stick 2 Posted September 6, 2011 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUHlIPJTMIg&feature=player_embedded Time to take off the gloves. Ron Paul campaign kicks it into high gear and exposes Slick Rick Perry for the fraud he is. Take a look at this official campaign ad that is about to be plastered all over the airwaves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted September 6, 2011 Glad to see Paul's planning on taking the low road and beginning the smear tactics right off the bat. Of course, what else would he run on? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 313 Posted September 6, 2011 Glad to see Paul's planning on taking the low road and beginning the smear tactics right off the bat. Of course, what else would he run on? At least he's not a 50yo DJ with homosexual tendencies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,567 Posted September 6, 2011 At least he's not a 50yo DJ with homosexual tendencies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 459 Posted September 6, 2011 It may be a somewhat effective ad, but it's loaded with irony and hypocrisy. Reagan himself was a former Democrat, and Ron Paul saw fit to support him...but here is Perry - also a reformed Democrat, espousing virtually an identical message to Reagan at the time - and he is forced to attack him, as his primary opposition. He should have gone with a positive message instead, because airing this message risks alienating voters like me, who are torn between Paul and Perry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redtodd 7 Posted September 6, 2011 At least he's not a 50yo DJ with homosexual tendencies. No way he is only 50. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,567 Posted September 6, 2011 It may be a somewhat effective ad, hypocrisy. He should have gone with a positive message instead Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MedStudent 56 Posted September 6, 2011 Perry is a lot more like Reagan than Paul is but it could be an effective ad. I think Paul needs to target the main stream reaganite conservatives and this is the type of ad that could make some of them reconsider Perry. But smart people will see through the bullshiit of this ad. And did Gore really favor a tax increase during his campaign? I thought he was talking about putting excess tax money in a "lockbox" while Bush favored a tax cut. Maybe he was, i'm just too lazy to google that campaign. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MedStudent 56 Posted September 6, 2011 This is a very interesting speech. Reagan bashing corporations for excessive profits. Just shows how people can change: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJDhS4oUm0M Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,567 Posted September 6, 2011 This is a very interesting speech. Reagan bashing corporations for excessive profits. Just shows how people can change: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJDhS4oUm0M Why aren't his lips moving? RIGGED! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 313 Posted September 6, 2011 This is a very interesting speech. Reagan bashing corporations for excessive profits. Just shows how people can change: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJDhS4oUm0M If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain.” - Winston Churchill Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 313 Posted September 6, 2011 It may be a somewhat effective ad, but it's loaded with irony and hypocrisy. Reagan himself was a former Democrat, and Ron Paul saw fit to support him...but here is Perry - also a reformed Democrat, espousing virtually an identical message to Reagan at the time - and he is forced to attack him, as his primary opposition. He should have gone with a positive message instead, because airing this message risks alienating voters like me, who are torn between Paul and Perry. http://www.ronpaulwasright.net/Liberal-Rick-Perry.html If you want some pretty bashing information on Perry check out the link. I had no idea he was that slick. Romney is obvious...Perry's much better at hiding it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted September 6, 2011 At least he's not a 50yo DJ with homosexual tendencies. Or a backwoods pussie who's scared of his own shadow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MedStudent 56 Posted September 6, 2011 If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain." - Winston Churchill Churchill never said that. It's been falsely attributed to him by others. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted September 6, 2011 Churchill never said that. It's been falsely attributed to him by others. BS. BLS has an actual video of him saying it. He keeps it under his Ron Paul Fathead and his suit of armour that he puts on when he's feeling especially scared of everything. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DankNuggs 305 Posted September 6, 2011 Churchill never said that. It's been falsely attributed to him by others. Doesn't mean it isn't true... Kind of like this Warren Buffet BS fellating/pandering... "Well if Warren Buffett said it (because of political influence and potential gain) then it MUST be true..." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BudBro 117 Posted September 6, 2011 ron paul sucks. he isn't made to be president. why can't he hitch his wagon to someone who has a chance to win, like perry, and be useful as an advisor. his policies would likely be put to use if he would pick a team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MedStudent 56 Posted September 6, 2011 Doesn't mean it isn't true... Kind of like this Warren Buffet BS fellating/pandering... "Well if Warren Buffett said it (because of political influence and potential gain) then it MUST be true..." What does your mancrush on Warren Buffett have to do with an inaccurate quote? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IAMWood 6 Posted September 6, 2011 It may be a somewhat effective ad, but it's loaded with irony and hypocrisy. Reagan himself was a former Democrat, and Ron Paul saw fit to support him...but here is Perry - also a reformed Democrat, espousing virtually an identical message to Reagan at the time - and he is forced to attack him, as his primary opposition. He should have gone with a positive message instead, because airing this message risks alienating voters like me, who are torn between Paul and Perry. It's also ironic that while George Bush jr was in office, he didn't say anything about big government or spending. hmmmm.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BudBro 117 Posted September 6, 2011 Churchill never said that. It's been falsely attributed to him by others. may have been will rogers. nonetheless, when you begin to make money as a doctor, you'll change your mind when the communists want to take it away. when obamacare kicks in and you have to work twice as long for half as much, you'll change your mind. it's alright to evolve. it's the alleghory of the cave...soon you'll walk into the light. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MedStudent 56 Posted September 6, 2011 BS. BLS has an actual video of him saying it. He keeps it under his Ron Paul Fathead and his suit of armour that he puts on when he's feeling especially scared of everything. This inaccurate Churchill quote has been posted many times on here. Usually I follow up with: So, were you a liberal when you my age (25)? And the question never gets answered. Their favorite 2 conservatives, Churchill and Reagan were liberals in their mid thirties. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted September 6, 2011 Usually I follow up with: So, were you a liberal when you my age (25)? And the question never gets answered. No. But I'm just wicked smart like that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 313 Posted September 6, 2011 This inaccurate Churchill quote has been posted many times on here. Usually I follow up with: So, were you a liberal when you my age (25)? And the question never gets answered. Their favorite 2 conservatives, Churchill and Reagan were liberals in their mid thirties. I don't know that I would ever say I was a liberal, but I certainly shared the opinion of liberals from time to time. I changed soon after I got my first real paycheck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,337 Posted September 6, 2011 Glad to see Paul's planning on taking the low road and beginning the smear tactics right off the bat. Of course, what else would he run on? It seems to be the only way he can get any media attention. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 313 Posted September 6, 2011 Churchill never said that. It's been falsely attributed to him by others. Learn something new everyday. Thanks for making me dig up the truth. While the sentiment is certainly astute and wise, the saying did not originate with Churchill. In fact, that wording is a variation of, "The man who is not a socialist at twenty has no heart, but if he is still a socialist at forty he has no head?, which belongs to the former French Prime Minister Aristide Briand, who was himself a recovered socialist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,337 Posted September 6, 2011 ron paul sucks. he isn't made to be president. why can't he hitch his wagon to someone who has a chance to win, like perry, and be useful as an advisor. his policies would likely be put to use if he would pick a team. Very true. I have always wondered about that. Then again, nobody in his party seems like like him at all.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted September 6, 2011 ron paul sucks. he isn't made to be president. why can't he hitch his wagon to someone who has a chance to win, like perry, and be useful as an advisor. his policies would likely be put to use if he would pick a team. Might be the first time I've ever agreed with you. Paul should be an economic advisor for a serious candidate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,567 Posted September 7, 2011 Might be the first time I've ever agreed with you. Paul should be an economic advisor for a serious candidate. Like Obama should have been a community organizer for a serious candidate. Oh well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 540 Posted September 7, 2011 Like Obama should have been a community organizer for a serious candidate. Oh well. Obama was a serious enough candidate to win the Presidency. Paul won't even sniff a victory within his own party. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
