The Religion of Peace Strikes Again-Australian Ediition

[Mark Davis 435]

15 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

It’s not, but in that specific example - Afghanistan - you’re proving too much. Those people came here because the Taliban or AQ would’ve killed them because they *weren’t Islamists.

Some are as you say, but I'd also say some lesser number are coming for non religious reasons but still have that same more radicalized view.  Since their society is such,, a critical mass of those people have to believe or support that more radical system.  Just because someone tells you they were persecuted, how do you prove it or vet them?  Is it the Taliban?  I am asking sincerely because the Taliban control that area.  I don't think any of us can answer that.  In fact, our government hasn't been able to answer it, nor the other Western governments taking in refugees from the area.  They've all failed to identify the threats.  It's not a Trump nor a Biden thing, it's an everyone thing.  If it's possible, nobody has figured it out.

[SaintsInDome2006 766]

25 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

Some are as you say, but I'd also say some lesser number are coming for non religious reasons but still have that same more radicalized view.  Since their society is such,, a critical mass of those people have to believe or support that more radical system.  Just because someone tells you they were persecuted, how do you prove it or vet them?  Is it the Taliban?  I am asking sincerely because the Taliban control that area.  I don't think any of us can answer that.  In fact, our government hasn't been able to answer it, nor the other Western governments taking in refugees from the area.  They've all failed to identify the threats.  It's not a Trump nor a Biden thing, it's an everyone thing.  If it's possible, nobody has figured it out.

We were at war in Afghanistan for 20 years. There is a vast amount of knowledge, especially as many of these people worked with US troops, intelligence, health, education, USAID, translation, you name it. 
 

And we have identified threats.

[Hardcore troubadour 16,017]

29 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

We were at war in Afghanistan for 20 years. There is a vast amount of knowledge, especially as many of these people worked with US troops, intelligence, health, education, USAID, translation, you name it. 
 

And we have identified threats.

The one that murdered the guardsman did too.  How did that work out?

[SaintsInDome2006 766]

42 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The one that murdered the guardsman did too.  How did that work out?

I said that in my OP. I asked between 9/11/01 & now how many mass murders have there been by outright Arab immigrants. I wasn’t being snarky, I couldn’t think of any besides the DC attack. I guarantee you Italian/Sicilian, Irish & Russian organized crime have killed more Americans than immigrant Arabs though. But we don’t talk about that, we make movies romanticizing that ‘immigrant story’ instead.

[Mark Davis 435]

1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

We were at war in Afghanistan for 20 years. There is a vast amount of knowledge, especially as many of these people worked with US troops, intelligence, health, education, USAID, translation, you name it. 
 

And we have identified threats.

Yet I can give you a list of terrorists and bad actors stopped from there since the war ended that we allowed into our country.  So we don't seem to have that ability.

[SaintsInDome2006 766]

2 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

Yet I can give you a list of terrorists and bad actors stopped from there since the war ended that we allowed into our country.  So we don't seem to have that ability.

Just a reminder, the Afghan program is its own thing. It’s a GOP program created by Congress because of the short withdrawal & lack of planning in the original US-Taliban agreement. There have been applicants rejected as part of that, we haven’t just been accepting everyone.

[seafoam1 3,499]

16 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Just a reminder, the Afghan program is its own thing. It’s a GOP program created by Congress because of the short withdrawal & lack of planning in the original US-Taliban agreement. There have been applicants rejected as part of that, we haven’t just been accepting everyone.

Incorrect. 

[jerryskids 7,192]

8 hours ago, Meglamaniac said:

Congrats Jerry, you got the TimHack trifecta

Show me a link, but it has to be a link I approve of

Tyler Robinson

Thanks for confirming

 

LOL

I know right?  Show me a link, but not one which shows that their parent organization is tied to Hamas funding:

Quote

National SJP founder Dr. Hatem Bazian serves as the Chairman of the National Board of AMP, further solidifying the current relationship between National SJP and AMP.13  AMP has substantial ties to Hamas via its financial sponsor, Americans for Justice in Palestine Educational Foundation, Inc. (AJP), a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Letter-to-National-SJP-5.29.24.pdf

Certainly not a quote from "The Written Resistance," the National SJP newsletter which started around October 7.

Quote

For all its imperfections, Hamas is a
progressive organization pursuing a program
of national emancipation and democratic
reconstruction. They collaborate with
other nationalist forces committed to
armed struggle, including the Communist
Left, with whom they coordinate militarily
and politically in their shared struggle
for national liberation. Hamas’ program
proclaims ethnic and religious civic equality
and seeks to create a unified democratic
Palestine that respects the rights of its
citizens.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F55MYJNSoFgm-NKI7HM4Wch3-iGKHFrS/view

Moderate Tim thinks it is unreasonable to think the National SJP supports Hamas.  It's only chapters!  He so readily believes anything that fits his Leftist worldview, and so fervently dismisses anything that doesn't.   

[TimHauck 3,395]

29 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I know right?  Show me a link, but not one which shows that their parent organization is tied to Hamas funding:

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Letter-to-National-SJP-5.29.24.pdf

Certainly not a quote from "The Written Resistance," the National SJP newsletter which started around October 7.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F55MYJNSoFgm-NKI7HM4Wch3-iGKHFrS/view

Moderate Tim thinks it is unreasonable to think the National SJP supports Hamas.  It's only chapters!  He so readily believes anything that fits his Leftist worldview, and so fervently dismisses anything that doesn't.   

The problem with distant links to funding sources is that Hamas is the governing body in Gaza.  So if there is any funding coming from someone in Gaza, there are probably “links” to Hamas.

Remind me, did you condemn Trump for pardoning CZ since his company laundered money for Hamas?

Looks like that comment was from an individual member and not necessarily representative of the group as a whole.   And again, even if it was, surely you’re not saying Mamdani definitely agrees with everything a club he was in 10+ years earlier does 10+ years later, right?

[shadrap 271]

On 12/15/2025 at 5:58 PM, squistion said:

No point as it won't change your mind or anyone else's on your side of the aisle here.

In other words you are lying & can't provide a link.

just as I figured.

[squistion 2,651]

18 minutes ago, shadrap said:

In other words you are lying & can't provide a link.

just as I figured.

The person who throws out a claim about a statistic is the one who is supposed to provide the link to prove it, not those who are disputing it.

The stats about Black men and crime that are cited are just wrong, that's why a link was not provided here.

[jerryskids 7,192]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

The problem with distant links to funding sources is that Hamas is the governing body in Gaza.  So if there is any funding coming from someone in Gaza, there are probably “links” to Hamas.

Remind me, did you condemn Trump for pardoning CZ since his company laundered money for Hamas?

Looks like that comment was from an individual member and not necessarily representative of the group as a whole.   And again, even if it was, surely you’re not saying Mamdani definitely agrees with everything a club he was in 10+ years earlier does 10+ years later, right?

Tim:  Show that NSJP supports Hamas, and not just a bunch of chapters, it's inconceivable that they would support Hamas!

Jerry:  Here are two examples.

Tim:  The first doesn't count because Hamas runs the country.  The second doesn't count because it's just an employee of the NSJP in an NSJP newsletter, that doesn't mean anything!  (I literally lol'd typing this one.)

Bonus Tim:  Surely your not saying Mamdani believes in EVERYTHING that SJP does, just because he went through the effort to form a chapter?!

Jerry:  Don't call me Shirley.

[TimHauck 3,395]

13 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Tim:  Show that NSJP supports Hamas, and not just a bunch of chapters, it's inconceivable that they would support Hamas!

Jerry:  Here are two examples.

Tim:  The first doesn't count because Hamas runs the country.  The second doesn't count because it's just an employee of the NSJP in an NSJP newsletter, that doesn't mean anything!  (I literally lol'd typing this one.)

Bonus Tim:  Surely your not saying Mamdani believes in EVERYTHING that SJP does, just because he went through the effort to form a chapter?!

Jerry:  Don't call me Shirley.

Remind me, did you condemn Trump for pardoning CZ since his company laundered money for Hamas?

[seafoam1 3,499]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Remind me, did you condemn Trump for pardoning CZ since his company laundered money for Hamas?

You voted for this. 

 

[dogcows 1,204]

Looks like I missed a lot while at work…

‘Concentration of Muslims” has been narrowed to just extremists. As I predicted, the goalposts would be moved when convenient. That being said, I’m happy to see it. Any group of radical extremists is a problem; I think we all agree on that.

But how did we get onto the silly idea that Mamdani supports terrorism? Seriously…

[seafoam1 3,499]

8 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Looks like I missed a lot in life.

