Blue_Star_Wrecking_Crew 0 Posted December 22, 2009 Tony Dungy needs to own up. The guy trashed romo all week. now he is still talking smack. He actually just said that NO was not expecting Ware to play and that's why they failed on their last play! After Ware had a great game, he says NO was not expecting him to be in the game on the last play or they would have had the RB on the other side to chip him! WHAT! After he was in all game playing great, they thought he was not in the game on the last play cause of his neck!?!?!?!?! DUNGY IS OFFICIALLY AN IDIOT! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted December 22, 2009 If that game goes ten more minutes, the Cowboys lose. You know it, I know it, and all of Dallas knows it. Be happy they spotted you 24. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blue_Star_Wrecking_Crew 0 Posted December 22, 2009 If that game goes ten more minutes, the Cowboys lose. You know it, I know it, and all of Dallas knows it. Be happy they spotted you 24. So you are saying the saints need 70 minutes to beat dallas. Must be pretty good for an undefeated top 2 team to have to have 70 minutes to eek out a win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted December 22, 2009 If that game goes ten more minutes, the Cowboys lose. You know it, I know it, and all of Dallas knows it. Be happy they spotted you 24. These are the kind of statements that make is so hard to take you serious. These are the kind of statements that lump you in with the rest of the Romo-ass-licking clowns you so detest here. These are the kind of statements that separate the lucid, reasonable, legit Eagles/anti-Cowboys fans like GhostofMeanMachine99 and you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted December 23, 2009 These are the kind of statements that make is so hard to take you serious. These are the kind of statements that lump you in with the rest of the Romo-ass-licking clowns you so detest here. These are the kind of statements that separate the lucid, reasonable, legit Eagles/anti-Cowboys fans like GhostofMeanMachine99 and you. Oh stop, Cruzer. When I'm debating intelligent people, I'll have intelligent discussion. But I when I'm arguing with mental midgets like Pimpdaddy or internet toughguys I'm more than happy to have some fun and post at their level. If you'd like to have some serious discussion or would like my honest appraisal of things, feel free to ask. I'm a messageboard chameleon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blue_Star_Wrecking_Crew 0 Posted December 23, 2009 Oh stop, Cruzer. When I'm debating intelligent people, I'll have intelligent discussion. But I when I'm arguing with mental midgets like Pimpdaddy or internet toughguys I'm more than happy to have some fun and post at their level. If you'd like to have some serious discussion or would like my honest appraisal of things, feel free to ask. I'm a messageboard chameleon. Watch these videos and let it sink in just what the Cowboys accomplished in New Orleans on Saturday. Saints 48, Giants 27 http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlig...ints-highlights Saints 48, Eagles 22 http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlig...gles-highlights Saints 46, Dolphins 34 http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlig...hins-highlights Saints 38, Patriots 17 http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlig...ints-highlights Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted December 23, 2009 Oh stop, Cruzer. When I'm debating intelligent people, I'll have intelligent discussion. But I when I'm arguing with mental midgets like Pimpdaddy or internet toughguys I'm more than happy to have some fun and post at their level. If you'd like to have some serious discussion or would like my honest appraisal of things, feel free to ask. I'm a messageboard chameleon. The question begs to be asked, then why engage? Again, by flip-flopping back and forth - you make it hard to decifer if/when you are rational, if indeed you are at all. You moan and groan about the very thing you feed. Again, take a page from Ghost if you want to make a point, or take a stance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted December 23, 2009 The question begs to be asked, then why engage? Again, by flip-flopping back and forth - you make it hard to decifer if/when you are rational, if indeed you are at all. You moan and groan about the very thing you feed. Again, take a page from Ghost if you want to make a point, or take a stance. I think it's pretty obvious when somebody is engaging a Pimp/Dallas Empire/Wrecking Crew/Purple Reign/Belicheck and when they are having a serious discussion with a legitimate board member.... Pimp/Dallas Empire/Wrecking Crew/Purple Reign/Belicheck is all over the place.... you can't escape him.... so to tell people not to engage him is extremely difficult to do.