TimHauck

Found a different article, apparently DHS is claiming the birth certificate is fake https://www.huffpost.com/entry/us-citizen-arrested-by-ice_n_693c9355e4b018dc36f254c0/amp

You’re a creepy stalker

Her claim is that she was born here.

Well she’s not claiming she “became a citizen later,” so I don’t see the relevance of your post here

So you’re saying the birth certificate is either fake or belongs to a different person?

You’ve seen her driver’s license? Link? Even if she did intentionally give the wrong name (not confirmed), that doesn’t mean she should get deported lol. Looks like her claim is that she was born here but then did live in Mexico for awhile but never got a passport. So if she was stopped at the border coming into the US, she wouldn’t have had a legal passport which might explain why she allegedly said at the border that she was a Mexican citizen (which according to the lawyer is not a lie, she is a citizen of both Mexico and the US).

Did they get Bill Clinton yet?

What are you even suggesting? That the birth certificate they produced is for a different person?

Ok, now I am remembering why I have you on ignore.

Fair use is legal, IANAL but I bet there are many that would argue that was not fair use.

What are you getting at? Are you saying that’s fake too? That came out over a month ago.

From a different article Another potential issue that may have led ICE to detain and seek to remove Diaz Morales is her name, her attorneys said. Her parents have two different last names, and it is common for immigrants whose first language isn’t English to find American officials have inserted a hyphen between two names, or used a different name such as in the statement provided by DHS.On https://www.newsweek.com/ice-detains-maryland-woman-us-citizen-claims-dhs-denies-11257159 That might excuse the initial detainment, but not once her identity was verified.

Yeah the first part appears to be a lie. Weird that they would state definitively that she is an illegal alien if full due process has not played out yet, right? They also have careful wording about the communication with a lawyer, saying she “has access to a phone.” If they’ve been moving her around it makes it pretty difficult for a lawyer to reach her.

I’m not sure who did the reporting there, I’d guess it was a right winger trying to get rid of RealTim who was being by far the bigger man in that exchange. But of course free speech doesn’t apply to private websites.

I think that’s basically what @Meglamaniac did because he was so embarrassed by his stupidity in the Venezuela thread