Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
HenryHill9323

Spy agency heads: Dem "report" "biased, inaccurate, and destructive".

Recommended Posts

 

I'm not afraid that I'll get blown up unless someone gets waterboarded. That's drobs and bunny.

Just quaking in their boots over a terrorist attack that is exceedingly unlikely to occur. It's pathetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sad? Because I believe techniques that help save lives are proven to work? I'm claustrophobic. If you put me in a box and made me believe I was going to be buried alive I would tell you what you need to know. It's human nature to find ones weakness and exploit it.

 

I've got a suggestion for terrorist not wanting to get water boarded or made to listen to bad 80's music: Don't become a terrorist! You want to fight us and kill my fellow Americans with beheadings or road side bombs while not wearing a uniform and obeying laws set by the Geneva convention, don't become a terrorist.

 

It's people like you that give them the power to do what they do. Not the other way around like you believe. Your ilk appease these barbaric ideas and promote them. That's what's sad.

 

And what's sadder is the fact that only a hundred or so of these Fawkers that you weep for were interrogated using these techniques that you deplore while they and their kind killed thousands of soldiers and many more innocent civilians that these motherfawkers hid behind in the name of religion and holy war.

 

You are such a hypocritical SOB. And those like you who sit on their high horse trying to judge those who had one job: protect and uphold the constitution in which live by.

 

I guarantee that if your wife and child were in any kind of danger you'd do everything you could within reason to ensure their safety. Given the choice of their life or deaths.

 

If you say you wouldn't, I feel sorry for your wife and child. I feel sorry for you. And I feel sorry for all of those who are as ignorant and biased as you.

 

War isn't pretty. It never has been.

I passed over this thread winner.

 

Nailed it :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No, he and you are just buying the CIA line that they need to hang guys up until they sh1t themselves so that Rahim won't come over here and blow up Grandma on her way to Sunday bingo.

 

 

Not worried about Grandma. She died in a gardening accident. The troops laying their lives on the line deserve every protection they can receive. If that means Rahim sh!ts himself so GI Jane doesn't get her t!ts blown off by a roadside bomb, so be it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just quaking in their boots over a terrorist attack that is exceedingly unlikely to occur. It's pathetic.

not as pathetic as putting the feelings of animals over the safety of our troops, but you liberals have been brain washed to hate them so not really surprising.

Dirtbags will be dirtbags.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Not worried about Grandma. She died in a gardening accident. The troops laying their lives on the line deserve every protection they can receive. If that means Rahim sh!ts himself so GI Jane doesn't get her t!ts blown off by a roadside bomb, so be it.

Another way to protect our soldiers would be not to put them in harms way for a needless war of choice you lied your way into getting.

 

And that option doesn't even require that we betray our principles.

 

Seems like a win-win to me :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just quaking in their boots over a terrorist attack that is exceedingly unlikely to occur. It's pathetic.

And your ilk are sobbing in your aprons at the thought of a terrorist having his sensibilities upset.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not as pathetic as putting the feelings of animals over the safety of our troops, but you liberals have been brain washed to hate them so not really surprising.

Dirtbags will be dirtbags.

I know you are far, far too stupid to understand this, but it is possible to be against torture and yet not for the terrorists.

 

Think about it but don't pop an aneurysm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And your ilk are sobbing in your aprons at the thought of a terrorist having his sensibilities upset.

See my response to drobs. Only the mind of a child would have this approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he's not the one buying the bogus opinion piece or bowing down to Allah.

 

Sure he is...you just buy the opinion of people who agree with you than run it out there claiming the other side lied (well, you and your buddies do that).

 

Claiming that we only use it to get information pretty much goes against things that actually happened in Iraq.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you are far, far too stupid to understand this, but it is possible to be against torture and yet not for the terrorists.

 

Think about it but don't pop an aneurysm

sure but your ilk are well know troop haters so your sympathy for the terrorists feelings is expected

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sure but your ilk are well know troop haters so your sympathy for the terrorists feelings is expected

I tell you to use your head and this is what you come up with? :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just quaking in their boots over a terrorist attack that is exceedingly unlikely to occur. It's pathetic.

What are the odds you personally will get shot by a policeman? Doesn't stop you from having an opinion, does it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure he is...you just buy the opinion of people who agree with you than run it out there claiming the other side lied (well, you and your buddies do that).

 

Claiming that we only use it to get information pretty much goes against things that actually happened in Iraq.

The lies of DiFi have been well documented. By the Rep report, past intel agency heads like Leon Panetta, the current head of the CIA, and those who implemented the program on an operational level.

 

But lil ol DiFi has a (D) after her name so you think whatever bullshit she throws out is the Gospel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the odds you personally will get shot by a policeman? Doesn't stop you from having an opinion, does it?

 

We should waterboard them regularly to see who the next one with a gripe against black people is.

 

To keep Americans safe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the odds you personally will get shot by a policeman? Doesn't stop you from having an opinion, does it?

Do you understand how that analogy does not fit? I have never nor would I ever argue that we should torture policemen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we should torture some of the people in this thread.

 

What do I win?

 

You do like it rough, don't you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not as pathetic as putting the feelings of animals over the safety of our troops, but you liberals have been brain washed to hate them so not really surprising.

Dirtbags will be dirtbags.

 

A. Who is hating the troops?

B. Who is caring about the feelings of animals over the safety of our troops?

 

You all like to make a lot of completely false claims. I guess it goes with believing everything people who torture people tell you about it.