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ers_suck 0 Posted December 23, 2009 Romo and the Cowboys still have everything to prove. they control their own destiny. they win the next two, and a playoff game, then thats something. again, Romo is not the problem. and i think he has proven that this year. the problem starts at the top of the organization. can they overcome this? maybe. as for the game vs. NO. the Cowboys dominated the LOS most of the game. that was the difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted December 23, 2009 We've agreed that I was right about nearly everything. Why must thou continue to babble on? This discussion is finished. Thank you again for agreeing with me. I'm being gracious. Thoust should acknowledge it. as expected. your points have been systematically refuted (except when they agreed with my original post). instead of trying to defend the indefensible, which you know is impossible, you simply claim victory without even attempting to make any substantive points. somehow i get the feeling that your "data handling" job is more along the lines of "data entry". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted December 23, 2009 The question begs to be asked, then why engage? Again, by flip-flopping back and forth - you make it hard to decifer if/when you are rational, if indeed you are at all. You moan and groan about the very thing you feed. Again, take a page from Ghost if you want to make a point, or take a stance. Can't you tell how much fun I have 'engaging' the idiots of the board? It makes my day more fun. My point is already made. Romo's record in December is his record. I don't have to embellish it. If an idiot like blue star/pimptard/etc wants to get all defensive and post links that no one will open, he's entertaining me. Or, if a guy wants to stick his nose in and start namecalling and making threats and being a toughguy, that's fine, too. Isn't that what it's all about? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted December 23, 2009 Romo and the Cowboys still have everything to prove. they control their own destiny. they win the next two, and a playoff game, then thats something. again, Romo is not the problem. and i think he has proven that this year. the problem starts at the top of the organization. can they overcome this? maybe. as for the game vs. NO. the Cowboys dominated the LOS most of the game. that was the difference. Romo sucks! Cowboys suck! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan 66 Posted December 23, 2009 I think it's pretty obvious when somebody is engaging a Pimp/Dallas Empire/Wrecking Crew/Purple Reign/Belicheck and when they are having a serious discussion with a legitimate board member.... Pimp/Dallas Empire/Wrecking Crew/Purple Reign/Belicheck is all over the place.... you can't escape him.... so to tell people not to engage him is extremely difficult to do.... This is true. I basically avoid . . . him, whatever his name really is . . . but it is very easy to find yourself feeling the need to respond at some point, on some level, eventually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan 66 Posted December 23, 2009 Romo and the Cowboys still have everything to prove. they control their own destiny. they win the next two, and a playoff game, then thats something. again, Romo is not the problem. and i think he has proven that this year. the problem starts at the top of the organization. can they overcome this? maybe. as for the game vs. NO. the Cowboys dominated the LOS most of the game. that was the difference. This is a good post. I will add this, though: Romo is not the problem, but it's still in question as to whether or not he is the answer. I'm not trying to bait, but given the level of hype that he has received, for almost all of his time as a starter, it is fair to compare him against the QBs that his supporters always want him cast in the same light with. One Dallas fan - I'm sorry I don't remember which - pointed out that he has won some "come-from-behind" games over the past few years, but the numbers pale compared to the target group, the so-called elite. And I don't remember the teams they were against, either, but obviously that has significance, as well as the time of year, as this discussion directly speaks to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted December 23, 2009 I think it's pretty obvious when somebody is engaging a Pimp/Dallas Empire/Wrecking Crew/Purple Reign/Belicheck and when they are having a serious discussion with a legitimate board member.... Pimp/Dallas Empire/Wrecking Crew/Purple Reign/Belicheck is all over the place.... you can't escape him.... so to tell people not to engage him is extremely difficult to do.... Ignore works great although my list is getting pretty long. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted December 23, 2009 Ignore works great although my list is getting pretty long. Although 'ignore' is certainly a possibility, I'd much rather just use my manual ignore mode. I ignore 90% of teh crap he posts under his 15 sillytarded membernames, but every once in a while, his stupidity shines so brightly that I take great pleasure in destroying him. I'd miss those good times if I had him on ignore. Someone mentioned the other day that he may really be Football_Scooter. There is no way that could be, for two reasons. First of all, scooter had a very bad anger management problem. If you debated him and he felt cornered, he would resort to insults and flipout like a grade-schooler. Pimpdaddy&friends don't have that temperment. Another reason it couldn't be Scooter is because Scooter actually had some football knowledge. If you could manage to sift through the toughguy stuff, he was a very knowledgable member. Pimpdaddy surely isn't that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted December 23, 2009 Although 'ignore' is certainly a possibility, I'd much rather just use my manual ignore mode. I ignore 90% of teh crap he posts under his 15 sillytarded membernames, but every once in a while, his stupidity shines so brightly that I take great pleasure in destroying him. I'd miss those good times if I had him on ignore. 