Green Bay Coach and GM

[Sweetness_34 0]

What a bunch of maroons. So now Mike McCarty tells us Aaron Rodgers gives the packers the best chance to win. Oh really? Then why were the GM and the coach willing to fly down in a private plane and officially un-retire Favre 2 weeks after he retired?

 

Gotta love the dumb and dumber packer front office. At least the Bears had no choice other than go with a Grossman vs Orton competition since the FA QBs and Qbs in this year's draft were not really great to begin with. But here we have dumb and dumber telling us that Rodgers is better than a QB that just had their team in the NFC Championship game.

 

 

Oh and I love how McCarthy realizes the O is gonna stink with Rodgers so he covers his azz by telling us how he is a defensive coach. Oh really? Since when did he become a defensive minded coach?

 

==============

 

"Aaron Rodgers is the starting quarterback for the Green Bay Packers," McCarthy said. "That's been stated over and over again. I hope we can finally understand that. That's where we are as an organization and as a head coach of the Green Bay Packers. I don't know how else to answer that question."

 

===============

 

Despite his background as a quarterbacks coach, McCarthy prefers to win with defense -- a philosophy that presumably works best with steady but unspectacular play from a quarterback.

 

==============

 

Who gives you the better chance of winning?

 

MM- AR is our starting QB. That should answer the question.

 

==============

 

MM- Moving forward means the emphasis is on the DEFENSE. I believe the defense is the focal part of this team as we move forward. Then Special Teams. Thirdly, the offense's ability to score points.

 

 

 

 

"The football team has moved forward with the emphasis on defense," McCarthy said. "Because that's what I believe in."

[football is life 0]

As Romey would say... "Rack him!"

[FlaHawker 24]

Gotta love the dumb and dumber packer front office. At least the Bears had no choice other than go with a Grossman vs Orton competition since the FA QBs and Qbs in this year's draft were not really great to begin with.

Guess you missed this:

 

The Bears had 12 draft choices this year. No quarterback picked. Chicago had nine draft choices in 2007. No quarterback picked. Chicago had seven draft choices in 2006. Three years with a quarterback need, 28 draft choices, and never a passer picked. This isn't odd. It's negligent.--Peter King

 

 

You're too easy. Go away

[DixieDevils 0]

Good grief, what is McCarthy supposed to say:

 

"With Aaron Rogers as our QB, we're going to suck." Of course, he's not going to say that.

 

I'm not a Packers fan. Far from it, but I'm pulling for the kid to do well just to shut people up.

 

The Packers front office made the right move here.

 

Sweetness, with all due respect, you're bias opinion here is getting rather old.

 

I guess misery loves company cause God knows the Bears aren't going anywhere this year.

[kwyjibo 0]

I guess if I was a Packer fan I'm supposed to want Favre back so I can watch my team get to the back to the brink of the Super Bowl only to see it all fall apart after another of Brett's brain-dead INTs.

 

What would be truly hilarious is if GB eventually does let Favre back, and let him be the starting QB, only to see the Pack get off to a terrible start, and then he decides he wants to retire again in the middle of the season.

 

The only game I saw Rodgers play last year was the GB-Dallas game, and he looked like a much better QB than Favre in that one.

[49ER MAN 0]

What a bunch of maroons. So now Mike McCarty tells us Aaron Rodgers gives the packers the best chance to win. Oh really? Then why were the GM and the coach willing to fly down in a private plane and officially un-retire Favre 2 weeks after he retired?

 

Gotta love the dumb and dumber packer front office. At least the Bears had no choice other than go with a Grossman vs Orton competition since the FA QBs and Qbs in this year's draft were not really great to begin with. But here we have dumb and dumber telling us that Rodgers is better than a QB that just had their team in the NFC Championship game.

 

 

Oh and I love how McCarthy realizes the O is gonna stink with Rodgers so he covers his azz by telling us how he is a defensive coach. Oh really? Since when did he become a defensive minded coach?

 

==============

 

"Aaron Rodgers is the starting quarterback for the Green Bay Packers," McCarthy said. "That's been stated over and over again. I hope we can finally understand that. That's where we are as an organization and as a head coach of the Green Bay Packers. I don't know how else to answer that question."

 

===============

 

Despite his background as a quarterbacks coach, McCarthy prefers to win with defense -- a philosophy that presumably works best with steady but unspectacular play from a quarterback.

