Jump to content



Photo

Anti-Trump FBI Agent at center of Clinton Email & Russian Collusion Scandals


  • Please log in to reply
262 replies to this topic

#241 Casual Observer

Casual Observer

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 741 posts

Posted 31 January 2018 - 04:44 PM

A. It was them getting out ahead of what the proteump jackholes in NY were doing (as they fed knformtheough Giuliani.
B. And it was determined easily those emails were nothing.
C. Yeah...that must be it (sarcasm intentional)

How do you know how many e-mails there were and what they contained?  Since you know so much I think you should appear before these House and Senate subcommittees and offer some testimony to help them out.  What do you say?



#242 EternalShinyAndChrome

EternalShinyAndChrome

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 938 posts

Posted 31 January 2018 - 06:05 PM

How do you know how many e-mails there were and what they contained?  Since you know so much I think you should appear before these House and Senate subcommittees and offer some testimony to help them out.  What do you say?

 

Well, that would be stupid of him to do.  All of America would find out first hand what we already know:  That SloTranny is a lying sack of ###### that does nothing but believe in and regurgitate DNC/MSNBC/HuffPo talking points.



#243 wiffleball

wiffleball

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 61,608 posts

Posted 01 February 2018 - 02:18 AM

So now, this allegedly Trump hating FBI agent was the guy who wrote the memo calling to reopen the Clinton investigation.

Jesus, do you guys take yoga to bend over backwards trying to make all the shiit fit your narrative? It was basically that last email probe 11 days before the election the ###### canned Hillary. Thankfully.

It's like when Trump keep going back and forth as to whether he loved Co me or hated call me or love the FBI or hated the FBI. Now the individual agent who was apparently anti-trump is now anti-hillary? Cheesus kids.
Users currently on :ignore: BudBro,Flahawker

#244 SenatorRock

SenatorRock

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 1,150 posts

Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:27 AM

I was looking for the thread that Saints asked about McCabe but guess this will do.

 

Appears McCabe knew about the Clinton emails on 9/28/16, Comey informed Congress about them on 10/26/2016. 11 days before election. And they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those meddling NY agents and NYPD cops who were doing their jobs. McCabe sat on the emails for a month rather than notify Comey and Congress so they could be reviewed. 

 

The spin is impressive though. News breaks that McCabe was removed from FBI on Monday in part because of OIG investigation into DOJ/FBI corruption under Obama. Somehow the leftards spin this into "McCabe is the one who "reopened" the email investigation. He is a good guy!

 

http://archive.is/lZoux

 

 

Kinda like Piece of Shiff going on twitter and screeching that Nunes altered the memo and HIC never approved an altered memo and omg russia. Reality: Nunes fixed a few grammatical errors, made 2 edits that the FBI and HIC Minority had requested. 

 

When you will you people ever learn. 



#245 SenatorRock

SenatorRock

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 1,150 posts

Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:29 AM

Poor wiff. 

 

You are always a day late and 100 IQ points short when it comes to political stuff. 

 

I'd love to know where you get your talking points. I could have fun breaking those people down.



#246 Hardcore troubadour

Hardcore troubadour

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 29,057 posts

Posted 01 February 2018 - 03:37 AM

You're doing some great work here Senator Rock. I, and your country thank you. It's Patriots like you that will be the reason we are able to beat back the liberal horde that would rather see our great nation plunge into the third world than admit their idealogy is harmful and would doom us.

#247 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 58,251 posts

Posted 01 February 2018 - 07:20 AM

I was looking for the thread that Saints asked about McCabe but guess this will do.
 
Appears McCabe knew about the Clinton emails on 9/28/16, Comey informed Congress about them on 10/26/2016. 11 days before election. And they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those meddling NY agents and NYPD cops who were doing their jobs. McCabe sat on the emails for a month rather than notify Comey and Congress so they could be reviewed. 
 
The spin is impressive though. News breaks that McCabe was removed from FBI on Monday in part because of OIG investigation into DOJ/FBI corruption under Obama. Somehow the leftards spin this into "McCabe is the one who "reopened" the email investigation. He is a good guy!
 
http://archive.is/lZoux
 
 
Kinda like Piece of Shiff going on twitter and screeching that Nunes altered the memo and HIC never approved an altered memo and omg russia. Reality: Nunes fixed a few grammatical errors, made 2 edits that the FBI and HIC Minority had requested. 
 
When you will you people ever learn. 


When will you?
Reality is it was just edits? Why do you keep believing Nunes (proven liar) over Schiff (actually credible guy who has been above board the entire time)
Oh wait...I know why.

#248 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 58,251 posts

Posted 01 February 2018 - 07:21 AM

Poor wiff. 
 
You are always a day late and 100 IQ points short when it comes to political stuff. 
 
I'd love to know where you get your talking points. I could have fun breaking those people down.


You just repeated Devin Nunes excuse and claim others just repeat talking points?

#249 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 20,405 posts

Posted 01 February 2018 - 09:58 AM

So now, this allegedly Trump hating FBI agent was the guy who wrote the memo calling to reopen the Clinton investigation.

Jesus, do you guys take yoga to bend over backwards trying to make all the shiit fit your narrative? It was basically that last email probe 11 days before the election the ###### canned Hillary. Thankfully.

