Ron_Artest 1,217 Posted March 17 13 minutes ago, HellToupee said: I can’t imagine people being against sending these scum to El Salvador but the libs here never disappoint. Maybe if one of their family members came across one of these bad hombres they’d feel differently. Maybe not You miss the point as usual. No one is against deporting gang members. We need to follow the law and due process, and if a judge says you can't do it, then we need to respect the law and follow the process. Maybe if one of your family members were illegally deported by Trump you'd feel different. Maybe not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,955 Posted March 17 https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/2025/03/16/he-voted-for-trump-then-ice-detained-his-wife/82469657007/ A fun FA&FO story... Still though- feel bad for the guy and the woman. But this is what happens when policy is enacted in sweeping change as opposed to looking at situations. If she is in the process of getting her paperwork done and you can check all that. AND you can see the circumstances as to why she couldn't go back initially there needs to be some recognition of that. She isn't some gang banger bringing drugs over the border or killing innocent American citizens. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,649 Posted March 17 7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: You miss the point as usual. No one is against deporting gang members. We need to follow the law and due process, and if a judge says you can't do it, then we need to respect the law and follow the process. Maybe if one of your family members were illegally deported by Trump you'd feel different. Maybe not. If my relative was a designated terrorist I’d be all for it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,217 Posted March 17 1 hour ago, HellToupee said: If my relative was a designated terrorist I’d be all for it And if Biden designated him a terrorist? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,649 Posted March 17 4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: And if Biden designated him a terrorist? ms-13 & tren de aragua sympathizer. I beat you’re a big fan of hamas as well. How about the houthis? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,217 Posted March 17 Just now, HellToupee said: ms-13 & tren de aragua sympathizer. I beat you’re a big fan of hamas as well. How about the houthis? Not a fan of any gang. Again with the telling people what they think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Psychic Observer 498 Posted May 2 Trump’s Corruption Hits Next Level With Shady $2 Billion Crypto Deal An investment firm backed by a foreign government just made a massive deal using the Trump family’s crypto firm. The conflicts of interest here are unprecedented With this deal, the Trump family will be enriched beyond most people’s comprehension, and they have the UAE government to thank for it. One can predict that Trump is likely to treat the country very favorably from here on out, again demonstrating that his power does have a price. https://newrepublic.com/post/194722/trump-corruption-2-billion-crypto-deal-uae 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,859 Posted May 2 On 3/17/2025 at 11:42 AM, HellToupee said: ms-13 & tren de aragua sympathizer. I beat you’re a big fan of hamas as well. How about the houthis? All any liberal wants is either bad for this country, or overwhelming mentally sick. It's surreal how unbelievably low their IQs are as a collective. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,217 Posted May 4 On 3/16/2025 at 12:48 PM, Ron_Artest said: Federal judge blocks Trump order against law firm, calling it a "personal vendetta" Judge Howell issued the temporary restraining order at the conclusion of a two-hour hearing over Trump's executive order against Perkins Coie https://www.lawdork.com/p/perkins-coie-trump-order-tro https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/judge-strikes-trump-order-targeting-perkins-coie-law-firm-rcna204564 And now the full decision striking down the EO. Props to Perkins coie. It's a shame others bent the knee already but everyone knew this was illegal and we'd get here eventually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,217 Posted May 28 On 5/4/2025 at 7:16 AM, Ron_Artest said: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/judge-strikes-trump-order-targeting-perkins-coie-law-firm-rcna204564 And now the full decision striking down the EO. Props to Perkins coie. It's a shame others bent the knee already but everyone knew this was illegal and we'd get here eventually. Wilmerhale wins. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/27/trump-leon-wilmerhale-mueller.html Calls Trump's EO absurd. So many L's for Trump's dictatorial ambitions. Democracy is still alive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,223 Posted May 28 You’ve got to wonder how many million$ of taxpayer dollars the Trump admin will waste fighting court challenges to unlawful EOs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,430 Posted May 28 On 2/12/2025 at 8:59 PM, The Psychic Observer said: Look at the facts here... Trump has a history as a fraudster, it's been well documented. Trump U, trump charities, he was convicted of fraud in a court of law. Long history of corruption, not a debate. Trump's first term, no intention of balancing budget, tackling waste fraud or abuse, added more to the debt than any other president in history. Oversaw the ppp loan act which was a direct trillion dollar handout to the elites. He doesn't care about any of this, not a debate. Enter Elon musk. World's richest man, desires to be worlds first trillionaire. Turns into a maga, pitches the doge idea in exchange for getting trump elected, trump buys in. Musk buys the election, some say stole the election but I won't go there, one way or another trump is now president. Musk's idea, create a new department, name it after a sh1t coin for giggles, and let me and my braniac posse get into the books. The largest and most valuable trove of data in the world. Give me all that data, we'll do it over a weekend so no one knows, fire anyone that gets in my way. Let me do this and I'll give you the election. If anyone finds out or objects I will just throw out all this misinformation to keep them occupied. I'll throw out all these posts on X about items the govt is spending money on and I'll amplify it for my followers. This will turn the public in our favor. Who doesn't want to cut waste fraud and abuse. They will fall for it hook line and sinker. Do this for me Donald because I have all these regulators and watchdogs after me. They are all investigating me and I want them gone. Usaid is on me, let's get rid of them. The FAA is going after me, get rid of the guy. Cfpb is questioning my new x payments, gone. While we're at it fire all the inspectors general whose job it is to find waste fraud and abuse. Oh and change the law that makes it illegal to bribe govt officials. The memes will be great. Americans are dumb Donald. If we get them to vote for you then they will support all this too. It will be the greatest heist in history. When Trump took office, the NLRB had 24 separate investigations into Musk’s corporations for violating workers’ rights. But presto...Trump fired three officials at that agency, effectively stalling the board's ability to rule on cases. On Monday, USAID's IG warned that Trump's agency cuts have made it harder to root out fraud and abuse — and that nearly $500M in food was about to spoil due to Trump's foreign aid freeze. On Tuesday, Trump fired him. While targeting federal education contracts, Elon Musk just scored a new deal for more government cash, according to documents reviewed by The Lever. The new "supplemental agreement" adds millions to SpaceX's already huge $3.9 billion deal. At least six independent inspectors general fired by Trump all have one thing in common: their agencies investigated Elon Musk's corporations. Musk's crusade against the government isn't about "waste" or "efficiency." It's about shielding himself from accountability. When Trump was sworn in, Elon Musk's corporations were under more than 32 investigations conducted by at least 11 federal agencies. Most of the cases are now closed or likely to be closed soon, and the federal agencies are being defanged by DOGE. Funny how that works, huh? Classic retard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,229 Posted May 28 On 5/4/2025 at 7:16 AM, Ron_Artest said: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/judge-strikes-trump-order-targeting-perkins-coie-law-firm-rcna204564 And now the full decision striking down the EO. Props to Perkins coie. It's a shame others bent the knee already but everyone knew this was illegal and we'd get here eventually. I got ridiculed for saying they were badly losing lawsuits in court. Quote WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie in a blistering opinion calling the president’s efforts “an unprecedented attack” on the U.S. judicial system. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,124 Posted May 28 He’s a dictator! Democracy is at stake! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,958 Posted May 28 8 hours ago, Mike Honcho said: I got ridiculed for saying they were badly losing lawsuits in court. Okay, ONE ruling doesn't mean "badly losing". You know better than this, Honcho. If I had to guess, I'd say he mostly winning, rather than losing. I'd give 60-40 win/lose percentage. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,229 Posted May 28 1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Okay, ONE ruling doesn't mean "badly losing". You know better than this, Honcho. If I had to guess, I'd say he mostly winning, rather than losing. I'd give 60-40 win/lose percentage. You would be wrong. HTH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 712 Posted May 28 22 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: You would be wrong. HTH. Coming from a guy who's never right? I'll take that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,124 Posted May 28 Liberals think that some leftard group running to a left wing judge in the lower courts and getting an injunction or a ruling they aren’t authorized to make for the country is a win, even though those rulings will go to a higher court. Highly educated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
