Jump to content
HellToupee

Father Trump Talk-the Boss is a true Alpha Chad🚨Donald is the only man who can save the world 🚨 You’re a sick SOB gutter , a sick SOB. It’s the truth , a sick SOB

Recommended Posts

47 states have a sore loser law or simultaneous registration for the primary and general, prohibiting a candidate from running as an independent after losing in the primary. The constitutionality of these restrictions is in question. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

American Samoa is too close to call.

:banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

American Samoa is too close to call.

:banana:

Biden lost to Powers in American Samoa, so suck it boyo! :lol: 

Also, I've been vindicated by Hardcore T's post above regarding primary sore loser rules, you b!tch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gepetto said:

Biden lost to Powers in American Samoa, so suck it boyo! :lol: 

Also, I've been vindicated by Hardcore T's post above regarding primary sore loser rules, you b!tch.

Oh, so you're going to take his word for it. No links. No facts.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

Oh, so you're going to take his word for it. No links. No facts.

🤣

Let's talk about Biden votes, or lack of votes, in American Samoa, boyo!   Bwahahahaha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gepetto said:

Let's talk about Biden votes, or lack of votes, in American Samoa, boyo!   Bwahahahaha

My joke was that American Samoa lacked political significance, and now you're all in with the American Samoa vote.

Consult your boyo HT on facts. Great idea.

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

HALEY WINS VERMONT!

:banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana::banana:

Where they let registered Democrats vote for her and keep their Democratic party designation, Bernie's state. That's just more proof she's more like Biden than Trump. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

Where they let registered Democrats vote for her and keep their Democratic party designation, Bernie's state. That's just more proof she's more like Biden than Trump. 

John Anderson was on the general-election ballot everywhere, and he took part in the primaries.

How do you explain this, boyo?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_United_States_presidential_election

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

John Anderson was on the general-election ballot everywhere, and he took part in the primaries.

How do you explain this, boyo?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_United_States_presidential_election

That was 1980. In your world nothing changes. The sore loser rules exist. If they are legit is up for debate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

John Anderson was on the general-election ballot everywhere, and he took part in the primaries.

How do you explain this, boyo?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_United_States_presidential_election

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries

Why did you quote my post about Vermont Dems voting in the Republican primary with links having nothing to do with that? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gepetto said:

Why did you quote my post about Vermont Dems voting in the Republican primary with links having nothing to do with that? 

I'm still waiting for you to produce a link to any information regarding a primary candidate not being able to run in the general election as an independent.

My trumpeting of the Haley victory in Vermont is a good, as is my American Samoa goof. 

But, you take HT's word for it that a primary candidate can't run in the general election as an independent.

Looking forward to seeing that proof, boyo.

:cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gepetto said:

1980 General Election 

Electoral college vote results 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ElectoralCollege1980.svg

That's a beautiful map of RED!

It shows John Anderson ran in the general election, in addition to the link I provided showing that he ran in the primaries.

Waiting ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I'm still waiting for you to produce a link to any information regarding a primary candidate not being able to run in the general election as an independent.

My trumpeting of the Haley victory in Vermont is a good, as is my American Samoa goof. 

But, you take HT's word for it that a primary candidate can't run in the general election as an independent.

Looking forward to seeing that proof, boyo.

:cheers:

They said it on the focking news, I told you.

Talking about the Republican party in 2024.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

It shows John Anderson ran in the general election, in addition to the link I provided showing that he ran in the primaries.

Waiting ...

That was Dems and that was 1980. Try again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

They said it on the focking news, I told you.Talking about the Republican party in 2024.

Link to this "news." Source yo' sh!t.

I don't see anything that indicates what you and HT are claiming.

All day long posters hear beyatch about the weak-minded falling for fake news.

I posted an actual example of a dude who lost in the primaries and ran in the general election.

Show me an actual law that says they can't do this anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Link to this "news." Source yo' sh!t.

I don't see anything that indicates what you and HT are claiming.

All day long posters hear beyatch about the weak-minded falling for fake news.

I posted an actual example of a dude who lost in the primaries and ran in the general election.

Show me an actual law that says they can't do this anymore.

You can just put sore loser law in your google. Get back to us after you do. I’ll go ahead and give you the L now though. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You can just put sore loser law in your google. Get back to us after you do. I’ll go ahead and give you the L now though. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sore_loser_law

Quote

 

... in most states these laws do not apply to presidential candidates.[4]

🤣

How do my sh!t peanuts taste?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sore_loser_law

🤣

How do my sh!t peanuts taste?

You Fockin idiot. It clearly says that’s one guys opinion.  You lose dumbass. The laws Gepetto spoke about exist, and like I said, they are in question. But thanks for the link showing how wrong you are and how right I am. I love when that happens. L. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

You Fockin idiot. It clearly says that’s one guys opinion.  You lose dumbass. The laws Gepetto spoke about exist, and like I said, they are in question. But thanks for the link showing his wrong you are and how right I am. I love when that happens. L. 

These so-called "sore loser" laws are obscure, squishy legislations that are in question, and this is the best you two clowns can come up with, particularly after the Supreme Court's recent unanimous vote?

I'm dying here.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gepetto said:

That is according to the opinion of one person.

You're basing your opinion on HT and a "news" source you refuse to link.

BUT THAT'S WERT THEY WERES SAYING ON DER NERWS!

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

These so-called "sore loser" laws are obscure, squishy legislations that are in question, and this is the best you two clowns can come up with, particularly after the Supreme Court's recent unanimous vote?

I'm dying here.

🤣

L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You're basing your opinion on HT and a "news" source you refuse to link.

BUT THAT'S WERT THEY WERES SAYING ON DER NERWS!

🤣

He’s basing it on the link you provided. Thank you.  L. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You're basing your opinion on HT and a "news" source you refuse to link.

BUT THAT'S WERT THEY WERES SAYING ON DER NERWS!

🤣

Hey focker , get out of this thread and go to the  serious pissboy thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PIMPADEAUX WINS AGAIN!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dang Pimp owning the cultist ITT like cultist are always owned.  With facts and logic.

Cultist have nothing but their feelz and their complete servitude to their orange moron master. 

Cucks

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, HellToupee said:

Hey focker , get out of this thread and go to the  serious pissboy thread

I put him on ignore a few weeks ago so the last couple pages have been less cluttered with his garbage.  Only geek on ignore.  
 

Thanks for being the bouncer.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

I put him on ignore a few weeks ago so the last couple pages have been less cluttered with his garbage.  Only geek on ignore.  
 

Thanks for being the bouncer.  

Putting someone on ignore is a sign of defeat boyo.

I don't even have League Loser or Seatard on ignore.  And together they make up half the posts in this forum.  Each post stupider than the last. 

You cultist run and hide behind your master's fat orange ass.  We libs will continue to speak facts over feelz cause we ain't cucks boyo.

Get yourself together friend. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Putting someone on ignore is a sign of defeat boyo.

I don't even have League Loser or Seatard on ignore.  And together they make up half the posts in this forum.  Each post stupider than the last. 

You cultist run and hide behind your master's fat orange ass.  We libs will continue to speak facts over feelz cause we ain't cucks boyo.

Get yourself together friend. 

pimledoosh being pimpledoosh....:dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ron_Artest said:

 

So basically your typical cultist.  Low IQ, uneducated, and driven by nothing but feelz.

SAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

put him on ignore a few weeks ago so the last couple pages have been less cluttered with his garbage.  Only geek on ignore.  
 

That’s a really good idea 👍 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, HellToupee said:

That’s a really good idea 👍 

Admitting defeat eh boyo.

SAD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×