Meanwhile, those who have actually been tortured tell you the exact opposite of whats true and you won't believe them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another way to protect our soldiers would be not to put them in harms way for a needless war of choice you lied your way into getting.

 

And that option doesn't even require that we betray our principles.

 

Seems like a win-win to me :dunno:

Did Bush lie, or did he get bad torture intel. I'm so confused. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

A. Who is hating the troops?

B. Who is caring about the feelings of animals over the safety of our troops?

 

You all like to make a lot of completely false claims. I guess it goes with believing everything people who torture people tell you about it.

Meanwhile, those who have actually been tortured tell you the exact opposite of whats true and you won't believe them.

was McCain ever a radical islamist ?

Then they don't compare

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Bush lie, or did he get bad torture intel. I'm so confused. :(

 

Seems reports are that some of the intel thru torture was bad...but there is plenty out there showing the intel we had we knew to be false but went in anyway.

You realize both of those things can be true right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Bush lie, or did he get bad torture intel. I'm so confused. :(

His handlers deliberately commissioned bad torture intel by outsourcing torture to Egypt. Sort of how they used to interrogate witches. Some to think of it those folks used water too. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

was McCain ever a radical islamist ?

Then they don't compare

 

So a radical islamist responds differently to torture than others?

 

They compare more than torture vs. drone strikes and the other pathetic attempts you have made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems reports are that some of the intel thru torture was bad...but there is plenty out there showing the intel we had we knew to be false but went in anyway.

You realize both of those things can be true right?

Who was tortured?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you understand how that analogy does not fit? I have never nor would I ever argue that we should torture policemen.

 

Flew right over your head. :lol:

 

Just because Bunny has a strong opinion on "torture" doesn't mean he thinks it will save his life per se but it may be prudent in the overall fight against terror and terrorism here in America, like 9/11.

 

Just as, because Worms has a strong opinion on police officers killing blacks, doesn't mean Worms, himself thinks it will save his life per se, but its his opinon as it may effect others in America.

 

You said:

 

Just quaking in their boots over a terrorist attack that is exceedingly unlikely to occur. It's pathetic.

 

One doesn't have to be personally "quaking in their boots" that something will personally happen to them to have an opinon if something is right or wrong or warranted. :)

 

In the Michael Brown thread don't you see how dumb it would be if I said to you "WTF are even concerned about it anyway Worms, the odds of a police officer killing you is almost nill". See how dumb that sounds?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another way to protect our soldiers would be not to put them in harms way for a needless war of choice you lied your way into getting.

 

And that option doesn't even require that we betray our principles.

 

Seems like a win-win to me :dunno:

 

 

Or the enemy can lay down their arms so we don't have fight wars against religous fanatics who are hell bent on living in the seventh century.

 

I don't want us to have to fight these wars but our enemy makes it very difficult for us not to.

 

And I don't feel bad one bit that Rahij stayed up a week listening to Tiffany so we could gather intel that might have or might not have saved the lives of our soldiers. It's the least we could do for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Or the enemy can lay down their arms so we don't have fight wars against religous fanatics who are hell bent on living in the seventh century.

 

I don't want us to have to fight these wars but our enemy makes it very difficult for us not to.

 

And I don't feel bad one bit that Rahij stayed up a week listening to Tiffany so we could gather intel that might have or might not have saved the lives of our soldiers. It's the least we could do for them.

 

Then why did we go into their country to fight them when they were not fighting us?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Then why did we go into their country to fight them when they were not fighting us?

 

 

 

We needed all of their camels.

 

Stop arguing like a twelve year old for once. We're there. And we will be for decades to come as long as they want to declare holy war and destroy our way of life. I don't see them changing anytime soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Flew right over your head. :lol:

 

Just because Bunny has a strong opinion on "torture" doesn't mean he thinks it will save his life per se but it may be prudent in the overall fight against terror and terrorism here in America, like 9/11.

 

Just as, because Worms has a strong opinion on police officers killing blacks, doesn't mean Worms, himself thinks it will save his life per se, but its his opinon as it may effect others in America.

 

You said:

 

 

One doesn't have to be personally "quaking in their boots" that something will personally happen to them to have an opinon if something is right or wrong or warranted. :)

 

In the Michael Brown thread don't you see how dumb it would be if I said to you "WTF are even concerned about it anyway Worms, the odds of a police officer killing you is almost nill". See how dumb that sounds?

I think you're having trouble following the conversation. Maybe try again when RP starts the next thread on this subject? :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Seems reports are that some of the intel thru torture was bad...but there is plenty out there showing the intel we had we knew to be false but went in anyway.

You realize both of those things can be true right?

I do realize that, thanks. It's just fun watching you guys shotgun crap to see what sticks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

We needed all of their camels.

 

Stop arguing like a twelve year old for once. We're there. And we will be for decades to come as long as they want to declare holy war and destroy our way of life. I don't see them changing anytime soon.

 

Yeah, the person claiming torturing protects the constitution is telling people to stop arguing like a 12 year old.

Sorry you can't handle that many that we have tortured had nothing to do with 9/11 are are directly pissed at us for invading their focking country over lies made by the same type of people now supporting torture. Focking ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do realize that, thanks. It's just fun watching you guys shotgun crap to see what sticks.

\

Crap...or the facts of what has happend?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×