Steve Young calls for Boys/Colts SB IF....

[Dallas_Empire 0]

You have to factor in Superbowl appearances and playoff wins. Dallas has exceeded Pitt by far.

[Foghorn Leghorn 0]

You have to factor in Superbowl appearances and playoff wins. Dallas has exceeded Pitt by far.

 

Dallas and Pittsurgh (and San Francisco) have each won 5 Super Bowls. Dallas has lost 3 Super Bowls, Pittsburgh only one.

 

I think you'd better stick to plagiarizing, Mr. Plagiarist_Empire. At least then you have a chance at getting facts straight.

[Dallas_Empire 0]

Dallas and Pittsurgh (and San Francisco) have each won 5 Super Bowls. Dallas has lost 3 Super Bowls, Pittsburgh only one.

 

I think you'd better stick to plagiarizing, Mr. Plagiarist_Empire. At least then you have a chance at getting facts straight.

 

 

The facts are clear. Dallas has put more foot to a-s than any other team in the modern era. That is why we are America's Team.

 

 

Dallas has the most post season wins at 32. No other team has won more playoff games than Dallas. Dallas also has the highest overall winning percentage including playoffs and regular season than any other team in NFL History at .577

 

 

This translates into 8 Superbowl appreances which is an NFL record and 5 Wins which is tied for first.

 

http://www.profootballhof.com/history/stat...oss_records.jsp

 

 

The Next time you want to bash another team for now winning playoff games you might want to pick another team. Dallas is first with 32. You have been owned. Bye Bye.

[Foghorn Leghorn 0]

The facts are clear. Dallas has put more foot to a-s than any other team in the modern era. That is why we are America's Team.

Dallas has the most post season wins at 32. No other team has won more playoff games than Dallas. Dallas also has the highest overall winning percentage including playoffs and regular season than any other team in NFL History at .577

This translates into 8 Superbowl appreances which is an NFL record and 5 Wins which is tied for first.

 

http://www.profootballhof.com/history/stat...oss_records.jsp

The Next time you want to bash another team for now winning playoff games you might want to pick another team. Dallas is first with 32. You have been owned. Bye Bye.

 

Soooooo....you argue that it's all about how you do in the big game. Then, when shown that your team has blown it in the big game more than the other couple of teams that have won as many titles as your team, you reverse direction and argue that it's about playoff wins, which you argue against when mocking Eagles fans about when they talk about their playoff success a few years ago....

 

Stick to plagiarism - at least then you'll stand the chance of having a cogent argument.

[kmbryant09 1]

Lets not go there. Troy's pick which was overturned should of ended that game. Steelers outplayed the Colts big time in that game.

 

 

All I'm saying is EVERYTHING is a big IF...you can't take away the Colts victory over the Steelers because Big Ben turned the ball over...Whos to say that next time he doesn't do the same?? I like the Colts chances (I think the game would be a tossup) considering we will have a healthy Saturday, Addai, and Bob Sanders, which is the first time all season...The old Colts knew how to look glamorous and score points; but everyone is right, they didn't grind out games and simply find ways to win close games.......Well guess what, they've done that more than anyone this year, while being shorthanded

[Dallas_Empire 0]

Soooooo....you argue that it's all about how you do in the big game. Then, when shown that your team has blown it in the big game more than the other couple of teams that have won as many titles as your team, you reverse direction and argue that it's about playoff wins, which you argue against when mocking Eagles fans about when they talk about their playoff success a few years ago....

 

Stick to plagiarism - at least then you'll stand the chance of having a cogent argument.

 

 

Dallas owns all teams in every way.

[jgcrawfish 232]

The facts are clear. Dallas has put more foot to a-s than any other team in the modern era. That is why we are America's Team.

Dallas has the most post season wins at 32. No other team has won more playoff games than Dallas. Dallas also has the highest overall winning percentage including playoffs and regular season than any other team in NFL History at .577

This translates into 8 Superbowl appreances which is an NFL record and 5 Wins which is tied for first.