Yeah. You have.

 

[TimHauck 3,395]

13 hours ago, TimHauck said:

The problem with distant links to funding sources is that Hamas is the governing body in Gaza.  So if there is any funding coming from someone in Gaza, there are probably “links” to Hamas.

Looks like this is now happening with the Brown shooting as well.  MAGA found a professor at Brown who previously worked at a university in Palestine.  In other words he must be Hamas!  (Some are even suggesting he might be the shooter)

 

[jerryskids 7,192]

12 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Remind me, did you condemn Trump for pardoning CZ since his company laundered money for Hamas?

Glad that you agree with my summary. 

I believe I said that I disagree with all executive (presidential and gubernatorial) pardons.  We have a whole judicial branch of government whose job it is to dole out sentences as per the laws enacted by the legislative branch, and pardons don't seem to fit that model.

I may also have said that I don't know enough to understand why Trump would have pardoned him.  His funding of Hamas is a good reason NOT to do so, but it doesn't explain the reason to pardon him.

I was somewhat busy when that was going down and didn't dig into it, to be honest.

Hopefully you can figure out how to wedge this response into your spreadsheet.  :thumbsup: 

[jerryskids 7,192]

12 hours ago, dogcows said:

Looks like I missed a lot while at work…

‘Concentration of Muslims” has been narrowed to just extremists. As I predicted, the goalposts would be moved when convenient. That being said, I’m happy to see it. Any group of radical extremists is a problem; I think we all agree on that.

But how did we get onto the silly idea that Mamdani supports terrorism? Seriously…

I missed that prediction, and I discussed your statement about Dearborn in a post to Fnord (I thought he was the one who said it, sorry about that), but if you acknowledge that concentrations like Somaliland in MN are a concern, then we are in agreement.   

[dogcows 1,204]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

I missed that prediction, and I discussed your statement about Dearborn in a post to Fnord (I thought he was the one who said it, sorry about that), but if you acknowledge that concentrations like Somaliland in MN are a concern, then we are in agreement.   

99+% of Somalians in MN are not radical extremists. So we agree that radical extremists are a problem, but disagree on who fits that description.

[Mr Fantasy 148]

Quote

Before you accuse critics of Islam of being “ignorant” or “Islamophobic,” listen to what John Quincy Adams, the 6th President of the United States, said nearly 200 years ago about Islam, the Quran, and Muhammad:

“The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat. But the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike by fraud or by force.”

John Quincy Adams, unsigned essays on the Russo-Turkish War and Greece, The American Annual Register (1827–29), New York, 1830.

Based.

[Mr Fantasy 148]

Again and again we’re shown examples of how Islam is not compatible with American principles and values. 

[jerryskids 7,192]

1 hour ago, dogcows said:

99+% of Somalians in MN are not radical extremists. So we agree that radical extremists are a problem, but disagree on who fits that description.

I introduced Somaliland, MN as a concern and a net negative to the country because of their extreme welfare, system abuse, lack of assimilation, and tribal approach to politics:

You won't engage on that, so you've turned this into a strawman about every Somali being a radical extremist.

But if you are going to pull a number out of thin air for your strawman, there are 80K-100K Somalis in MN, so 1% means 800-1000 radical extremists.  

[The Real timschochet 7,543]

1 hour ago, Mr Fantasy said:

Based.

What does the Old Testament instruct Jews to do with non believers? See 2 Chronicles 15:12-13

What does the New Testament say to do with those who don’t accept the divinity of Jesus Christ? See Luke 19:27

 

[Maximum Overkill 2,599]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

What does the Old Testament instruct Jews to do with non believers? See 2 Chronicles 15:12-13

What does the New Testament say to do with those who don’t accept the divinity of Jesus Christ? See Luke 19:27

 

Know your Bible? 

"If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads". 

In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men

[Hardcore troubadour 16,017]

I read a report somewhere that Islamophobia is directly related to Muslims continually killing people for not being Muslim. And saying they are going to do it. 

[The Real timschochet 7,543]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Know your Bible? 

"If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads". 

In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.

Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men

Yes the first quote is from Leviticus. Do you agree? Should all male homosexuals be put to death? 

[The Real timschochet 7,543]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I read a report somewhere that Islamophobia is directly related to Muslims continually killing people for not being Muslim. And saying they are going to do it. 

