have now. So again, assigning an accurate value to an asset is in the best interests of everyone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bert 1,128 Posted December 2, 2009 I never said any such thing, left to itself the free market is rather adept at controlling costs and prices. In fact it wasn't until the government stepped in with its community reinvestment act, repealed Glass-Seagal, lowered interest rates and allowed bankruptcy reform that things truly got out of hand. The market ran rather well for decades, with small bubbles here and there, but it was not until the government took its socialist stance that things went badly. Accurate asset prices became something of a joke, with both real estate and stocks spiraling into obscene bubbles, resulting in what we have now. So again, assigning an accurate value to an asset is in the best interests of everyone. Just checking. The use of the word "assigning" caused some confusion on my part. The government did so good with realestate I can't wait to see what they do with health care. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,083 Posted December 2, 2009 I never said any such thing, left to itself the free market is rather adept at controlling costs and prices. In fact it wasn't until the government stepped in with its community reinvestment act, repealed Glass-Seagal, lowered interest rates and allowed bankruptcy reform that things truly got out of hand. The market ran rather well for decades, with small bubbles here and there, but it was not until the government took its socialist stance that things went badly. Accurate asset prices became something of a joke, with both real estate and stocks spiraling into obscene bubbles, resulting in what we have now. So again, assigning an accurate value to an asset is in the best interests of everyone. Cat, I'm a kitty cat. And I dance dance dance... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,143 Posted December 2, 2009 Just checking. The use of the word "assigning" caused some confusion on my part. The government did so good with realestate I can't wait to see what they do with health care. For real estate the appraisers are integral to the process, but have been compromised as banks sought to exploit the weaknesses in the system - thanks to the government actions - in order to exploit those who were least capable of making the right decisions. It still staggers the imagination that banks continue to use every tool at their disposal to gouge the people who can least afford the financial assault, and as such are killing themselves in the process. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites