wiffleball 4,788 Posted February 20, 2018 wiff is all over the place. now an investor (aka exec producer) has enough weight to force actresses to ###### him if they want the role. Mnuchin is doing the same thing. You must be drinking and an idiot. What do you think Weinstein's title and role was compared to mnuchin? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 20, 2018 ...Porter, Sorenson...lol Do these imaginary women have first names? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 20, 2018 You must be drinking and an idiot. What do you think Weinstein's title and role was compared to mnuchin? My bad, I assumed you would understand the difference between the two, didn't realize a credit technicality would bog you down. Do you really think Mnuchin was conducting meetings with directors, screenwriters, and actors? Hanging out on set? You realize producer is a broad umbrella in Hollywood. (Brett Ratner would be the guy in Mnuchin's company that had the Weinstein role, both in production, and in raping) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,788 Posted February 20, 2018 Do these imaginary women have first names? Wow. Just, wow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 20, 2018 https://www.snopes.com/trump-eo-seize-assets/ Lol Snopes debunks it by saying the Clintons and Obama aren't among the 13 foreign nationals named? Two things wrong there skippy... 1. Several of those foreign nationals have ties to the Clintons and or Obama. So they're at risk that way. 2. Guilty of corruption....Clintons are a no brainer with the clear Pay to Play and Uranium One. Obama was in on the Uranium One scandal due to his administration buying off on it. There will be a paper/money trail. Also, he's guilty of corruption with all the illegal surveillance. Sorry I once again sh!t on your narrative. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,691 Posted February 20, 2018 "There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig Americas elections, in part because theyre so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved, - Barack Obama 2016 Michael Moore participated in anti-Trump rally allegedly organized by Russians http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/20/michael-moore-participated-in-anti-trump-rally-allegedly-organized-by-russians.html 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 420 Posted February 20, 2018 Guys, there was a 22nd indictment today. No thoughts? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,850 Posted February 20, 2018 "There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig Americas elections, in part because theyre so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved, - Barack Obama 2016 Michael Moore participated in anti-Trump rally allegedly organized by Russians http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/20/michael-moore-participated-in-anti-trump-rally-allegedly-organized-by-russians.html 'The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back' 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,271 Posted February 20, 2018 Guys, there was a 22nd indictment today. No thoughts? I think Sho's wife should lock the door to the basement and take his school issued Ipad away. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,057 Posted February 20, 2018 Guys, there was a 22nd indictment today. No thoughts? I havent had a chance to review. Looks like it was a lawyer who lied in relation to Manaforts russia dealings? More smoke, and where theres smoke... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,880 Posted February 20, 2018 I havent had a chance to review. Looks like it was a lawyer who lied in relation to Manaforts russia dealings? More smoke, and where theres smoke... ...there's the smoldering remains of a liberal coverup (or the body of a Clinton enemy) and a bunch of hysterical liberals so despondent over an election loss that they'll believe anything. IT WAS HER TURN!!!!!!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 20, 2018 Guys, there was a 22nd indictment today. No thoughts?yeah, where's the collusion ? Any thoughts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 20, 2018 I think Sho's wife should lock the door to the basement and take his school issued Ipad away. Mr adult conversation with another childish post despite claiming to ignore me. So pathetic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 20, 2018 ...there's the smoldering remains of a liberal coverup (or the body of a Clinton enemy) and a bunch of hysterical liberals so despondent over an election loss that they'll believe anything. IT WAS HER TURN!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,410 Posted February 21, 2018 oooh this is deep In reality this issue should have been over a week after it started can we turn the page already? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 420 Posted February 21, 2018 yeah, where's the collusion ? Any thoughts? None here that I see. I don't think Mueller will be filing charges based on collusion, unless it's an element of something bigger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 21, 2018 None here that I see. I don't think Mueller will be filing charges based on collusion, unless it's an element of something bigger.wait! Isn't what this whole investigation was for ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 420 Posted February 21, 2018 wait! Isn't what this whole investigation was for ?Well, no. Check Rosenstein's letter on that.https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/17/us/politics/document-Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.html?mtrref=undefined&gwh=ED3B23BB8A38A3E526008733AF3E5481&gwt=pay Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 21, 2018 Well, no. Check Rosenstein's letter on that. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/17/us/politics/document-Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.html?mtrref=undefined&gwh=ED3B23BB8A38A3E526008733AF3E5481&gwt=pay ok "Russian interference" Yay they got 13 cyber dorks, whipdeefockingdoodah! Tell me do think the goal is to get Trump on some technicality bullsh!t or to get him on collusion ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 420 Posted February 21, 2018 ok "Russian interference" Yay they got 13 cyber dorks, whipdeefockingdoodah! Tell me do think the goal is to get Trump on some technicality bullsh!t or to get him on collusion ? 