More likely it’s related to your ignorance and bigotry. 

[Hardcore troubadour 16,017]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

More likely it’s related to your ignorance and bigotry. 

Police are murdering unarmed blacks. 

[Maximum Overkill 2,599]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yes the first quote is from Leviticus. Do you agree? Should all male homosexuals be put to death? 

Not at all, we love the Gays! 

Trannies should not exist. They are not real

A MAN CAN NEVER BE A WOMAN AND A WOMAN CAN NEVER BE A MAN. - Biology 101

Do you agree??? 

[The Real timschochet 7,543]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Police are murdering unarmed blacks. 

Sometimes. They certainly treat them differently and worse. Institutionalized racism against young black males by the police forces of this country has always been a reality; it can’t be rationally disputed. 

[The Real timschochet 7,543]

1 minute ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Not at all, we love the Gays! 

Trannies should not exist. They are not real

A MAN CAN NEVER BE A WOMAN AND A WOMAN CAN NEVER BE A MAN. - Biology 101

Do you agree??? 

Why did you choose to quote Leviticus if you disagree with it? 

[Maximum Overkill 2,599]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Why did you choose to quote Leviticus if you disagree with it? 

I'm not allowed to quote if I disagree???

Answer mine 

[jerryskids 7,192]

Hey @dogcows, I forgot to add brotherly rape gangs to the  list for Somaliland.  This from Mark Steyn.  He's British so he starts with them, but it's a lead in to MN:

Quote

For over a decade at this shingle, we've reported on the industrial-scale gang-rape afflicting almost every town up and down the spine of England, most recently on a special edition of The Mark Steyn Show. The stories are all different, and yet in their most salient aspect all the same: In every town the girls are doubly violated - sodomised by their Pakistani Muslim clan-rapists, and then further assaulted by a whitey-white officialdom that is, as a practical matter, on the same side as the rape-gangs. The politicians, the social workers, the media, the coppers, all of them. In a particularly brazen example, after our friend Samantha Smith made her debut appearance on the Steyn Show, the goons of West Mercia Constabulary came banging on her door the following morning to warn her about going on telly to talk about it. Of course, Samantha, having more courage than the entirety of the English police, immediately went back on telly to shove it up West Mercia's flabby arses:

[see link for video]

We generally report such stories under the headline "The Shame of England". For a decade, the overwhelming reaction of our American readers and viewers has been along the lines of "This would never happen in America, Steyn", augmented by a few random observations on Euro-pussies more generally.

Well, it turns out it is happening in America, or at least in Minnesota: exactly the same collision and collusion between progressive "anti-racist" pieties and the sacrifice of your womenfolk to certain "communities" (dread word). Meet "Minnesota man" Abdimahat Bille Mohamed:

On December 12, 2017, Mohamed and two others kidnapped and raped a 15-year-old girl (Minor Victim 1). Minor Victim 1 met Mohamed online, on the social media platform Snapchat. Mohamed agreed to give Minor Victim 1 a ride and picked her up in St. Paul. Instead of driving her to her requested location, Mohamed drove Minor Victim 1 to Minneapolis against her will. Mohamed parked his car in Minneapolis. Suddenly, two more men got in the car. One of them was holding a short-barreled silver revolver. The man pointed the gun at Minor Victim 1's head and said, "give my brother some head or I'll blow your head off."

Just hold it there for a moment - and let me ask you as one man of the world to another: when you're at home of an evening and thinking you'd rather go out for a gang-rape than a meatball sub, do you take along your brother? or your cousin? or your uncle? Or would that make conversation round the Thanksgiving table a little icky?

Twenty sodding years ago, the late Martin Amis wondered why I would write about anything so serious as the west's demographic death-spiral by way of Dean Martin jokes. Well, because unlike Francis Fukuyama and other experts, Dino predicted a lot of this. As he was wont to sing on Rat Pack nights:

You are too beautiful for one man alone
So I brought along my brother...

As we have discussed with respect to France, Germany and other Continental countries, until diversity became our strength, gang-rape was an extremely rare phenomenon; now it is routine. Beyond that, gang-rape by multiple members of the same family was all but unknown. But in the new post-western west, members of the same biraderi (Urdu, from the Persian, literally "brotherhood") work in the same business, marry each other, organise themselves politically, and go out raping together. In Rotherham, they're Pakistani. In Minneapolis, they're Somali.

