Several SCOTUS decisions coming out today.....

[Strike 5,463]

One that just dropped regarding nationwide injunctions.  It's in the birthright citizenship case but related to nationwide injunctions.  Sounds like Trump got a win and the court has partially overturned some nationwide injunctions and said the following:

 

Quote

When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too.

 

More to come on this decision, and others will be coming out as well, so starting this thread to discuss these and their implications.  

 

[Strike 5,463]

Additional analysis of the birthright citizenship cases, which were really about universal injunctions, by a law professor:

https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/06/supreme-court-rules-for-trump-in-birthright-citizenship-case/

[Hardcore troubadour 15,291]

Way back in 2022 Kagan said she was against lower court rulings affecting the whole country and not just their district. She voted against that.  

[jerryskids 6,740]

@Strike, you should change the title and make this thread about SCOTUS biotch-slapping the lower courts' attempted power grabs with national injunctions.  This is a BIG decision that we've been waiting for.  Well, those of us who want true checks and balances, anyway.   

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,053]

Looks like they just handed normal people a win as well:  Allowing parents to opt out of Rainbow Mob propaganda at schools too: 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-decides-whether-allow-parents-shield-children-from-lgbtq-books-school

#winning

[squistion 2,151]

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1938610815155732762

WASHINGTON (AP) -

Supreme Court rules Maryland parents can pull their children from public school lessons that use LGBTQ storybooks.

https://x.com/kylegriffin1/status/1938615845246112121

Sotomayor: "Today's ruling ushers in that new reality."  

"Exposing students to the 'message' that LGBTQ people exist, and that their loved ones may celebrate their marriages and life events, the majority says, enough to trigger the most demanding form of judicial scrutiny."

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,053]

Looks like the resident fairy zealot is losing his mind over the Rainbow Mob ruling!  

#winning

[Hardcore troubadour 15,291]

And that DEI dope Jackson actually asked why don’t the parents just send their kids to a different school. What an elitist twat.  

[Strike 5,463]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

And that DEI dope Jackson actually asked why don’t the parents just send their kids to a different school. What an elitist twat.  

Jackson is an idiot.  ACB called her as much when addressing Jackson's dissent in the birthright citizenship case:

Quote

 

The principal dissent focuses on conventional legal terrain, like the Judiciary Act of 1789 and our cases on equity. JUSTICE JACKSON, however, chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever. Waving away attention to the limits on judicial power as a “mind-numbingly technical query,” she offers a vision of the judicial role that would make even the most ardent defender of judicial supremacy blush. In her telling, the fundamental role of courts is to “order everyone (including the Executive) to follow the law—full stop.” And, she warns, if courts lack the power to “require the Executive to adhere to law universally,” courts will leave a “gash in the basic tenets of our founding charter that could turn out to be a mortal wound.” [Emphasis added]

Rhetoric aside, JUSTICE JACKSON’s position is difficult to pin down. She might be arguing that universal injunctions are appropriate—even required—whenever the defendant is part of the Executive Branch. If so, her position goes far beyond the mainstream defense of universal injunctions. As best we can tell, though, her argument is more extreme still, because its logic does not depend on the entry of a universal injunction: JUSTICE JACKSON appears to believe that the reasoning behind any court order demands “universal adherence,” at least where the Executive is concerned. In her law-declaring vision of the judicial function, a district court’s opinion is not just persuasive, but has the legal force of a judgment. Once a single district court deems executive conduct unlawful, it has stated what the law requires. And the Executive must conform to that view, ceasing its enforcement of the law against anyone, anywhere. [Emphasis added]

We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.  [Emphasis added]

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,291]

Damn.  Not so happy with ACB but she just crushed miss DEI. Worst justice ever. 

[Strike 5,463]

Trump holding a press conference to gloat over SCOTUS decision(s).  

[Strike 5,463]

Next decision:  The SCOTUS ruled that it's legal for a state to require age verification to try to prevent minors from viewing porn.  

This ruling underscores that we treat minors differently than adults under the law.  Those in favor of cutting off 10 year old boys pee pees should take note.

[squistion 2,151]

https://x.com/DisavowTrump20/status/1938619467640049906

Today, Supreme Court Justices Sotomayor, Jackson, and Kagan bravely stood up and tried to defend the Constitution from Donald Trump. History will remember the justices who undermined our judicial system.

[seafoam1 2,950]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Looks like they just handed normal people a win as well:  Allowing parents to opt out of Rainbow Mob propaganda at schools too: 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-decides-whether-allow-parents-shield-children-from-lgbtq-books-school

#winning

Winning. 

[seafoam1 2,950]

44 minutes ago, Strike said:

Trump holding a press conference to gloat over SCOTUS decision(s).  

Keep it coming. 

The winning is just flowing in in daily. 

[squistion 2,151]

 

[seafoam1 2,950]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

 

Excellent!! 

Go Trump!!

[Hardcore troubadour 15,291]

ACB politely told The DEI justice she’s not smart enough to be here. lol. 

[The Real timschochet 6,684]

25 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

ACB politely told The DEI justice she’s not smart enough to be here. lol. 

Your use of the term “DEI Justice” to describe Jackson is racist. You deserve to be called out for this every time you do it. It’s ugly and stupid. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,291]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Your use of the term “DEI Justice” to describe Jackson is racist. You deserve to be called out for this every time you do it. It’s ugly and stupid. 