 

http://www.profootballhof.com/history/stat...oss_records.jsp

The Next time you want to bash another team for now winning playoff games you might want to pick another team. Dallas is first with 32. You have been owned. Bye Bye.

 

dallas also has more seasons with only 4 wins or less than any other of the elite teams. and your stats suck, the franchise winning percentages include playoff and superbowl games. you're making sh!t up now because you got called out, used and abused. going to the superbowl and getting your ass handed to you doesn't count for much, just ask the bills. and despite your playoff wins you haven't won one there in the last 12 years.

 

more stats for your ass...

 

Playoff wins

1. Dal 26

2. Pit 23

3. SF 20

4. Oak 19

5. Mia 18

6. NE 17

6. Was 17

8. Min 16

9. Den 15

9. Stl 15

 

Superbowls

Team

1. Dal 5-3

2. Pit 5-1

3. SF 5-0

4. NE 3-3

5. Was 3-2

5. Den 2-4

7. NYG 3-1

7. Oak 3-1

7. Mia 2-3

10. Ind 2-0

10. Stl 1-2

10. Buf 0-4

 

Winning %

1. Mia .608

2. Pit .603

3. Dal .594

4. Den .586

5. Min .572

6. SF .568

7. Oak .5582

7. Was .5582

9. Jac .543

10. Stl .534

 

All-Pros

Team No.

1. Pit 62

2. Dal 56

2. Mia 56

4. SF 55

5. Min 52

6. Oak 49

7. Stl 44

8. Den 39

9. Chi 38

10. KC 37

 

4 or fewer Ws

Team No.

1. Pit 0

2. Bal 1

2. Den 1

2. Jac 1

2. Min 1

6. Car 2

6. Dal

6. Hou 2

6. Mia 2

6. Was 2

 

you want stats...there you go. pittsburgh HAS a better winning %, more all pros, less suck-ass seasons and will by the end of this year have more superbowls and as many playoff wins. if anything 2 victories over you in the superbowl and having just kicked your ass means the steelers own you...

[mrgymrat 0]

You have to factor in Superbowl appearances and playoff wins. Dallas has exceeded Pitt by far.

 

As per wikipedia...

 

Super Bowls

 

5-0 1.000... San Francisco

5-1 .833... Pittsburg

3-1 .750... Oak/LA Raiders

5-3 .625... Dallas

3-2 .600... Washington

3-3 .500... New England

2-3 .400... Miami

2-4 .333... Denver

 

 

Most Successful Professional Football Franchises in League Titles (1920-present)

(as per 2008 NFL Record & Fact Book)

 

12 - Packers

9 - Bears

8 - Browns

7 - Giants

5 - Cowboys, Steelers, 49ers, Redskins, Colts

 

 

Most Playoff Wins

(as per 2008 NFL Record & Fact Book)

 

32 Cowboys

28 Steelers

25 Packers

25 Raiders

25 49ers

21 Patriots

20 Redskins

20 Giants

19 Rams

18 Vikings

 

 

Most Playoff Losses

(as per 2008 NFL Record & Fact Book)

 

24 Cowboys

24 Vikings

24 Rams

23 Giants

20 Browns

19 Dolphins

19 Steelers

18 Raiders

18 Titans

17 Bears

17 Colts

17 Eagles

17 49ers

 

 

Playoff Winning %

 

28-19 .595... Steelers

25-17 .595... 49ers

32-24 .571... Cowboys

 

In case you were wondering...

[Dallas_Empire 0]

As per wikipedia...

 

Super Bowls

 

5-0 1.000... San Francisco

5-1 .833... Pittsburg

3-1 .750... Oak/LA Raiders

5-3 .625... Dallas

3-2 .600... Washington

3-3 .500... New England

2-3 .400... Miami

2-4 .333... Denver

Most Successful Professional Football Franchises in League Titles (1920-present)

(as per 2008 NFL Record & Fact Book)

 

12 - Packers

9 - Bears

8 - Browns

7 - Giants

5 - Cowboys, Steelers, 49ers, Redskins, Colts

Most Playof f Wins

 

 

 

 

Only Superbowl titles count. The stupid titles from when skinny white guys played with leather helmets don't count. Sorry Gay Bay. You suck.

(as per 2008 NFL Record & Fact Book)

 

32 Cowboys

28 Steelers

25 Packers

25 Raiders

25 49ers

21 Patriots

20 Redskins

20 Giants

19 Rams

18 Vikings

Most Playoff Losses

(as per 2008 NFL Record & Fact Book)

 

24 Cowboys

24 Vikings

24 Rams

23 Giants

20 Browns

19 Dolphins

19 Steelers

18 Raiders

18 Titans

17 Bears

17 Colts

17 Eagles

17 49ers

Playoff Winning %

 

28-19 .595... Steelers

25-17 .595... 49ers

32-24 .571... Cowboys

 

In case you were wondering...

 

 

Only Superbowl titles count. The stupid titles from when skinny white guys played with leather helmets don't count. Sorry Gay Bay. You suck.

[mrgymrat 0]

Dallas is the most successful team in the modern era.

 

Not quite...

 

 

SUPER BOWL RECORDS

 

5-0 1.000... San Francisco

5-1 .833... Pittsburg

3-1 .750... Oak/LA Raiders

5-3 .625... Dallas

 

 

Playoff Winning %

 

28-19 .595... Steelers

25-17 .595... 49ers

32-24 .571... Cowboys

[Dallas_Empire 0]

Not quite...

SUPER BOWL RECORDS

 

5-0 1.000... San Francisco

5-1 .833... Pittsburg

3-1 .750... Oak/LA Raiders

5-3 .625... Dallas

Playoff Winning %

 

28-19 .595... Steelers

25-17 .595... 49ers

32-24 .571... Cowboys

 

 

 

32 playoff wins is tops. The highest combined winning percentage of playoffs and regular season. The most superbowls and most superbowl appearances. I rest my case.

[Franknbeans 46]

didn't Steve Young retire because of repeated concussions?

[tubby_mcgee 701]

I CALL BS!!!

 

look it up dipshit and you'll find the winningest team since the modern era of football resides in Pittsburgh. Your stupidity knows no bounds.

 

 

LOL. Ummm...where did he say "winningest"? He said most successful. Pitt & SF would be tied, of course...but uhh...you look like a complete focking moron by thinking "successful" = "winningest". So, according to your OWN theory, The Patriots were the most successful team in the NFL last year, because they won more games than the Giants? What a dipsh!t.

 

Next time, how about you THINK first, THEN run your inbound calorie port. Ever think of that?

[tubby_mcgee 701]

Not quite...

SUPER BOWL RECORDS

 

5-0 1.000... San Francisco

5-1 .833... Pittsburg

3-1 .750... Oak/LA Raiders

5-3 .625... Dallas

Playoff Winning %

 

28-19 .595... Steelers

25-17 .595... 49ers

32-24 .571... Cowboys

 

 

The ultimate goal in the NFL is to WIN the SB. 3 teams have 5 wins. It would be difficult to create a valid argument as to why those 3 are not the most successful of the modern era.

 

It looks like you docked Dallas because of a lower SB win %. Based on your theory, the Cardinals have been more successful than the Vikes or Bills (because they would be docked for losing). Also based on your theory, the Ravens should be the #2 most successful team (in that category, not counting playoffs) because they have a 1.000 win % in the SB. That's some pretty intelligent stuff.

[mrgymrat 0]

BTW... 24 playoff losses is also tops. Your team has as many Super Bowl losses as the Vikings, almost as many as the Buffalo Bills.

 

The Cowboys have only been the best team of one era and that was because they were lucky enough to play the Bills in two Super Bowls.

