Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 11, 2010 Most of us were laughing too watching your over-rated team getting waxed while giving up 51 points thanks to an aging D and a QB that directly gave up 14 points to the opposition in a playoff game. Nice FF QB though Aging D? Too funny. BTW...that aging D held your Bears and your little buddy Cutler to 29 points in 2 games...so keep talking smack. Hilarious that you would bag on Rodgers given Cutler has never made the postseason and led the league in interceptions. Wow, you are really that dumb aren't you. BTW...you never answered in that other thread...why is it that Williams and Omiyale can improve but guys like TJ Lang cannot? I won't hold my breath for that answer though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted March 11, 2010 Aging D? Too funny.BTW...that aging D held your Bears and your little buddy Cutler to 29 points in 2 games...so keep talking smack. Hilarious that you would bag on Rodgers given Cutler has never made the postseason and led the league in interceptions. Wow, you are really that dumb aren't you. BTW...you never answered in that other thread...why is it that Williams and Omiyale can improve but guys like TJ Lang cannot? I won't hold my breath for that answer though. He never answers your questions. He never makes an attempt to engage in any sort of fact-based discussion. It's just all FUDGEPACKERS 51 points! how sad!! BWAHAHAHAAHHA! Your typical anonymous internet poosay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted March 11, 2010 Most of us were laughing too watching your over-rated team getting waxed while giving up 51 points thanks to an aging D and a QB that directly gave up 14 points to the opposition in a playoff game. Nice FF QB though They didn't get waxed.... the lost in overtime.... that's pretty much the opposite of getting waxed.... Waxed is what has happened to your Chicago Lions 25 times out of the last 35 times they have played the Green Bay Packers.... HTH! We own you: Past, present, and future Perhaps you were laughing at something on the Figure Skating Championships that you Bear fans are used to watching on Sundays in January?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Walter34 3 Posted March 11, 2010 Waxed is what has happened to your Green bay Lions 7 times out of the last 12 times they have played the Chicago Bears ....HTH! Donnie - you need some new material. Copy and pasting the same post over and over is getting boring. Entertain me, you can do better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 11, 2010 Oh and for the record, the Packers needed an idiotic snap to a gnome of a RB that hopefully won't be on the roster anymore on 4th and long to win that 1st game. Partly because your line made Ogunleye look like a worldbeater in that game. Hate to see what an actual worldbeater will do. But hey, maybe he won't show up that day. true...it took a breakdown in the bears secondary for the packers to sneak off with that win at home..... as for gb having the #2 D in 09...lets be honest about it..with that schedule, they SHOULDVE been #2... there are solid players on that D...clay matthews was a tremendous move by ted.... but they arent close to being a #2 D....more middle of the pack... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 11, 2010 Aging D? Too funny.BTW...that aging D held your Bears and your little buddy Cutler to 29 points in 2 games...so keep talking smack. Hilarious that you would bag on Rodgers given Cutler has never made the postseason and led the league in interceptions. cutler never kicked a ball away for a playoff OT loss either....thats an all-timer, isnt it? he looked down and KICKED the focking ball.....had that been brett, you and others would still be up in arms over it.... he KICKED the ball....a tuck rule incomplete..and he KICKED it...aye... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 11, 2010 cutler never kicked a ball away for a playoff OT loss either....thats an all-timer, isnt it? he looked down and KICKED the focking ball.....had that been brett, you and others would still be up in arms over it.... he KICKED the ball....a tuck rule incomplete..and he KICKED it...aye... Well...hard for Cutler to do that in playoff game since he has never gotten to the postseason. All timer? kick or no kick the game was ending on that play. I would say the same thing had it been Brett...the kick was such a minimal thing. Not protecting the ball there was the problem. A free man coming in on a blitz was the problem. Not the kick (which was done to try and keep the ball close to him. Id excuse the kick part no matter who was the QB. But for anyone to use that to bash Rodgers after that game...and somehow try to say