Julius Peppers & Chester Taylor

[Sho Nuff 720]

The Packers have no OL and their secondary is getting old and will be injured (look at Harris last year; Woodson is on his last legs too); packers have no pass rush .... watch Warner picking apart the packers to the tuen of 51 points....where was the pass rush?

 

The Packers have as much OL as the Bears do chief.

Tackles are getting older...but the interior is set for a while.

Secondary is old in 2 spots (Harris and Woodson). Have one backup already set with Tramon, the other will be addressed soon I believe.

 

You can keep saying they have no pass rush because of the one game against Warner...but it just continues to make you look like the ignorant homeristic jackass we all know you are.

[Joey Gladstone 33]

For the record, I have always liked Peppers. He's around a top 5 DE every season. He has always seemed like a guy that gets by on his talent though, which is QUITE considerable. Very few human beings on this earth have possessed his mix of size, strength and athleticism.

 

If the Hawks were going to be in SB contention next season, I would be tickled pink if they signed a Peppers or Kampman. Simple fact is they won't be, just like the Bears won't.

 

I understand what the Bears are doing, having burned so many high picks on Cutler and the dead guy, they need to hit free agency hard in an attempt to win now so guys can save their jobs. That almost never works. Mix in a broken Martz offense that has only worked one time when the stars aligned and he happened to have several HOF caliber players, and Chicago might want to worry less about the Packers and the Vikings, and worry more about the Lions in their rear view mirror.

[Walter34 3]

For the record, I have always liked Peppers. He's around a top 5 DE every season. He has always seemed like a guy that gets by on his talent though, which is QUITE considerable. Very few human beings on this earth have possessed his mix of size, strength and athleticism.

 

If the Hawks were going to be in SB contention next season, I would be tickled pink if they signed a Peppers or Kampman. Simple fact is they won't be, just like the Bears won't.

 

I understand what the Bears are doing, having burned so many high picks on Cutler and the dead guy, they need to hit free agency hard in an attempt to win now so guys can save their jobs. That almost never works. Mix in a broken Martz offense that has only worked one time when the stars aligned and he happened to have several HOF caliber players, and Chicago might want to worry less about the Packers and the Vikings, and worry more about the Lions in their rear view mirror.

 

My serious assessment:

 

Not a Martz fan at all, but I expect him to do better than Ron Turner last year. If nothing else, he needs to get Cutler's Ints down to a reasonable level and not get him killed with sacks. In order to do that they still need to upgrade a couple of spots on the oline. Overall, I think they will be better than last year. Cutler should set the new Bears passing records of 3800 yds and 29 TDs.

 

Despite the rocky start, I would still make the Cutler trade in hindsight. The Adams trade was bad before he passed away.

 

On defence, they have added Peppers and will get urlacher back. That makes them better. The secondary of course still needs some work. Cut Vasher and sign a decent safety and nickel back.

 

If hester moves back to special teams as his primary focus, that would be wise as well.

 

Better in all 3 areas, but the division is very tough now and they may still end up in 3rd. Minnesota and GB are better teams overall at the moment and the schedule is tough playing against the East in both conferences. They will be a tough team, but the results will be similar with 7-9 wins. If the stars align, they could sneak in to the post season, assuming GB or Minn falters.

 

That kind of year will likely get Smith fired and his buddies will go with him. Angelo is trying to distance himself a bit so that Lovie's neck is on the line instead of his. Not sure if he will succeed.

 

NFC contenders this year are: NYG, Dallas, GB, Minn, NO, Atl and whoever wins the west (SF likely). That accounts for 3 wildcard spots with Chi coming next in my estimation along with Philly. Tough for all involved.

[Joey Gladstone 33]

My serious assessment:

 

Not a Martz fan at all, but I expect him to do better than Ron Turner last year. If nothing else, he needs to get Cutler's Ints down to a reasonable level and not get him killed with sacks. In order to do that they still need to upgrade a couple of spots on the oline. Overall, I think they will be better than last year. Cutler should set the new Bears passing records of 3800 yds and 29 TDs.

 

Despite the rocky start, I would still make the Cutler trade in hindsight. The Adams trade was bad before he passed away.

 

On defence, they have added Peppers and will get urlacher back. That makes them better. The secondary of course still needs some work. Cut Vasher and sign a decent safety and nickel back.

 

If hester moves back to special teams as his primary focus, that would be wise as well.

 

Better in all 3 areas, but the division is very tough now and they may still end up in 3rd. Minnesota and GB are better teams overall at the moment and the schedule is tough playing against the East in both conferences. They will be a tough team, but the results will be similar with 7-9 wins. If the stars align, they could sneak in to the post season, assuming GB or Minn falters.

 

That kind of year will likely get Smith fired and his buddies will go with him. Angelo is trying to distance himself a bit so that Lovie's neck is on the line instead of his. Not sure if he will succeed.

 

NFC contenders this year are: NYG, Dallas, GB, Minn, NO, Atl and whoever wins the west (SF likely). That accounts for 3 wildcard spots with Chi coming next in my estimation along with Philly. Tough for all involved.

 

Good, fair, analysis.

[Sweetness_34 0]

The Packers have as much OL as the Bears do chief.

Tackles are getting older...but the interior is set for a while.

Secondary is old in 2 spots (Harris and Woodson). Have one backup already set with Tramon, the other will be addressed soon I believe.

 

You can keep saying they have no pass rush because of the one game against Warner...but it just continues to make you look like the ignorant homeristic jackass we all know you are.

 

One game? I guess 2 games where Favre lit them up or the game against the Steelers does not count? Any time the fudgepackers played a team who's strength was passing the ball, they got waxed. Hell, the Bucs and their rookie QB waxed the sorry fudgepackers D, full of gimmicks but no real pass rush.

 

[Sho Nuff 720]

One game? I guess 2 games where Favre lit them up or the game against the Steelers does not count? Any time the fudgepackers played a team who's strength was passing the ball, they got waxed. Hell, the Bucs and their rookie QB waxed the sorry fudgepackers D, full of gimmicks but no real pass rush.

 

 

Steelers game the pass rush was there.

Fact remains they were 11th last year in sacks...hardly a team with no pass rush as you keep claiming.

You keep hanging your hat on the 51 Warner put up...while ignoring your Bears had 2 games and only scored 29 points total.

But hey...you added an OC that will get your QB killed and a blocking TE so you are all set right?

 

Its hilarious that you have to keep harping on what some other teams did against the Packers...cause the Bears simply could do nothing and your little golden boy Cutler looked bad against that D.

 

But glad to see you are a Cardinal/Steeler/Viking/Bucs fan too huh?

[donhaas 19]

Are these the same fudgepackers that Lovie has a better head to head record against? The same fudgepackers who last went to the SB in 1998 while the Bears were there just a few years back? The same fudgepackers who just gave up an embarassing 51 points in the playoffs?

 

Then what do you call a team that gets slaughtered twice by a team that gives up 51 points?

What do you call a team that has four more losses than a team that gives up 51 points?

What do you call a team that has been owned past, present and future by a team that gives up 51 points?

 

I'll take your answers off the air

 

 

And although the Packers dominance over the Bears past, present, and future is an interesting discussion in itself…let’s not get too far off track…. The real question is: Why is a Chicago Lions fan – a fan rooting for the crappiest team in the NFL over the last 20 years save the actual Detroit Lions – talking bad about the most glorious franchise in the history of the NFL who has had only 2 losing seasons over the last 18 years and are at the beginning of another long, impressive run....

 

Why is the Packers overtime loss on the road to the previous NFC Champs "embarrassing".... but your own Chicago Lions 13th losing season in the last 18 years not??

Why do you hold the Packers to such a high standard but not your own crapass Chicago Lions?

 

The Packers are supposed to be rebuilding.... (youngest team in the league for the third year straight) but are already 11-5..... Bears have been rebuilding for 20 years! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

And have had 37 quarterbacks during that stretch

 

To summarize:

Chicago Lions: Sucky.... past, present, future

 

Thanks for playing

[Sweetness_34 0]

Uh oh....good thing dumb and dumber know how to sign a FA.....oooops. Al Harris was already burnt toast every time he played a decent WR (still has Plaxico Burress' cleat marks all over him)....now looks like he may never come back, despite his wishful thinking.

 

Me thinks dumb and dumber need to add to the secondary given CHuck Woodson is getting old too. Just read the fudgepackers might make an offer for RFA Gay....how perfect that would be. Fudgepackjer fans walking around with the name "Gay" on their backs....

