Creationism education bills

[penultimatestraw 473]

So you'd hit a woman if she hit you? I wouldn't. Maybe rape which is then justified, but not hitting. Hitting in the act of rape would be satisfactory.

What if a kid hit you?

I would rape both women and children, but only if they did so first.

[Mookz 1,375]

itsatip: intellectually honest participants in a debate don't simultaneously insult people of a different view engage them on a topic and whine about the same thing being said over and over again, and then try to trollbait the topic into staying open for continuation of the exact same purpose.

 

HTH.

Soon after this thread really got rolling, it was decreed that it would be this decade's "being here illegally is not a crime". But for that to truly happen, and for this thread to become legendary, you would have to leave the bored like torridjoe. At that point the goal was to pile on and frustrate you into leaving (except for a few people who were still actually interested in the debate). That didn't happen, and it's left a bad taste in some people's mouths.

 

Just my take.

[mobb_deep 920]

This is a long thread.

[penultimatestraw 473]

This is a long thread.

Not on an evolutionary time scale.

Or compared to this: Mensa, we can beat it!

[FeelingMN 273]

Jesus motherfocking Christ....this gawdamn thing is still going.

 

How many gods has the polytheist invoked so far? He's like a pseudointellectual Cal Naughton: "I like to picture Jesus as a figure skater. He wears like a white outfit, and He does interpretive ice dances of my life's journey."

 

"I like to think of Jesus as a mischievous badger."

 

[Voltaire 5,491]

We're running out of gas. I think that's a good thing.

[Mookz 1,375]

We're running out of gas. I think that's a good thing.

Unlike jocstrap's boardroom.

[IMMensaMind 462]

Soon after this thread really got rolling, it was decreed that it would be this decade's "being here illegally is not a crime". But for that to truly happen, and for this thread to become legendary, you would have to leave the bored like torridjoe. At that point the goal was to pile on and frustrate you into leaving (except for a few people who were still actually interested in the debate). That didn't happen, and it's left a bad taste in some people's mouths.

 

Just my take.

 

I could never be driven to that level of frustration by people who I do not like or respect. I am here to do exactly as I have: frustrate them by not doing what they want.

[IMMensaMind 462]

I would rape both women and children, but only if they did so first.

 

I don't see GH posts because I put him on ignore. I just haven't seen anything of value from him; he acted like an immature sh!thead in this thread. I feel compelled to answer his question here, though, seeing as I see it after you responded to it.

 

My comment doesn't reference a thing about me hitting a woman. It's about someone hitting someone after - and only after - they've been hit first.

 

The analogy stands.

[penultimatestraw 473]

We're running out of gas. I think that's a good thing.

Take your leftist crap to the global warming thread - there's plenty of pseudoscience left on the internet to propagate this thread

[nikki2200 4]

I don't see GH posts because I put him on ignore. I just haven't seen anything of value from him; he acted like an immature sh!thead in this thread. I feel compelled to answer his question here, though, seeing as I see it after you responded to it.

 

My comment doesn't reference a thing about me hitting a woman. It's about someone hitting someone after - and only after - they've been hit first.

 

The analogy stands.

 

 

You said you would hit me. Unless you don't think I'm a woman. You threatened me with violence. Abuser.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also Gettnhuge CLEARLY won this thread. There's got to be a dozen people on this board that wish you would put them on ignore so they don't have to read your 14 page responses if they post something you don't agree with. Congrats GH!

[IMMensaMind 462]

You said you would hit me. Unless you don't think I'm a woman. You threatened me with violence. Abuser.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also Gettnhuge CLEARLY won this thread. There's got to be a dozen people on this board that wish you would put them on ignore so they don't have to read your 14 page responses if they post something you don't agree with. Congrats GH!

 

I think I'm gonna dust your cornflakes with penicillin. It would probably kill you.

