Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Utilit99

One year without Rush Limbaugh – 5 lessons he left us on how to handle the left

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Love how the liberals get their jollies...Happy to get rid of people who are smarter than they are. :dunno:

That doesn't make Rush Limbaugh any less fabulously dead.

:banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

That doesn't make Rush Limbaugh any less fabulously dead.

:banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:

Funny how often you lose both arguments and jobs. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

:thumbsup:

 

1. Know your enemy. Rush’s core mission was to give his listeners an ideological understanding of our political opponents on the left. The left’s handbook never, ever changes. 

2. Reject the premise. Leftist accusations and attacks are based on unstated premises: You are the problem; conservatives are the problem; America is the problem. 

3. Use your power. The left may appear invincible, but it exerts control based on a currency of deception, manipulation, corrupt bargains. The power we have is unassailable, and it is built on invisible things: Truth. Joy. Common sense. Humor. Love. Gratitude. Faith. These qualities answer to a Higher Authority, and the left has no counter to them. 

4. Have no fear. Leftists are bullies who are terrified of fearless, cheerful people – who know they’re right. Those who, like Rush, truly grasp the pathetic nature of leftism exude confidence, even glee. 

5. Stay on offense. Be relentless. Because it is has no moral foundation, the left’s "power" is ephemeral – when fought, it will deflate like a souffle, and come crashing down like the Berlin Wall. Follow Rush’s model and laugh at them every day. 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/year-without-rush-limbaugh-5-lessons-diana-allocco

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guy would sell his soul and say anything if it meant an extra point in his ratings.  Should've ran for office if he truly loved his country.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, BufordT said:

Guy would sell his soul and say anything if it meant an extra point in his ratings.  Should've ran for office if he truly loved his country.

You are incorrect on all points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BufordT said:

Guy would sell his soul and say anything if it meant an extra point in his ratings.  Should've ran for office if he truly loved his country.

What's the name of the sandy hook denier?

And yeah, no different from any other AM shock jock. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

What's the name of the sandy hook denier?

And yeah, no different from any other AM shock jock. 

Have you ever listened to him? Most people that don't like him never heard him because they are straight up liberal loons like rusty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Have you ever listened to him? Most people that don't like him never heard him because they are straught up liberal loons like rusty.

How old are you? Serious question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Have you ever listened to him? Most people that don't like him never heard him because they are straught up liberal loons like rusty.

Look up Alan Berg and Alex Jones. 

Jesus. Listen to pillow guy too? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Look up Alan Berg and Alex Jones. 

Jesus. Listen to pillow guy too? 

So no?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Have you ever listened to him? Most people that don't like him never heard him because they are straught up liberal loons like rusty.

Well, his nonsense about Sandy Hook being a hoax is cause for automatic dismissal. Even though he gets  many things right. But as they say, build 100 bridges and they call you a bridge builder. But if you suck  one cack they don’t call you a bridge builder anymore, they call you a cack sucker 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

So no?

 

Actually, yes. He's no different than Rome. He says crap that your s*** because it gets people to call in. And his producers count all the phone calls that come in and are ecstatic. It's not that f****** hard. 

 

The Law and Order Repube was a drug addict. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Look up Alan Berg and Alex Jones. 

Jesus. Listen to pillow guy too? 

Mike Lindell is a good guy. He correctly wanted the obvious fraud in the election looked into. What’s so wrong with that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Mike Lindell is a good guy. He correctly wanted the obvious fraud in the election looked into. What’s so wrong with that? 

God, you're retarded. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wiffleball said:

God, you're retarded. 

Really? You think there wasn’t a lot of fraud, or at least many “irregularities”?  Simple question. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Actually, yes. He's no different than Rome. He says crap that your s*** because it gets people to call in. And his producers count all the phone calls that come in and are ecstatic. It's not that f****** hard. 

 

The Law and Order Repube was a drug addict. 

Who's Rome? Nevermind. I don't care. 

Limbaugh was brilliant in what he said about politics over the years. You just disagreed so you hate him. 

And when did call in shows become the devil in your book? Sometimes I like hearing what the people of this country have to say.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Well, his nonsense about Sandy Hook being a hoax is cause for automatic dismissal. Even though he gets  many things right. But as they say, build 100 bridges and they call you a bridge builder. But if you suck  one cack they don’t call you a bridge builder anymore, they call you a cack sucker 

Kind of like rusty. He writes one dumb article for his high school newspaper, and for the rest of his life he calls himself a journalist. 

He thinks Steven A. Smith is a journalist. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, MDC said:

The irony is that Rush himself was a thrice divorced pill popping racist in addition to being a fat sack of shiit.