1 campaign manager, 1 national political director, 1 National Security Advisor, 1 foreign policy advisor, 1 Russian oligarch, 1 former Russian Ministry Of Internal Affairs colonel, 1 attorney, 1 hacker, etc. I think the chips will fall where they will. My guess is we still have a wave indictments on hacking involving some more Russians, and a round involving obstruction maybe including Hicks, and maybe some more money laundering. The only way Trump gets fingered is as unindicted co-conspirator, in a report to Congress, or if someone testifies against him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 21, 2018 Watch the videos Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 21, 2018 1 campaign manager, 1 national political director, 1 National Security Advisor, 1 foreign policy advisor, 1 Russian oligarch, 1 former Russian Ministry Of Internal Affairs colonel, 1 attorney, 1 hacker, etc. I think the chips will fall where they will. My guess is we still have a wave indictments on hacking involving some more Russians, and a round involving obstruction maybe including Hicks, and maybe some more money laundering. The only way Trump gets fingered is as unindicted co-conspirator, in a report to Congress, or if someone testifies against him. yet only the 13 cyber dorks charged with the supposed purpose of the investigation You know Flynn case is getting thrown out, right? Tell me when did russia become the boogie man ? And why? You seem bright, but it amazes me you don't see the blatant scam right before your eyes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 420 Posted February 21, 2018 yet only the 13 cyber dorks charged with the supposed purpose of the investigation You know Flynn case is getting thrown out, right? Tell me when did russia become the boogie man ? And why? You seem bright, but it amazes me you don't see the blatant scam right before your eyes. I really don't want to argue with you, I don't enjoy that. I see the point you're making, but my feeling about it is if you're right about the FISA issue then the FISA court or Sullivan or Horowitz can address it, and if you're right about Flynn then Sullivan will throw his plea out. I am willing to give you credence, I'm just saying something has to happen, that's all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,994 Posted February 21, 2018 Where's that democrat memo? It takes this long to redact a few things? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted February 21, 2018 Guys, there was a 22nd indictment today. No thoughts? I think that you should stick to fbg with slo nuts, where you can circle jerk for another 1,000 pages with your Trump impeachment porn. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted February 21, 2018 I havent had a chance to review. Looks like it was a lawyer who lied in relation to Manaforts russia dealings? More smoke, and where theres smoke... A lawyer talked to someone in August, told the FBI it was September and now he's charged with a process crime. I don't see any smoke, especially when Manafort's supposed crimes aren't related to the Trump campaign at all. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,057 Posted February 21, 2018 1 campaign manager, 1 national political director, 1 National Security Advisor, 1 foreign policy advisor, 1 Russian oligarch, 1 former Russian Ministry Of Internal Affairs colonel, 1 attorney, 1 hacker, etc. I think the chips will fall where they will. My guess is we still have a wave indictments on hacking involving some more Russians, and a round involving obstruction maybe including Hicks, and maybe some more money laundering. The only way Trump gets fingered is as unindicted co-conspirator, in a report to Congress, or if someone testifies against him. Trump is pretty much on public record for obstruction of justice. I personally think that is the starting point but we shall see 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,850 Posted February 21, 2018 Trump is pretty much on public record for obstruction of justice. I personally think that is the starting point but we shall see Any day now, eh Comrade? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 21, 2018 Wow. Just, wow. So no first names. WJW Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 21, 2018 Guys, there was a 22nd indictment today. No thoughts? And still zero indictments related to Trump, Russia, or the 2016 election. Keep hoping and wishing! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 21, 2018 None here that I see. I don't think Mueller will be filing charges based on collusion, unless it's an element of something bigger. I know you have a rep to keep up on the unhinged board but why don't you go ahead and admit here you have been officially woke. This is a safe space. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 21, 2018 I really don't want to argue with you, I don't enjoy that. I see the point you're making, but my feeling about it is if you're right about the FISA issue then the FISA court or Sullivan or Horowitz can address it, and if you're right about Flynn then Sullivan will throw his plea out. I am willing to give you credence, I'm just saying something has to happen, that's all. Without the illegally obtained FISA you don't have an investigation. No investigation, no charges of lying to FBI and it looks as if McCabe changed 302s to make it appear people (at least Flynn) lied. That leaves Manafort and Partner but then again, no investigation, no bank crimes years before campaign. Honestly, there's no debating this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 21, 2018 I know you have a rep to keep up on the unhinged board but why don't you go ahead and admit here you have been officially woke. This is a safe space. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 21, 2018 Guys, there was a 22nd indictment today. No thoughts? https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/966121512825585664.html Check out that thread and get back to me. Greg Haig was the guy playing footsie there and guess who he has ties with....Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton. The clown show continues. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 21, 2018 CNN is so desperate (as if manipulating high school kids to push a narrative to useful idiots wasn't bad enough) they are tracking down old ladies who may have shared "Russian propaganda" on Facebook. https://twitter.com/CNN/status/966134015337140229 And people wonder why nobody trusts them. Very Fake News. Michael Moore just got put on notice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 21, 2018 CNN is so desperate (as if manipulating high school kids to push a narrative to useful idiots wasn't bad enough) they are tracking down old ladies who may have shared "Russian propaganda" on Facebook. https://twitter.com/CNN/status/966134015337140229 And people wonder why nobody trusts them. Very Fake News. Michael Moore just got put on notice. did they cover their own network going to a Russian promoted anti trump rally ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,850 Posted February 21, 2018 CNN is so desperate (as if manipulating high school kids to push a narrative to useful idiots wasn't bad enough) they are tracking down old ladies who may have shared "Russian propaganda" on Facebook. https://twitter.com/CNN/status/966134015337140229 And people wonder why nobody trusts them. Very Fake News. Michael Moore just got put on notice. They (CNN) where literally digging through trash the other day. I'm not even joking they had video of a reporting opening trash bags looking for russia. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,271 Posted February 21, 2018 They (CNN) where literally digging through trash the other day. I'm not even joking they had video of a reporting opening trash bags looking for russia. He should head up to Sarah Palin's. He can see it from her porch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
