Fnord 2,051 Posted January 23 5 minutes ago, jonmx said: There were zero people charged with having a gun inside the Capitol and certainly none were fired which is in huge contrast to your typical blm riot. I believe there was one person charged with having a gun but he did not enter the Capitol building. Oh please send me your dozen bs links. How about just one? Wouldn't want to overload your cognitive centers which are barely functioning as it is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted January 23 8 minutes ago, Fnord said: How about just one? Wouldn't want to overload your cognitive centers which are barely functioning as it is. Thank you!!! That link verified everything I said. There were exactly one person charge with having a gun on Capitol grounds and he did not enter the Capitol. A few people claiming there were other arms present on the Capitol grounds does not mean crap. Through the over 15,000 hours of video examined, not a single one shows any protestor possessing a firearm inside the Capitol building and certainly no one was brandishing a gun, as one would expect in an actual insurrection. Fuk the morons who want to classify a flagpole as armed. They are too fuking stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,051 Posted January 23 1 minute ago, jonmx said: Thank you!!! That link verified everything I said. There were exactly one person charge with having a gun on Capitol grounds and he did not enter the Capitol. A few people claiming there were other arms present on the Capitol grounds does not mean crap. Through the over 15,000 hours of video examined, not a single one shows any protestor possessing a firearm inside the Capitol building and certainly over one was brandishing a gun. Fuk the morons who want to classify a flagpole as armed. They are too fuking stupid. FFS you cannot read. However, court records show, at least five cases where carrying or possessing a firearm was part of the indictment. A summary, of the cases by the Justice Department as of Jan. 3 said 180 defendants were charged with entering a restricted area with a dangerous or deadly weapon, which includes firearms and other types of weapons. The article also mentions someone using a tomahawk, as well as police riot shields. Which we all saw on video. Keeping in mind this only counts those that were indicted. I'm sure there were dozens or even hundreds of guns in the crowd, thankfully those carrying them did so responsibly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,121 Posted January 23 1 minute ago, Fnord said: FFS you cannot read. However, court records show, at least five cases where carrying or possessing a firearm was part of the indictment. A summary, of the cases by the Justice Department as of Jan. 3 said 180 defendants were charged with entering a restricted area with a dangerous or deadly weapon, which includes firearms and other types of weapons. The article also mentions someone using a tomahawk, as well as police riot shields. Which we all saw on video. Keeping in mind this only counts those that were indicted. I'm sure there were dozens or even hundreds of guns in the crowd, thankfully those carrying them did so responsibly. Talk about old school. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 23 21 minutes ago, jonmx said: There were zero people charged with having a gun inside the Capitol and certainly none were fired which is in huge contrast to your typical blm riot. I believe there was one person charged with having a gun but he did not enter the Capitol building. Oh please send me your dozen bs links. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/us-capitol-attack-rioters-had-weapons-including-firearms-2025-01-16/ You're so dumb Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,121 Posted January 24 4 hours ago, The Real timschochet said: I did read the article. I think it makes a broad point and then offers examples that, while they don’t pertain to the current case, the broader point does. But in the end does any of this matter? There is no set definition of an impeachable offense anyhow. One of the articles against Andrew Johnson, if I remember correctly, was for “lewd behavior.” Obviously it’s very subjective. Thats why I think you’re flawed for attempting to challenge me on this. We can agree to disagree on whether or not Trump should be impeached for these pardons (theoretically since we both know it will never happen) but there aren’t any set rules on this. It’s completely arbitrary and based on opinion. Or, you know, you could just admit you are full of sh!t and so partisan that you think a President exercising a Constitutionally granted right, and not for personal gain for to cover up a crime or treason, is an impeachable offense. Me, I am going to stick to the narrative that a President exercising a clearly enumerated Constitutional right even if uncautiously, is not remotely, and never will be remotely, considered an impeachable offcense by any but frankly the insane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 21 hours ago, TrailGuy said: https://x.com/SeditionHunters/status/1881790682748371128?t=Guvk2pRV2PL5c70t8F2l2g&s=19 Trump pardons a child predator. Magas support the pardons of pedos. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,738 Posted January 24 4 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: Magas support the pardons of pedos. Joe Biden pardoned 2000+ Pedos, rapists and Killers BOYO. Check yourself Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said: Joe Biden pardoned 2000+ Pedos, rapists and Killers BOYO. Check yourself BIDEN!! Also false. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maximum Overkill 1,738 Posted January 24 Biden pardons Chinese Pedophile Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 7 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said: Biden pardons Chinese Pedophile That was a hostage exchange dimwit. He went back to china. Trump pardoned and american pedophile that attacked the Capitol. Hes roaming school yards for his next victim. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, TrailGuy said: That was a hostage exchange dimwit. He went back to china. Trump pardoned and american pedophile that attacked the Capitol. Hes roaming school yards for his next victim. How was work today? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: How was work today? Great how about you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Girlfriend 208 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, TrailGuy said: Great how about you? I bet he got extra jello in the rec room. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: Great how about you? Impossible. You were posting here all day as usual. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Impossible. You were posting here all day as usual. I'm that good boyo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 Lots of stories coming out now about Capitol Police and their family members being harassed, swatted, had feces thrown at name etc since Jan 6. Now these terrorists are on the streets and it will only get worse. Geek club magas support this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: Lots of stories coming out now about Capitol Police and their family members being harassed, swatted, had feces thrown at name etc since Jan 6. Now these terrorists are on the streets and it will only get worse. Geek club magas support this. How come it’s just coming out now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: How come it’s just coming out now? It came out over the past few years but now that they are all out, it's coming back. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/mother-jan-6-officer-michael-fanone-swatted-called-trump-authoritarian-rcna154467 You ok with this behavior boyo? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 8 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: It came out over the past few years but now that they are all out, it's coming back. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/mother-jan-6-officer-michael-fanone-swatted-called-trump-authoritarian-rcna154467 You ok with this behavior boyo? No. But you said lots of stories. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted January 24 1 hour ago, TrailGuy said: https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/us-capitol-attack-rioters-had-weapons-including-firearms-2025-01-16/ You're so dumb Can you read dipshit? Not a single word un the article contradicted anything I said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,391 Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said: Or, you know, you could just admit you are full of sh!t and so partisan that you think a President exercising a Constitutionally granted right, and not for personal gain for to cover up a crime or treason, is an impeachable offense. Me, I am going to stick to the narrative that a President exercising a clearly enumerated Constitutional right even if uncautiously, is not remotely, and never will be remotely, considered an impeachable offcense by any but frankly the insane. Well no I won’t admit to that. Lol FTR a lot of people I’ve heard on the radio today, including some legal experts share my current insanity: they also think Trump should be impeached for this. Mostly progressive of course… 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,391 Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said: Or, you know, you could just admit you are full of sh!t and so partisan that you think a President exercising a Constitutionally granted right, and not for personal gain for or to cover up a crime or treason , is an impeachable offense. Me, I am going to stick to the narrative that a President exercising a clearly enumerated Constitutional right even if uncautiously, is not remotely, and never will be remotely, considered an impeachable offcense by any but frankly the insane. And FTR with regard to the bolded I think it’s both. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,181 Posted January 24 39 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: Well no I won’t admit to that. Lol FTR a lot of people I’ve heard on the radio today, including some legal experts share my current insanity: they also think Trump should be impeached for this. Mostly progressive of course… They can add it to the huge pile of fake things that only the rabid frothing at the mouth left think he should be impeached or convicted or sued for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,391 Posted January 24 21 minutes ago, Voltaire said: They can add it to the huge pile of fake things that only the rabid frothing at the mouth left think he should be impeached or convicted or sued for. I don’t get it Voltaire. Why are you willing to defend this? Maybe it’s not an impeachable offense. But do you really like the fact that some of these dudes who viciously attacked police officers are getting off free here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: I don’t get it Voltaire. Why are you willing to defend this? Maybe it’s not an impeachable offense. But do you really like the fact that some of these dudes who viciously attacked police officers are getting off free here? They were doing prison time. How is that getting off free? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,181 Posted January 24 10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: I don’t get it Voltaire. Why are you willing to defend this? Maybe it’s not an impeachable offense. But do you really like the fact that some of these dudes who viciously attacked police officers are getting off free here? Jan 6th was a protest that got a little out of hand and was less peaceful than it should have been. It was a three hour political hiccup - not an insurrection. It does meet the bare minimum threshold for being a riot since a few doors/locks were broken, Congressional offices entered, and a few incidents of scuffing with police occurred. Overall it was a minor and hyped-up anthill, amplified by Trump's enemies to make it seem significant. What happened to these people was the real crime and now that has been rectified. For the very worst of the worst offenders, the ones who laid hands on police, four years was enough punishment. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: They were doing prison time. How is that getting off free? Not all of them. Several did no time. Several didn't even have a trial yet. Low information pothead Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Girlfriend 208 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, TrailGuy said: Not all of them. Several did not time. Several didn't even have a trial yet. Low information pothead 🪴 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, Voltaire said: Jan 6th was a protest that got a little out of hand and was less peaceful than it should have been. It was a three hour political hiccup - not an insurrection. It does meet the bare minimum threshold for being a riot since a few doors/locks were broken, Congressional offices entered, and a few incidents of scuffing with police occurred. Overall it was a minor and hyped-up anthill, amplified by Trump's enemies to make it seem significant. What happened to these people was the real crime and now that has been rectified. For the very worst of the worst offenders, the ones who laid hands on police, four years was enough punishment. You don't deal in facts or the truth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 11 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: Not all of them. Several did no time. Several didn't even have a trial yet. Low information pothead The ones that assaulted cops? They weren’t in jail/ prison? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 13 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: The ones that assaulted cops? They weren’t in jail/ prison? Some yes. Olivia Pollock and Joseph Hutchinson are 2 examples. Please stop being so ignorant boyo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 7 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: Some yes. Olivia Pollock and Joseph Hutchinson are 2 examples. Please stop being so ignorant boyo. Well, a simple google search will tell you they were both in jail. So, now that that’s settled, I guess we can say that no one that assaulted a cop or was even accused of it got off free. Stop being so ill informed BOYO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Well, a simple google search will tell you they were both in jail. So, now that that’s settled, I guess we can say that no one that assaulted a cop or was even accused of it got off free. Stop being so ill informed BOYO. You know why they were in jail? Because they were fugitives and were captured. They were waiting for their trial in jail when trump freed them. Did maybe a year. There are others boyo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 Federal prosecutors are weighing charging as many as 200 more people for their involvement in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol — including 60 suspected of assaulting or impeding police officers during the riot that nearly derailed the transfer of power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/01/06/january-6-cases-donald-trump-00196501 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 6 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: You know why they were in jail? Because they were fugitives and were captured. They were waiting for their trial in jail when trump freed them. Did maybe a year. There are others boyo. Lol. We went to no jail to a year in jail pretty quick. Thanks google! Well then, I’d hardly call that getting off free. Who are the others? Ignorant bastard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: Lol. We went to no jail to a year in jail pretty quick Thanks google! Well then, I’d hardly call that getting off free. Who are the others? Look up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,910 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, TrailGuy said: Look up. They haven’t been charged yet BOYO. The subject was the people that were pardoned. Just take the L. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Fantasy 67 Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: the riot that nearly derailed the transfer of power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden. There is zero truth to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