 

=========================================

 

Harris has predicted a six-month recovery from an injury that he once thought was career-ending. It's an unrealistic goal given all the damage he did to the lateral side of his left knee - torn anterior cruciate ligament, torn lateral collateral ligament, torn Iliotibial band and hamstring - but Harris is convinced he'll be back for the 2010 season.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Uh oh....good thing dumb and dumber know how to sign a FA.....oooops. Al Harris was already burnt toast every time he played a decent WR (still has Plaxico Burress' cleat marks all over him)....now looks like he may never come back, despite his wishful thinking.

 

Me thinks dumb and dumber need to add to the secondary given CHuck Woodson is getting old too.

 

=========================================

 

Harris has predicted a six-month recovery from an injury that he once thought was career-ending. It's an unrealistic goal given all the damage he did to the lateral side of his left knee - torn anterior cruciate ligament, torn lateral collateral ligament, torn Iliotibial band and hamstring - but Harris is convinced he'll be back for the 2010 season.

Hilarious that you bash on Harris. While he got toasted a few times...calling him burnt toast against any decent receiver given his resume of guys he has shut down is hilarious.

But that is the best you have is calling people old. And Woodson may be getting old...but he still is playing at a high level isn't he.

 

But where are you getting that he may never come back?

[Sweetness_34 0]

Hilarious that you bash on Harris. While he got toasted a few times...calling him burnt toast against any decent receiver given his resume of guys he has shut down is hilarious.

But that is the best you have is calling people old. And Woodson may be getting old...but he still is playing at a high level isn't he.

 

But where are you getting that he may never come back?

 

What I pasted was from a packer message board. So how is that D going to get better when it gave up 51 poitns to a team without Anquan Boldin in the line up and now Harris may be out or just not as good?

[Sweetness_34 0]

Here is the article

 

Pretty funny to see you bash on the Peppers signing when Al Harris is 35; Chuck Woodson is probably as old and there are no replacements in the packers system (Tramone W? )

 

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/86780217.html

[Jarvis Basnight 119]

So how is that D going to get better when it gave up 51 poitns to a team without Anquan Boldin in the line up and now Harris may be out or just not as good?

It only has 1 team that it needs to get better than on defense to be the best. The Jets were #1 in total D last year, the Packers were #2 (Bears #17). The Packers were #1 in rushing D (Chicago #23). The Packers were #5 in passing D this year (Chicago #13). The Packers were 7th in scoring D (Bears 22nd). The Packers were #1 in turnovers this year (Chicago #23). I can't wait to see that Packer Defense get even better.

 

You're making a fool of yourself

[DrJ 0]

Then what do you call a team that gets slaughtered twice by a team that gives up 51 points?

What do you call a team that has four more losses than a team that gives up 51 points?

What do you call a team that has been owned past, present and future by a team that gives up 51 points?

 

I'll take your answers off the air

And although the Packers dominance over the Bears past, present, and future is an interesting discussion in itself…let’s not get too far off track…. The real question is: Why is a Chicago Lions fan – a fan rooting for the crappiest team in the NFL over the last 20 years save the actual Detroit Lions – talking bad about the most glorious franchise in the history of the NFL who has had only 2 losing seasons over the last 18 years and are at the beginning of another long, impressive run....

 

Why is the Packers overtime loss on the road to the previous NFC Champs "embarrassing".... but your own Chicago Lions 13th losing season in the last 18 years not??

Why do you hold the Packers to such a high standard but not your own crapass Chicago Lions?

 

The Packers are supposed to be rebuilding.... (youngest team in the league for the third year straight) but are already 11-5..... Bears have been rebuilding for 20 years! HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

And have had 37 quarterbacks during that stretch

 

To summarize:

Chicago Lions: Sucky.... past, present, future

 

Thanks for playing

 

You must have a different definition of domination than most. Even the Packers own website concedes they have a losing record vs the Bears. They don't even have a winning record at home.

 

http://www.packers.com/history/record_book...;opponent=Bears

[donhaas 19]

You must have a different definition of domination than most. Even the Packers own website concedes they have a losing record vs the Bears. They don't even have a winning record at home.