What would you do if you wanted to incentivise the exciting multiculti phenomenon of gang-rape? Well, you'd do exactly what the impeccably "progressive" Hennepin County Attorney, Mary Moriarty (pictured at top right), did. You'd do a "plea deal" with Mr Mohamed:

He was sentenced to three years in prison for the attack on the 15-year-old, but the sentence was stayed for five years, meaning he served no time in prison...

He was sentenced to 14 months in prison for the 2024 sexual assault, but that sentence was also stayed, meaning he avoided prison.

Mr Mohamed is a career rapist; raping is what he does. It is not known whether he has other interests, such as stamp-collecting or dogsledding, but the belated federal (ie, non-Minnesota) indictment suggests his priorities:

He and two other men held her against her will in the car. The men raped Victim 2...

He pulled the car into an alley, where Mohamed raped Victim 3. After the rape, a second man got into the backseat...

Mohamed told Victim 4 that if she didn't have sex with him, he would get a gun from his car and shoot her or her sister...

Mohamed drove Victim 5 approximately 70 miles to a hotel in Bloomington, where he kept her for nearly a week...

How is it that a multiple gang-rapist walks free? As those of us who have engaged in the thankless task of trying to get American "prosecutors" to put career criminals behind bars well know, it all starts very butch - he's facing forty-seven felony charges each carrying a minimum sentence of twenty-nine years! - and then gets plea-dealed down to a couple of misdemeanours and an unpaid parking ticket. The County Attorney isn't talking, but her spokesperson - the usual pronoun-laden pajama boy - is defending the deal:

"Due to circumstances that cause difficulty in many criminal sexual conduct cases, these charges were the available and appropriate ones to secure a felony conviction," spokesperson Daniel Borgertpoepping told Fox 9.

Ooh, a "felony conviction"!!! That sounds scary!!!!!

But does it actually make any difference to a respected member of the Somali "community"? Does it, say, prevent him from resuming all the rapey-rape? Mr Mohamed received his super-butchy-butch "felony conviction" in May. Four months later, on September 15th, he seized Victim 5 and drove her to a motel in Bloomington. On September 21st, she managed to escape. That week's on Mary Moriarty.

Ms Moriarty has form in this regard: She indulges not just gang-rapists but killers. Zaria McKeever was shot five times, including one shot point-blank in the head, but the County Attorney thought that the killer would benefit from a two-year rehabilitation programme at a juvenile facility rather than banging him up in the Big House. So even Minnesota's Governor Jazz Hands was moved to act and took the case away from her.

Yet, in fairness to the County Attorney, young Miss McKeever was murdered by a black man in the George Floyd state. That's the original systemic-racist paradigm. Same in England - where thirty years ago the report into the Stephen Lawrence case found the Metropolitan Police guilty of "institutional racism" and thereby inaugurated the new culture of British bureaucracy, where the absolute over-riding priority is not to be perceived as "racist" lest you get tied up in sensitivity-training hell for the next six months. It was entirely predictable that electorally vital "communities" in towns like Rotherham would soon see the opportunities in such an environment. And, as it goes for Pakistanis in Yorkshire, so too for Somalis in a demographically transformed Minnesota.

And so cobwebbed white-guilt victim/oppressor narratives are effortlessly extended to newcomers who showed up twenty minutes ago and have no reason to be other than eternally grateful to the death-wish societies that made the mistake of taking them in: no Somali ever sat at an Alabammy lunch counter; no Rwandan was ever colonised by the British Empire. In fact in 2009 Rwanda voluntarily joined the British Empire in order to lessen the likelihood of another 1990s-style genocide. That's how sod-bollockingly stupid is the whole "progressive" Mary Moriarty "But think of the poor gang-rapists!" narrative.

Some states have a "nice" reputation - which invariably becomes a lagging indicator. Thus Minnesota, thanks to Lake Wobegon and The Mary Tyler Moore Show and a few other cultural artifacts. Garrison Keillor has introduced no Somali gang-rape biraderi to his charming stories of small-town life, although I would urge him to do so: since he got MeTooed, the guy has nothing to lose. No danger of Abdimahat Bille Mohamed getting MeTooed, is there? The Powerline blog covers in real time the Somalification of their state, and today Bill Glahn pushes back at the suggestion that the Land of 10,000 Rapes has fallen prey to the same evil as a dying England:

John Ondrasik commented "Minnesota is London." Minnesota might be London if it weren't for the efforts of United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota Daniel Rosen and his team, including Melinda Williams. Ms. Williams is now prosecuting Mohamed's case in federal court for kidnapping and gang-raping the 15-year-old girl and raping other women.

