Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
TimHauck

Horseman - Matt Walsh thinks you are trying to destroy the human race

Recommended Posts

I believe you’ve mentioned you’ve chosen not to have kids, apologies if I’m mistaken.  This is of course assuming your Hotwife works and wasn’t ordered through the mail.

What a weird take:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since I occupy so much space in your head - I think you owe me cliff notes.  The other executives in the meeting I'm in probably won't appreciate me playing the audio.  

And I don't think I've mentioned anything about kids.  

TIA and thanks for the free rent!  Good to know I haunt your thoughts no matter how small your brain.    :first:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Since I occupy so much space in your head - I think you owe me cliff notes.  The other executives in the meeting I'm in probably won't appreciate me playing the audio.  

And I don't think I've mentioned anything about kids.  

TIA and thanks for the free rent!  Good to know I haunt your thoughts no matter how small your brain.    :first:

Do you have kids?  I know you said something to the effect of calling someone poor because they had kids, so if you didn’t explicitly say that you didn’t, that statement certainly implies it.

Basically, he’s saying people who choose not to have kids are stupid and are trying to destroy the human race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's funny to see the classic GC idiot follow certain people around, call them life losers, and recycle the same insults over and over, and then when they get called out, they go with "rent free in your head".  Horsesh1t, tardcore, utilit, they all do it.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Basically, he’s saying people who choose not to have kids are stupid and are trying to destroy the human race.

What's his reasoning, I know this might be hard for you because you're not so good at coming up with your own, but see if you can ferret it out from what he says?  What's his objective evidence the couples who don't have kids will lead to destruction of the human race?  

I got the jist of the rest from the graphics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

But what does Matt Walsh say about hotwifing? :unsure: 

My guess is he would be for it since it increases the chance of the HOTWIFE getting pregnant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Horseman said:

The other executives in the meeting I'm in probably won't appreciate me playing the audio.  

Dude is in an exec meeting and can't stay away from the GC.  Life loser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shooter McGavin said:

It's funny to see the classic GC idiot follow certain people around, call them life losers, and recycle the same insults over and over, and then when they get called out, they go with "rent free in your head".  Horsesh1t, tardcore, utilit, they all do it.

The day I wake up and make a thread specifically about one of you retards will be the day I jump off a cliff.  I got a lot better things to think about and do.  You mean very little to me, zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shooter McGavin said:

It's funny to see the classic GC idiot follow certain people around, call them life losers, and recycle the same insults over and over, and then when they get called out, they go with "rent free in your head".  Horsesh1t, tardcore, utilit, they all do it.

I do? Also, I actually do occupy a lot of space in your head. Obviously.  I don’t recall pointing it out though, but thanks for confirming! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shooter McGavin said:

Dude is in an exec meeting and can't stay away from the GC.  Life loser.

It's called multitasking.  Something you are incapable of.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Horseman said:

The day I wake up and make a thread specifically about one of you retards will be the day I jump off a cliff.  I got a lot better things to think about and do.  You mean very little to me, zero.

Which is why you're sitting in an exec meeting responding to my posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Horseman said:

What's his reasoning, I know this might be hard for you because you're not so good at coming up with your own, but see if you can ferret it out from what he says?  What's his objective evidence the couples who don't have kids will lead to destruction of the human race?  

I got the jist of the rest from the graphics.

Uh, I thought it was obvious.  If more and more people choose not to have kids, then the population will continually decline.

But it’s an incredibly stupid take.  There is no shortage of people in the country.  If the human race was actually in danger, then I’m sure these people would have kids.

I was not specifically thinking of you, you were just the only poster I could think of that I thought didn’t have kids.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shooter McGavin said:

It's funny to see the classic GC idiot follow certain people around, call them life losers, and recycle the same insults over and over, and then when they get called out, they go with "rent free in your head".  Horsesh1t, tardcore, utilit, they all do it.

I mean you guys do have a bit of an obsession with horse.  I think he gets under guys like Tim's skin.  Then the other week you had Mooney following around raiders everywhere calling him MAGA.  You guys are all bizarre.   

