*EDIT* Going to be 56/52/53 this weekend - June 3/4/5 *GLOBAL WARMIING IN FULL EFFECT*

[seafoam1 2,805]

23 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

You are free to not read the narrative, look at charts and articles, and decide for yourself too.   Most of the time when people use the nebulous "they", it's in reference to their political opponents, the media, etc..   

We used to at least have some respect for people who are experts in their field and turn to them for information.  Now everybody is an expert online and instead of listening to climatologists, virologists, and the like we are turning to random Tweets and politicians.   Or are you referring to a different "they"?  

Charts and articles. 

Fauci!!!!  What an idiot follower.

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

35 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

You are free to not read the narrative, look at charts and articles, and decide for yourself too.   Most of the time when people use the nebulous "they", it's in reference to their political opponents, the media, etc..   

We used to at least have some respect for people who are experts in their field and turn to them for information.  Now everybody is an expert online and instead of listening to climatologists, virologists, and the like we are turning to random Tweets and politicians.   Or are you referring to a different "they"?  

When they as in the climate scientists learned how to monetize it it all became a game of scare tactics. I guarantee nothing catastrophic is going to happen in my lifetime or my sons. Yet the opposite continually tells us it’s too late if we don’t act now. Solar power scams, wind scams, oil is horrible, fracking is the devil. It’s all the same. Let’s sign a pact that says we reduce our carbon(l (something we are already regulating) but do t make china or India do it.  Allow them to continue polluting. If it’s so catastrophic then do something about that.  Meanwhile all the politicians and scientists enjoy their beachfront properties while we struggle to get a tank of gas. F them all

[BuckSwope 654]

7 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

When they as in the climate scientists learned how to monetize it it all became a game of scare tactics. I guarantee nothing catastrophic is going to happen in my lifetime or my sons. Yet the opposite continually tells us it’s too late if we don’t act now. Solar power scams, wind scams, oil is horrible, fracking is the devil. It’s all the same. Let’s sign a pact that says we reduce our carbon(l (something we are already regulating) but do t make china or India do it.  Allow them to continue polluting. If it’s so catastrophic then do something about that.  Meanwhile all the politicians and scientists enjoy their beachfront properties while we struggle to get a tank of gas. F them all

There is for sure a disconnect here.   

I am not talking about scientists and doctors people like Fauci or the people doing the talk show circuit.   That is the problem - people do what you are doing and talk as though the 1000s of scientists in the field are doing what you describe.   Most are going about their business, doing research, publishing papers, etc.     There is actual data and science going on, then there is the b.s that you are describing.   IMO posts like yours are dangerous because they encourage people to not even bother looking.   People need to spend more time reading actual articles and data and not waiting until the couple scientists show up on Fox/CNN or social media to tell them what's going on.  

[BuckSwope 654]

7 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

Charts and articles. 

Fauci!!!!  What an idiot follower.

 

Yes, I am advocating for looking at actual data and thinking for yourself.    

I mispoke when I said article - that should have been reasearch paper or the like.   I'm not talking about articles in Time or in the news.  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

1 hour ago, BuckSwope said:

There is for sure a disconnect here.   

I am not talking about scientists and doctors people like Fauci or the people doing the talk show circuit.   That is the problem - people do what you are doing and talk as though the 1000s of scientists in the field are doing what you describe.   Most are going about their business, doing research, publishing papers, etc.     There is actual data and science going on, then there is the b.s that you are describing.   IMO posts like yours are dangerous because they encourage people to not even bother looking.   People need to spend more time reading actual articles and data and not waiting until the couple scientists show up on Fox/CNN or social media to tell them what's going on.  

