All Political people are double minded

[weepaws 2,517]

RFK Jr walks back support for full-term abortion.   

Anything to buy the votes of those that support the crap that pours out of their mouths, but it always starts in the heart. 

Matthew 15:18   

But Those Things Which Proceeds Out Of The Mouth Comes Forth From The Heart, And They Defile The Man   

Amen   

Thanks  

 

[listen2me 23 1,586]

Your shtick is boring.  But I can agree with you here for the most part.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,770]

Charlatans like Weepaws gonna' charlatan.

The Devil has a special circle in hell for his kind - normal sinners don't get that special treatment like the false prophets, charlatans and those who fake piousness get.

 

[weepaws 2,517]

13 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Charlatans like Weepaws gonna' charlatan.

The Devil has a special circle in hell for his kind - normal sinners don't get that special treatment like the false prophets, charlatans and those who fake piousness get.

 

Yes, my puppet

[jerryskids 5,434]

17 minutes ago, weepaws said:

RFK Jr walks back support for full-term abortion.   

Anything to buy the votes of those that support the crap that pours out of their mouths, but it always starts in the heart. 

Matthew 15:18   

But Those Things Which Proceeds Out Of The Mouth Comes Forth From The Heart, And They Defile The Man   

Amen   

Thanks  

 

I am in no way defending politicians.  But you are a great example of the perfect being the enemy of the good.  

You probably supported that Arizona 1864 law that outlawed abortion.  Had that stood, you would have been happy.  But a proposal on our November ballot would most certainly have passed which would embed in our constitution the right to abort a baby until birth.

Instead, the state supreme court just this week pushed back the enforcement of that 1864 law for 90 days, until September.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/arizona-supreme-court-pushes-back-enforcement-1864-abortion-ban-rcna152092

In that time an interim law allowing abortion up to 15 weeks will stand, until a more permanent law can be put in place.  If it stays at 15 weeks, I would argue that that is better than until birth.  Would you agree?

I give the Dems here a hard time (well, I probably make fun of our Republican nutcases more, but...) but I give credit to our governor Katie Hobbs and AG Kris Mayes for seeing the bigger picture and not pushing for enforcement of the 1864 law in hopes of a November bigger win.

[weepaws 2,517]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

I am in no way defending politicians.  But you are a great example of the perfect being the enemy of the good.  

You probably supported that Arizona 1864 law that outlawed abortion.  Had that stood, you would have been happy.  But a proposal on our November ballot would most certainly have passed which would embed in our constitution the right to abort a baby until birth.

Instead, the state supreme court just this week pushed back the enforcement of that 1864 law for 90 days, until September.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/arizona-supreme-court-pushes-back-enforcement-1864-abortion-ban-rcna152092

In that time an interim law allowing abortion up to 15 weeks will stand, until a more permanent law can be put in place.  If it stays at 15 weeks, I would argue that that is better than until birth.  Would you agree?

I give the Dems here a hard time (well, I probably make fun of our Republican nutcases more, but...) but I give credit to our governor Katie Hobbs and AG Kris Mayes for seeing the bigger picture and not pushing for enforcement of the 1864 law in hopes of a November bigger win.

I think murder is wrong.  Must murders of unborn babies take place because of an unwanted pregnancy, why should  someone die because of that?  

[jerryskids 5,434]

Just now, weepaws said:

I think murder is wrong.  

And in doing so, you enable a lot more murders.  Winning!  Jesus would be proud!

[listen2me 23 1,586]

Oh we are talking this abortion stuff?

I was just agreeing that all politicians talk out both sides of their mouth.  

[weepaws 2,517]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

And in doing so, you enable a lot more murders.  Winning!  Jesus would be proud!

No a lot less murders, woman can’t keep murdering their unborn children. That’s wrong no matter the time frame. 

[weepaws 2,517]

1 minute ago, listen2me 23 said:

Oh we are talking this abortion stuff?

I was just agreeing that all politicians talk out both sides of their mouth.  

They indeed do. 

[weepaws 2,517]

11 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I am in no way defending politicians.  But you are a great example of the perfect being the enemy of the good.  

You probably supported that Arizona 1864 law that outlawed abortion.  Had that stood, you would have been happy.  But a proposal on our November ballot would most certainly have passed which would embed in our constitution the right to abort a baby until birth.

Instead, the state supreme court just this week pushed back the enforcement of that 1864 law for 90 days, until September.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/arizona-supreme-court-pushes-back-enforcement-1864-abortion-ban-rcna152092

In that time an interim law allowing abortion up to 15 weeks will stand, until a more permanent law can be put in place.  If it stays at 15 weeks, I would argue that that is better than until birth.  Would you agree?

I give the Dems here a hard time (well, I probably make fun of our Republican nutcases more, but...) but I give credit to our governor Katie Hobbs and AG Kris Mayes for seeing the bigger picture and not pushing for enforcement of the 1864 law in hopes of a November bigger win.

Hobbs is allowing murders to take place to gain votes, and you applaud that,  I keep learning more about how evil of a person you are.  

The ones that get it done

[jerryskids 5,434]

11 minutes ago, weepaws said:

No a lot less murders, woman can’t keep murdering their unborn children. That’s wrong no matter the time frame. 

No, more, because come November, women would be able to abort the baby as it is coming out of the womb at birth.  That is what you are supporting.  You can say "woman can't keep murdering their unborn children," but you support a path which increases it.

You are making my case of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.  

[weepaws 2,517]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

No, more, because come November, women would be able to abort the baby as it is coming out of the womb at birth.  That is what you are supporting.  You can say "woman can't keep murdering their unborn children," but you support a path which increases it.

You are making my case of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.  

No time frame is acceptable for an abortion, zero.  You’re the one that agrees with abortion and the murder of children. I’m against it 100%.  No child should suffer because mom had sex.  

 

[weepaws 2,517]

22 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I am in no way defending politicians.  But you are a great example of the perfect being the enemy of the good.  

You probably supported that Arizona 1864 law that outlawed abortion.  Had that stood, you would have been happy.  But a proposal on our November ballot would most certainly have passed which would embed in our constitution the right to abort a baby until birth.

Instead, the state supreme court just this week pushed back the enforcement of that 1864 law for 90 days, until September.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/arizona-supreme-court-pushes-back-enforcement-1864-abortion-ban-rcna152092

In that time an interim law allowing abortion up to 15 weeks will stand, until a more permanent law can be put in place.  If it stays at 15 weeks, I would argue that that is better than until birth.  Would you agree?

I give the Dems here a hard time (well, I probably make fun of our Republican nutcases more, but...) but I give credit to our governor Katie Hobbs and AG Kris Mayes for seeing the bigger picture and not pushing for enforcement of the 1864 law in hopes of a November bigger win.

You give credit?  You endorse abortion.  

[jerryskids 5,434]

4 minutes ago, weepaws said:

No time frame is acceptable for an abortion, zero.  You’re the one that agrees with abortion and the murder of children. I’m against it 100%.  No child should suffer because mom had sex.  

 

Bless your heart.  Do you understand the concept of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good?  I'm guessing not.

Congrats, your position results in more murders of unborn babies. 

 

[jerryskids 5,434]

5 minutes ago, weepaws said:

You give credit?  You endorse abortion.  

No, I endorse minimizing abortion.  You, not so much.

[weepaws 2,517]

30 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

And in doing so, you enable a lot more murders.  Winning!  Jesus would be proud!

You Mock Jesus, and you call him a liar. 

[weepaws 2,517]

5 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Bless your heart.  Do you understand the concept of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good?  I'm guessing not.

Congrats, your position results in more murders of unborn babies. 

 

No my results remove abortion, that’s stops abortion. 

You agree with those that agree with the murder of children, Shame on you. 

[jerryskids 5,434]

1 minute ago, weepaws said:

You Mock Jesus, and you call him a liar. 

How so?  I'm being sarcastic; IMO Jesus would think you are a bumbling idiot for pushing a policy that leads to more baby murders.

[weepaws 2,517]

5 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

No, I endorse minimizing abortion.  You, not so much.

I endorse no abortion, a woman should face the same prison time as anyone that murders, and so should those at assisted in the murder of the children, that you endorse.

[jerryskids 5,434]

1 minute ago, weepaws said:

No my results remove abortion, that’s stops abortion. 

You agree with those that agree with the murder of children, Shame on you. 

You have no positive results.  In your model, AZ voters pass a constitutional amendment allowing abortion until birth.

[weepaws 2,517]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

You have no positive results.  In your model, AZ voters pass a constitutional amendment allowing abortion until birth.

No not my model they did, then they changed it so that they can continue killing babies.  And you said you agree with it.  Shame on you.  And stop mocking the name of Jesus, and stop calling Jesus a liar.  All about winningvots for Hobbs

 

[jerryskids 5,434]

Just now, weepaws said:

No not my model they did, then they changed it so that they can continue killing babies.  And you said you agree with it.  Shame on you.  And stop mocking the name of Jesus, and stop calling Jesus a liar.  

 

Your model is fantasy, it has no basis in reality.  It will absolutely never happen, at least in this election cycle.  The path to minimizing abortions, in AZ anyway, is to allow the 15 week law (or similar) to stand, diffuse the constitutional amendment on the November ballot, and "boil the frog" over time to reduce the 15 weeks to... 

As a bonus, your position will rally a bunch of young, single women to come vote for that ballot initiative, and while doing so, vote for Biden to win AZ.

Also, putting women in prison is not a good strategy.  A better strategy is to push for a positive culture shift which celebrates birth, babies, integral families.

We both want to minimize abortions.  Your approach is an abject failure, mine works.  

[Pimpadeaux 2,353]

Republiturds support candidates who commit adultery with porn stars, pay those porn stars hush money for political reasons and commit felonies to cover up the paper trail.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[jerryskids 5,434]

19 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Republiturds support candidates who commit adultery with porn stars, pay those porn stars hush money for political reasons and commit felonies to cover up the paper trail.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Is this your center-right position of Republicans?  Also, @GutterBoy posted recently that Stormy is NOT a porn star, FTW%$#@#!

[Pimpadeaux 2,353]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Is this your center-right position of Republicans?  Also, @GutterBoy posted recently that Stormy is NOT a porn star, FTW%$#@#!

Yes, it sure is, at least anyone who supports Clownzo. Are you going to vote for him? Anyone who occupies right of center will hold their nose and vote for Biden in November. This is how he got elected the first time and how Clownzo got elected in 2016, before the craziness ensued.

Also, how does what gutter posted having anything to do with me here? Can you quote him on that, because an easy search turns up lots of Stormy Daniels porn videos?

You have quite this weird disconnect when it comes to staying on subject matter.

 

[GutterBoy 2,491]

7 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Is this your center-right position of Republicans?  Also, @GutterBoy posted recently that Stormy is NOT a porn star, FTW%$#@#!

I did?

[jerryskids 5,434]

15 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Yes, it sure is, at least anyone who supports Clownzo. Are you going to vote for him? Anyone who occupies right of center will hold their nose and vote for Biden in November. This is how he got elected the first time and how Clownzo got elected in 2016, before the craziness ensued.

Also, how does what gutter posted having anything to do with me here? Can you quote him on that, because an easy search turns up lots of Stormy Daniels porn videos?

You have quite this weird disconnect when it comes to staying on subject matter.

 

I plan to vote for Trump given the current candidates.  I see you continue to dehumanize him in a machiavellian way with your insistent use of Clownzo, congrats, you suck at being a Christian.  Also, according to polls, you are in the vast minority of people right of center who will vote for a dementia-ridden guy increasing his support for Hamas terrorists.  

14 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I did?

My bad, you made a point that she was a porn star, not a prostitute.  Mea culpa.   

[weepaws 2,517]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Your model is fantasy, it has no basis in reality.  It will absolutely never happen, at least in this election cycle.  The path to minimizing abortions, in AZ anyway, is to allow the 15 week law (or similar) to stand, diffuse the constitutional amendment on the November ballot, and "boil the frog" over time to reduce the 15 weeks to... 

As a bonus, your position will rally a bunch of young, single women to come vote for that ballot initiative, and while doing so, vote for Biden to win AZ.

Also, putting women in prison is not a good strategy.  A better strategy is to push for a positive culture shift which celebrates birth, babies, integral families.

We both want to minimize abortions.  Your approach is an abject failure, mine works.  

Not true, don’t you ever say lies about me, first you lie about Jesus, And now you say lies about me.  

You want to minimize the killing of children, you just said it,  I want to eliminate killing of children.  

Shame on you,  your a politician on this board, you agree with what ever gets you the most yes votes.   Shame on you.  

[weepaws 2,517]

21 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I plan to vote for Trump given the current candidates.  I see you continue to dehumanize him in a machiavellian way with your insistent use of Clownzo, congrats, you suck at being a Christian.  Also, according to polls, you are in the vast minority of people right of center who will vote for a dementia-ridden guy increasing his support for Hamas terrorists.  

My bad, you made a point that she was a porn star, not a prostitute.  Mea culpa.   

