TimHauck

Thomas Crooks apparently agreed as he was not into them

No that was a different ex-Fox News host whose publication “broke” that story…Glenn Beck

Correct

She never claimed there was a link in the article. Idiot MAGA’s did.

Lol thank you, I couldn’t find the thread where our resident conspiracy theorist believed this nonsense

As I stated earlier, the author of that article admitted there were no links to Crooks and furry art.

There was an article talking about how he joined an art sharing website called “deviantart” which has millions of users. Apparently some of those users share furry art, but Crooks did not, however many within MAGA took that to mean that he was a furry.

Woman named in Blaze report cleared by FBI. She is about to own the Blaze if she wants. MAGA fell for fake news. Yet again. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jan-6-pipe-bombs-innocent-womans-name/

He was definitely a right wing lunatic at one point. His later posts were not really left-wing, moreso just anti-government as a whole and in some cases anti-Trump.

Bump for @Voltaire

Honestly, no, I don’t think it’s a valid point that Russia or China “establishing a military presence” in Venezuela is somehow more dangerous than from various other possible places, considering a flight from there is at minimum 3 hours to the closest part of the US. And of course our Department of War has made it pretty clear that we’re willing to blow up anything coming from that direction before it even gets very close to America But sure, if someone is going to get their oil, it might as well be us.

Maybe I missed it but did you bring up any of these concerns earlier in the thread when MAGA was trying to claim it was primarily about drugs? I mostly just think it’s funny how quickly MAGA is willing to eat up their new talking points. But, at least you realize that it’s not primarily about drugs. And also realize that “war” with Venezuela is a real possibility. Kinda funny that @Meglamaniac still seems to think it isn’t. Of course he may think it’s only war if we declare war, in which case he thinks we haven’t been in a war since WWII. But we’ll probably never know as he’s apparently allergic to opinions.

Are you saying it isn’t about oil? Isn’t oil a major “natural resource” that you’re saying China and Russia have their sights set on? TBH, I don’t really have a huge problem with military action there, but it’s of course not a “nothingburger” as was previously claimed. I do have a problem however with claiming it’s about drugs when it’s really not (again, thanks for admitting it isn’t), or nonsense like people claiming that Trump is the “peace President.”

Thanks for confirming you disagree with @Meglamaniac