 

==============

 

Who gives you the better chance of winning?

 

MM- AR is our starting QB. That should answer the question.

 

==============

 

MM- Moving forward means the emphasis is on the DEFENSE. I believe the defense is the focal part of this team as we move forward. Then Special Teams. Thirdly, the offense's ability to score points.

 

"The football team has moved forward with the emphasis on defense," McCarthy said. "Because that's what I believe in."

 

The Pack gave Favre the benefit of the doubt at the end of March and gave him an opportunity to come back, but Favre said no. Who's to say that Rodgers couldn't lead the Pack to a Super Bowl title this year? How many people thought Eli would win a ring last year? Not too many I'm sure.

[ieatchickens 0]

Sweetness,

 

Sounds like you are a little bitter that the Packers have more than one option at quarterback. Even with only one option it's still more than the Bears have had for the past 22 years.

 

Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy gave their word to Rodgers that he was their starting quarterback. I guess giving your word is not in style in Chicago.

 

Funny how people are down on them for making a decision and sticking with their man. Who by the way isn't going to flip flop about retiring after the 2008 season. Given that Rodgers (hopefully get resigned), Thompson and McCarthy all will be with the organization in 09' and beyond, I can see why they had to cut bait with Favre.

[Yippie Skippy 0]

The Pack gave Favre the benefit of the doubt at the end of March and gave him an opportunity to come back, but Favre said no. Who's to say that Rodgers couldn't lead the Pack to a Super Bowl title this year? How many people thought Eli would win a ring last year? Not too many I'm sure.

 

The point is that the Packers have a better chance of winning the Super Bowl with Farve. Would anybody argue that??

 

Clearly winning the SB, and doing everything possible to put your team there is not the highest priority in GB for Ted and Mike.

 

Dumb and dumber fits.

[DixieDevils 0]

The point is that the Packers have a better chance of winning the Super Bowl with Farve. Would anybody argue that??

 

Clearly winning the SB, and doing everything possible to put your team there is not the highest priority in GB for Ted and Mike.

 

Dumb and dumber fits.

 

Can we revisit this should Aaron Rodgers lead Green Bay to the NFC Championship Game and/or Super Bowl? And shoot, what if they win it with him.

 

Last I checked there was no guarantee that Favre gave them a better chance. How does anyone know that he does? As Chris Berman says, "That's why they play the game."

 

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying Favre is better or worse than Rodgers or vice-versa. I'm just saying there's no way of telling. Shoot Favre could come back and stink up the joint, then what.

[Yippie Skippy 0]

Can we revisit this should Aaron Rodgers lead Green Bay to the NFC Championship Game and/or Super Bowl? And shoot, what if they win it with him.

 

Last I checked there was no guarantee that Favre gave them a better chance. How does anyone know that he does? As Chris Berman says, "That's why they play the game."

 

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying Favre is better or worse than Rodgers or vice-versa. I'm just saying there's no way of telling. Shoot Favre could come back and stink up the joint, then what.

 

So would you say that they both give the Packers an equal chance of winning the SB??

[Sweetness_34 0]

Can we revisit this should Aaron Rodgers lead Green Bay to the NFC Championship Game and/or Super Bowl? And shoot, what if they win it with him.

 

Last I checked there was no guarantee that Favre gave them a better chance. How does anyone know that he does? As Chris Berman says, "That's why they play the game."

 

Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying Favre is better or worse than Rodgers or vice-versa. I'm just saying there's no way of telling. Shoot Favre could come back and stink up the joint, then what.

 

Do you really believe that Rodgers gives the packers a better shot this year than Favre? Now, I agree favre is over-rated and a selfish prima donna, but he does give the packers a better shot to win the SB this year; no doubt in my mind there. If you think a Qb who has 0 full games in the NFL is going to just set the league on fire, especially a QB who fell to the bottom of the 1st round because almost every NFL team saw his major flaws, then you are being delusional here, in my humble opinion.

 

This is going to be lots of fun this year.

[Sweetness_34 0]

The only game I saw Rodgers play last year was the GB-Dallas game, and he looked like a much better QB than Favre in that one.

 

On the one side you have a QB who has played half a game (and been injured all the time) and on the other side you have a QB who just threw for 4000+ yards and 23 TDs and is a HOF Qb that actually makes defensive co-ordinators prepare for the pass (that makes average RBs like Ryan Grant look like real NFL players) and you are telling me you pick that QB with 1/2 game of data? Geez....I am gonna love seeing fudgepacker fans throw themselves off buildings when the packers realize how difficult it is to get a franchise QB and how they were stupid to let one go before he was done. But I am enjoying "dumb and dumber"....the favorite part was McCarthy telling the world he is a defensive coach.

[Sweetness_34 0]

Can we revisit this should Aaron Rodgers lead Green Bay to the NFC Championship Game and/or Super Bowl? And shoot, what if they win it with him.

 

Are you going to start a thread and admit you were wrong when Rodgers does not lead the packers to a NFC Championship game this year? I will have a sig bet with you right now....wanna do it?

[Lobo237 0]

Who's to say Favre plays that great again next year? His numbers took some real significant jumps from the prior 2 seasons when everyone was saying he was done. The GB front office is handling this the right way. He was given the opportunity to return and chose not to take it. Favre took too long to make a decision and now has to deal with the consequences. Is Favre a HOF QB of course, but father time catches up with everyone. Plus making it to a conference championship game is tough, Favre coming back is no guarantee that GB gets there again, let alone to the Super Bowl.

 

Brett Favre G QBR Com Att % Yards YPG YPC TD INT

2005 Green Bay 16 70.9 372 607 61.3 3881 242.6 6.4 20 29

2006 Green Bay 16 72.7 343 613 56.0 3885 242.8 6.3 18 18

2007 Green Bay 16 95.7 356 535 66.5 4155 259.7 7.8 28 15

[FlaHawker 24]

Are you going to start a thread and admit you were wrong when Rodgers does not lead the packers to a NFC Championship game this year? I will have a sig bet with you right now....wanna do it?

Admit what? He said "should" Rodgers lead them, not when "he does" lead them. Read what he wrote you fockin moron

[Belushi 9]

Chicago would be happy to have any of the Packer's QB starting for them, even Brohm. Heck, Brohm would be the best QB to start for Chicago in the last 10 years.

 

How did that first round pick on Benson work out for ya? Yea, great front office in Chicago.

 

It's kind of sad that with training camp starting, all that the Chicago fans have to talk about is the Packers. If you want to jump on the bandwagon, go ahead. We'll understand.

[b.j. booker 0]

Who's to say Favre plays that great again next year? His numbers took some real significant jumps from the prior 2 seasons when everyone was saying he was done.

 

Brett Favre G QBR Com Att % Yards YPG YPC TD INT

2005 Green Bay 16 70.9 372 607 61.3 3881 242.6 6.4 20 29

2006 Green Bay 16 72.7 343 613 56.0 3885 242.8 6.3 18 18

2007 Green Bay 16 95.7 356 535 66.5 4155 259.7 7.8 28 15

 

 

I think that Favre has shown time and time again, what he can do when he has some talent around him on offense. 2005 was the culmination of the horror of the Sherman years -- ZERO help on offense and lots of injuries. If you watch football, you'd realize Favre was just chukking the ball all over the place that season, and there were clearly skill players or any kind of a game plan to back him up. And, no, I'm not saying it is inexcusable, but as people love to make fun of, "that's just Favre being Favre"

 

But seriously, my point is this: don't just blindly post season stats to "prove" a point. Favre has shown over and over that with the right amount of pressure on him from the coach, and even a small number of offensive weapons, he can DOMINATE the game. Right now, comparing him to Aaron Rogers is laughable. (that is: comparing them as QBs for the 2008 season is laughable)

 

 

 

 

EDIT: ok, and to stay on my soapbox for one more second... This argument, "well, Favre might not even be good anymore" is soo washed up. Lots of people did exactly what you are doing one and two years ago. After a bad year and a mediocre one, they were saying, "clearly Favre is completely washed up". These people also don't watch football, because if they did, they would have seen him making the same amazing throws -- it is very clear that his skills are not eroding yet. If you WATCH the games, you know that every year, even his bad ones, he was making the impossible throws. What Favre needs is a coach to keep him in line and some meager amount of talent on offense.

 

Also, Favre blew it in the championship game. It made me sick. Fortunately it wasn't a surprise for me. Why? -- because I know that Favre always blows it? NO! -- because the entire game I watched the coaching staff abandon the run, and make Favre throw pass after pass in bad conditions. The game plan was terrible, and I knew after watchting the entire thing that at some point Favre was going to F-up.

 

This isn't a hard concept -- it's like being a good manager. You have to know how to get the best out of your workers. If you do that with Favre, he's unstoppable. If you don't, he's going to make big mistakes.

[Phurfur 70]

I think that Favre has shown time and time again, what he can do when he has some talent around him on offense. 2005 was the culmination of the horror of the Sherman years -- ZERO help on offense and lots of injuries. If you watch football, you'd realize Favre was just chukking the ball all over the place that season, and there were clearly skill players or any kind of a game plan to back him up. And, no, I'm not saying it is inexcusable, but as people love to make fun of, "that's just Favre being Favre"

 

But seriously, my point is this: don't just blindly post season stats to "prove" a point. Favre has shown over and over that with the right amount of pressure on him from the coach, and even a small number of offensive weapons, he can DOMINATE the game. Right now, comparing him to Aaron Rogers is laughable. (that is: comparing them as QBs for the 2008 season is laughable)

EDIT: ok, and to stay on my soapbox for one more second... This argument, "well, Favre might not even be good anymore" is soo washed up. Lots of people did exactly what you are doing one and two years ago. After a bad year and a mediocre one, they were saying, "clearly Favre is completely washed up". These people also don't watch football, because if they did, they would have seen him making the same amazing throws -- it is very clear that his skills are not eroding yet. If you WATCH the games, you know that every year, even his bad ones, he was making the impossible throws. What Favre needs is a coach to keep him in line and some meager amount of talent on offense.

 

Also, Favre blew it in the championship game. It made me sick. Fortunately it wasn't a surprise for me. Why? -- because I know that Favre always blows it? NO! -- because the entire game I watched the coaching staff abandon the run, and make Favre throw pass after pass in bad conditions. The game plan was terrible, and I knew after watchting the entire thing .

This isn't a hard concept -- it's like being a good manager. You have to know how to get the best out of your workers. If you do that with Favre, he's unstoppable. If you don't, he's going to make big mistakes.

 

You people crack me up. I saw the game too and what I saw was a NYG team that completely shut down the run. The way to change that is to use your passing game. You have a HOF QB, who would be better to loosen up that defense.

 

You said it yourself, "that at some point Favre was going to F-up". This is the guy everyone is making such a fuss about?

[b.j. booker 0]

You people crack me up. I saw the game too and what I saw was a NYG team that completely shut down the run. The way to change that is to use your passing game. You have a HOF QB, who would be better to loosen up that defense.

 

You said it yourself, "that at some point Favre was going to F-up". This is the guy everyone is making such a fuss about?

 

 

This is true -- regarding the NYG D and needing to use the pass. Maybe I blame the Packer's game plan and coaching more than I should be giving credit to the Giants D -- they did a similar thing against the Pats in the SB. It was very frustrating to watch the pack with zero ground game, and then start forcing lots of passes into shallow dink and dunk routes against the GMen. I really did know something bad was coming. So, maybe that is how you beat Brett Favre. It is a definite weakness of his, much more so than some of the other current great qbs in the league. It obviously works against Tom Brady to some extent.

 

 

My only position in the Favre saga is that GB should put the best players on the field, and in the case of the QB I think Favre gives them a better chance to win.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Do you really believe that Rodgers gives the packers a better shot this year than Favre? Now, I agree favre is over-rated and a selfish prima donna, but he does give the packers a better shot to win the SB this year; no doubt in my mind there. If you think a Qb who has 0 full games in the NFL is going to just set the league on fire, especially a QB who fell to the bottom of the 1st round because almost every NFL team saw his major flaws, then you are being delusional here, in my humble opinion.

 

This is going to be lots of fun this year.

 

A certain QB was drafted in the 7th round of the NFL draft...came in when the starting QB of a team that went 5-11 the year before got hurt.

He ended up winning the SB MVP....and 2 other SB titles.

 

Im not saying Rodgers is Brady...Im saying that you just never know what Rodgers can do.

 

And you...the most ignorant poster on the FF Today Board...calling the coach and GM of the Packers dumb is freakin hilarious.

 

Worry about your own crappy team...and quit worrying about a team who is not just focused on winning 2 games...but actually doing something during the whole season.

 

But hey...maybe you all can beat the Packers twice again only to finish in the bottom of the division.

[Sho Nuff 720]

On the one side you have a QB who has played half a game (and been injured all the time) and on the other side you have a QB who just threw for 4000+ yards and 23 TDs and is a HOF Qb that actually makes defensive co-ordinators prepare for the pass (that makes average RBs like Ryan Grant look like real NFL players) and you are telling me you pick that QB with 1/2 game of data? Geez....I am gonna love seeing fudgepacker fans throw themselves off buildings when the packers realize how difficult it is to get a franchise QB and how they were stupid to let one go before he was done. But I am enjoying "dumb and dumber"....the favorite part was McCarthy telling the world he is a defensive coach.

 

What would you know about Grant being just average? Oh wait...you only know what below average RBs look like in Chicago.

 

hah!!!!!

 

Though...a Bears fan should know how hard it is to find a QB...they have been looking for one for 20 years.

 

Though...I have much more faith in McCarthy and Thompson than I ever would in the Bears management.

[Sho Nuff 720]

You people crack me up. I saw the game too and what I saw was a NYG team that completely shut down the run. The way to change that is to use your passing game. You have a HOF QB, who would be better to loosen up that defense.

 

You said it yourself, "that at some point Favre was going to F-up". This is the guy everyone is making such a fuss about?

 

It was not all Favre in that game.

Plenty of blame to go around...in no particular order

-Al Harris' inability to cover Burress

-longer pass play calls in crappy weather...look at that final play and INT...all the receiving options were 15 yards down field...for a team that thrived off of short passes all year long.

-inability to run the ball

-DB trying to pick up a damn fumble and run with it rather than just falling on it....

-Favre's play a few times...the last throw was a poor pass for sure.

[BMoney 0]

It was not all Favre in that game.

Plenty of blame to go around...in no particular order

-Al Harris' inability to cover Burress

-longer pass play calls in crappy weather...look at that final play and INT...all the receiving options were 15 yards down field...for a team that thrived off of short passes all year long.

-inability to run the ball

-DB trying to pick up a damn fumble and run with it rather than just falling on it....

-Favre's play a few times...the last throw was a poor pass for sure.

 

 

focking jarrett bush

 

if u are going to beat seattle..at least finish the deal...

 

agree on all of this..they went away from what got them there..at home..

 

al harris shouldve retired instead(ok, not really..but still..cmon)..

[Sweetness_34 0]

Dumb and dumber classic

 

"I asked Ted [saturday], 'Am I welcome in the building if I report?' and Ted was just about shattered," said Favre in a telephone interview. "He said, 'Brett, you can't do that -- you'll get me fired.' I told him I'm not trying to get anybody fired. So Ted asked me to let the guys report and let's try to resolve this over the next two or three days."

 

Favre adamantly denied reports that the Packers had evidence of his communications with Childress because they had the phone records from Favre's team-issued cell phone.

 

"That's just bogus," said Favre. "I don't have a Packers' cell phone. Never have. I told Ted [on Thursday] that he and [coach Mike] McCarthy needed to clear up this cell phone thing. I told him they needed to get in front of the media and admit that I don't have one of their cell phones. And Ted said, 'Well, I think somebody already squashed that [story].' But that isn't enough. They need to get up and admit it's ridiculous and bogus."

 

 

=============

 

What a joke of a GM and coach....nice hire fudgepackers. Keep it up maroons!!! Liars and incompetent boobs!!

[Sweetness_34 0]

A certain QB was drafted in the 7th round of the NFL draft...came in when the starting QB of a team that went 5-11 the year before got hurt.

He ended up winning the SB MVP....and 2 other SB titles.

 

Yeah you keep dreaming Rodgers will be the next Brady.... oh yeah, you are not a homer....

[Sweetness_34 0]

It was very frustrating to watch the pack with zero ground game, and then start forcing lots of passes into shallow dink and dunk routes against the GMen.

