justforbeer

Hello Brady hater. Clearly you have no respect for the greatest quarterback ever. this shows in your comments about how lucky he is, and that he is not as valuable. He was the reason why they won. He also proved that he didn’t need a Belichick as he won in Tampa the next year. aside from Brady, any quarterback that has played under Belichick has been put in the grave by him. he is completely lost in his own mind. Always about defense. He was never a great coach. He was a good defensive coordinator.

Well, Now you almost got there! coaches are not as important as we perceive them to be. ultimately that is the true point.

McDaniels, Runner up to Belichick for being the biggest dumpster fire in NFL coaching history when they do not have Brady as their QB.

Ha, and now runner up for another coach who benefitted from BRADY. McDaniels, (Now Fired) another failed guy who could do nothing without TOM at the helm.

Yes, they won 11 games. And they didn’t make the playoffs! I wouldn’t call that a successful year just a good year, which was luck more than anything. how do you think they would’ve done if Brady was playing…… uhhhh, they would’ve won the Super Bowl! 2007 they went 16-0 and should’ve won the Super Bowl but got snakebitten by the Giants beating BB’s defense! That was simply the greatest offense ever to play football in 07. Belichick let them down that year….

Too young, I am one of the oldest members of FF today. Clearly, you are not looking at the stats from 2001 to 2004. in those years, the offense was #6,10,12&4. Ranked. Avg #8 defense was the #6,17,1,2. Avg #6/7 in 2003 and 2004 Super Bowls, it was high scoring. 32 to 29 against Carolina. Tom Brady - 350 yards and three touchdowns. The 2004 Super Bowl, 24 to 21 and the defense allowed McNabb to throw for over 350 yards and 3 touchdowns. The defense was good, but not the greatest. It wasn’t about coaching as much as it was about the players ability. again, if you’re the coach and you have a bunch of talented players, then you’re going to do well. it was not BB. It was Brady, and it was every year that Tom was playing for the patriots.

That is a fact!

Oh my….. look, as a head coach for the Cleveland Browns from 91 to 95 which was five seasons. This was his record. 36-44. Trash! Don’t tell me he didn’t suck as a coach during that five-years. That was his first five years coaching. add in his first year in New England without Brady, he was 5- 11. so, he was 41-55 for the first six years as a coach. Without Tom Brady! these last 3 1/2 years, he is sub500 again. No Tom Brady. How is that good? He is not a good coach. also, the first year Tom Brady was the quarterback and they won the Super Bowl. They were the number 6 scoring offense in the league. They were also the number 6 defense. The following year, the number 10 scoring offense and the number 17 scoring defense. Don’t tell me they won because of defense. They were led by the best quarterback, which was what made the difference. You can’t argue with the fact that Tom Brady was by far the greatest quarterback ever to play this game, and to think that anybody didn’t benefit from his success, you’re crazy. Especially the coach. The fact is any coach would have won, it didn’t matter who the coach was. In fact, if Bledsoe didn’t get hurt, Brady may never have gotten his chance because Belichick cannot evaluate quarterbacks. So many of you are giving so much credit to BB because of the record he had when Tom Brady was the quarterback. I’m telling you, he was just lucky.

This was a good thing for Miami. They will sharpen up, look out next game! thankfully I had Kelce and AJ to carry me!

That is irrelevant. What position did BB play? bottom line is this. When Brady is not around, BB is garbage.

Brady was on the field, not BB. HE RODE BRADYS COATTAILS! The defining point is that he sucked before Brady for Years!! Do your research! It’s clear as day.

Step away from the Rams RB Situation! Nuf said

Gentleman, less politics in anything is better. Remember this! if everyone would start to realize that politics is just today’s crack and you’re hooked. And the media is your pimp. yes, once you realize, mind blown!

Pats have 6, Brady has 7 SB rings. You are right about how bad Belichick is without Brady. It shows he would have won nothing without him. In 10 seasons without, he sucks! Look how bad they are this year! We all just forgot how bad he was in Cleveland and how he ruins QB's. The only truly successful QB is Brady. Ask Kosar and Bledsoe what they think of BB. Belichick has a great record and lots of rings, but he is not a good coach. He was SOOOOO lucky to have Tom. The facts are clear as day.

How are your predictions looking?