something about Cutler in it...freaking high comedy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted March 11, 2010 cutler never kicked a ball away for a playoff OT loss either....thats an all-timer, isnt it? A few things *** your obsession with Aaron Rodgers in a Bears thread is noted for the judge **** Kicking it up was just a split-second reaction..... if it would have went to a Packer, all works out great.... I actually think that was smart. You are being taken down for 9 seconds by your facemask and there are five AZ defenders waiting to scrape the ball off the ground and bring it in... the ball bounced wrong.... but if it hits the ground; same result... Yes, he held on to the ball too long.... But on third down with his defense not stopping AZ all day, he had to make a play.... He takes a sack and the game is over.... Now if he would have thrown an extremely dumbass across his body INT to lose the game when he could have crawled/moonwalked backwards/crabwalked into automatic Ryan Longwell's field goal range for the win and led you to your franchise's first Super Bowl since the 1970s, I think that boneheadness would be worth an off-topic Bmoney posting in a Bears thread..... The thing that makes Favre's bonehead play even worse is that Minn completely outplayed NO and deserved to win..... I don't know if you can say that about the Packers.... despite Rodgers awesome performance (425 and 5 TDs), that defense was just pathetic and probably didn't deserve to be winners... Another thing that makes it much worse is that Favre is 41; Rodgers just turned 26 It's been a pleasure owning you in a new thread Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted March 11, 2010 true...it took a breakdown in the bears secondary for the packers to sneak off with that win at home.....as for gb having the #2 D in 09...lets be honest about it..with that schedule, they SHOULDVE been #2... there are solid players on that D...clay matthews was a tremendous move by ted.... but they arent close to being a #2 D....more middle of the pack... This is a really stupid excuse/argument. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enis_44 0 Posted March 11, 2010 It's hard to know what Cutler would do in a playoff game....... We may never know...... Still waiting....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windycityguy 1 Posted March 11, 2010 ahhhhhhh. Don't care what any one says Bears vs Packers best rivalry in football. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted March 11, 2010 A few things that defense was just pathetic Agreed! Some reality is setting in....now what will make that D better this year? That's right .... nothing has been done by dumb and dumber yet. If anything, Harris might be out entire season or just too gimpy to be very effective. And the schedule is not the NFC West and AFC North.....NFC and AFC East are no walk in the park except for the Bills and Redskins. So how is that pathetic D improved since last season? If anything, Woodson is one more year older. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 11, 2010 Agreed! Some reality is setting in....now what will make that D better this year? That's right .... nothing has been done by dumb and dumber yet. If anything, Harris might be out entire season or just too gimpy to be very effective. And the schedule is not the NFC West and AFC North.....NFC and AFC East are no walk in the park except for the Bills and Redskins. So how is that pathetic D improved since last season? If anything, Woodson is one more year older. You can keep hoping Harris is out. Well, what has changed? They won't be playing Kurt Warner again? Cause that "pathetic D" (don was talking about in one game, not all year moron) held your little Bears to 29 points. Funny how that schedule did not seem to help your Bears either. But keep worrying about the Packers D...lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted March 11, 2010 Agreed! Some reality is setting in....now what will make that D better this year? That's right .... nothing has been done by dumb and dumber yet. If anything, Harris might be out entire season or just too gimpy to be very effective. And the schedule is not the NFC West and AFC North.....NFC and AFC East are no walk in the park except for the Bills and Redskins. So how is that pathetic D improved since last season? If anything, Woodson is one more year older. "Nothing has been done"? Maybe that's foreign to you because you think something has to be done via trade or FA for success. That's too bad. Rookies Matthews Jr., Raji, and Brad Jones are going to be more experienced. Young guys like T Williams, B Underwood, P Lee, and W Blackmon get another year to progress. They all begin to get more comfortable in the 3/4 defense. It's sad that you expose yourself as more of and internet geek than football fan. Apparently you don't understand the game at all if you believe that the only routes to success are through FA and trades. You embarrass yourself a lot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted March 11, 2010 Agreed! Some reality is setting in....now what will make that D better this year? They were pathetic for that game.... They shut down your -- admittingly crapass -- Bears, completely shut down the Cowboys, had a lot of great games throughout the season and I believe they ended up #2 overall HTH! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted March 11, 2010 They were pathetic for that game.... They shut down your -- admittingly crapass -- Bears, completely shut down the Cowboys, had a lot of great games throughout the season and I believe they ended up #2 overall HTH! And yet the Bears were one drive away from winning both games and could easily have won both. In fact, it took 5 turn overs AND a gift on special teams for the fudgepackers to steal one at home. Since then, the Bears have improved on both the O and the D, adding 2 HOF players on D. And the fudgepackers are going to be without one of their best D players in Harris. Keep dreaming about your over-rated team. Reality will set in this year.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted March 11, 2010 "Nothing has been done"? Maybe that's foreign to you because you think something has to be done via trade or FA for success. That's too bad. Rookies Matthews Jr., Raji, and Brad Jones are going to be more experienced. Young guys like T Williams, B Underwood, P Lee, and W Blackmon get another year to progress. They all begin to get more comfortable in the 3/4 defense. It's sad that you expose yourself as more of and internet geek than football fan. Apparently you don't understand the game at all if you believe that the only routes to success are through FA and trades. You embarrass yourself a lot. All teams have young guys that will get better. Omiyale and Chris Williams will get better too in their 2nd year of starting full time. It works both ways. Funny how it only works for your home team though ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted March 11, 2010 Reality will set in this year.... Yep... and then you'll disappear again for long stretches of time like you did last year I think "reality" will set in when you realize that the Bears will once again have another losing season (14th time in the last 20 years) and that you and your fellow Bears fans will once again be watching Figure Skating Championships in January when Packer fans will once again be watching their team play NFL playoff football... HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sweetness_34 0 Posted March 11, 2010 Not much impact to the salary cap in the future. Front loaded contracts with most of the impact in the non-salary cap year Chester Taylor 2010 $2 million signing bonus $955,000 base salary $4 million roster bonus $45,000 workout bonus Total: $7.0 million 2011 $1.25 million base salary $25,000 workout bonus Total: $1.275 million 2012 $1.75 million base salary $25,000 workout bonus Total: $1.775 million 2013 $2.425 million base salary $25,000 workout bonus Total: $2.45 million Contract total: $12.5 million, four seasons Brandon Manumaleuna 2010 $2 million signing bonus $1.055 million base salary $3 million roster bonus $50,000 workout bonus Total: $6.105 million 2011 $1.495 million base salary $1 million roster bonus $100,000 workout bonus Total: $2.595 million 2012 $1.95 million base salary $100,000 workout bonus Total: $2.05 million 2013 $2 million base salary $100,000 workout bonus Total: $2.1 million 2014 $2.05 million base salary $100,000 workout bonus Total: $2.15 million Contract total: $15 million, five seasons Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted March 11, 2010 All teams have young guys that will get better. Omiyale and Chris Williams will get better too in their 2nd year of starting full time. It works both ways. Funny how it only works for your home team though ... So then what the f's your problem? The Packers suck because they don't make desperate moves through trades/FA, but the Bears do so they're legit? Their 2009 records tell a different story. We'll see what happens in 2010. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 12, 2010 And yet the Bears were one drive away from winning both games and could easily have won both. In fact, it took 5 turn overs AND a gift on special teams for the fudgepackers to steal one at home. Since then, the Bears have improved on both the O and the D, adding 2 HOF players on D. And the fudgepackers are going to be without one of their best D players in Harris. Keep dreaming about your over-rated team. Reality will set in this year.... Funny, but the Bears lost both of those games. Added 2 HOF players? No, not really. Urlacher has been on that team for quite some time. Why do you keep thinking they will be without Harris...Id say you need to check out NationalFootballPost.com and watch his 4 rehab videos. There is no way that guy will not be out there game one next year. Overrated...hah!!! Reality will never set in your head, you will be as delusional as ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 12, 2010 All teams have young guys that will get better. Omiyale and Chris Williams will get better too in their 2nd year of starting full time. It works both ways. Funny how it only works for your home team though ... But you don't seem to think it works both ways. which is why when you thought Clifton was not going to sign you were doing nothing but bashing TJ Lang. BTW...Omiyale will not likely improve. He simply is not that good. Williams is a good player though. But always funny that you predict improvement for young Bears players...but the Packers young guys all just suck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 12, 2010 Not much impact to the salary cap in the future. Front loaded contracts with most of the impact in the non-salary cap year Chester Taylor 2010 $2 million signing bonus $955,000 base salary $4 million roster bonus $45,000 workout bonus Total: $7.0 million 2011 $1.25 million base salary $25,000 workout bonus Total: $1.275 million 2012 $1.75 million base salary $25,000 workout bonus Total: $1.775 million 2013 $2.425 million base salary $25,000 workout bonus Total: $2.45 million Contract total: $12.5 million, four seasons Brandon Manumaleuna 2010 $2 million signing bonus $1.055 million base salary $3 million roster bonus $50,000 workout bonus Total: $6.105 million 2011 $1.495 million base salary $1 million roster bonus $100,000 workout bonus Total: $2.595 million 2012 $1.95 million base salary $100,000 workout bonus Total: $2.05 million 2013 $2 million base salary $100,000 workout bonus Total: $2.1 million 2014 $2.05 million base salary $100,000 workout bonus Total: $2.15 million Contract total: $15 million, five seasons Funny how you leave off Peppers' deal and just decide to show the smaller contracts. Hilarious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windycityguy 1 Posted March 12, 2010 Funny how you leave off Peppers' deal and just decide to show the smaller contracts.Hilarious. Peppers is getting $20 mi in the first year of the deal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 12, 2010 Peppers is getting $20 mi in the first year of the deal And $42 mil overall is guaranteed right? or $41 mil? So roughly 20 million over the two years after that. BTW...the other funny thing is acting like the Bears are the only one thinking of such things...but that is typical of sweetness. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Walter34 3 Posted March 12, 2010 But always funny that you predict improvement for young Bears players...but the Packers young guys all just suck. That is pretty much everyone on this site, yourself included. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted March 12, 2010 That is pretty much everyone on this site, yourself included. You have a point. Certain people on here take it a tad too far though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 13, 2010 A few things *** your obsession with Aaron Rodgers in a Bears thread is noted for the judge **** Kicking it up was just a split-second reaction..... if it would have went to a Packer, all works out great.... I actually think that was smart. You are being taken down for 9 seconds by your facemask and there are five AZ defenders waiting to scrape the ball off the ground and bring it in... the ball bounced wrong.... but if it hits the ground; same result... Yes, he held on to the ball too long.... But on third down with his defense not stopping AZ all day, he had to make a play.... He takes a sack and the game is over.... Now if he would have thrown an extremely dumbass across his body INT to lose the game when he could have crawled/moonwalked backwards/crabwalked into automatic Ryan Longwell's field goal range for the win and led you to your franchise's first Super Bowl since the 1970s, I think that boneheadness would be worth an off-topic Bmoney posting in a Bears thread..... The thing that makes Favre's bonehead play even worse is that Minn completely outplayed NO and deserved to win..... I don't know if you can say that about the Packers.... despite Rodgers awesome performance (425 and 5 TDs), that defense was just pathetic and probably didn't deserve to be