 

1970's - Steelers

1980's - 49ers

1990's - Cowboys

2000's - Patriots

[tubby_mcgee 701]

Dallas and Pittsurgh (and San Francisco) have each won 5 Super Bowls. Dallas has lost 3 Super Bowls, Pittsburgh only one.

 

I think you'd better stick to plagiarizing, Mr. Plagiarist_Empire. At least then you have a chance at getting facts straight.

 

 

Ohh. Interesting. YOUR THEORY...based on what you wrote would indicate the following;

 

If there were a poll, asking for the LEAST successful NFL franchises, YOU would voice your opinion that the Minnesota Vikings and Buffalo Bills are both less successful than the Lions and Cardinals.

 

You are "docking" teams based on SB losses, and are saying that an appearance doesn't matter---actually counts against you if you don't win the game.

 

Here is what your dumbass statement would look like:

 

"Minnesota and Detroit have each won 0 Superbowls. Minnesota has lost 4 Superbowls, Detroit has lost 0. "

 

Hmmm. What kind of a focking dipshit would think the Lions are more successul than the Bills or Vikes? LOL. Congrats.

 

You better stick to working a shovel or some other form of physical labor, because you were't exactly created to be in an industry that requires thinking.

[Dallas_Empire 0]

Ohh. Interesting. YOUR THEORY...based on what you wrote would indicate the following;

 

If there were a poll, asking for the LEAST successful NFL franchises, YOU would voice your opinion that the Minnesota Vikings and Buffalo Bills are both less successful than the Lions and Cardinals.

 

You are "docking" teams based on SB losses, and are saying that an appearance doesn't matter if you don't win the game.

 

Here is what your dumbass statement would look like:

 

"Minnesota and Detroit have each won 0 Superbowls. Minnesota has lost 4 Superbowls, Detroit has lost 0. "

 

Hmmm. What kind of a focking dipshit would think the Lions are more successul than the Bills or Vikes? LOL. Congrats.

 

You better stick to working a shovel or some other form of physical labor, because you were't exactly created to be in an industry that requires thinking.

 

 

Yeah look at the Lakers titles. They have won 16 but have lost quite a few titles as well. The same goes for most great teams. If you are docking teams based on Superbowl losses then fine, but that Superbowl loss team was better than all the other teams expect one team on one Sunday. Those Bills teams in the early 90's were fantastic. Yeah, they never got a ring and my Cowboys denied them twice but still they deserve respect. You got it right about this moron not having the intelligence for a thinking job. He needs to stick to ditch digging and try not to crap his pants on a daily basis.

[kmbryant09 1]

OH MY GOD WILL YOU GUYS STOP WHINING LIKE A BUNCH OF FOCKIN BABIES....Seriously who the f*ck cares who's franchise has had MORE ALLPRO PLAYERS in the past 10 or 30 years?!?!?! Certainly the way your team is playing gives you a reason to take pride in them, or hope for better days, or whatever, BUT STOP BRINGIN UP ALL THIS SH!T FROM THE LAST 30 YEARS TO TRY AND PROVE YOUR TEAM IS BETTER THAN SOMEONE ELSES....Guess what, it doesn't matter, and if you guys haven't found out already, i'll let you in on a little secret....No matter how good your arguments are or how persuasive you are, the other person is not going to suddenly jump to your team's bandwagon and admit that your team is better.....

 

This thread started out as a SuperBowl Prediction between the Colts and Cowboys, and all of a sudden it's a freakin convention for washed-up, ignorant homers trying to make ridiculous claims against another franchise, simply because you had an extra all-pro guard 40 years ago....WOW

[NewbieJr 541]

Tubby McGee and Dallas Empire make such a great team. Pees in a pod.

[mrgymrat 0]

It looks like you docked Dallas because of a lower SB win %

 

I didn't dock Dallas at all. I ranked them in order of their winning percentage. Obviously the 3 teams that have won 5 Super Bowls separate themselves from all other Super Bowl winners but to imply that the Cowboys are the best ever just because they have won more playoff games is absurd.