Again saying lies about someone, you cannot be trusted.  Shame on you politician. 

[weepaws 2,517]

23 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I plan to vote for Trump given the current candidates.  I see you continue to dehumanize him in a machiavellian way with your insistent use of Clownzo, congrats, you suck at being a Christian.  Also, according to polls, you are in the vast minority of people right of center who will vote for a dementia-ridden guy increasing his support for Hamas terrorists.  

My bad, you made a point that she was a porn star, not a prostitute.  Mea culpa.   

Says the catholic, Who has said he has trouble with his own faith, now laying unrighteous Judgement upon another.  Shame on you. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,353]

22 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I plan to vote for Trump given the current candidates.  I see you continue to dehumanize him in a machiavellian way with your insistent use of Clownzo, congrats, you suck at being a Christian.  Also, according to polls, you are in the vast minority of people right of center who will vote for a dementia-ridden guy increasing his support for Hamas terrorists.  

My bad, you made a point that she was a porn star, not a prostitute.  Mea culpa.   

Clownzo is a philandering crook and psychopath, but I'm pretty sure he doesn't feel one bit dehumanized by me mocking him in a lightly trafficked, low-rent message board, and I'm most definitely sure that calling him out for the P.O.S., evil anti-Christ and false idol and prophet that MAGAturds claim him to be is more Christian than you can imagine.

You're a focking fool for believing in him. 

[Cloaca du jour 2,084]

Sinners call it being 2 faced.  Double minded...

 

[jerryskids 5,434]

19 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Not true, don’t you ever say lies about me, first you lie about Jesus, And now you say lies about me.  

You want to minimize the killing of children, you just said it,  I want to eliminate killing of children.  

Shame on you,  your a politician on this board, you agree with what ever gets you the most yes votes.   Shame on you.  

What lies did I say about  you, or Jesus?  I know you won't answer because you are a borderline retard, but I figured I 'd ask in the interest of conversation.

[jerryskids 5,434]

22 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Again saying lies about someone, you cannot be trusted.  Shame on you politician. 

What lies, I admitted to misrepresenting his position.  People make mistakes.  Jesus forgave such mistakes.  You don't.  HTH

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,770]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

What lies, I admitted to misrepresenting his position.  People make mistakes.  Jesus forgave such mistakes.  You don't.  HTH

Charlatans like Weepaws never practice what they preach.

Eternal Shiny and Chrome 15:3-8

[Pimpadeaux 2,353]

44 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

What lies did I say about  you, or Jesus?  I know you won't answer because you are a borderline retard, but I figured I 'd ask in the interest of conversation.

You shouldn't refer to people as a "retard."

You're better than this.

Show some sophistication, empathy and class.

You weaken yourself with such things.

[jerryskids 5,434]

5 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

You shouldn't refer to people as a "retard."

You're better than this.

Show some sophistication, empathy and class.

You weaken yourself with such things.

Says the guy who dehumanizes Trump with Clownzo at every opportunity?

And I said borderline retard.

I admit that this phrase has a special meaning with @kutuluwho resurfaced recently, which made me think of it.

[Pimpadeaux 2,353]

15 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Says the guy who dehumanizes Trump with Clownzo at every opportunity?

And I said borderline retard.

I admit that this phrase has a special meaning with @kutuluwho resurfaced recently, which made me think of it.

So you're equating a mocking term of one guy who is in a world of scandals and allegedly presidential to you using a highly offensive term that applies to mentally retarded people in this country?

I guess if my label offended clowns or those who are parents or work with clowns, you'd have a point.

But as usual, you have stupid points, so you should stick to your wispy navel gazing in regard to cultural existentialism.

Takes a big man to mock the mentally retarded.

 

[jerryskids 5,434]

20 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

So you're equating a mocking term of one guy who is in a world of scandals and allegedly presidential to you using a highly offensive term that applies to mentally retarded people in this country?

I guess if my label offended clowns or those who are parents or work with clowns, you'd have a point.

But as usual, you have stupid points, so you should stick to your wispy navel gazing in regard to cultural existentialism.

Takes a big man to mock the mentally retarded.

 

I presume you are upset by the word because of your son.  I would never use it in such a case.  My daughter has type 1 diabetes,  but most people conflate that with type 2, which is more behavior driven.  I don't take it personally. I would suggest you do the same with my reference to a poster like weepaws.

You dehumanize the former POTUS and current nominee with every Clownzo post, and I think less of you with each one.