Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
drobeski

60% of all military deaths in afghanistan have occured on barrys watch

Recommended Posts

I never said WMDs were not part of the reason we went in. I simply pointed out it was one of many reasons. Reading comprehension, catch it!

It wasn't a lie, we had bad intel along with several other countries.

 

A lie would be promising to be out of Iraq in 18 months only to still be there...........

 

Your Messiah lied, people died.

 

Yeah, and I'm saying you're a liar. It was all about WMDs and you know that. But you don't have a problem lying, as we all know from the global warming thread and your own tendency to welch on bets. POS. :thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy with an eighth grade education thinks the conservatives are winning. Somehow I'm okay with that! :lol:

don't be so hard on yourself ....you have been refuted by facts all day.

I have a funny feeling you and mobb may be the products of either overbearing moms who's dad left early in your childhood or the whole new wacky my 2 dads generation.....which is it ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy with an eighth grade education thinks the conservatives are winning. Somehow I'm okay with that! :lol:

 

Your Hero has a degree from Harvard, and he thinks $1.7 Trillion dollar deficits and adding

more than $4 Trillion in debt so far is "Winning The Future".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy with an eighth grade education thinks the conservatives are winning. Somehow I'm okay with that! :lol:

 

Haha, I know right. If agreeing with drobeski is a good thing, I want to be bad.

 

At the same time, I can't really hate on drobeski. He just "loves are country a hole lot". :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, and I'm saying you're a liar. It was all about WMDs and you know that. But you don't have a problem lying, as we all know from the global warming thread and your own tendency to welch on bets. POS. :thumbsdown:

To have that position you have to ignore the Cease Fire Agreement and the 17 UN Resolutions. Ignoring facts to call me a liar.........crassic!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haha, I know right. If agreeing with drobeski is a good thing, I want to be bad.

 

At the same time, I can't really hate on drobeski. He just "loves are country a hole lot". :cheers:

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well its a valid question.

 

I don't know. I wasn't a protester. But maybe because we've been at war for eight years everyone just knows it is what it is and we won't be leaving anytime soon. We were already in Afghanistan, it's not like this is anything new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know. I wasn't a protester. But maybe because we've been at war for eight years everyone just knows it is what it is and we won't be leaving anytime soon. We were already in Afghanistan, it's not like this is anything new.

Libya ?

Think it might of had anything to do with the guy in the white house at the time ?

 

If not can I have some of those imagination land drugs you guys take ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Libya ?

Think it might of had anything to do with the guy in the white house at the time ?

 

If not can I have some of those imagination land drugs you guys take ?

 

if we go full blown war into libya I don't know that there won't be protests. neither do you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if we go full blown war into libya I don't know that there won't be protests. neither do you.

There were protests well before the Iraq war, during the debate about going in and the vote by Congress to approve going in. Why didn't we see protests before we went into Libya?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if we go full blown war into libya I don't know that there won't be protests. neither do you.

Do you think the protest while bush was in office had anything to do with bush being in office ?

 

Holy fock can a liberal answer a question without dancing around the issue ?

For a bunch of self proffered smarty pants ....you're all pretty stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think the protest while bush was in office had anything to do with bush being in office ?

 

Holy fock can a liberal answer a question without dancing around the issue ?

For a bunch of self proffered smarty pants ....you're all pretty stupid.

 

I said I DON'T FOCKING KNOW. I answered your question. Unlike the freaking conservatives here I don't try to put thought in peoples brains or predict a hypothetical future.

 

Also I will challenge you to a smart off anytime you'd like einstein.

 

Also I'm pretty sure I already said I initially supported the Iraqi war and I was calling the protesters a bunch of dirty hippies. Turns out they were right. I am not inside their brains so I have no idea what their motivations were but the signs said "no war for oil"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drobesker Pilot is really focking annoying. I was focking around with GH cuz he said that the libs all supported the Iraq war initially then changed their mind later. And I was saying that wasn't really true. Now we change the subject and argue hypotheticals because you found something you can glom onto and repeat it over and over. Then claim how smart you are. Retards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I said I DON'T FOCKING KNOW. I answered your question. Unlike the freaking conservatives here I don't try to put thought in peoples brains or predict a hypothetical future.

 

Also I will challenge you to a smart off anytime you'd like einstein.

 

Also I'm pretty sure I already said I initially supported the Iraqi war and I was calling the protesters a bunch of dirty hippies. Turns out they were right. I am not inside their brains so I have no idea what their motivations were but the signs said "no war for oil"

I can tell you want me by the way you yelled at me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can tell you want me by the way you yelled at me.

 

You would probably cry when I was done with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 years of the afgani war were under Bush, and only 2.5 years so far under Obama

 

That means that soldiers are dieing in Afghanistan at 3.5 times the rate under Obama than under Bush.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drobesker Pilot is really focking annoying. I was focking around with GH cuz he said that the libs all supported the Iraq war initially then changed their mind later. And I was saying that wasn't really true. Now we change the subject and argue hypotheticals because you found something you can glom onto and repeat it over and over. Then claim how smart you are. Retards.