winners... Another thing that makes it much worse is that Favre is 41; Rodgers just turned 26 It's been a pleasure owning you in a new thread wow..you've had 2 months to come up with something and thats it, don? ouch.... you actually thought favre couldve RUN for positive yards? you mustve been doing yardwork when favre was knocked silly 8 times..he couldnt run.... and Ill explain an NFL rule to you... a qb CANT kick a ball to his teammate...are you from England?...I wouldnt even hand this to a judge..this is sad, really... you thought him looking down and KICKING the ball was a good play?....good grief... and by his facemask haha...I wont go over that rule either...but decent try....I figure this was coming with an excuse... it would NOT have been a fumble..it wouldve been an incomplete.... granted, you wouldnt dare blame aaron for the wide open bomb on play 1 of that series..Im sure that was Jennings fault.... but kicking the ball is NOT a good play...rodgers is a QB....Crosby is the kicker... and no..there werent 5 cards there to scoop it up..he KICKED the ball into the air...an incomplete tuck rule pass.....ouch... you go about owning and how rodgers will be here for 10 years...an assumption.... you go on about how favre will retire...this is his 3rd year according to you..and favres STILL playing... you may think you own this thread..itd be better if you owned a dose of reality.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 13, 2010 This is a really stupid excuse/argument. explain how it is.... besides shutting down dallas in gb...please point out all of the fine D performances vs top flight qbs... or has the season been gone long enough for you to forget that they faced the lions twice.. browns rams bears twice tampa a seattle team that had given up on mora cards with leinart and not trying.... thats more than half the schedule... feel free to recite how gb did vs brett twice...carson palmer...ben.. yep, gb shut romo down..incredible performance..theres 1 game..others vs the elite? ..if you honestly think that gb will be the same vs this years schedule... well, THATS why vegas keeps building new casinos....crazy... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 13, 2010 wow..you've had 2 months to come up with something and thats it, don? ouch....you actually thought favre couldve RUN for positive yards? you mustve been doing yardwork when favre was knocked silly 8 times..he couldnt run.... and Ill explain an NFL rule to you... a qb CANT kick a ball to his teammate...are you from England?...I wouldnt even hand this to a judge..this is sad, really... you thought him looking down and KICKING the ball was a good play?....good grief... and by his facemask haha...I wont go over that rule either...but decent try....I figure this was coming with an excuse... it would NOT have been a fumble..it wouldve been an incomplete.... granted, you wouldnt dare blame aaron for the wide open bomb on play 1 of that series..Im sure that was Jennings fault.... but kicking the ball is NOT a good play...rodgers is a QB....Crosby is the kicker... and no..there werent 5 cards there to scoop it up..he KICKED the ball into the air...an incomplete tuck rule pass.....ouch... you go about owning and how rodgers will be here for 10 years...an assumption.... you go on about how favre will retire...this is his 3rd year according to you..and favres STILL playing... you may think you own this thread..itd be better if you owned a dose of reality.... Yes...Favre could have gained positive yards...if he was so hurt and could not run...why was he rolling out just fine? Your first BS. BTW...true...he could not just "kick" it to a teammate...but while being pulled down, his foot comes up...it would have been a tough call for them to make...especially while missing a facemask. But to still kill him for that kick is just freaking stupid. No it was not a good play...but hardly some big joke like you want it to be. And yes, by his facemask...or did you not see it? Yes...most of that was on Aaron...but some was on Jennings (99% on Rodgers though). And you go on about how Favre will play longer than Rodgers and how you claim to be a Packer fan...but you prove over and over again that you are not. Reality...let me know when you ever talk reality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 13, 2010 BTW...Nick Collins signed...and Tauscher may be close. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 13, 2010 into automatic Ryan Longwell's field goal range for the win it wasnt automatic Longwell territory..Im sure you have no idea when the last time Ryan kicked one from that far...or his longest, without looking it up... you know what? do it anyway...and tell yourself that Ryan wouldve made it from that far...all the while bashing favre for being old, but also coming on here and saying that he couldve run like tebow for 8 yards.....which is it? cant have it both ways, champ ill let you say you owned everyone...I actually feel sorry for you and what you post....cmon now... ps..I can post in any ol thread I want....your tired glory days reciting homeristic ways wont stop me..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 13, 2010 BTW...Nick Collins signed...and Tauscher may be close. Tauscher will be back by next week.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 13, 2010 Tauscher will be back by next week.... Good to see a nearly identical line to start the year that ended it last year. With maybe Spitz at LG over Colledge. And for sweetness..Pickett, Collins, and Clifton...most of their deals are loaded for this year too...something like 31 mil this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted March 13, 2010 it wasnt automatic Longwell territory..Im sure you have no idea when the last time Ryan kicked one from that far...or his longest, without looking it up... you know what? do it anyway...and tell yourself that Ryan wouldve made it from that far...all the while bashing favre for being old, but also coming on here and saying that he couldve run like tebow for 8 yards.....which is it? cant have it both ways, champ ill let you say you owned everyone...I actually feel sorry for you and what you post....cmon now... ps..I can post in any ol thread I want....your tired glory days reciting homeristic ways wont stop me..... Favre had a parted red sea of open territory to easily get into automatic Longwell's range -- GAME OVER! Rodgers could have ran for 40 yards through that gigantic hole, although unlike Favre, Rodgers is young and athletic..... Stupid, stupid, stupid INT.... Minn completely outplayed NO.... It's a shame that game had to end that way.... Oh, well.... there's always next year! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 13, 2010 Yes...Favre could have gained positive yards...if he was so hurt and could not run...why was he rolling out just fine? Your first BS.BTW...true...he could not just "kick" it to a teammate...but while being pulled down, his foot comes up...it would have been a tough call for them to make...especially while missing a facemask. But to still kill him for that kick is just freaking stupid. No it was not a good play...but hardly some big joke like you want it to be. And yes, by his facemask...or did you not see it? Yes...most of that was on Aaron...but some was on Jennings (99% on Rodgers though). And you go on about how Favre will play longer than Rodgers and how you claim to be a Packer fan...but you prove over and over again that you are not. Reality...let me know when you ever talk reality. the facemask? of course I saw it..but it was legal.... as the nfl said...it was a good play.... In a statement, an NFL spokesman pointed out that an "incidental grasp" of the facemask is allowed. The rule reads that "no player shall twist, turn, or pull the facemask of an opponent in any direction." when you and don learn the nfl rules...you can feel to chime in and talk about wanting reality....til then...go find a rule book online and quit making excuses for #12.... who looked down...and KICKED at the ball....good times....or as don would say..a SMART play http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOCAqdDQSsc Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 13, 2010 Favre had a parted red sea of open territory to easily get into automatic Longwell's range -- GAME OVER!Rodgers could have ran for 40 yards through that gigantic hole, although unlike Favre, Rodgers is young and athletic..... Stupid, stupid, stupid INT.... Minn completely outplayed NO.... It's a shame that game had to end that way.... Oh, well.... there's always next year! a next year that includes favre beating gb twice again? why does that excite you? oh yeah..the stats rodgers will put up while trailing? dont forget the fumbles in the vikes game, skip....the vikes outplayed the saints because of 1 guy...old man brett with 1 leg....if it hadnt been for brett, they lose by 14... bad adp fumble deep...bad rice fumble...and the ol man STILL took the sb champs to the end.... rodgers wouldve ran for 40 yards, but you are talking nfc title game....that and rodgers dont belong in the same sentence...he lost to a team that gave up 95 points in 6 quarters...#2 d...favre didnt put his team in a big hole early and KICK the game away.... aaron did..he KICKED the freeking ball..... or are you talking about rodgers running for 40 yards in a pro bowl that no one showed up to?... rodgers is almost half favres age..he SHOULD be more athletic...lets not give credit to people because of their age.... so if he IS more young and athletic...and has great receivers all over...whats aarons problem? whats the excuse of the week? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donhaas 18 Posted March 13, 2010 so if he IS more young and athletic...and has great receivers all over...whats aarons problem? whats the excuse of the week? Rodgers problem? His defense gave up 51 points.... I don't think his 430 yards and 5 TDs on the road against the defending NFC Champs was the problem, dumbass I also don't think his being the only quarterback in history to throw for 4,000-plus yards in his first two seasons was the problem... Consider that Favre himself went for 19 TDs/24 INTs in his second season and that might give you a little something to think about as you try to wrap your little mind around Rodgers awesome numbers Favre also had an INT and a fumble before his dreadful game-losing INT.... He also had a couple bonehead balls right in NO defenders hands that should have been easily caught. Sealing Minn (clearly the better team)'s fate with a bonehead INT when he could have crawled into automatic Longwell's FG range CHECK! Holding up Minn. rebuilding and ruining their chances of competing long term by sticking around CHECK! Rodgers looking like one of the best players in the NFL for the next 13-15 years CHECK! BMoney owned for the one billionth time... CHECK!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted March 13, 2010 Rodgers problem? His defense gave up 51 points....I don't think his 430 yards and 5 TDs on the road against the defending NFC Champs was the problem, dumbass I also don't think his being the only quarterback in history to throw for 4,000-plus yards in his first two seasons was the problem... Consider that Favre himself went for 19 TDs/24 INTs in his second season and that might give you a little something to think about as you try to wrap your little mind around Rodgers awesome numbers Favre also had an INT and a fumble before his dreadful game-losing INT.... He also had a couple bonehead balls right in NO defenders hands that should have been easily caught. Sealing Minn (clearly the better team)'s fate with a bonehead INT when he could have crawled into automatic Longwell's FG range CHECK! Holding up Minn. rebuilding and ruining their chances of competing long term by sticking around CHECK! Rodgers looking like one of the best players in the NFL for the next 13-15 years CHECK! BMoney owned for the one billionth time... CHECK!!!! next 13-15 years? hahahahaha.... I see you have NO idea what Longwells range is..did you forget what team he played for before minny? I bet you did....how many 54 yarders was he hitting in the last 4 years? dome or no dome?...hmm? comparing favres receivers in his 2nd year to Rodgers shows what little you know....but its a shock to no one... as if that wasnt clear already......and whats with the CHECK? is that your Tourettes kicking in? I didnt realize that the packers D kicked the ball right to a cardinal player for the loss...Ill have to see that replay again.... as for favres first INT..the nfl admitted they goofed up not calling that a personal foul on NO..so nice try.... but Im guessing you didnt know that...as you thought Rodgers kicking the ball was smart.... please keep on....you are quite entertaining... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted March 13, 2010 the facemask? of course I saw it..but it was legal.... as the nfl said...it was a good play.... In a statement, an NFL spokesman pointed out that an "incidental grasp" of the facemask is allowed. The rule reads that "no player shall twist, turn, or pull the facemask of an opponent in any direction." when you and don learn the nfl rules...you can feel to chime in and talk about wanting reality....til then...go find a rule book online and quit making excuses for #12.... who looked down...and KICKED at the ball....good times....or as don would say..a SMART play http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOCAqdDQSsc Well...if the NFL said it...btw...the NFL also said it was the right call of PI against Minnesota...but Im not buying it. Not sure how they could say the guy did not pull down on the facemask. Either way, I have never blamed the loss on that, the ball was already out...so no need to start now. Incidental is hilarious...even when that used to be a call...that would have been the 15 yard variety and not the 5...he pulled down and all the way to the ball. And Im not making excuses...I have said over and over the ball was already out...it was Rodgers fault. But all you can do is whine about the kick. Yeah...big Packer fan you are...all you do is rip the team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