Between Justin, Horse, and apparently Raiders, yes you guys are a bit obsessed.  You will reference them in threads that have no correlation.   Out of the blue.  The same tired nuclear war jokes in any thread you can post it in.  

Just now, Shooter McGavin said:

Dude is in an exec meeting and can't stay away from the GC.  Life loser.

See.  I mean he makes you guys so riled up.  He could say "i have a giant cack" and you guys would get bent out of shape.  He could say "i banged 2 supermodels last night" and you guys would lose your shlt.  You guys are like puppets on strings.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, listen2me 23 said:

I mean you guys do have a bit of an obsession with horse.  I think he gets under guys like Tim's skin.  Then the other week you had Mooney following around raiders everywhere calling him MAGA.  You guys are all bizarre.   

Between Justin, Horse, and apparently Raiders, yes you guys are a bit obsessed.  You will reference them in threads that have no correlation.   Out of the blue.  The same tired nuclear war jokes in any thread you can post it in.  

See.  I mean he makes you guys so riled up.  He could say "i have a giant cack" and you guys would get bent out of shape.  He could say "i banged 2 supermodels last night" and you guys would lose your shlt.  You guys are like puppets on strings.  

I think your definitions of "lose you sh1t", "puppets", and "riled up" are a little out of whack.  You're here posting about it, doesn't that make you riled up too?

Some people post here more than others, that's evident.  It's not a right v left thing.  People constantly bring my name up all the time in threads I don't even post in "Gutterpedo approves this" and sh1t like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shooter McGavin said:

I think your definitions of "lose you sh1t", "puppets", and "riled up" are a little out of whack.  You're here posting about it, doesn't that make you riled up too?

Some people post here more than others, that's evident.  It's not a right v left thing.  People constantly bring my name up all the time in threads I don't even post in "Gutterpedo approves this" and sh1t like that.

That’s me. I did that. It’s fun. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/12/2022 at 1:21 AM, Horseman said:

Selfish NOT to have kids?  WTF is wrong with some people's brain?

https://www.theworldcounts.com/challenges/planet-earth/state-of-the-planet/world-population-clock-live/story

Most scientists estimate the world can sustain about 10 billion max.   Tick tock. 

 

On 9/2/2022 at 10:21 AM, Horseman said:

My gawd you suck at this.  What made you think I have kids?  🤣  Sounds like something someone would say who's made some poor life choices.

Wait, you have kids living in that disgusting house with you?  Someone should really contact child services.

Also, not fat and intelligent enough to have a 300K job and a HOTWIFE.  Your job - ordering Tidy Cat and spell checker at FFT.  🤣

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Horseman said:

The day I wake up and make a thread specifically about one of you retards will be the day I jump off a cliff.  I got a lot better things to think about and do.  You mean very little to me, zero.

Also this is a really weird (and incorrect) post.  You are constantly making fun of posters’ wives and children, even when they weren’t being talked about previously.  So clearly you’re thinking about them.  But I guess posting in threads is fine, you just draw the line at starting threads?  You’re a weird dude. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Uh, I thought it was obvious.  If more and more people choose not to have kids, then the population will continually decline.

But it’s an incredibly stupid take.  There is no shortage of people in the country.  If the human race was actually in danger, then I’m sure these people would have kids.

I was not specifically thinking of you, you were just the only poster I could think of that I thought didn’t have kids.

Good we are in 100% agreement on this topic. 

My Link

Most scientists believe the earth's population limit is around 10B.  Until that clock starts unwinding by a large margin I'm more worried about over population not under, let alone extinction.  His take is ridiculous.

And yes, dual income with no dependents is awesome.   She makes good money with what amounts so just a couple hours each week in addition to my executive salary.  💰:doublethumbsup:💰

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Horseman said:

She makes good money with what amounts so just a couple hours each week 


I bet. :unsure: 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Also this is a really weird (and incorrect) post.  You are constantly making fun of posters’ wives and children, even when they weren’t being talked about previously.  So clearly you’re thinking about them.  But I guess posting in threads is fine, you just draw the line at starting threads?  You’re a weird dude. 