Good riddance to human garbage. :thumbsup: 

Who is Ted Kennedy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Really? You think there wasn’t a lot of fraud, or at least many “irregularities”?  Simple question. 

60 different court cases, challenges. Including those adjudicated by Trump appointees. 

 

Scoreboard? 

 

Focking retard. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Kind of like rusty. He writes one dumb article for his high school newspaper, and for the rest of his life he calls himself a journalist. 

He thinks Steven A. Smith is a journalist. 

I can't think of a simpler question than asking how old you are. You can use your fingers and toes if you're struggling with the question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

60 different court cases, challenges. Including those adjudicated by Trump appointees. 

 

Scoreboard? 

 

Focking retard. 

So that’s a no I guess. Just remember, when the evidence flows, you and your fellow liberals retort is “not enough to change the outcome”.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liberals call conservatives names and blame things on them and then say "Prove it you're not." 

Just like Russia Russia Russia. How did that turn out? How much money is spent  on these hate filled liberal games? 

They attack anyone they don't like with nothing to back it up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So that’s a no I guess. Just remember, when the evidence flows, you and your fellow liberals retort is “not enough to change the outcome”.  

I just quoted 60 different cases. Denial much? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Liberals call conservatives names and blame things on them then say "Prove it you're not." 

Just like Russia Russia Russia. How did that turn out. How much money is spent these hate filled liberal games? 

They attack anyone they don't like with nothing to back it up. 

You mean like the 7 different  congressional investigations against Hillary that went nowhere? Cost? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

I just quoted 60 different cases. Denial much? 

It ain’t over. Stand by. And you need a court to decide for you? No faith in your own eyes? Remember, not guilty is a legal designation. Innocent isn’t. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/17/2022 at 8:40 PM, wiffleball said:

60 different court cases, challenges. Including those adjudicated by Trump appointees. 

 

Scoreboard? 

 

Focking retard. 

But what about all the sworn affidavits? More than THREE HUNDRED Trumptards SWORE they saw unverifiable evidence of fraud!

That’s almost as many people who’ve seen Bigfoot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim of “no widespread fraud” says it all. If you have a clue   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The claim of “no widespread fraud” says it all. If you have a clue   

You're a widespread nimrod with a marshmallow for a brain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You're a widespread nimrod with a marshmallow for a brain.

2000 mules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

2000 mules

Ah, your family tree. 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

:thumbsup:

 

1. Know your enemy. Rush’s core mission was to give his listeners an ideological understanding of our political opponents on the left. The left’s handbook never, ever changes. 

2. Reject the premise. Leftist accusations and attacks are based on unstated premises: You are the problem; conservatives are the problem; America is the problem. 

3. Use your power. The left may appear invincible, but it exerts control based on a currency of deception, manipulation, corrupt bargains. The power we have is unassailable, and it is built on invisible things: Truth. Joy. Common sense. Humor. Love. Gratitude. Faith. These qualities answer to a Higher Authority, and the left has no counter to them. 

4. Have no fear. Leftists are bullies who are terrified of fearless, cheerful people – who know they’re right. Those who, like Rush, truly grasp the pathetic nature of leftism exude confidence, even glee. 

5. Stay on offense. Be relentless. Because it is has no moral foundation, the left’s "power" is ephemeral – when fought, it will deflate like a souffle, and come crashing down like the Berlin Wall. Follow Rush’s model and laugh at them every day. 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/year-without-rush-limbaugh-5-lessons-diana-allocco

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


 My mentor Mr. Mac, taught me to listen to both sides. Great Man. Started listening to Rush during the hearings for Reagan’s attempted impeachment. I leaned a lot. Didn’t always agree, but learned a lot about government and liberal policies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It ain’t over. Stand by. And you need a court to decide for you? No faith in your own eyes? Remember, not guilty is a legal designation. Innocent isn’t. 

You know it was Trumpers who initiated all the court cases and recounts, right? 

 

And, failed miserably. Even with Trump judges. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Looking forward to an intelligent post. But don't worry, no Rush.

Yeah, you don't have one. Great set up retard. :mellow:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, wiffleball said:

You know it was Trumpers who initiated all the court cases and recounts, right? 

 

And, failed miserably. Even with Trump judges. 

There was a recount of the fraudulent votes? Cool. That settles it. Remember : it wasn’t widespread, as if it would need to be, and, not enough for Trump to win. No harm no foul, right? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Limbaugh was an American hero. 

You liberals are failures at life and have no substance except for hatred.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×