Jump to content
NewbieJr

What if it's found that Trump did help the Russians

Recommended Posts

This is also factually inaccurate.

Hey Sho/Saints why do you think the FBI didn't tell the FISA court that the Clinton campaign funded the dossier when they were applying for the warrant?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being caught up in an espionage investigation is not a "sting." Page himself described himself as a Kremlin advisor.

He described himself as an informal advisor to the Kremlin for a G-20 energy summit. No telling if he actually was or what he did, which, by the way, was at a time when there were not the current hostilities with Russia. Page was in contact with FBI since 2013. His communications with these Russians are reputed to be part of the case against these guys. Contrary to your unfounded implication, Page wasn't accused of wrongdoing. He was essentially an undercover employee of the FBI getting the Russians to implicate themselves in crimes. He was not "caught up" in an investigation-he was actively furthering it on behalf of the FBI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Sho/Saints why do you think the FBI didn't tell the FISA court that the Clinton campaign funded the dossier when they were applying for the warrant?

Because the names of citizens are masked in FISA applications.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He described himself as an informal advisor to the Kremlin for a G-20 energy summit. No telling if he actually was or what he did, which, by the way, was at a time when there were not the current hostilities with Russia. Page was in contact with FBI since 2013. His communications with these Russians are reputed to be part of the case against these guys. Contrary to your unfounded implication, Page wasn't accused of wrongdoing. He was essentially an undercover employee of the FBI getting the Russians to implicate themselves in crimes. He was not "caught up" in an investigation-he was actively furthering it on behalf of the FBI.

I'm fine with giving him the benefit of the doubt (ok innocent guy just keeps getting caught up in counterespionage investigations I guess...), but even Donald Trump & Sean Hannity don't argue that Page was a secret FBI employee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Sho/Saints why do you think the FBI didn't tell the FISA court that the Clinton campaign funded the dossier when they were applying for the warrant?

Dont know. They stated information about it showing it wasnt political...according to Schiff who actually voted the application vs making baseless claims.

Is it legally required to say that the material may have been funded by a candidate who paid a law firm who paid a company who paid a credible investigator. Do you have something to cite that this was legally required information?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Saints and Sho are doing a world class tango on this one. You guys really think they shouldn't have disclosed that? And yes, they are bound to disclose all aspects.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Saints and Sho are doing a world class tango on this one. Carry on

You call other people trolls...yet this is your response?

Any answer to the questions I posed?

Anything to refute what sains and I stated?

 

Now that you edited...please cite where they are bound to disclose it was the Clinton campaign?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Saints and Sho are doing a world class tango on this one. You guys really think they shouldn't have disclosed that? And yes, they are bound to disclose all aspects.

You asked. Nunes' sole complaint that I can tell is that the FBI didn't specifically inform the judge it was Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You asked. Nunes' sole complaint that I can tell is that the FBI didn't specifically inform the judge it was Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Uh, yeah. Kind of an important detail. You don't think it is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You call other people trolls...yet this is your response?

Any answer to the questions I posed?

Anything to refute what sains and I stated?

 

Now that you edited...please cite where they are bound to disclose it was the Clinton campaign?

My question was why didn't they, not if they have to or not. Even though they do. But please answer the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh, yeah. Kind of an important detail. You don't think it is?

It is but names are masked. The FBI informed the FISC that the source had been hired by a political opponent of the campaign Page was working on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is but names are masked. The FBI informed the FISC that the source had been hired by a political opponent of the campaign Page was working on.

Masked to the judge approving the warrant? I don't think so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My question was why didn't they, not if they have to or not. Even though they do. But please answer the question.

Last I checked I wasnt a part of the FBI...so to answer why someone else didnt include that particular detail would be impossible.

 

Im asking if its even required...if not...and they presented credible information from the source...why would they have included it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Names of citizens and sources are masked.

The campaign isn't a citizen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last I checked I wasnt a part of the FBI...so to answer why someone else didnt include that particular detail would be impossible.

 

Im asking if its even required...if not...and they presented credible information from the source...why would they have included it?

It's required that all pertinent information be provided. I'd say this qualifies as pertinent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's required that all pertinent information be provided. I'd say this qualifies as pertinent.

And as Saints said...that it was a political opponent of Page was provided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The name of the campaign is the Hillary Clinton campaign.

That's still not a person. It's an entity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fine with giving him the benefit of the doubt (ok innocent guy just keeps getting caught up in counterespionage investigations I guess...), but even Donald Trump & Sean Hannity don't argue that Page was a secret FBI employee.

Oh, I didn't know he's been involved in multiple counterespionage investigations. It really makes no difference to the facts what Trump and Hannity are arguing, but try to color within the lines. The real reason this is important is that the FBI knew Page was their guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I didn't know he's been involved in multiple counterespionage investigations. It really makes no difference to the facts what Trump and Hannity are arguing, but try to color within the lines. The real reason this is important is that the FBI knew Page was their guy.

