Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
GutterBoy

Republican from Texas anti-drag bill author dresses in drag

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Is the Left officially starting the "DeSantis is more Trumpier than Trump$#@!" campaign?

It’s been that way since Nixon. The leftist media will paint the next guy worse than the last guaranteed. These same people all endorsed Mondale over Regan. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just want to remind everyone how stupid the original post is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, RLLD said:

It is a difference without a distinction.

Pretending one is worse or better  is a flawed approach.  In EVERY instance where it arises we need to meet it, stand up to it, protect people from the government and the mob.

Nonsense. Government censorship is drastically worse than people shunning others. Look at Russia or North Korea or China as examples. I’m not sure why you’re doubling down on this.

Canceling Scott Adams for saying blatantly racist things is a great thing. People are saying: “we don’t want this racist person’s work in our newspapers.” Do you want to force newspapers to carry offensive writings by anybody who wants to be heard? Sorry, that’s now how it works. They have editorial control. See also: the first amendment.

If you really believe that government censorship and somebody losing a job for posting a racist rant are the same? You’re just being silly, and there’s nothing left to discuss. Try reading a bit of history and maybe you’ll come to a different conclusion on this topic,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dogcows said:

Nonsense. Government censorship is drastically worse than people shunning others. Look at Russia or North Korea or China as examples. I’m not sure why you’re doubling down on this.

Canceling Scott Adams for saying blatantly racist things is a great thing. People are saying: “we don’t want this racist person’s work in our newspapers.” Do you want to force newspapers to carry offensive writings by anybody who wants to be heard? Sorry, that’s now how it works. They have editorial control. See also: the first amendment.

If you really believe that government censorship and somebody losing a job for posting a racist rant are the same? You’re just being silly, and there’s nothing left to discuss. Try reading a bit of history and maybe you’ll come to a different conclusion on this topic,

Utter excrement.....silencing people is wrong, whether government sanctioned or mob-allowed.

I will stand up for this. It is wrong when government does it.  It is wrong when your cult of liberalism does it. Allowing YOUR little religion the space to do it might seem just fine, right now.  But what if the world were to swing a bit? What if it became true that conservatism became the en vogue cult and dominated society and silenced YOUR people and THEIR views....guess what, that would still.....focking....be....wrong..... because it is not WHO does it.....it is that it happens....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RLLD said:

Utter excrement.....silencing people is wrong, whether government sanctioned or mob-allowed.

I will stand up for this. It is wrong when government does it.  It is wrong when your cult of liberalism does it. Allowing YOUR little religion the space to do it might seem just fine, right now.  But what if the world were to swing a bit? What if it became true that conservatism became the en vogue cult and dominated society and silenced YOUR people and THEIR views....guess what, that would still.....focking....be....wrong..... because it is not WHO does it.....it is that it happens....

Nope, we’re done. If you cannot understand why government censorship is different, then you are just whining because your ideas are unpopular and no website or newspaper wants to carry them. Deal with it, and stop being a ❄️.

Again, conservatives are NOT being censored. Losing a job for calling black people a hate group is not censorship. It is a consequence for bad behavior.

Bye, Felicia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are some still in denial that the FBI wasn’t steering the censorship on Twitter? For the dimwits amongst us, the FBI is the government. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dogcows said:

Nope, we’re done. If you cannot understand why government censorship is different, then you are just whining because your ideas are unpopular and no website or newspaper wants to carry them. Deal with it, and stop being a ❄️.

Again, conservatives are NOT being censored. Losing a job for calling black people a hate group is not censorship. It is a consequence for bad behavior.

Bye, Felicia.

I accept your surrender, you would allow censorship where it suits you, because you lack the stamina to be honest and decent. You represent the worst part of us in that you accept evil where it serves you, and attack it where it does not.....eventually, the evil will consume you in that model. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another Magatard calls for the genocide of trans folk, yet poses with drag queen.

 

 

 

 

 

You can't make this stuff up.  Every one of these clowns is closeted, most people here too.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×