 

http://www.packers.com/history/record_book...;opponent=Bears

 

 

This is a continuation of a long conversation I've been having with your pal Sweetness....

 

.... which stated that Packer have completely dominated the Bears the last 20 years (past), the current two games they just played (present), and talentwise, youth wise, coaching wise, GMing wise, and QBing wise will continue to dominate them (future)...

 

 

Yes, there were times in the 20s and the 40s when the Bears faired better than the Packers -- and I appreciate your ancient history link -- and for that I salute you with a very rare live version of

 

[donhaas 19]

They don't even have a winning record at home.

 

Yes, they do... Milwaukee counts as home....

[Joey Gladstone 33]

What I pasted was from a packer message board. So how is that D going to get better when it gave up 51 poitns to a team without Anquan Boldin in the line up and now Harris may be out or just not as good?

 

Last season the Bears gave up 136 total yards to Julius Jones. In that same game Seneca Focking Wallace racked up 261 of his 700 passing yards for the season, his season high (Cutler passed for 247). Nate Burleson (WATCH OUT! He's in your division now!!) also led all WR's with 109 yards. On the day, despite missing several starters, the putrid Seahawk offense managed to put up 346 total yards. But yeah, the Packers are the NFC North team that needs help on defense!

 

Is that why you guys broke the bank for Peppers?

[Sho Nuff 720]

What I pasted was from a packer message board. So how is that D going to get better when it gave up 51 poitns to a team without Anquan Boldin in the line up and now Harris may be out or just not as good?

 

So a Packer message board is what told you Harris might not play?

Thanks for that source. Hah.

 

How is the D going to be better?

Year 2 in the 3-4.

Matthews in year 2. Brad Jones in year 2.

Entire team knows the D much better.

 

And good thing the team does not play that exact Cardinals team is great..

BTW...how did your golden boy do against that D and Harris who supposedly was no good and had no pass rush?

Oh right...29 points total in 2 games...2 losses...and a lot of INTs.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Here is the article

 

Pretty funny to see you bash on the Peppers signing when Al Harris is 35; Chuck Woodson is probably as old and there are no replacements in the packers system (Tramone W? )

 

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/86780217.html

 

I don't recall bashing the Peppers signing.

I recall blowing your idiocy about him being the best DE in the league or top 2 out of the water.

 

Awesome on Woodson being old...I hate guys who win the D player of the year and work hard.

Tramon W...yup, pretty solid young corner really.

 

Keep trying.

[rholio 340]

My serious assessment:

 

Not a Martz fan at all, but I expect him to do better than Ron Turner last year. If nothing else, he needs to get Cutler's Ints down to a reasonable level and not get him killed with sacks. In order to do that they still need to upgrade a couple of spots on the oline. Overall, I think they will be better than last year. Cutler should set the new Bears passing records of 3800 yds and 29 TDs.

 

Despite the rocky start, I would still make the Cutler trade in hindsight. The Adams trade was bad before he passed away.

 

On defence, they have added Peppers and will get urlacher back. That makes them better. The secondary of course still needs some work. Cut Vasher and sign a decent safety and nickel back.

 

If hester moves back to special teams as his primary focus, that would be wise as well.

 

Better in all 3 areas, but the division is very tough now and they may still end up in 3rd. Minnesota and GB are better teams overall at the moment and the schedule is tough playing against the East in both conferences. They will be a tough team, but the results will be similar with 7-9 wins. If the stars align, they could sneak in to the post season, assuming GB or Minn falters.

 

That kind of year will likely get Smith fired and his buddies will go with him. Angelo is trying to distance himself a bit so that Lovie's neck is on the line instead of his. Not sure if he will succeed.

 

NFC contenders this year are: NYG, Dallas, GB, Minn, NO, Atl and whoever wins the west (SF likely). That accounts for 3 wildcard spots with Chi coming next in my estimation along with Philly. Tough for all involved.

 

Good points. The problem I see for Cutler is that Martz's offense usually leads to an increase in INTs and the QB getting hit or sacked. I don't see an improvement coming there. If.. sorry, IF Cutler can tough it out, he should reach those projections however, and likely surpass the yardage. John Kitna managed 4,000yds under Martz with a struggling (still struggling) Lions team, and he's not as talented as Cutler.