DEI can cover all colors in the rainbow. But she’s a twofer. 

[seafoam1 2,950]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Your use of the term “DEI Justice” to describe Jackson is racist. You deserve to be called out for this every time you do it. It’s ugly and stupid. 

If someone isn't smart, saying they aren't smart, is not racist. Exercising "DEI Justice" by any colored person, is not smart.

You are a piece of crap calling everyone racist. 

Thank goodness Trump won. 

[The Real timschochet 6,684]

4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

If someone isn't smart, saying they aren't smart, is not racist. Exercising "DEI Justice" by any colored person, is not smart.

You are a piece of crap calling everyone racist. 

Thank goodness Trump won. 

I don’t call everyone racist. Just those who deserve it. Suggesting Jackson isn’t smart is just ignorant on your part. Calling her DEI is both ignorant and racist, hth

[The Real timschochet 6,684]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

DEI can cover all colors in the rainbow. But she’s a twofer. 

Doubling down on your bigotry. Keep it coming. 

[squistion 2,151]

5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Your use of the term “DEI Justice” to describe Jackson is racist. You deserve to be called out for this every time you do it. It’s ugly and stupid. 

If they want to be technical, Clarence Thomas was the first DEI Justice (although the term didn't exist then) as he was chosen to replace Thurgood Marshall apparently only because he was Black (his legal experience was limited). 

 

[The Real timschochet 6,684]

2 minutes ago, squistion said:

If they want to be technical, Clarence Thomas was the first DEI Justice (although the term didn't exist then) as he was chosen to replace Thurgood Marshall apparently only because he was Black (his legal experience was limited). 

 

I wouldn’t call him one either. I think the use of that term, in nearly any context, is racist and highly offensive. 

[seafoam1 2,950]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t call everyone racist. Just those who deserve it. Suggesting Jackson isn’t smart is just ignorant on your part. Calling her DEI is both ignorant and racist, hth

She's both DEI AND ignorant. She doe doesn't even know what a woman is. 

And she's DEI. 

[seafoam1 2,950]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Doubling down on your bigotry. Keep it coming. 

You are a bigot in so many ways. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,053]

46 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Excellent!! 

Go Trump!!

Oh noooz!!!  NOT Stuart Richardson!!! 

Of course, these are the same f@ckers that want COMPLETE JUDICIARY CONTROL but not EXECUTIVE CONTROL. 

Just like ACB said in her opinion:  JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,053]

22 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Your use of the term “DEI Justice” to describe Jackson is racist. You deserve to be called out for this every time you do it. It’s ugly and stupid. 

Nope, HT is right.  She's a DEI hire.  It's obvious in her opinions and the fact that she has no idea what a woman is.  THAT is DEI almost to the letter.

And calling someone dumb is not racist by any stretch of the imagination.

[Strike 5,463]

24 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Your use of the term “DEI Justice” to describe Jackson is racist. You deserve to be called out for this every time you do it. It’s ugly and stupid. 

She was chosen due to her color. That's the definition of DEI.  

[squistion 2,151]

8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I wouldn’t call him one either. I think the use of that term, in nearly any context, is racist and highly offensive. 

That doesn't ignore the fact that Thomas' was chosen because he is Black.

I am just pointing out that they aren't being consistent calling Jackson DEI but not Thomas. 

[Strike 5,463]

12 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t call everyone racist. Just those who deserve it. Suggesting Jackson isn’t smart is just ignorant on your part. Calling her DEI is both ignorant and racist, hth

Do you have to fock up every thread you enter?  

[HellToupee 1,732]

26 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Your use of the term “DEI Justice” to describe Jackson is racist. You deserve to be called out for this every time you do it. It’s ugly and stupid. 

 

Blame Biden for making a DEI pick

 

Quote

during his presidential campaign, Joe Biden pledged to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court

 

[seafoam1 2,950]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Oh noooz!!!  NOT Stuart Richardson!!! 

Of course, these are the same f@ckers that want COMPLETE JUDICIARY CONTROL but not EXECUTIVE CONTROL. 

Just like ACB said in her opinion:  JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary

Yep. Stuart. 

Liberals do their best work acting as cockroaches. Crawling out of the cracks. 

Thank goodness Trump was elected president back in 2016. It's factoring in now in 2025 in the SC. 

[The Real timschochet 6,684]

7 minutes ago, Strike said:

Do you have to fock up every thread you enter?  

Well sir I would argue that your defense of the ugly and racist term “DEI hire” is the focked up part, but hey that’s just me. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,291]

24 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Doubling down on your bigotry. Keep it coming. 

I’m even more annoyed  by and against nepotism. 

[HellToupee 1,732]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’m even more annoyed  by and against nepotism. 

Tim’s a “thanks dad” self made man

 

nttawwt

[Hardcore troubadour 15,291]

Clarence Thomas was picked because of his color. He also happens to be qualified and intelligent. And he overcame a lot. KJB has had it great since birth. Pushed along for only one reason. 

[jonmx 2,429]

Suck it retards.   Finally the SC reigns in these lunatic judges.  

[seafoam1 2,950]

16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well sir I would argue that your defense of the ugly and racist term “DEI hire” is the focked up part, but hey that’s just me. 

DEI is a liberal policy. Call it racist all you want. You idiots invented and executed it. Now that it's caving in, eat it bltch.