Relax Broccoli T!ts, mine was a trick question. There was no opportunity to protest before the Libyan war since there was no debate, and Obama didn't get the Constitutionally required approval from Congress. He just started the war all by himself. No need to pay attention to that pesky Constitution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 years of the afgani war were under Bush, and only 2.5 years so far under Obama

 

That means that soldiers are dieing in Afghanistan at 3.5 times the rate under Obama than under Bush.

ROE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Relax Broccoli T!ts, mine was a trick question. There was no opportunity to protest before the Libyan war since there was no debate, and Obama didn't get the Constitutionally required approval from Congress. He just started the war all by himself. No need to pay attention to that pesky Constitution.

 

Your clever wit wasn't lost on me toothpick d1ck. I just didn't feel like acknowledging it. I don't think anyone here has been supportive of his actions in libya, so there's no argument to be had. Move along.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, and I'm saying you're a liar. It was all about WMDs and you know that. But you don't have a problem lying, as we all know from the global warming thread and your own tendency to welch on bets. POS. :thumbsdown:

 

Sounds like someone wasn't getting balanced coverage back then. I heard all kinds of reasons BEFORE we went into Iraq as to why. Many of which have been mentioned. Hell, Sodom Insane was actually paying the families of suicide bombers 25K. How in the fock can you not go after a guy who does that???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules of engagement were setup by General McCrystal.

 

And who put him into that command and why?

Also you so soon forget about 10 months ago what happened?

And since then the roe are still the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, and I'm saying you're a liar. It was all about WMDs and you know that. But you don't have a problem lying, as we all know from the global warming thread and your own tendency to welch on bets. POS. :thumbsdown:

400,000 Dead Kurds wished we would have wiped out Hussein a little quicker..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

400,000 Dead Kurds wished we would have wiped out Hussein a little quicker..

 

That was our job, why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like someone wasn't getting balanced coverage back then. I heard all kinds of reasons BEFORE we went into Iraq as to why. Many of which have been mentioned. Hell, Sodom Insane was actually paying the families of suicide bombers 25K. How in the fock can you not go after a guy who does that???

It's hard to get balanced coverage when your information universe consists of Pelosi's daily talking points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was our job, why?

Because like it or not, we are still the worlds police.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because like it or not, we are still the worlds police.

 

 

I think I'll call Darfur and Rwanda and get their opinions on that topic. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

400,000 Dead Kurds wished we would have wiped out Hussein a little quicker..

 

I agree. But that was the Bush Administration's stated reason to going to war with Iraq. The only reason the American people supported it was because the Administration convinced everyone that Saddam had WMDs and was going to use them on us or give them to the terrorists. This was completely and utterly false.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like they have phones over there :rolleyes:

:first:

 

Also, it's not they have any natural resources that we can get our greedy fingers on. :D

Except for AIDS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. But that was the Bush Administration's stated reason to going to war with Iraq. The only reason the American people supported it was because the Administration convinced everyone that Saddam had WMDs and was going to use them on us or give them to the terrorists. This was completely and utterly false.

I know that this was the easy selling point to the American public, but I still believe that their aresenal of bio weapons and their developing knowledge in how to more effeciently use them was reason enough.

 

Plus they tried to kill daddy :mad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that this was the easy selling point to the American public, but I still believe that their aresenal of bio weapons and their developing knowledge in how to more effeciently use them was reason enough.

 

Plus they tried to kill daddy :mad:

 

Plus, PLUS...I hear they have a lot of honey badgers there. :bandana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

7 years of the afgani war were under Bush, and only 2.5 years so far under Obama

 

That means that soldiers are dieing in Afghanistan at 3.5 times the rate under Obama than under Bush.

 

We finally found something Obama is good at...........getting our guys killed. :thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

threadtitle isn't Barry's fault, his response to Libya IS his fault, and was one of the most spineless, and weak gestures I thought i would ever see from a POTUS. A true embarrassment. I also don't appreciate McCain's recent cheerleading. However, at this point you are up to your armpits in it, I can see why you'd make it as politically palatable as possible. (alliteration = 3x word score)

 

 

...and circle takes the square

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are b1tching about casualties in Afghanistan on the one hand, and on the other hand you're complaing that Obama hasn't been aggressive enough in Libya. I'm beginning to think you wouldn't be satisfied no matter what course of action President Obama took. :shocking:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are b1tching about casualties in Afghanistan on the one hand, and on the other hand you're complaing that Obama hasn't been aggressive enough in Libya. I'm beginning to think you wouldn't be satisfied no matter what course of action President Obama took. :shocking:

 

Who are you refering to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are b1tching about casualties in Afghanistan on the one hand, and on the other hand you're complaing that Obama hasn't been aggressive enough in Libya. I'm beginning to think you wouldn't be satisfied no matter what course of action President Obama took. :shocking:

i think we should be the hell out of libya. Ivory Coast is getting decimated far worse. Afrika is FUBAR, let them figure it out. His weak tiptoe into the pool following the french was a dumbazz move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×