 

49ers winning 5 Super Bowls against no defeats is most impressive. I would rank the 3 5-time champs in this order:

 

1. 49ers

2. Steelers

3. Cowboys

[tubby_mcgee 701]

Not quite...

SUPER BOWL RECORDS

 

5-0 1.000... San Francisco

5-1 .833... Pittsburg

3-1 .750... Oak/LA Raiders

5-3 .625... Dallas

Playoff Winning %

 

28-19 .595... Steelers

25-17 .595... 49ers

32-24 .571... Cowboys

 

 

Ohh.....so it's all about win %? I see, I see. So according to you, if a team was in the NFL for 40 years, and made the playoffs 2 times, and had a 5-2 record in the playoffs, and a 1-0 record in the SB, they would obviously be the most successful team ever?

 

Care to explain how you think a team that has made the playoffs 2x over 40 years would considered the most successful team ever?

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Dude, if the Cowboy's season comes down to beating Philly in Philly, no way they make the playoffs. The Eagles will play the most inspired football of the year, reguardless of what their playoff chances are. Even if the Eagles don't make the playoffs, knocking Dallas out would still make their year.

 

So Empire, when that happens will you spend all offseason coming up with delusional excuses and conspiracy theories, or will you just go away? Or will you jump on an AFC team's bandwagon?

 

I'm hoping for suicide...and I don't mean board suicide.

[jgcrawfish 232]

Only Superbowl titles count. The stupid titles from when skinny white guys played with leather helmets don't count. Sorry Gay Bay. You suck.

 

hmmm...i seem to recall that two of your wins came during that same period...so you've just invalidated your own argument.

 

32 playoff wins is tops. The highest combined winning percentage of playoffs and regular season. The most superbowls and most superbowl appearances. I rest my case.

 

it's great getting to the superbowl, but nobody remembers the loser. and you don't have the highest winning % in the playoffs and regular season, in fact, the % i listed was for ALL games since the merger. you just keep getting deeper and deeper in your own poo.

 

LOL. Ummm...where did he say "winningest"? He said most successful. Pitt & SF would be tied, of course...but uhh...you look like a complete focking moron by thinking "successful" = "winningest". So, according to your OWN theory, The Patriots were the most successful team in the NFL last year, because they won more games than the Giants? What a dipsh!t.

 

Next time, how about you THINK first, THEN run your inbound calorie port. Ever think of that?

 

way to pick and choose your stats there fatboy. i'll grant that winning and success may be two different things...however, the Cowboys lose out to the Steelers on both. If success is measured in superbowl wins, then the Cowboys, Steelers and 49ers are tied, however, I would think that the team that is most successful more often would win that argument, meaning 49ers, Steelers and Cowboys in that order. You can't pick only your good performances and list them when you're talking about the "most successful franchise" because the seasons of suckitude count as well. Yes the Cowboys have more playoff wins that any other franchise, but they also have more losses. The also have more seasons with 4 wins or less. consistency has to count for something as well. perhaps you should think before running off your mouth fatboy.

 

I didn't dock Dallas at all. I ranked them in order of their winning percentage. Obviously the 3 teams that have won 5 Super Bowls separate themselves from all other Super Bowl winners but to imply that the Cowboys are the best ever just because they have won more playoff games is absurd.

 

49ers winning 5 Super Bowls against no defeats is most impressive. I would rank the 3 5-time champs in this order:

 

1. 49ers

2. Steelers

3. Cowboys

 

Again, if judging solely on superbowl performance, then yes, San Fran wins that. However, as far as their overall success goes, they rank third, because both the Cowboys and Steelers have much higher franchise winning %, playoff appearances, etc.