I do agree with the data that things are happening and I do read it

what I don’t believe or agree with is the doomsday or the solutions 

example

i believe climate changes

i believe mankind has possible had an affect on that

i don’t believe the world is gonna end because of it

i don’t believe the solution is throwing tons of money at it

the bottom two make me a climate denier

f that like I said you can show me all the data in the world but if your solution is one thing but don’t apply that solution to china and India F off 

 

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

 

[BuckSwope 654]

20 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I do agree with the data that things are happening and I do read it

what I don’t believe or agree with is the doomsday or the solutions 

example

i believe climate changes

i believe mankind has possible had an affect on that

i don’t believe the world is gonna end because of it

i don’t believe the solution is throwing tons of money at it

the bottom two make me a climate denier

f that like I said you can show me all the data in the world but if your solution is one thing but don’t apply that solution to china and India F off 

 

Which has nothing to do with science, facts, and such.   Most of the "solutions" are from politics, but posts like yours and the other this am imo are dangerous because they drum that anti-science beat a bit too much. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

10 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Which has nothing to do with science, facts, and such.   Most of the "solutions" are from politics, but posts like yours and the other this am imo are dangerous because they drum that anti-science beat a bit too much. 

cmon man, dont get into that words are dangerous, what people say on message boards affect nothing

like I said, I have never once seen a main stream report about the positive affects of CO2 on plant life and food production, I never have seen a discussion on the greening of the planet

 

[BuckSwope 654]

7 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

cmon man, dont get into that words are dangerous, what people say on message boards affect nothing

like I said, I have never once seen a main stream report about the positive affects of CO2 on plant life and food production, I never have seen a discussion on the greening of the planet

 

Completely disagree when I see those attitudes IRL.   This isn't just here, there is a big shift away from science, data, and facts.  I see attitudes like yours with "all the scientists are getting rich" nonsense all the time.  As though Al Gore and the annoying Nordic teen are representative of climate scientists or something.  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

19 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Completely disagree when I see those attitudes IRL.   This isn't just here, there is a big shift away from science, data, and facts.  I see attitudes like yours with "all the scientists are getting rich" nonsense all the time.  As though Al Gore and the annoying Nordic teen are representative of climate scientists or something.  

when thats who they choose to promote consider them part of the problem

 

[seafoam1 2,805]

22 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Completely disagree when I see those attitudes IRL.   This isn't just here, there is a big shift away from science, data, and facts.  I see attitudes like yours with "all the scientists are getting rich" nonsense all the time.  As though Al Gore and the annoying Nordic teen are representative of climate scientists or something.  

What about all the liberal science data and facts about global cooling 40 years ago? 

[BuckSwope 654]

2 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

when thats who they choose to promote consider them part of the problem

 

They get together and vote in this?  Virologists appointed Fauci? Come on man.   

Sorry, this is a stink that is around the right currently- coming off as anti-science.  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

Just now, BuckSwope said:

They get together and vote in this?  Virologists appointed Fauci? Come on man.   

Sorry, this is a stink that is around the right currently- coming off as anti-science.  

irrelevant, my point is when you put someone like the black lesbian (its important cause shes a black lesbian) as a press secretary, thats where the words come from, when that person is untrustworthy, everything they say makes it harder to sell

 

[BuckSwope 654]

1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

irrelevant, my point is when you put someone like the black lesbian (its important cause shes a black lesbian) as a press secretary, thats where the words come from, when that person is untrustworthy, everything they say makes it harder to sell

 

What the hell does this havee to do with me telling people to look at things themselves?  I am actively telling you NOT to listen to the person you are talking about.  Why would you turn to a press secretary for science info on an issue? 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

1 minute ago, BuckSwope said:

What the hell does this havee to do with me telling people to look at things themselves?  I am actively telling you NOT to listen to the person you are talking about.  Why would you turn to a press secretary for science info on an issue? 

I am making a generalized statement, when you put forth a "speaker or representative" aka Al Gore, it ruins everything that comes after that

most people cant understand the data, so you can't tell people to look at things themselves.  Then the division comes cause leftist starts yelling climate change world ending sky falling blah blah, and the right is like oh jeez this again??? can you just stfu with your nonsense

 

[BuckSwope 654]

34 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

What about all the liberal science data and facts about global cooling 40 years ago? 

"Liberal science".  Lol. 

Thanks for proving my point. 

