Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
listen2me 23

Man stabs young child, released for good behavior.

Recommended Posts

Good or bad for society?  Justice?  Discuss.  

WOODFORD COUNTY, Ky. —

An Indiana man convicted in the death of a 6-year-old Kentucky boy is now out of prison on parole.

Ronald Exantus was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2018, but was released early on good behavior and education credits.

He broke into the Versailles home of Logan Tipton in December 2015, fatally stabbed the boy and attacked the little boy's father and sisters.

He was found not guilty by reason of insanity for murder, but a jury found him guilty but mentally ill on assault charges.

Tipton's family also survived the attack and his father says after that night he also lost the will to live.

"I laid in bed. I gave up. I gave up on life. I gave up on my family. I gave up on everybody. I just wanted to die," said Logan's father Dean Tipton.

Exantus will remain under probation and parole supervision until his sentence ends next year.

He will serve his mandatory re-entry supervision in Florida.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mentally competent or not, you stab someone to death, a 6 year old child no less, you should be put in the ground immediately.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From 20 years to 7?! Good behavior and education? But also yes to the mentally ill? 

Fock that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

From 20 years to 7?! Good behavior and education? But also yes to the mentally ill? 

Fock that. 

The jury is the one who found him not guilty of murder by reason of insanity, which to my understanding is a hard standard to meet. And guilty but mentally ill still got him a 20 year sentence on the assault charges (I don't know Kentucky law, but in California prisoners can get one day of credit against their sentence for every day served and there are also similar incentives to reduce sentence like he received). 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, squistion said:

The jury is the one who found him not guilty of murder by reason of insanity, which to my understanding is a hard standard to meet. And guilty but mentally ill still got him a 20 year sentence on the assault charges (I don't know Kentucky law, but in California prisoners can get one day of credit against their sentence for every day served and there are also similar incentives to reduce sentence like he received). 

So you approve of his release. Go figure

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SUXBNME said:

So you approve of his release. Go figure

No, Straw Man, I didn't say that, however sentencing guidelines have to be followed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, squistion said:

No, Straw Man, I didn't say that, however sentencing guidelines have to be followed. 

Do you approve of his release? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SUXBNME said:

Do you approve of his release? 

Like it or not, sentencing guidelines have to be followed when a prisoner meets all the criteria. State authorities had no other alternative in the situation. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, squistion said:

No, Straw Man, I didn't say that, however sentencing guidelines have to be followed. 

you didnt really say anything, just word vomit

And gudlines have nothing to do with it, they didnt have to grant him parole

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Like it or not, sentencing guidelines have to be followed when a prisoner meets all the criteria. State authorities had no other alternative in the situation. 

More lies, they dont have to grant him parole

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, who’s guilty when he repeats?  Those that approve abd granted is release?  Haven’t there been enough times that we have seen this, and yet the bs continues 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, squistion said:

Like it or not, sentencing guidelines have to be followed when a prisoner meets all the criteria. State authorities had no other alternative in the situation. 

That's not what I'm asking you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, weepaws said:

So, who’s guilty when he repeats?  Those that approve abd granted is release?  Haven’t there been enough times that we have seen this, and yet the bs continues 

I've had the same question for decades. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×