[Sweetness_34 0]

Aaawwwwww...... John Fox is just going to make all the bitter, jealous seahooker, fudgepacker and lydown fans even more pissed off now.

 

 

======================

 

Panthers coach Fox: Pep's a heck of a player

 

By Dan Pompei

 

Tribune staff reporter

 

9:01 p.m. CST, March 8, 2010

 

E-mail Print Share Text Size

 

In Charlotte, N.C., they still talk about the back-to-back plays Julius Peppers made in a game in Denver in 2004.

 

On third-and-3, he pushed Broncos quarterback Jake Plummer out of bounds on a bootleg after a 2-yard gain. Then on fourth-and-1, he intercepted Plummer's pass and ran it back 97 yards.

 

That is how Peppers will be remembered by John Fox, the only NFL head coach Peppers has known.

 

"Pep's a heck of a player," Fox said Monday. "I knew he'd be a guy who would be one of the first to get signed. He hasn't had any injuries. He's clean as a whistle medically. I know he's 30, but he looks just like he did when he was 22."

 

Fox dispelled the notion that the Bears' new defensive end takes a lot of plays off. He said effort was not a problem for Peppers.

 

"He trains and works hard," Fox said. "He's a great kid. He's quiet, but he leads by example."

 

Fox said he thought Peppers had a fine season in 2009, and he's a player who has made improvements in his game.

 

"His tenacity has picked up," he said. "He doesn't look for excuses. He doesn't fall into a rut. He finishes."

 

Peppers' athleticism stands out to Fox. In fact, he said Peppers is the most athletic pass rusher he has seen.

 

"He would have been a phenomenal tight end too," Fox said. "He has height, weight and speed and he can flex and bend. He's not just a speed rusher. He's fast, but he's not just one of those 4.5 guys who only has speed."

 

But that doesn't mean the 6-foot-7 Peppers doesn't play the run. He is a complete defensive end.

 

"He plays with good power," Fox said. "He's a big body. And even if he doesn't play it perfectly technique wise, he can slip off blocks and (make the play)."

 

Peppers' combination of size and athleticism is what makes the former basketball player unusual. Fox said Peppers typically will report to camp in the vicinity of 290 pounds. He may lose 15 pounds or so during the course of the season, but he moves well no matter what he weighs.

 

Bigger men like Peppers usually are cast as left ends. At Carolina, he primarily played on the left side for the first six years of his career. Fox said he played Peppers on the left side because Mike Rucker had already established himself as the right end. But after Rucker retired in 2008, Fox moved Peppers to the right side, where he didn't see as many tight end double teams.

 

Fox said Peppers can play either side and cause problems for opponents no matter where he lines up.

 

"He's a matchup problem for offenses," he said. "The Bears got a good player in Julius."

 

dpompei@tribune.com

Copyright © 2010, Chicago Tribune

 

==================

[Sho Nuff 720]

Why would it piss me off?

Almost every Packer fan have said he is a hell of a player numbnuts.

[Sweetness_34 0]

Last season the Bears gave up 136 total yards to Julius Jones. In that same game Seneca Focking Wallace racked up 261 of his 700 passing yards for the season, his season high (Cutler passed for 247). Nate Burleson (WATCH OUT! He's in your division now!!) also led all WR's with 109 yards. On the day, despite missing several starters, the putrid Seahawk offense managed to put up 346 total yards. But yeah, the Packers are the NFC North team that needs help on defense!

 

Is that why you guys broke the bank for Peppers?

 

Yes we needed to improve on D and we did.....we will have 2 probowl, HOF players this year that we did not have last year (Peppers and Urlacher). And I am sure the Bears will be getting a Safety either via FA or draft or even both to upgrade/create competition at that spot.

 

But thanks for proving my point, numb nuts

[Sho Nuff 720]

Yes we needed to improve on D and we did.....we will have 2 probowl, HOF players this year that we did not have last year (Peppers and Urlacher). And I am sure the Bears will be getting a Safety either via FA or draft or even both to upgrade/create competition at that spot.

 

But thanks for proving my point, numb nuts

 

Yes...like on the other board where you claim they will get a starting caliber safety in the 3rd or 4th round?

Then tried to twist your way out of how you said that claiming you said you thought they should get someone like Sharper and then a draft pick (to which I proved you did not say that until you defended the 3rd and 4th round crap as what Mayock said).

 

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Yes we needed to improve on D and we did.....we will have 2 probowl, HOF players this year that we did not have last year (Peppers and Urlacher). And I am sure the Bears will be getting a Safety either via FA or draft or even both to upgrade/create competition at that spot.

 

But thanks for proving my point, numb nuts

 

And when factoring in the regression of your offense under Mike Martz (I didn't think it was possible for that offense to regress further) You guys are looking at about 8-8 tops, and thats best case scenerio. Money well spent!

 

But at least all the intelligent Bear fans will be happy that ownership FINALLY decided to clear house and rebuild.

[DrJ 0]

This is a continuation of a long conversation I've been having with your pal Sweetness....

 

.... which stated that Packer have completely dominated the Bears the last 20 years (past), the current two games they just played (present), and talentwise, youth wise, coaching wise, GMing wise, and QBing wise will continue to dominate them (future)...

Yes, there were times in the 20s and the 40s when the Bears faired better than the Packers -- and I appreciate your ancient history link -- and for that I salute you with a very rare live version of

 

 

The 20's? Don't need to go much further back than your definition of the past to see a time when the Packers were the Bears doormats. For a team so rich in tradition, it's a shame you guys are still pretending football was invented when Brett Favre took the field.

[donhaas 19]

The 20's? Don't need to go much further back than your definition of the past to see a time when the Packers were the Bears doormats. For a team so rich in tradition, it's a shame you guys are still pretending football was invented when Brett Favre took the field.

 

You just jumped in at the tail end of a long conversation of me consistently owning your pal Sweetness, so somethings will be a bit out of context....

 

But, yes, I do enjoy rehashing the history of the NFL -- and nobody has a better history in the NFL than the Packers -- 12 Championships.... but at some point you have to move on from the long discussions about that friend who was a big baseball player back in high school... and talk about the immediate past, the present, and the future...

 

As a Bears fan, I can understand why the latter discussion makes you feel uncomfortable

 

Talking about the Fridge is much more fun than talking about Shane Miller/Matthews/Moreno/Krenzel/Chandler/Stewart/Grossman/Orton/Cutler

[Walter34 3]

8-8

 

Awesome! Things are getting better each day! Next week we'll be back in the playoffs!

 

WOOT!

 

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Awesome! Things are getting better each day! Next week we'll be back in the playoffs!

 

WOOT!

 

 

I did say best case scenerio, but I get where you are coming from.

[DrJ 0]

You just jumped in at the tail end of a long conversation of me consistently owning your pal Sweetness, so somethings will be a bit out of context....

 

But, yes, I do enjoy rehashing the history of the NFL -- and nobody has a better history in the NFL than the Packers -- 12 Championships.... but at some point you have to move on from the long discussions about that friend who was a big baseball player back in high school... and talk about the immediate past, the present, and the future...

 

As a Bears fan, I can understand why the latter discussion makes you feel uncomfortable

 

Talking about the Fridge is much more fun than talking about Shane Miller/Matthews/Moreno/Krenzel/Chandler/Stewart/Grossman/Orton/Cutler

 

Not sure what you're rambling about, but the Bears managed to get to the Superbowl in this century. Like the team that put up 51 points on you guys a couple months back. OJ Simpson riding his Bronco down the highway isn't exactly immediate past anymore man.

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Not sure what you're rambling about, but the Bears managed to get to the Superbowl in this century. Like the team that put up 51 points on you guys a couple months back. OJ Simpson riding his Bronco down the highway isn't exactly immediate past anymore man.

 

Whats with (certain) Bear fans and the 51 points?

[DrJ 0]

Whats with (certain) Bear fans and the 51 points?

 

Would it make you feel better if I said 531 yards instead?

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Would it make you feel better if I said 531 yards instead?

 

No. It doesn't make you look like any less of a D-bag either.

[DrJ 0]

Steelers game the pass rush was there.

Fact remains they were 11th last year in sacks...hardly a team with no pass rush as you keep claiming.

You keep hanging your hat on the 51 Warner put up...while ignoring your Bears had 2 games and only scored 29 points total.

But hey...you added an OC that will get your QB killed and a blocking TE so you are all set right?

 

Its hilarious that you have to keep harping on what some other teams did against the Packers...cause the Bears simply could do nothing and your little golden boy Cutler looked bad against that D.

 

But glad to see you are a Cardinal/Steeler/Viking/Bucs fan too huh?

 

Oh and for the record, the Packers needed an idiotic snap to a gnome of a RB that hopefully won't be on the roster anymore on 4th and long to win that 1st game. Partly because your line made Ogunleye look like a worldbeater in that game. Hate to see what an actual worldbeater will do. But hey, maybe he won't show up that day.

[DrJ 0]

No. It doesn't make you look like any less of a D-bag either.

 

Yeah the whole Packer clan piling on in a Bears signing thread, like usual, makes you guys all look like the class of the league. If I hadn't actually been to Lambeau to witness Favre get shut out back in 2006, I would have thought you guys were all D-bags. Thankfully the Packers fans that still don't have internet connections aren't all that bad.

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Yeah the whole Packer clan piling on in a Bears signing thread, like usual, makes you guys all look like the class of the league. If I hadn't actually been to Lambeau to witness Favre get shut out back in 2006, I would have thought you guys were all D-bags. Thankfully the Packers fans that still don't have internet connections aren't all that bad.

 

Im not a Packers fan, and if I was SICK BURN! BWAAAHHHHHHH! WAY TO STICK IT TO THOSE FUDGEPACKERS!!!!!

[Sho Nuff 720]

Not sure what you're rambling about, but the Bears managed to get to the Superbowl in this century. Like the team that put up 51 points on you guys a couple months back. OJ Simpson riding his Bronco down the highway isn't exactly immediate past anymore man.

 

Wow...is sweetness your alter ego? Because he is the only one dumb enough to talk about that 51 points.

BTW...like I tell him, shame the Bears had 2 games against the defense and could only put up 29 points.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Oh and for the record, the Packers needed an idiotic snap to a gnome of a RB that hopefully won't be on the roster anymore on 4th and long to win that 1st game. Partly because your line made Ogunleye look like a worldbeater in that game. Hate to see what an actual worldbeater will do. But hey, maybe he won't show up that day.

 

It helped...but was that why they won? Not totally.

Just like the Bears needed a freaking blocked FG to win the one time in 2008.

BTW...Ogunleye did look good against Allen Barbre...good thing he likely won't be anywhere near the starting lineup this year.

And certainly would never be around Peppers either.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Yeah the whole Packer clan piling on in a Bears signing thread, like usual, makes you guys all look like the class of the league. If I hadn't actually been to Lambeau to witness Favre get shut out back in 2006, I would have thought you guys were all D-bags. Thankfully the Packers fans that still don't have internet connections aren't all that bad.

 

Well, if you look at what the Packers are piling on (Sweetness) you would understand.

But the best you got is 51 points and bringing up a game in 2006?

 

Weak...very weak.

[donhaas 19]

Not sure what you're rambling about, but the Bears managed to get to the Superbowl in this century.

 

So the Bears eeking through a weak NFC to get stomped in the Super Bowl and being one of worst Super Bowl teams in the history of the NFL (with the worst starting quarterback in the history of the Super Bowl) > losing to the Super Bowl champions in overtime in the NFC Championship Game (much more recently)

 

I guess when you have 6 winning seasons in the last 18 years, that is quite an accomplishment.... but most of us are laughing at you...

 

 

And I see you latched on to Sweetness' "51".... never a wise move to regurgitate Sweetness...

 

The Packer D actually gave up 45 points..... same as AZ did -- who had home field advantage -- that you haven't mentioned.....

 

Like Sho said -- da Bears could only score 29 total points in 2 games against the same said crapass defense.... So ever time you rag on the Packer defense, you rag on your own Chicago Lions even more

 

More importantly, while Packer fans were once again watching playoff footbal, Bears fans were watching figure skating -- something they have been doing quite a bit of in the immediate past, the present, and will be in the future.....

 

 

You finally came back to FFToday to regurgitate Sweetness... Really?

[Sweetness_34 0]

.... but most of us are laughing at you...

 

Most of us were laughing too watching your over-rated team getting waxed while giving up 51 points thanks to an aging D and a QB that directly gave up 14 points to the opposition in a playoff game. Nice FF QB though