[BuckSwope 654]

26 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I am making a generalized statement, when you put forth a "speaker or representative" aka Al Gore, it ruins everything that comes after that

most people cant understand the data, so you can't tell people to look at things themselves.  Then the division comes cause leftist starts yelling climate change world ending sky falling blah blah, and the right is like oh jeez this again??? can you just stfu with your nonsense

 

People can't understand temperatures and simple charts?   Come on, man. 

 

[seafoam1 2,805]

36 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

"Liberal science".  Lol. 

Thanks for proving my point. 

Yeah. It's all based on feelers. They are wrong. Just like they were 40 years ago. "The earth will turn into a vast frozen desert."

[Cdub100 3,843]

On 5/30/2023 at 11:59 AM, edjr said:

Is Friday really the weekend?  Sat/Sun/Mon  58/55/60  01930

Friday Saturday Sunday is the weekend. Even though Sunday is the start of the week on the Western calendar you focking rahtard

[seafoam1 2,805]

5 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Friday Saturday Sunday is the weekend. Even though Sunday is the start of the week on the Western calendar you focking rahtard

Just say it. He's a retard. 

[Cdub100 3,843]

2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Just say it. He's a retard. 

Trying to emphasis RAHtard

[edjr 6,578]

teed off at 3 it was 85. it is like 60 and raining now. 

[seafoam1 2,805]

Just now, edjr said:

teed off at 3 it was 85. it is like 60 and raining now. 

Global Cooling!!!! 

[Thornton Melon 607]

17 hours ago, Cdub100 said:

Trying to emphasis RAHtard

No, it's ReTAHD

[Cdub100 3,843]

1 hour ago, Thornton Melon said:

No, it's ReTAHD

Don't be a Rahtard

[edjr 6,578]

1 hour ago, Thornton Melon said:

No, it's ReTAHD

This man is correct. ReTAHDID

[Reality 3,104]

 

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

These are insane people and shouldn’t be near our children.

 

[edjr 6,578]

Record cold of 51 expected today.

Breaking the record from 1891, our last global warming event

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

1 minute ago, edjr said:

Record cold of 51 expected today.

Breaking the record from 1891, our last global warming event

Just think ed, if we didn’t pump all that extra CO2 into the atmosphere, we could be experiencing another ice age

[edjr 6,578]

Just now, Dizkneelande said:

Just think ed, if we didn’t pump all that extra CO2 into the atmosphere, we could be experiencing another ice age

[Thornton Melon 607]

Wife and I stayed at her cousin's beach house last week. Friday was low 80s, nice beach day, light breeze, water was cold but not unbearable. Saturday was 30+ degrees colder, windy, and felt like November.

A guy at work today told me a friend of his went golfing in Vermont on Friday. It was 92 degrees. On Saturday, it snowed.

[edjr 6,578]

41 minutes ago, Thornton Melon said:

Wife and I stayed at her cousin's beach house last week. Friday was low 80s, nice beach day, light breeze, water was cold but not unbearable. Saturday was 30+ degrees colder, windy, and felt like November.

A guy at work today told me a friend of his went golfing in Vermont on Friday. It was 92 degrees. On Saturday, it snowed.

feels like it should be snowing right now

[seafoam1 2,805]

64 degrees and beautiful in June on the east coast. This global warming climate crisis is really taking it's toll on me. 

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

 

[edjr 6,578]

Did I mention I was going to Orlando for a week on june 14 and 95 will be the lowest it hits in 7 days... Karma

[Dizkneelande 1,086]

3 minutes ago, edjr said:

Did I mention I was going to Orlando for a week on june 14 and 95 will be the lowest it hits in 7 days... Karma

I’m going to ft worth then just looked says 103

[edjr 6,578]

27 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

I’m going to ft worth then just looked says 103

I am not even bringing my clubs. I aint golfing in that. Pool, lazy river and cocktails

[Reality 3,104]

I don't have time to worry about this, I'm still trying to get over dieing from net neutrality.

[edjr 6,578]

6 minutes ago, Reality said:

I don't have time to worry about this, I'm still trying to get over dieing from net neutrality.