1. Personally I don't think he is smart enough to know he is being destroyed. 2. It is a shallow victory because it is similar to punching out a 2nd grade girl. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ers_suck 0 Posted December 23, 2009 Romo sucks! Cowboys suck! wow, thanks for enlightening me. i was unaware. so, what exactly are you adding to this discussion? oh i know, less than pimp. good for you. This is a good post. I will add this, though: Romo is not the problem, but it's still in question as to whether or not he is the answer. I'm not trying to bait, but given the level of hype that he has received, for almost all of his time as a starter, it is fair to compare him against the QBs that his supporters always want him cast in the same light with. One Dallas fan - I'm sorry I don't remember which - pointed out that he has won some "come-from-behind" games over the past few years, but the numbers pale compared to the target group, the so-called elite. And I don't remember the teams they were against, either, but obviously that has significance, as well as the time of year, as this discussion directly speaks to. yea, im not sure if he's the answer, but he's taking care of the ball much better, which was one of his weaknesses in the past. he's taking what defenses give him, vs. trying too much and turning the ball over. again, he has to get into the playoffs and win a game, period. remember, a lot of the guys on this board were saying Romo was done without TO................ i was cautiously optimistic about Roy Williams possibly being reborn as a Cowboy. um, aint gonna happen. after he dropped that 1st down late against NO, that would have sealed the game, forcing the Cowboys to punt................... he can still be a possession receiver, but he just isnt a #1, period. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted December 23, 2009 wow, thanks for enlightening me. i was unaware. We all know that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blue_Star_Wrecking_Crew 0 Posted December 23, 2009 Where are all the Miles Austin, Anthony Spencer, Patrick Crayton, Tony Romo haters that flooded this forum before the season? I was really looking forward to more idiotic rants and excuses around this time of the season from these romo trashers and football "fans". I miss their inaccurate assessment of football teams, players, and strategy. The holidays must be hard on all y'all. Ya know, eatin' all that crow instead of turkey and ham. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foghorn Leghorn 0 Posted December 24, 2009 Where are all the Miles Austin, Anthony Spencer, Patrick Crayton, Tony Romo haters that flooded this forum before the season? I was really looking forward to more idiotic rants and excuses around this time of the season from these romo trashers and football "fans". I miss their inaccurate assessment of football teams, players, and strategy. The holidays must be hard on all y'all. Ya know, eatin' all that crow instead of turkey and ham. Speaking of holidays....will you have a table big enough to fit all of your aliases around for Christmas dinner? I'd just hate to think one might get left out during this most holiest of seasons. Oh, and a tip - you're gonna need one hell of a big turkey to feed them all, so you might want to start cooking it tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blue_Star_Wrecking_Crew 0 Posted December 24, 2009 Can't you tell how much fun I have 'engaging' the idiots of the board? It makes my day more fun. My point is already made. Romo's record in December is his record. I don't have to embellish it. If an idiot like blue star/pimptard/etc wants to get all defensive and post links that no one will open, he's entertaining me. Or, if a guy wants to stick his nose in and start namecalling and making threats and being a toughguy, that's fine, too. Isn't that what it's all about? Ea-girls Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ers_suck 0 Posted December 24, 2009 We all know that. who's we? you got a turd in your pocket? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Admiral Awesome 0 Posted December 24, 2009 You really don't know. No one knows. And, I care. I want to see the Cowboys haters take their medicine. That includes you. AMERICA'S TEAM is the Dallas Cowboys and they just defeated the previously undefeated New Orleans Saints In week 15 of the NFL Season, December 19th, 2009. That has to be difficult for you and the rest of the Cowboys haters to cope with. America's Team is such a horrible term for the Cowboys. How the hell are they America's Team? Half of the country hates them anyway. Plus we have our own teams to follow. You can have Tony Romo and your Cowboys. We all know they are not the best team in the NFL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Admiral Awesome 0 Posted December 24, 2009 DUNGY IS OFFICIALLY AN IDIOT! Yes, that Tony Dungy is an idiot. He only won the Super Bowl. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted December 24, 2009 Where are all the Miles Austin, Anthony Spencer, Patrick Crayton, Tony Romo haters that flooded this forum before the season? I was really looking forward to more idiotic rants and excuses around this time of the season from these romo trashers and football "fans". I miss their inaccurate assessment of football teams, players, and strategy. The holidays must be hard on all y'all. Ya know, eatin' all that crow instead of turkey and ham. Romo sucks! Cowboys suck! Anthony Spencer sucks! Patrick Crayton sucks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PsychoBelichickFan 0 Posted December 24, 2009 Yes, that Tony Dungy is an idiot. He only won the Super Bowl. He rode manning and the colts D. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted December 24, 2009 Yes, that Tony Dungy is an idiot. He only won the Super Bowl. You're in Psycho_Pimp's world. Superbowl wins after 1995 don't count. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ers_suck 0 Posted December 25, 2009 Romo sucks! Cowboys suck! Anthony Spencer sucks! Patrick Crayton sucks! what ever a phurfur is, it sucks! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Admiral Awesome 0 Posted December 25, 2009 You're in Psycho_Pimp's world. Superbowl wins after 1995 don't count. Why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blue_Star_Wrecking_Crew 0 Posted December 25, 2009 Why? they will count when respect is paid to the greatest dynasty of all time. The 90's cowboys Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted December 26, 2009 Why? Because you are in Psyco_Pimp's world. Rationality does not apply. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted December 27, 2009 what ever a phurfur is, it sucks! Romo sucks! Cowboys suck! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mdm_1971 0 Posted December 27, 2009 Romo sucks! Cowboys suck! Anthony Spencer sucks! Patrick Crayton sucks! 23 tds 7 ints....yep that sucks......what about austin?????? oh yeah i guess he doesnt huh.....man people just cause romo hasnt won a playoff game....i think it was several years before manning hell how many did marino win.....but i guess if super bowl mean anything that means Dilfer wasa better qb then a lot of qbs.......ok... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blue_Star_Wrecking_Crew 0 Posted December 27, 2009 23 tds 7 ints....yep that sucks......what about austin?????? oh yeah i guess he doesnt huh.....man people just cause romo hasnt won a playoff game....i think it was several years before manning hell how many did marino win.....but i guess if super bowl mean anything that means Dilfer wasa better qb then a lot of qbs.......ok... just a reset here for the romo bashers. 23 tds 7ints four games without throwing an int. just off a road win against the best team in the nfl. good times. The romo nation is strong now. Time for a playoff push Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted December 27, 2009 23 tds 7 ints....yep that sucks......what about austin?????? oh yeah i guess he doesnt huh.....man people just cause romo hasnt won a playoff game....i think it was several years before manning hell how many did marino win.....but i guess if super bowl mean anything that means Dilfer wasa better qb then a lot of qbs.......ok... It's not so much Romo not winning playoff games as it's delusional homer tools with multiple aliases tend to rim him constantly on this board. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted December 27, 2009 just a reset here for the romo bashers. 23 tds 7ints four games without throwing an int. just off a road win against the best team in the nfl. good times. The romo nation is strong now. Time for a playoff push Rimjob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted December 27, 2009 just a reset here for the romo bashers. 23 tds 7ints four games without throwing an int. just off a road win against the best team in the nfl. good times. The romo nation is strong now. Time for a playoff push Still one for three in December. Business as usual. Still fades as the season starts meaning something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
49ers_suck 0 Posted December 27, 2009 Still one for three in December. Business as usual. Still fades as the season starts meaning something. i watch every Cowboys game. if you think for a second that Romo was to blame for the losses, you are crazy, or you aint watchin. i do understand you are repsonding to pimp, but i'm just telling like it is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofMeanMachine99 1 Posted December 27, 2009 The question begs to be asked, then why engage? Again, by flip-flopping back and forth - you make it hard to decifer if/when you are rational, if indeed you are at all. You moan and groan about the very thing you feed. Again, take a page from Ghost if you want to make a point, or take a stance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites