Comey to be Indicted

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

Andrew McCarthy on the Comey charges: dismiss them.

[seafoam1 3,315]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Andrew McCarthy on the Comey charges: dismiss them.

Oh, did he dismiss them? 

[TimHauck 3,187]

3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Taibbi called it.  Huge. 

Yes, Comey being accused of a false statement is exactly the same as Obama committing treason.

Clown

[seafoam1 3,315]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Yes, Comey being accused of a false statement is exactly the same as Obama committing treason.

Clown

Yeah. Agreed. They are both guilty. 

[MDC 7,696]

15 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Andrew McCarthy on the Comey charges: dismiss them.

The liberal National Review!  

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

The liberal National Review!  

Andrew MCarthy no less.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

I like Andrew McCarthy. Disagree. More to come. 

[Maximum Overkill 2,312]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Obama committing treason.

What comes around __________

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

The DOJ has subpoenaed Fani Willis’ travel records.  Oh boy oh boy oh boy! It’s really happening! The reckoning is nigh! 

[The Real timschochet 7,203]

4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I like Andrew McCarthy. Disagree. More to come. 

Please explain the specific points by McCarthy  that you disagree with and why. 
 

This will be good. 

[KSB2424 3,172]

https://x.com/mazemoore/status/1971658919295832157?s=46&t=r0y3bJ1CDXchoYAztDxmqw

[Ron_Artest 1,952]

I love the rationalization of corruption and authoritarianism by using revenge and retribution.

Shows your character.  Shows your morality.

History will not be kind to trump and the cucks that support the death of democracy.

[Ron_Artest 1,952]

We had some brave folks speak up against his attack on freedom of speech with stupid Jimmy Kimmel.

Waiting for people to speak out against the weaponization of the DOJ for personal retribution.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I love the rationalization of corruption and authoritarianism by using revenge and retribution.

Shows your character.  Shows your morality.

History will not be kind to trump and the cucks that support the death of democracy.

Depends who’s writing it. 

[seafoam1 3,315]

14 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

We had some brave folks speak up against his attack on freedom of speech with stupid Jimmy Kimmel.

Waiting for people to speak out against the weaponization of the DOJ for personal retribution.

What a queen. 

[Maximum Overkill 2,312]

17 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

We had some brave folks speak up against his attack on freedom of speech with stupid Jimmy Kimmel.

Waiting for people to speak out against the weaponization of the DOJ for personal retribution.

Comey is a Lefty Groyper, say it  

[Ron_Artest 1,952]

3 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Comey is a Lefty Groyper, say it  

Comey played a huge part in tanking Hillary and electing trump.  His daughter worked to convict Maxwell.  This is just revenge for the Russia investigation and convicting his friend.

[Maximum Overkill 2,312]

1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said:

Comey played a huge part in tanking Hillary

And then he went Full Left Groyper  

It's sad how Liberals get, especially as they get older. 

[BrahmaBulls 879]

41 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

We had some brave folks speak up against his attack on freedom of speech with stupid Jimmy Kimmel.

Waiting for people to speak out against the weaponization of the DOJ for personal retribution.

Are you triggered by this, snowflake?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

20 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Comey played a huge part in tanking Hillary and electing trump.  His daughter worked to convict Maxwell.  This is just revenge for the Russia investigation and convicting his friend.

I thought he won because of racism and misogyny? And Russia! 

[BrahmaBulls 879]

43 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I love the rationalization of corruption and authoritarianism by using revenge and retribution.

Shows your character.  Shows your morality.

History will not be kind to trump and the cucks that support the death of democracy.

History will not be kind to you freaks that let boys play girls sports, weirdo.

[seafoam1 3,315]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I thought he won because of racism and misogyny? And Russia! 

Ouch. Poor gutterboy.

[jonnyutah 482]

45 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

History will not be kind to you freaks that let boys play girls sports, weirdo.

You don't trust the science!

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

Judge who reviewed James Comey's indictment was confused by prosecutor's handling of case, transcript shows

>>

But two versions of the indictment were published on the case docket: one with the dropped third count, and one without. The transcript reveals why this occurred. 

"So this has never happened before. I've been handed two documents that are in the Mr. Comey case that are inconsistent with one another," Vaala said to Halligan. "There seems to be a discrepancy. They're both signed by the (grand jury) foreperson." 

And she noted that one document did not clearly indicate what the grand jury had decided.

"The one that says it's a failure to concur in an indictment, it doesn't say with respect to one count," Vaala said. "It looks like they failed to concur across all three counts, so I'm a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent."

Halligan initially responded that she hadn't seen that version of the indictment.

"So I only reviewed the one with the two counts that our office redrafted when we found out about the two — two counts that were true billed, and I signed that one. I did not see the other one. I don't know where that came from," Halligan told the judge.

Vaala responded, "You didn't see it?" And Halligan again told her, "I did not see that one."

Vaala seemed surprised: "So your office didn't prepare the indictment that they —"

Halligan then replied, "No, no, no — I — no, I prepared three counts. I only signed the one — the two-count (indictment). I don't know which one with three counts you have in your hands."

"Okay. It has your signature on it," Vaala told Halligan, who responded, "Okay. Well."<<

[TimHauck 3,187]

9 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Judge who reviewed James Comey's indictment was confused by prosecutor's handling of case, transcript shows

>>

But two versions of the indictment were published on the case docket: one with the dropped third count, and one without. The transcript reveals why this occurred. 

"So this has never happened before. I've been handed two documents that are in the Mr. Comey case that are inconsistent with one another," Vaala said to Halligan. "There seems to be a discrepancy. They're both signed by the (grand jury) foreperson." 

And she noted that one document did not clearly indicate what the grand jury had decided.

"The one that says it's a failure to concur in an indictment, it doesn't say with respect to one count," Vaala said. "It looks like they failed to concur across all three counts, so I'm a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent."

Halligan initially responded that she hadn't seen that version of the indictment.

"So I only reviewed the one with the two counts that our office redrafted when we found out about the two — two counts that were true billed, and I signed that one. I did not see the other one. I don't know where that came from," Halligan told the judge.

Vaala responded, "You didn't see it?" And Halligan again told her, "I did not see that one."

Vaala seemed surprised: "So your office didn't prepare the indictment that they —"

Halligan then replied, "No, no, no — I — no, I prepared three counts. I only signed the one — the two-count (indictment). I don't know which one with three counts you have in your hands."

"Okay. It has your signature on it," Vaala told Halligan, who responded, "Okay. Well."<<

Oh this is going to be fun 

[TimHauck 3,187]

Klepper makes a good point here.  Weird for Trump to go after Comey since he basically got Trump elected the first time by announcing the investigation into Hillary’s emails.

 

[TimHauck 3,187]

Good to see DEI still in effect with Halligan though.

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

WAPO: DOJ’s star witness McCabe (really their whole case) wasn’t interviewed by the FBI/DOJ & didn’t appear before the grand jury.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

13 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Please explain the specific points by McCarthy  that you disagree with and why. 
 

This will be good. 

Ask nice. 

[The Real timschochet 7,203]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Ask nice. 

I already wrote please. 

[The Real timschochet 7,203]

14 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Oh this is going to be fun 

Yeah I’m kinda concerned this will be thrown out too quickly on a technicality. Given that the judge is a Biden appointee that will allow Trump and MAGA to simply argue that it’s the Deep State protecting their own. I would almost rather it go to trial so that the public can see what a farce and embarrassment this is. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I already wrote please. 

Lose the snark. 

[Ron_Artest 1,952]

This dumb b1tch Halligan has never indicated anyone before.  She has no idea what she's doing, something everyone else refused to do, just listening to Grandpa dementia cry about revenge.

[The Real timschochet 7,203]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Lose the snark. 

It’s not snark; it’s contempt. 

Ita up to you if you want to respond to my request. Andrew McCarthy is a guy I at times disagree with (he is very conservative) but one I always enjoy reading because he is extremely smart, and, I believe, has integrity. You lack either attribute IMO.  You wrote that you disagree with him here. I think you should explain why. I doubt you will, or even can. I doubt you even bothered to read his arguments. But if I’m wrong here’s your chance to prove it. 

[TimHauck 3,187]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yeah I’m kinda concerned this will be thrown out too quickly on a technicality. Given that the judge is a Biden appointee that will allow Trump and MAGA to simply argue that it’s the Deep State protecting their own. I would almost rather it go to trial so that the public can see what a farce and embarrassment this is. 

Yeah the MAGA folks already have “activist judge!!” on their list of excuses.  And based on this thread, if it gets to a jury they’re also prepping to use “activist jury!!” too.

[SaintsInDome2006 519]

9 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yeah I’m kinda concerned this will be thrown out too quickly on a technicality. Given that the judge is a Biden appointee that will allow Trump and MAGA to simply argue that it’s the Deep State protecting their own. I would almost rather it go to trial so that the public can see what a farce and embarrassment this is. 

We’ve already done this twice. Durham took two ‘Russia Hoax’ cases to trial, in both situations the juries acquitted very quickly. In one of the cases the DOJ star witness was completely adverse to the prosecution’s case. Stuff like that isn’t even supposed to get that far.

[Mike Honcho 5,381]

29 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Oh this is going to be fun 

Who would of thought that an attorney that's never prosecuted a case would be ill prepared to be a U.S. Attorney. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,826]

A grand jury chose to indict. And the fact that they chose to dismiss one of the counts indicates they were measured in their approach and didn’t take their duty lightly. More to come. 

[TimHauck 3,187]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

A grand jury chose to indict. And the fact that they chose to dismiss one of the counts indicates they were measured in their approach and didn’t take their duty lightly. More to come. 

And if a jury chooses that Comey is not guilty, I’m sure you will accept that as being measured in their approach as well, correct?

[seafoam1 3,315]

31 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

And if a jury chooses that Comey is not guilty, I’m sure you will accept that as being measured in their approach as well, correct?

I'm 100% sure conservatives won't be committing arson and looting and murder and blocking roadways across the nation in protest.

2020 liberal riots anyone?