 

If this is a debate, then it's a 3 team race and the Steelers have just as many superbowls and the highest winning % of any team in the NFL since the merger (trailed by the Dolphins and Cowboys...in that order Dumbass_Empire)

[jgcrawfish 232]

Ohh.....so it's all about win %? I see, I see. So according to you, if a team was in the NFL for 40 years, and made the playoffs 2 times, and had a 5-2 record in the playoffs, and a 1-0 record in the SB, they would obviously be the most successful team ever?

 

Care to explain how you think a team that has made the playoffs 2x over 40 years would considered the most successful team ever?

 

that's why you factor in franchise winning % there dumbass...a team that makes the playoffs 2 times in 40 yrs would probably get knocked slightly, dontchathink???

[tubby_mcgee 701]

winning and success may be two different things

 

 

 

Ohh......nowwww they're two different things. Before they weren't. I see. Hey when you're getting your ass handed to you, just do a "180".

 

 

How about you think first next time, k, couch potato?

[tubby_mcgee 701]

that's why you factor in franchise winning % there dumbass...a team that makes the playoffs 2 times in 40 yrs would probably get knocked slightly, dontchathink???

 

 

In my example, I did factor in playoff win %. I used the exact same criteria you used in your initial comparison: Playoff win%, SB win%.

 

That's okay. You just forgot to think before you typed.

[NewbieJr 541]

Does anyone really care how successful Dallas was when Aikman, Smith, and Irvin played? That was a good team. We get it.

 

The fact is, Dallas hasn't won a playoff game in forever. I didn't say 'a Super Bowl', I said 'a playoff game'. Nor even a measly little wildcard-one. None. Zilch. Nada.

 

That's horrible.

 

 

We'll all admit that Dallas is one of football's all-time best franchises, if you Cowboy-lovers admit that they are one of present-time football's biggest failures.

[Gepetto 1,370]

Here's the truth for all of the idiots in this thread: getting to the Super Bowl and losing in it is better than not getting to the Super Bowl.

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Here's the truth for all of the idiots in this thread: getting to the Super Bowl and losing in it is better than not getting to the Super Bowl.

 

Well the last time you guys got to the Superbowl was 1995. Since then you haven't even won a game after the regular season has ended.

 

And despite the fact that the national media, including Cowboy hating ESPN, annoited you the preseason Superbowl Favorite, there is a good chance you wont even make the playoffs.

 

You're wasting your homosexual rage on the haters, when it should all be directed at assclown Jerry Jones for sabatoging the talented roster Parcells assembled for him.

[jgcrawfish 232]

In my example, I did factor in playoff win %. I used the exact same criteria you used in your initial comparison: Playoff win%, SB win%.

 

That's okay. You just forgot to think before you typed.

 

really? really? funny, i never said anything about playoff winning %, i said franchise winning %. but here, so perhaps we can settle the debate, we'll let a 3rd party wade in on it...

 

ESPN Ultimate NFL Power Rankings

 

When written, before the season, the Cowboys were a mere 3 pts ahead of the Steelers, and both of those teams were 200 or so ahead of 3rd place San Fran. However, based on their formula, the Steelers have not only increased their franchise winning % more than the Cowboys have, but are 1 win away from another 12 win season, which would definitely put them in front.

 

Regardless, it's a question for the ages...Good (Steelers) vs Evil (Cowboys)

 

[Franknbeans 46]

Here's the truth for all of the idiots in this thread: getting to the Super Bowl and losing in it is better than not getting to the Super Bowl.

tell that to Buffalo fans

[hines86rules 0]

... the Boys can make the playoffs.

 

Always knew that dude had at least half a brain.

 

See his Week 15 Rant video...

 

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/index

Colts/Cowboys was my prediction at the start of the season, and of course I am sticking by it until it becomes impossible.

 

The AFC just isn't scary this year. I see the Colts as a team that simply knows how to win at this point, and will be able to knock off the Jets or Titans of the conference.

 

The NFC is weak this year and the Giants have been exposed as frauds. The Panthers are a joke team that is doing it with smoke and mirrors. We can beat the rest of the chump teams easily.

Steve Young is a genius and he is far too intelligent to be on ESPN.