And how did the FBI persuade Trump to take him on as a foreign policy advisor?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump's campaign was masked, does that help?

Don't care. The fact that the Hillary campaign funded the very evidence being presented should have been the first thing brought to the attention of the judge. It wasn't. It was a footnote. Tucked away to not be noticed. On purpose. They played a game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't care. The fact that the Hillary campaign funded the very evidence being presented should have been the first thing brought to the attention of the judge. It wasn't. It was a footnote.

You know, you're right. Page should file a petition with the court. I'm sure the judges will be really angry about this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, you're right. Page should file a petition with the court. I'm sure the judges will be really angry about this.

I am right. I know a lawyer trick when I see one. A little game designed to slip a fast one by the teacher, with a little CYA at the bottom of the page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am right. I know a lawyer trick when I see one. A little game designed to slip a fast one by the teacher, with a little CYA at the bottom of the page.

Please, someone, tell the FISA court. Any time will do

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please, someone, tell the FISA court. Any time will do

It's exactly what happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And how did the FBI persuade Trump to take him on as a foreign policy advisor?

Page came in through some other Trump supporter. I am not aware of Carter Page doing anything for Trump. Is Carter Page working at the WH, writing policy papers for Trump, heading or managing some Fed agency by Trumps appointment or is he a resume padder who never really did anything? I don't know the answer, but did Page ever meet Trump?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's exactly what happened.

Yes I understand and if the FISC really feels like they will be deceived then it's just a matter of time before it revokes everything and upends the whole apple court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is also factually inaccurate.

 

Oh I thought they arrested 11 people? Did they not post on twitter? I swear they posted on twitter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Oh I thought they arrested 11 people? Did they not post on twitter? I swear they posted on twitter.

13 indictments..but there were more than that as far as number of twitter bots used.

You should try reading rather than trying to make jokes that just come off as terribly ignorant.

And even that isnt the full extent of Russian measures...just the foolish things you all keep saying to justify not caring about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 indictments..but there were more than that as far as number of twitter bots used.

You should try reading rather than trying to make jokes that just come off as terribly ignorant.

And even that isnt the full extent of Russian measures...just the foolish things you all keep saying to justify not caring about it.

 

Thank you for the correction

 

They also had 11 13 twitter trolls

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Thank you for the correction

 

They also had 11 13 twitter trolls

13 indictments of people...algorithms ran way more than 13 trolls.

Try again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 indictments of people...algorithms ran way more than 13 trolls.

Try again.

 

Okay how many twitter trolls did they have that cause Hillary to not campaign in Wisconsin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Okay how many twitter trolls did they have that cause Hillary to not campaign in Wisconsin?

Andthis is why its impossible to talk to unreasonable and dishonest people like you.

Did anyone claim this? Or that twitter alone changed the election or did I say anything about Hillary?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andthis is why its impossible to talk to unreasonable and dishonest people like you.

Did anyone claim this? Or that twitter alone changed the election or did I say anything about Hillary?

 

Dude this is a huge win for you. You where right. 13 Russian twitter trolls hacked, influenced, helped Trump, meddled in the election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Page came in through some other Trump supporter. I am not aware of Carter Page doing anything for Trump. Is Carter Page working at the WH, writing policy papers for Trump, heading or managing some Fed agency by Trumps appointment or is he a resume padder who never really did anything? I don't know the answer, but did Page ever meet Trump?

Page has said he was in a number of meetings with Trump.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/372547-carter-page-previously-said-he-has-been-in-a-number-of-meetings-with?amp&__twitter_impression=true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Dude this is a huge win for you. You where right. 13 Russian twitter trolls hacked, influenced, helped Trump, meddled in the election.

Have a link to me claiming the twitter trolls did anything else? Or that it was all that Russia did.

 

Again...this is why your not a reasonable time or honest person to discuss such a topic in this way. Pretty much justvtrolling with posts like this. Which is why you take my post and avoid what I asked you to do.

Shocking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I get the impression this guy is a bullshitter who was on the periphery of the campaign. Since he's been under the FBIs thumb since 2013 I guess we can expect all those communications between Page and the "Russians" on Trump's behalf to come out any day now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I get the impression this guy is a bullshitter who was on the periphery of the campaign. Since he's been under the FBIs thumb since 2013 I guess we can expect all those communications between Page and the "Russians" on Trump's behalf to come out any day now.

Ok that's fair. Page presents a problem for Trump supporters and critics alike. For Trump supporters he's obviously a lynchpin to Trump's claim his campaign was eavesdropped on, but he's such a weasel that they have to explain how he got hired in the first place, distance him from the campaign, and also accept that the FISA order wasn't granted until after he left the campaign. For Trump critics yes he seems like a connection to SVR/FSB but again the fact that he's such a flake that it seems hard to imagine him doing anything seriously nefarious It should be a wash, but Nunes has decided to make him the tip of the spear in vindicating Trump, which again seems like a really poor choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×