 

Wait until you have no Favre and teams actually decide to play the run. That 35-7 beating you took from the Bears might look as a mercy killing compared to this year.... but it is fun seeing Favre being such a selfish distraction and just killing the franchise during training camp. The boos from lameblow field will be entertaining this year when Rodgers throws his 1st int and loses a game

[Sweetness_34 0]

Worry about your own crappy team...and quit worrying about a team who is not just focused on winning 2 games...but actually doing something during the whole season.

 

Bears take care of their franchise players - both Urlacher and Hester sign extensions. Briggs, Tillman, Vasher, Mike Brown,Olin Kreutz etc were all given extensions. almost all of them before they hit FA (except Briggs of course)

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp...tory?id=3507118

 

Fudgepackers tarnish their HOF Qb and face of the franchise who made them relevant after 30 years by LYING. Nice job idiots lying about your HOF Qb using a cell phone from the team when it is not true. Oh wait, this is the same GM that LIED about Randy Moss, about Javon Walker etc etc.... keep it up, I love it!! More 35-7 beatings on the way

[Sweetness_34 0]

So Favre would rather side with the Vikings than the packers right now....ROTFLMAO. Take that fudgepacker fans....

 

==========================

 

"I have no qualms about admitting I talked to them,'' Favre said. "Talking with Milt, he said, 'Brett, did they entice you?' I said no, 'I don't need to be enticed anywhere.' They absolutely did not entice me to come to Minnesota.''

[DixieDevils 0]

Do you really believe that Rodgers gives the packers a better shot this year than Favre? Now, I agree favre is over-rated and a selfish prima donna, but he does give the packers a better shot to win the SB this year; no doubt in my mind there. If you think a Qb who has 0 full games in the NFL is going to just set the league on fire, especially a QB who fell to the bottom of the 1st round because almost every NFL team saw his major flaws, then you are being delusional here, in my humble opinion.

 

This is going to be lots of fun this year.

 

I guess we were all delusional, too, then when a certain 6th-rounder came off the bench to lead the Patriots to the Super Bowl title in 2001-02. He turned out pretty good.

 

What I'm saying is that nobody can possibly know what is going to happen until it does. And if your the Packers you can't let one guy, even if it's Brett Favre, dictate how you run the show. He's jerked their chain long enough with this retirement talk.

[DixieDevils 0]

Are you going to start a thread and admit you were wrong when Rodgers does not lead the packers to a NFC Championship game this year? I will have a sig bet with you right now....wanna do it?

 

I never said that Aaron would lead them to the NFC title game. I said let's revisit it IF HE DOES. If he doesn't, then everybody will come out and say the Packers were wrong. They should've kept Brett Favre. But those same people will not be able to prove that they were right, either, because nobody will ever know for a fact that Favre would do it again. There's a no-win situation here.

[DixieDevils 0]

Admit what? He said "should" Rodgers lead them, not when "he does" lead them. Read what he wrote you fockin moron

 

Thank you

[The Moz 69]

I will say it again - Ted Thompson is the NFL Jerry Krause. Made alot of decent moves but forced out a legend and likley never recovers from tha mistake UNLESS Rodgers is a all world QB right away.

[DixieDevils 0]

You know I think I figured this out.

 

Seems the reason the Chicago Bears fans are so happy about all of this is because the Bears have not had the same QB lead the team in passing in back-to-back years since Jim Miller -- YES, JIM MILLER -- in 2001 and '02. Not one.

 

Maybe the Bears can find themselves a real QB -- one that is more than a one-year wonder -- to stand up and play for them this year. But I doubt it.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Dumb and dumber classic

 

"I asked Ted [saturday], 'Am I welcome in the building if I report?' and Ted was just about shattered," said Favre in a telephone interview. "He said, 'Brett, you can't do that -- you'll get me fired.' I told him I'm not trying to get anybody fired. So Ted asked me to let the guys report and let's try to resolve this over the next two or three days."

 

Favre adamantly denied reports that the Packers had evidence of his communications with Childress because they had the phone records from Favre's team-issued cell phone.

 

"That's just bogus," said Favre. "I don't have a Packers' cell phone. Never have. I told Ted [on Thursday] that he and [coach Mike] McCarthy needed to clear up this cell phone thing. I told him they needed to get in front of the media and admit that I don't have one of their cell phones. And Ted said, 'Well, I think somebody already squashed that [story].' But that isn't enough. They need to get up and admit it's ridiculous and bogus."