[OldMaid 2,135]

I don't see GH posts because I put him on ignore. I just haven't seen anything of value from him; he acted like an immature sh!thead in this thread. I feel compelled to answer his question here, though, seeing as I see it after you responded to it.

 

My comment doesn't reference a thing about me hitting a woman. It's about someone hitting someone after - and only after - they've been hit first.

 

The analogy stands.

A "someone" could include a woman. So by your own admission, if a woman hit you first, you'd hit her back. Very classy, Mensa!

[nikki2200 4]

I think I'm gonna dust your cornflakes with penicillin. It would probably kill you.

 

is that before or after you hit me? Provoked of course.

[nikki2200 4]

A "someone" could include a woman. So by your own admission, if a woman hit you first, you'd hit her back. Very classy, Mensa!

 

Well he said "you". And he was responding to one of my posts. So I'm assuming he wants to hit me.

[Frank M 181]

Well he said "you". And he was responding to one of my posts. So I'm assuming he wants to hit me.

 

He is quite aggressive for a right wing Christian fundamentalist. Earlier in the thread he said he wanted to fly me down to Texas to beat me up, now he admits he would beat a woman.

 

It's sad, really.

[nikki2200 4]

He is quite aggressive for a right wing Christian fundamentalist. Earlier in the thread he said he wanted to fly me down to Texas to beat me up, now he admits he would beat a woman.

 

It's sad, really.

 

Meh. Religion taught us a long time ago that the whole peace and love thing is just a cover story.

[MTSkiBum 1,626]

I could never be driven to that level of frustration by people who I do not like or respect. I am here to do exactly as I have: frustrate them by not doing what they want.

 

Do you actually play fantasy football, or are you only here to debate politics?

[OldMaid 2,135]

Meh. Religion taught us a long time ago that the whole peace and love thing is just a cover story.

Well, it does say an eye for an eye...

[nikki2200 4]

Do you actually play fantasy football, or are you only here to debate politics?

 

Oh he plays. You should see how he riles up the mange board with his arrogance.

 

And then he brags about winning and crap. It's "Look at me" to the nth degree.

 

The whole reason he came to the Geek Club was because he went after edjr then a bunch of people went to call him out on the mange board for being a dooshbag and then he mosied in here to see what was going on.

[IMMensaMind 462]

Do you actually play fantasy football, or are you only here to debate politics?

 

I patronized this site long before I knew it had a Geek Bored. I've played fantasy football for 10+ years.

[IMMensaMind 462]

Oh he plays. You should see how he riles up the mange board with his arrogance.

 

And then he brags about winning and crap. It's "Look at me" to the nth degree.

 

The whole reason he came to the Geek Club was because he went after edjr then a bunch of people went to call him out on the mange board for being a dooshbag and then he mosied in here to see what was going on.

 

[nikki2200 4]

I guess we can blame Edjr for being a dooshbag.

[MTSkiBum 1,626]

Both of Jonny's posts are great - and correct.

 

This isn't about choosing to play who you think will score the most points, people - not really. It's about hedging your bets, and I cannot explain it any better than Jonny did - he's right.

 

It's about having the smartest lineup in place if you are wrong about who was going to go off. I particularly like this strategy if you are looking to offset the opposing teams strongest player (ala in my case, in considering playing Crayton as one of my WRs because my opponent has Rivers). If you actually pick the players which score the most points, congrats: you couldn't have done any better. But what if you didn't? In the scenario where you put in the player who has a chance to offset one of the opponent's stronger players, and that player doesn't do well, it's better odds that his player didn't do that well either - making this about the rest of the rosters.

 

Like Jonny said - a major consideration in employing this strategy is whether you're heavily favored, or a heavy underdog. If you're an underdog, you go for who will score the most points for you, and ignore this strategy. If you're heavily favored, all you're doing is improving your odds that the determination of whether you win comes down to players other than those who are supposed to cancel each other out - and if you can reduce those odds to as few variables as possible (which this strategy does), the better off you'll be.

 

I did not remember ever reading one of mensa's posts over at the mange board. His 3rd post was defending the cancel out theory.

[OldMaid 2,135]

You know with the amount of validation that Mensa needs from this bored, it wouldn't surprise me to find out he's 5'6", weighs 225lbs and has never known the love of a woman, other than his mother.

[nikki2200 4]

I did not remember ever reading one of mensa's posts over at the mange board. His 3rd post was defending the cancel out theory.

 

Go back and look for the thread where people were arguing that bullsh!t call against the Lions in the opening game of the season that negated the TD. That is where this all started.

[nikki2200 4]

Here. Found it.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=370003

[Frank M 181]

Here. Found it.

 

http://www.fftodayfo...howtopic=370003

 

I remember that thread. And look at this:

 

I guess Mr I-Never-Insult-Anyone-Unless-They-Insult-Me-First can't claim to be so high and mighty, as this was clearly unprovoked.

[Strike 6,023]

Here. Found it.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=370003

 

That thread reads eerily like this thread does......

[nikki2200 4]

That thread reads eerily like this thread does......

 

Isn't it funny to read? He was saying the same stuff all the way back then on the mange board. I never attack without being provoked. blah blah blah

 

Crazy.

 

Also this: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=370021&st=0

 

He started posting here not that long after that. That is an amusing thread but too much nikki stuff in it.

[OldMaid 2,135]

I can't determine if this thread has gone off topic or not...

[IMMensaMind 462]

Pathetic lefties are pathetic. Huddle like little scared children convincing each other that they're right; that they're justified.

 

Keep it up, little pathetic lefties. I will always provide you fodder to continue to obsess.

 

[Frank M 181]

Pathetic lefties are pathetic. Huddle like little scared children convincing each other that they're right; that they're justified.

 

Keep it up, little pathetic lefties. I will always provide you fodder to continue to obsess.

 

 

At this point, nobody's trying to convince anybody that they're right. At this point, we're just here to laugh at you and your inane ramblings.

 

You certainly provide fodder for that. On that, we agree.

[IMMensaMind 462]

At this point, nobody's trying to convince anybody that they're right. At this point, we're just here to laugh at you and your inane ramblings.

 

You certainly provide fodder for that. On that, we agree.

 

Still talking about me, Frankfurter? Good.

 

[Frank M 181]

Still talking about laughing at me, Frankfurter? Good.

 

 

Yes.

[OldMaid 2,135]

Still laughing about me, Frankfurter? Good.

 

Fixed

 

 

 

 

Oops! You beat me!

[MTSkiBum 1,626]

Scientists think they have found the answer: The organics were locked in stable chains formed from formaldehyde, an ironic finding considering that formaldehyde ended up being poisonous to the very life it may have made possible.

"Formaldehyde is very interesting, very reactive. It can even react with itself and form complex polymers," George Cody, a senior scientist at the Carnegie Institution of Washington, told Discovery News.

 

Formaldehyde also is plentiful in molecular clouds in space, meaning ample quantities would have been around for incorporation into the solar system's population.

 

Two chains of evidence support this theory. First, organic solids have been found in meteorites and in comets. A sample from NASA's Stardust comet mission gave Cody and colleagues a sign they were on the right path.

 

http://news.discovery.com/space/life-poison-earth-organics-110425.html

 

 

 

We all evolved from formaldehyde.

[IMMensaMind 462]

Fixed

 

That works too. Either way, you're obsessed.

[OldMaid 2,135]

That works too. Either way, you're obsessed.

But you keep responding... I guess you have an obsession of your own!

[nikki2200 4]

Pathetic lefties are pathetic. Huddle like little scared children convincing each other that they're right; that they're justified.

 

Keep it up, little pathetic lefties. I will always provide you fodder to continue to obsess.

 

 

Nobody's convincing anyone they are right. We're just all laughing at you.

 

ETA: We all said the same thing individually.