Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Ray Lewis's Limo Driver

Barr opens investigation into spying

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

That she used an illegal server and did not follow the protocols/ laws concerning classified material. You didn't know that?  And didn't send help. 

Why didn't they decide to move forward with charges?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, drobeski said:

Trey was a special counsel? Wow learn something new every day

No. He wasn't a neutral party like the special counsel was. He was actually from the opposing party and had an ax to grind. Much much more difficult for Hillary than the special counsel was for Trump. I wonder why Hillary decided to testify. And more importantly, how did she ever manage to avoid that perjury trap we've heard so much about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Observer said:

Why didn't they decide to move forward with charges?

Loretta "Let's call it a matter" Lynch

They couldn't charge her because Obama/White House was emailing her so they knew about the illegal server the whole time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Filthy Fernadez said:

Loretta "Let's call it a matter" Lynch

They couldn't charge her because Obama/White House was emailing her so they knew about the illegal server the whole time.

is that anything like they couldn't charge him because of the doj policy of not being able to indict a sitting president? Which Mueller came right out and plainly said in his speech a couple weeks ago?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Why didn't they decide to move forward with charges?

Because Comey decided two months before the conclusion of their investigation not to? That one get by you as well? He wrote a memo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Observer said:

is that anything like they couldn't charge him because of the doj policy of not being able to indict a sitting president? Which Mueller came right out and plainly said in his speech a couple weeks ago?

He said something different to Barr/Rosenstein/others.

Did he say they would charge him if they could? Did Mueller say why he called Mifsud a Russian asset (despite him working with Western Intelligence)? Did Mueller say why he didn't investigate Hillary since she had dinner in 2016 with Mifsud? Did Mueller examine the alleged hacked DNC servers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Because Comey decided two months before the conclusion of their investigation not to? That one get by you as well? He wrote a memo. 

Comey is a republican. The same guy who decided to go public and announce that he's reopening the investigation into her emails just three weeks before the election. Probably handing Trump the presidency. That one get by you as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

He said something different to Barr/Rosenstein/others.

Did he say they would charge him if they could? Did Mueller say why he called Mifsud a Russian asset (despite him working with Western Intelligence)? Did Mueller say why he didn't investigate Hillary since she had dinner in 2016 with Mifsud? Did Mueller examine the alleged hacked DNC servers?

I really don't know what all that gibberish has to do with the fact that Mueller went into the investigation knowing he could never charge Trump with anything.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Comey is a republican. The same guy who decided to go public and announce that he's reopening the investigation into her emails just three weeks before the election. Probably handing Trump the presidency. That one get by you as well?

So all republicans love Trump? Have you not been paying attention?  Not everyone is a partisan lemming. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Observer said:

I really don't know what all that gibberish has to do with the fact that Mueller went into the investigation knowing he could never charge Trump with anything.  

Exactly. His threshold was much less than what a criminal indictment would require. And they still couldn't come up with enough for the civil (impeachment) end of things. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

You should make that your sig

It's already his religion.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, The Observer said:

No. He wasn't a neutral party like the special counsel was. He was actually from the opposing party and had an ax to grind. Much much more difficult for Hillary than the special counsel was for Trump. I wonder why Hillary decided to testify. And more importantly, how did she ever manage to avoid that perjury trap we've heard so much about?

She knew the justice department wasn't going to pursue charges no matter what crimes she committed.  

Pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain cell or more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, The Observer said:

is that anything like they couldn't charge him because of the doj policy of not being able to indict a sitting president? Which Mueller came right out and plainly said in his speech a couple weeks ago?

Did you know he corrected that ? I bet mr maddow didnt tell you that .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, drobeski said:

She knew the justice department wasn't going to pursue charges no matter what crimes she committed.  

Pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain cell or more.

Can you believe this clown is trotting out the "opposistion party" nonsense? It's like he's clueless and Ill informed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, The Observer said:

I really don't know what all that gibberish has to do with the fact that Mueller went into the investigation knowing he could never charge Trump with anything.  

Then why bother ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Can you believe this clown is trotting out the "opposistion party" nonsense? It's like he's clueless and Ill informed. 

That's not very nice. Why do you always insult the people that don't agree with you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2019-06-05 State to CEG (Security Investigation Follow-Up).pdf

Pompeo's letter to Grassley re: ACTUAL investigation by the Dept of State for Hillary's email server.

"To this point, the Department has assessed culpability to 15 individuals, some of whom were culpable in multiple security incidents. DS has issued 23 violations and 7 infractions incidents under 12 FAM 550. This number will likely change as the review progresses."

This is just to point out there were violations of not only policy but the law. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mr. Hand said:

Why do you?

I'll insult people who insult me.  That's not the same as getting all huffy because someone disagrees with you so you have to start calling them names.  I know name calling is all you know how to do, so it's excused in your case. It's your way of taking part in something. We all understand that and we let it go. I was talking about hardcore. I think there's some psychological issues he's dealing with that he becomes very insecure when someone doesn't agree with him on a subject. Probably something in his childhood. I was just trying to get to the bottom of it since he would be too proud to see a psychiatrist about it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So all republicans love Trump? Have you not been paying attention?  Not everyone is a partisan lemming. 

Yes.  The GOP has Neocon and Jacksonian Nationalist factions.  The democrats have Tammany Hall and socialist factions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, The Observer said:

I'll insult people who insult me.  That's not the same as getting all huffy because someone disagrees with you so you have to start calling them names.  I know name calling is all you know how to do, so it's excused in your case. It's your way of taking part in something. We all understand that and we let it go. I was talking about hardcore. I think there's some psychological issues he's dealing with that he becomes very insecure when someone doesn't agree with him on a subject. Probably something in his childhood. I was just trying to get to the bottom of it since he would be too proud to see a psychiatrist about it

Psych issues? I've actually been through processes that require significant psychological testing. You, on the other hand, have been banned for not being able to control yourself and need to vent in a physical manner towards your girlfriend if someone doesn't acknowledge you the way you prefer.  Who's dealing with mental issues again? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Psych issues? I've actually been through processes that require significant psychological testing. You, on the other hand, have been banned for not being able to control yourself and need to vent in a physical manner towards your girlfriend if someone doesn't acknowledge you the way you prefer.  Who's dealing with mental issues again? 

A physical manner towards my girlfriend? Lol. Another lie so you don't feel inferior to me or confused with another poster again like you were yesterday?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Psych issues? I've actually been through processes that require significant psychological testing. You, on the other hand, have been banned for not being able to control yourself and need to vent in a physical manner towards your girlfriend if someone doesn't acknowledge you the way you prefer.  Who's dealing with mental issues again? 

And by the way, that psychological testing you had was in order to be a cop. I think your past as a cop has a lot to do with your mental issues today. The badge gave you some power. You were somebody. Could mouth off to people knowing they couldn't mouth off back to you. Now you're an Uber driver and people are telling you to grab their luggage. You have gone from being somebody to literally being peoples driver. When someone simply disagrees with you on your political opinion, you right away turn to calling them clowns and ill-informed and uneducated. It's covering a rage that you have about being questioned. This didn't happen when you had your badge on. I'm sure it's an adjustment for all retired cops. Even more so for those who have to take a job in retirement to make ends meet.  I'm going to continue to offer my support and when you flip out about being disagreed with and start the name calling I'll reach out to you in sympathy, knowing that you're dealing with issues that none of us quite understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Observer said:

A physical manner towards my girlfriend? Lol. Another lie so you don't feel inferior to me or confused with another poster again like you were yesterday?

You just said the other day you and your girlfriend know that you need a physical release when you get angry and thatyou squeeze her thigh in those situations.  Are you denying that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Observer said:

And by the way, that psychological testing you had was in order to be a cop. I think your past as a cop has a lot to do with your mental issues today. The badge gave you some power. You were somebody. Could mouth off to people knowing they couldn't mouth off back to you. Now you're an Uber driver and people are telling you to grab their luggage. You have gone from being somebody to literally being peoples driver. When someone simply disagrees with you on your political opinion, you right away turn to calling them clowns and ill-informed and uneducated. It's covering a rage that you have about being questioned. This didn't happen when you had your badge on. I'm sure it's an adjustment for all retired cops. Even more so for those who have to take a job in retirement to make ends meet.  I'm going to continue to offer my support and when you flip out about being disagreed with and start the name calling I'll reach out to you in sympathy, knowing that you're dealing with issues that none of us quite understand.

The cliche store called and said you're over doing it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You just said the other day you and your girlfriend know that you need a physical release when you get angry and thatyou squeeze her thigh in those situations.  Are you denying that? 

Ahhh.  Thank God you're just being a goof and not actually lying again. You restored my faith in you.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The cliche store called and said you're over doing it. 

You're an ex-cop who literally is a walkin talkin cliche. The post's literally right themselves. You are a caricature of an ex-cop who is having trouble fitting into society without a badge to hide behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Ahhh.  Thank God you're just being a goof and not actually lying again. You restored my faith in you.  

Dodge city. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, the only way Mueller could have gotten trump on obstruction is the destroyed subpoenaed evidence. That's obvious blatant obstruction that no reasonable prosecutor would refuse to go after. 

I just dont know why Mueller didnt go down that road. Maybe it was because of that unwritten rule you cant indict a sitting president  :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You just said the other day you and your girlfriend know that you need a physical release when you get angry and thatyou squeeze her thigh in those situations.  Are you denying that? 

Anyone seen Newbie? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Anyone seen Newbie? 

I responded to that already. Are you going senile as well as your other mental ailments?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, The Observer said:

I'll insult people who insult me.  That's not the same as getting all huffy because someone disagrees with you so you have to start calling them names.  I know name calling is all you know how to do, so it's excused in your case. It's your way of taking part in something. We all understand that and we let it go. I was talking about hardcore. I think there's some psychological issues he's dealing with that he becomes very insecure when someone doesn't agree with him on a subject. Probably something in his childhood. I was just trying to get to the bottom of it since he would be too proud to see a psychiatrist about it

Newbie, the terrible things you say to people isn’t close to my postings. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, The Observer said:

I responded to that already. Are you going senile as well as your other mental ailments?  

Perfect example 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, The Observer said:

I responded to that already. Are you going senile as well as your other mental ailments?  

No you didn't. Are you denying that you said you need a physical release when you perceive a slight? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×