5-Points

It doesn't just apply to illegals though. They aren't reporting anybody. Seems counterintuitive if they are truly concerned about keeping guns out of the wrong hands.

Help me understand their logic, or lack thereof. They hate guns, don't think anybody should own guns and want to make it as difficult as possible to legally obtain guns but when a convicted felon, or somebody otherwise prohibited from owning guns, attempts to purchase one, we shouldn't notify law enforcement? Why wouldn't they want LE to know that a prohibited person was attempting to buy a gun?

I'm not in favor of UBC but why have background checks if you aren't going to notify law enforcement when a prohibited person is attempting to purchase a firearm?

He took out what was left of mine too.

I jinxed him.

There went my dark horse. Sucks hard for Matt. He was running so well all day.

It's Daytoner. We could wait for the last 3 laps and it would still be a toss up.

Didn't expect him to be out front this early. Doesn't bode well for my pick.

Winner: Clint Bowyer Dark Horse: Matt DiBenedetto

Exactly. It will work to help get him reelected so if that's what they want they should keep it up.

Let's go #14!

Nobody takes you seriously when this is your argument. HTH

Border control is within the president's purview, climate control isn't. Neither is health care. Good luck overriding a constitutional right by fiat. Trump isn't making laws, he's doing what he thinks is necessary to make sure existing immigration laws are enforced, which is absolutely his responsibility. Congress allocated funds for DoD. Trump is using a small percentage of those funds for Border Security. I'm not applauding anything. As I said, it's the sad state of our politics that got us to this point. What's the old adage, we get the government we deserve? If we would elect people who had the country's best interest at heart instead of their own, things might be different.