Sorry, if you can't see the difference between responding to posts attacking my wife vs. waking up / seeing a YouTube video and creating a thread about someone I don't know what to say.

Well, other than don't be a hater and worry more about your own life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Which is why you're sitting in an exec meeting responding to my posts.

Jealous?  You responded to me first, that's how forums work dumbass.  If you don't quote me you don't enter my mind at all, zero.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were up to me, I'd limit the number of kids.

2 max, required to meet financial and IQ requirements.  

IQ requirements in particular would clean up the gene pool and stop producing a country full of dummies.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Sorry, if you can't see the difference between responding to posts attacking my wife vs. waking up / seeing a YouTube video and creating a thread about someone I don't know what to say.

Well, other than don't be a hater and worry more about your own life.

So your claim is that you don’t make fun of other posters wives and children unless they make fun of your wife first? Because you and I both know that’s not true.

34 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Well, that didn't go as planned.  :lol:

You guys suck at this.

Like I said I wasn’t trying to criticize you. I was trying to criticize Walsh. Personally I think him having opinions like this should call into question some of his other opinions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

If it were up to me, I'd limit the number of kids.

2 max, required to meet financial and IQ requirements.  

IQ requirements in particular would clean up the gene pool and stop producing a country full of dummies.  

So basically you’re doing the human race a disservice by not procreating since you’re so smart, rich and goodlooking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Elon Musk pretty much thinks the same thing. He thinks everyone should be having more kids. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, limiting the number of kids sounds like government overreach to me.  And you call yourself conservative?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So basically you’re doing the human race a disservice by not procreating since you’re so smart, rich and goodlooking?

Correct.  But here is the catch.  I don't care because I wont be here.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Elon Musk pretty much thinks the same thing. He thinks everyone should be having more kids. 

I'm pretty sure the people talking about having more kids are only talking about whites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Also, limiting the number of kids sounds like government overreach to me.  And you call yourself conservative?

Ok fine.  How about we take away all incentives currently in place for having kids where the government is already involved.  No tax breaks.  More kids, more services used, pay more taxes.

Now I think about it that would go a long way solving my concerns without stating it so bluntly.  :thumbsup:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Elon Musk pretty much thinks the same thing. He thinks everyone should be having more kids. 

I think he's smarter than that.  He's got ulterior motives; he wants to colonize Mars.  World overpopulation would work greatly in his favor.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Dude only cares about himself.  Checks out.

Conversely, you having a bunch of dumb kids does the same thing.  Obviously you don't care either.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shooter McGavin said:

I'm pretty sure the people talking about having more kids are only talking about whites.

I’m not sure how I feel about that. I do consider myself liberal, but I live in LA, and the demographics have definitely changed a lot in the last 10yrs. I do like diversity, but it’s strange feeling like you’re in the minority. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Elon Musk pretty much thinks the same thing. He thinks everyone should be having more kids. 

Billy, you will inherit SpaceX, Johnny, you get Tesla, Maven you get Neuralink, Stevie because you're my least favorite, you get The Boring Company, and Patricia you get Twitter.  Any more kids/companies left?  Whew.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Ok fine.  How about we take away all incentives currently in place for having kids where the government is already involved.  No tax breaks.  More kids, more services used, pay more taxes.

Now I think about it that would go a long way solving my concerns without stating it so bluntly.  :thumbsup:

 

Ok that’s fine.  I’m not sure getting government benefits is really the reason people that receive them have kids though, so I’m not sure that will do much except increase crime.

 

7 minutes ago, Horseman said:

I think he's smarter than that.  He's got ulterior motives; he wants to colonize Mars.  World overpopulation would work greatly in his favor.  

I’d agree with that.  Just like his claim of “wanting transparency” is really just about getting more eyeballs on twitter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

I'm pretty sure the people talking about having more kids are only talking about whites.

Oh, look at Mr woke here. Too funny. It’s not racist when he says it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×