Philosophically, I do not really support the idea of the Feds playing catch up, as it's pretty obviously double-jeopardy, and ever more openly so. But America is a land of legalisms rather than law, so whatever. However, even that is only possible because of the current administration. A year ago, President Autopen would not have done this. So Minnesota not being London is predicated on the Democrats eternally nominating a ticket as obviously club-footed and repellent as Vice President Cackles and Governor Jazz Hands.

Is that really what you're willing to bet the future on? After all, Hennepin County cheerfully elected a county attorney on the side of the gang-rapists.

For the last thirteen months, the United States has demonstrated the central aspect of the thesis of America Alone - that in critical aspects it remains different from the more obviously suicidal parts of the west. The real question is whether it is sufficiently different to affect the ultimate outcome. As I have said, absent severe course-correction, we are in the last fifteen years of anything remotely recognisable as the western world. No country other than Somalia - or the breakaway Somaliland - needs a single Somali other than Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

And yet there is the Hennepin County Attorney loosing them on Minneapolis in order that its maidenhood should grow accustomed to the progressivism of gang-rape.

https://www.steynonline.com/15792/minneapolis-twinned-with-rotherham

[dogcows 1,204]

21 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I introduced Somaliland, MN as a concern and a net negative to the country because of their extreme welfare, system abuse, lack of assimilation, and tribal approach to politics:

You won't engage on that, so you've turned this into a strawman about every Somali being a radical extremist.

But if you are going to pull a number out of thin air for your strawman, there are 80K-100K Somalis in MN, so 1% means 800-1000 radical extremists.  

I’m really not seeing your point here. I called you out for saying all “‘concentrations of Muslims” are a problem. You clarified that you meant extremists. 

I don’t really agree with your other assertions, but at least we agree that labeling all groups of Muslims as trouble is unfair. So let’s just be happy we agreed on something at least.

[The Real timschochet 7,543]

5 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

I'm not allowed to quote if I disagree???

Answer mine 

I didn’t say you weren’t allowed to. I just couldn’t figure out why you did. Which is why I asked. Why did you quote Leviticus if you don’t believe in it? 

[The Real timschochet 7,543]

9 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

A MAN CAN NEVER BE A WOMAN AND A WOMAN CAN NEVER BE A MAN. - Biology 101

Do you agree??? 

Is this supposed to be a quote? I don’t believe it appears in any legitimate biology textbook. Certainly it didn’t in any biology class I took. 

On the issue of transgenders, which btw is completely irrelevant to this topic, I will trust the science of the American Psychological Association: 

https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/transgender-people-gender-identity-gender-expression

Feel free to read up. You might learn something. 

 

[jerryskids 7,192]

6 minutes ago, dogcows said:

I’m really not seeing your point here. I called you out for saying all “‘concentrations of Muslims” are a problem. You clarified that you meant extremists. 

I don’t really agree with your other assertions, but at least we agree that labeling all groups of Muslims as trouble is unfair. So let’s just be happy we agreed on something at least.

No I didn't; that's you making stuff up again.  I said "large concentrations from radicalized origins," which includes Somaliland, MN, not just your 1%.  Although such cultures allow, protect, and perhaps encourage the behavior of the 1%.

[squistion 2,651]

8 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I didn’t say you weren’t allowed to. I just couldn’t figure out why you did. Which is why I asked. Why did you quote Leviticus if you don’t believe in it? 

I would imagine he is selective about what he quotes from Leviticus, for instance, Leviticus also prohibits the eating of pork, and Max impresses me as the type that probably enjoys a yummy ham sandwich. 

[The Real timschochet 7,543]

Just now, squistion said:

I would imagine he is selective about what he quotes from Leviticus, for instance, Leviticus also prohibits the eating of pork, and Max impresses me as the type that probably enjoys a yummy ham sandwich. 

Well me too. (Actually not so much ham but bacon and pepperoni for sure.) Screw being kosher; life is too short. Love me some oysters too.