=============

 

What a joke of a GM and coach....nice hire fudgepackers. Keep it up maroons!!! Liars and incompetent boobs!!

 

So far it was a great hire.

Im glad that they piss you off so bad...only furthers my opinion of them that they are doing a good job.

I would be worried if you thought they were competent and kept finishing dead last in the division like your Bears did...keeping their heads in the sand...no QB problem...we will just flip a coin between Sexy Rexy and the Neck Beard Orton.

 

Talk about a joke...just look to your own team.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Yeah you keep dreaming Rodgers will be the next Brady.... oh yeah, you are not a homer....

 

 

So you are ignorant and illiterate...

why don't you quote my whole post...you know...where I say

Im not saying Rodgers is Brady...Im saying that you just never know what Rodgers can do.

 

Yup...never said he would be the next Brady...but he could be...it could happen. Not a dream...Im not expecting it...but claiming it just cannot happen that he could succeed is ever more foolish.

 

Talk about a homer...you are whining so much about the Packers, you forget your Bears blow ass.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Bears take care of their franchise players - both Urlacher and Hester sign extensions. Briggs, Tillman, Vasher, Mike Brown,Olin Kreutz etc were all given extensions. almost all of them before they hit FA (except Briggs of course)

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp...tory?id=3507118

 

Fudgepackers tarnish their HOF Qb and face of the franchise who made them relevant after 30 years by LYING. Nice job idiots lying about your HOF Qb using a cell phone from the team when it is not true. Oh wait, this is the same GM that LIED about Randy Moss, about Javon Walker etc etc.... keep it up, I love it!! More 35-7 beatings on the way

 

Problem is they have only few franchise players. Mike Brown...yeah...call me when he finishes a season.

You mean like GB did with Barnett, Kampman, Driver...and so on. Yeah...the Packers do that too.

 

Lied about Javon? Link...you mean the WR that still has bum knees and got cut from another team this year?

 

Keep up the 35-7 lucky win...but still lose twice to the liedowns and finish dead last in the division while GB ended up in the NFC Title Game...lot of good those 2 wins did you.

 

Link about the team lying about any cell phone too? Oh wait...you can only find where two media outlets reported that and not the team?

[Sweetness_34 0]

Link about the team lying about any cell phone too? Oh wait...you can only find where two media outlets reported that and not the team?

 

So now you are telling me Favre is a liar too? Remove your homer glasses, stupid.

 

============

 

Favre adamantly denied reports that the Packers had evidence of his communications with Childress because they had the phone records from Favre's team-issued cell phone.

 

"That's just bogus," said Favre. "I don't have a Packers' cell phone. Never have. I told Ted [on Thursday] that he and [coach Mike] McCarthy needed to clear up this cell phone thing. I told him they needed to get in front of the media and admit that I don't have one of their cell phones. And Ted said, 'Well, I think somebody already squashed that [story].' But that isn't enough. They need to get up and admit it's ridiculous and bogus."

[Sweetness_34 0]

So far it was a great hire.

 

Tell that to your lover boy, Brett Favre. He hates them both and thinks they lied to him repeatedly and cannot be trusted. In fact he told Goodell the same thing that he does not trust them to trade him and that they say different things to the media but do different things. I believe Favre actually....the fudgepacker GM and coach have egg on their face and are now being slimy snakes. Nice hire dipsh!ts. Enjoy being the joke of the NFL again for the next 30 years....like you were before Favre got there.

[Sweetness_34 0]

Keep up the 35-7 lucky win...

 

I am sure you enjoy being the Bear's beotch....

[Sweetness_34 0]

you are whining so much about the Packers, you forget your Bears blow ass.

 

I am not whining about the fudgepackers at all. I love this (sait it multiple times...learn to read). This is great entertainment and fun seeing favre sh!t all over the fudgepackers and his fans, ad expose the packer GM and coach as liars and frauds. So much fun seeing fudgepacker fans cuss Favre these days. Keep up with the entertainment while you cry at the end of the season when rodgers turns out to be not even half the QB Favre is right now. You seriously cannot make this up....

 

Oh and the Bears are 6-2 (actually 7-1) the last 4 years against your piss yellow and puke green franchise; with 1 SB appearance .... much better than anything the fudgepackers have done the last 4 years. But whatever makes you sleep well at night, princess!!