It's like when Trump keep going back and forth as to whether he loved Co me or hated call me or love the FBI or hated the FBI. Now the individual agent who was apparently anti-trump is now anti-hillary? Cheesus kids.


He and McCabe sat on new info for two weeks before taking action and then only because someone asked about it during a meeting with top brass.

Oh and during those weeks his wife Mellisa Hodgeman got a nice SEC job.

Sorry I sh!t on your narrative.

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#250 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 58,251 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 01:59 PM

Kyle Griffin‏Verified account @kylegriffin1 3m3 minutes ago

Meanwhile, WSJ has reviewed roughly 7,000 text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, which stretch across 384 pages, and found "no evidence of a conspiracy against Mr. Trump."

 

 

That ultra liberal WSJ...right?

https://www.wsj.com/...9380?mod=e2twus



#251 12th Man

12th Man

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 2,332 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 02:35 PM

SLO Tard on full tilt in several threads. Sad. Imagine if actually missed this place?

#252 SenatorRock

SenatorRock

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 1,150 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 03:50 PM

When will you?
Reality is it was just edits? Why do you keep believing Nunes (proven liar) over Schiff (actually credible guy who has been above board the entire time)
Oh wait...I know why.

Who is the credible guy who has been above board the entire time?

 

And link to the changes made were NOT minor edits?



#253 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 58,251 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 03:57 PM

Who is the credible guy who has been above board the entire time?
 
And link to the changes made were NOT minor edits?

Schiff has been.
Link to what? We were not provided copies of both versions.
Didnt seem to matter...Schiff tore Nunes apart.
Just as the WSJ tore apart your text message narrative.

Better start moving in to your next bogus theory.

Still running away from who you were at FBG I see.
Why not tell who you were there? What are you afraid of?

#254 EternalShinyAndChrome

EternalShinyAndChrome

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 938 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 04:07 PM

Schiff has been.
Link to what? We were not provided copies of both versions.
Didnt seem to matter...Schiff tore Nunes apart.
Just as the WSJ tore apart your text message narrative.

Better start moving in to your next bogus theory.

Still running away from who you were at FBG I see.
Why not tell who you were there? What are you afraid of?

 

That is a flat-out, partisan lie.  Is that what MSNBC told you to say?  Or your masters at the DNC?

 

Anyone with a logical and thinking brain knows that Schiff - and the Democrats - are the real bad guys in this whole mess.  The same guys that wanted all kinds of transparency during the Bush years.

 

That's not even debatable, SloCuck.  What's also not debatable is that you're a DNC cuck who is clearly a liar.



#255 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 58,251 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 04:14 PM

 
That is a flat-out, partisan lie.  Is that what MSNBC told you to say?  Or your masters at the DNC?
 
Anyone with a logical and thinking brain knows that Schiff - and the Democrats - are the real bad guys in this whole mess.  The same guys that wanted all kinds of transparency during the Bush years.
 
That's not even debatable, SloCuck.  What's also not debatable is that you're a DNC cuck who is clearly a liar.


Max.
Stop. Stop your bogus claims that I am lying. Stop your bogus claims that I am using talking points from man can. Stop your baseless personal attacks and the childish names.
Just stop.

#256 SenatorRock

SenatorRock

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 1,150 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 04:19 PM

Still running away from who you were at FBG I see.
Why not tell who you were there? What are you afraid of?

 

Why would I tell you who I was over there? Why do you care? 

 

Do you stalk everyone like this?



#257 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 58,251 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 04:29 PM

 
Why would I tell you who I was over there? Why do you care? 
 
Do you stalk everyone like this?


Stalk?
Just a question as it would be quite telling about you.
Why would you be so afraid to reveal that?

#258 12th Man

12th Man

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 2,332 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 04:39 PM

Stalk?
Just a question as it would be quite telling about you.
Why would you be so afraid to reveal that?

Full tilt in several threads. My god he's lost it.  



#259 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 20,405 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 04:54 PM

How the fock is anyone defending Strzok at this point? Have you no sense of integrity?

FFS call a spade a spade.

BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#260 Sho Nuff

Sho Nuff

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 58,251 posts

Posted 02 February 2018 - 04:57 PM

How the fock is anyone defending Strzok at this point? Have you no sense of integrity?

FFS call a spade a spade.


What should Incall him? A guy who said bad things about Trump?
Check out the WSJ article posted earlier.

#261 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 20,405 posts

Posted 04 February 2018 - 12:54 PM

What should Incall him? A guy who said bad things about Trump?
Check out the WSJ article posted earlier.

 

If Strzok is just a guy who said bad things about Trump, why did he get demoted from #4 at FBI to Human Resources?

 

How about his 'Insurance plan' if Trump got elected? 


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.


#262 drobeski

drobeski

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 58,314 posts

Posted 04 February 2018 - 12:57 PM

 
If Strzok is just a guy who said bad things about Trump, why did he get demoted from #4 at FBI to Human Resources?
 
How about his 'Insurance plan' if Trump got elected? 

he was talking geico

#263 Filthy Fernadez

Filthy Fernadez

    FF Geek

  • Members
  • 20,405 posts

Posted 04 February 2018 - 01:03 PM

It's funny the outrageous lengths people are defending this guy and all the co-conspirators. All the evidence against them has to be fake for them not to be guilty of a conspiracy to rig an election and unseat the duly elected President.

 

Unfockingreal.


BBC for the most part is pretty damn good.