I see your boycott of ESPN is still going well.

[jgcrawfish 232]

I see your boycott of ESPN is still going well.

 

he left that picket line and decided to boycott rational thought instead.

 

[Foghorn Leghorn 0]

Ohh. Interesting. YOUR THEORY...based on what you wrote would indicate the following;

 

If there were a poll, asking for the LEAST successful NFL franchises, YOU would voice your opinion that the Minnesota Vikings and Buffalo Bills are both less successful than the Lions and Cardinals.

 

You are "docking" teams based on SB losses, and are saying that an appearance doesn't matter---actually counts against you if you don't win the game.

 

Here is what your dumbass statement would look like:

 

"Minnesota and Detroit have each won 0 Superbowls. Minnesota has lost 4 Superbowls, Detroit has lost 0. "

 

Hmmm. What kind of a focking dipshit would think the Lions are more successul than the Bills or Vikes? LOL. Congrats.

 

You better stick to working a shovel or some other form of physical labor, because you were't exactly created to be in an industry that requires thinking.

 

If you're too obtuse to realize that I was using the same theory that Plagiarist_Empire, Pimp_mcgee, tubby_taddy, or any of your other aliases use in the first place, a theory that you now conveniently disagree with, then there's really no point in continuing, is there?

 

[idiotekniQues 0]

The Giants won three road games last year Try again.

 

it's good to see you pay your respects to the giants, and the greatest superbowl victory run in nfl history, not even a full season removed

[Dallas_Empire 0]

it's good to see you pay your respects to the giants, and the greatest superbowl victory run in nfl history, not even a full season removed

 

 

 

Far from it

[49ers_suck 0]

this is all a bunch of jaw flapping. the fact is, the AFC is wide open. the Colts have a decent shot, but who knows.

 

the NFC has become more clouded as well. as for the Cowboys, i'd like to see them win their last regular season game at Texas Stadium this saturday. and then its a VERY tough game in philly.

 

i'm a Cowboys fan, and a realist. this team can be good, but they have everything to prove. Romo has not won a playoff game. not completely his fault, but he's the QB, so it lands on his shoulders.

 

we all know Romo's history. but it's a short history. i hope he gets a shot at another playoff game, because i believe he has it in him to get to the next level. IF the Cowboys grab a wildcard they might be playing ARZ or MINNY on the road. i like their chances in both games, especially if the defense continues to play at a high level.

 

no doubt, the Cowboys have a very tough road, and odds are they wont succeed, but they're in the hunt, and it makes things exciting.

[Dallas_Empire 0]

this is all a bunch of jaw flapping. the fact is, the AFC is wide open. the Colts have a decent shot, but who knows.

 

the NFC has become more clouded as well. as for the Cowboys, i'd like to see them win their last regular season game at Texas Stadium this saturday. and then its a VERY tough game in philly.

 

i'm a Cowboys fan, and a realist. this team can be good, but they have everything to prove. Romo has not won a playoff game. not completely his fault, but he's the QB, so it lands on his shoulders.

 

we all know Romo's history. but it's a short history. i hope he gets a shot at another playoff game, because i believe he has it in him to get to the next level. IF the Cowboys grab a wildcard they might be playing ARZ or MINNY on the road. i like their chances in both games, especially if the defense continues to play at a high level.

 

no doubt, the Cowboys have a very tough road, and odds are they wont succeed, but they're in the hunt, and it makes things exciting.

 

 

America's Team

[jgcrawfish 232]

America's Team

 

made up title by NFL films...but maybe appropriate since most of america these days is more concerned about style than substance. Hey, we're the Cowboys, it's fine if we can't win playoff games as long as people are talking about us. I'd rather be in the spotlight than in the endzone anyway.

[GhostofMeanMachine99 1]

Can people really start ignoring this clown. He's just saying this stuff to get a rise out of everyone. He just wants the attention.

 

Make him earn it, and don't get sucked into his vortex of idiocy.