Reality 3,121 Posted October 27, 2010 Saddam's WMD Program Existed in Iraq Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MedStudent 56 Posted October 27, 2010 Saddam's WMD Program Existed in Iraq You should read the actual Wikileaks instead of that garbage. "In the summer of 2008, according to one WikiLeaked report, American troops found at least 10 rounds that tested positive for chemical agents. 'These rounds were most likely left over from the [saddam]-era regime. Based on location, these rounds may be an AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] cache. However, the rounds were all total disrepair and did not appear to have been moved for a long time.'" 10 whole rounds. Wow what a huge program they had. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted October 27, 2010 You should read the actual Wikileaks instead of that garbage. 10 whole rounds. Wow what a huge program they had. Sorry, that wasn't all that was found. A simple google search would prob help you out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 28, 2010 I'm wondering why some sniper hasn't taken this fukktard out by now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
itsbigmoni 1 Posted October 28, 2010 I'm wondering why some sniper hasn't taken this fukktard out by now. Why should he be taken out? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 28, 2010 Why should he be taken out? Illegaly releasing hundreds of thousands of pages of classified documents that put our Armed Forces and our allies in harms way. This fukktard is on par with any terrorist we are fighting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted October 28, 2010 Why should he be taken out? You have a brother in the military. Ask your brother about the missions that are run by Army Rangers: classified; often undercover - protected by intel which must remain unpublished. Ask your brother if the media published everything the military knew, and when they knew it. Ask him how effective such a military would be on counter-terrorism ops. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 28, 2010 Looks like Bigmoni cashed in his chip. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
itsbigmoni 1 Posted October 28, 2010 Looks like Bigmoni cashed in his chip. I don't get what that means. Although my brother is a marine, im glad these came out. The secretary of defense already came out and said the wikileaks release about afghanistan didn't compromise intelligence/missions in afghanistan after they were released. Aside from that, these leaks are about iraq and not afghanistan. And lastly, its mostly documents pertaining to what happened. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,367 Posted October 28, 2010 http://www.wikileaks.org/search/ That link takes you to page 1 of 39,184 pages regarding US Military operations in Iraq. Happy reading. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drizzay 719 Posted October 28, 2010 What the hell does 'wiki' mean? And why do they feel the need to put it in front of words? Focking hipsters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted October 28, 2010 I assume that if the U.S. had actually found substantial evidence of WMD's, we would have heard about it ad nauseum from the Bush Administration. I mean, half the reason his approval ratings when in the sh!tter were because people were pissed we got bogged down in Iraq war for no good reason. If there actually had been a good reason we went there (like the actual existence of WMDs), don't you think the Bush Admin would have clued us into that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 28, 2010 The secretary of defense already came out and said the wikileaks release about afghanistan didn't compromise intelligence/missions in afghanistan after they were released. http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6986173n&tag=contentMain;contentBody Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 28, 2010 I don't get what that means. Although my brother is a marine, im glad these came out. The secretary of defense already came out and said the wikileaks release about afghanistan didn't compromise intelligence/missions in afghanistan after they were released. Aside from that, these leaks are about iraq and not afghanistan. And lastly, its mostly documents pertaining to what happened. Of course you're glad, you root for the other team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
itsbigmoni 1 Posted October 28, 2010 http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6986173n&tag=contentMain;contentBody Obviously they're pissed. It shows them doing focked up things. Torture, killing people who surrendered, civilian casualties in the 100k range, etc. I know you're gonna justify this war, the collateral damage, torture, and everything else, but thats fine. Whether or not you agree with those things doesn't change the fact that the administration consistently lied. I'm glad this is out there. Obviously the media is in full blown character assassination of asange and is barely covering the content, but at least its out there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted October 29, 2010 Obviously they're pissed. It shows them doing focked up things. They are pissed cuz it puts our military lives at risk. I know that doesn't compute with you, but thems the facts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites