titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted August 13, 2013 Yeah. No way they could be used against buildings. Geebus, you are dumb. Sams are basically missiles that explode in lots of shrapnel, so as to take out an airplane. I guess you could shoot I've at a building, but it would be pretty stupid, when you could, you know, take down airplanes full of people with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 13, 2013 Sams are basically missiles that explode in lots of shrapnel, so as to take out an airplane. I guess you could shoot I've at a building, but it would be pretty stupid, when you could, you know, take down airplanes full of people with it. Which SAM do you refer to? The Patriot, which is the backbone of the U.S. missile defense program, relies on direct impact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted August 13, 2013 Which SAM do you refer to? The Patriot, which is the backbone of the U.S. missile defense program, relies on direct impact. Those things are huge right? Like towed by a truck sort of things. I assumed we were talking shoulder fired stinger tires here, as even the US government isn't incompetent enough to lose 400 trucks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 13, 2013 Those things are huge right? Like towed by a truck sort of things. I assumed we were talking shoulder fired stinger tires here, as even the US government isn't incompetent enough to lose 400 trucks. Once again, I ask you which SAM you refer to. Your "Stinger" is a "hit to kill" unit as well. The warhead is a 3 kg penetrating hit-to-kill warhead type with an impact fuze and a self-destruct timer . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIM-92_Stinger Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,432 Posted August 14, 2013 Why do you hate America? :lol: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 14, 2013 Or its just more likely the lawyer is full of crap and there are no missing SAMs...nor is that what was part of the reason to close the embassies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 14, 2013 Or its just more likely the lawyer is full of crap and there are no missing SAMs...nor is that what was part of the reason to close the embassies.I agree, it was the video. They got the bad guy, case closed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 14, 2013 Or its just more likely the lawyer is full of crap and there are no missing SAMs...nor is that what was part of the reason to close the embassies. Yep. I'm sure the people representing those who were there know less than a whiny fukkweed on an obscure FFB website. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 14, 2013 Hey look everyone, Slo-N-Nuts found the next video the Obama administration can blame for losing 400 missiles. Charlie Brown, you better run and hide. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 14, 2013 SNOOPY BIN LADEN! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phurfur 70 Posted August 14, 2013 Is this about what Bush did ignoring Clinton's advice to keep an eye on Al Qaeda and thousands of New Yorkers were killed in the 9/11 attacks? That's what all this about isn't it? Isn't it? Yes, it is. Do you hateful Republicans not know the American public sees this? Yet you keep at it. :shakeshead: :shakeshead: It's Bush's fault! Priceless Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken8080 6 Posted August 14, 2013 It's Bush's fault! Priceless IF you're gonna blame Obama for Benghazi then why aren't you blaming Bush for 9/11? Never mind. We know why. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 14, 2013 IF you're gonna blame Obama for Benghazi then why aren't you blaming Bush for 9/11? Never mind. We know why. Were the folks at the WTCs and the Pentagon calling the Bush administration for months prior to the attack saying an attack was expected and we need more security? Did Bush refuse to send help during 9/11 after it was requested? But hey, keep up with the Bush! line if it makes you feel better about the incompetence of your Hero. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted August 14, 2013 Were the folks at the WTCs and the Pentagon calling the Bush administration for months prior to the attack saying an attack was expected and we need more security? Did Bush refuse to send help during 9/11 after it was requested? But hey, keep up with the Bush! line if it makes you feel better about the incompetence of your Hero. BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US. MULTIPLE fbi reports. DUMBASS STILL. OBAMA STILL IN POWER. SO NOT WATERLOO. SIMPLE, HUH? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 14, 2013 MULTIPLE fbi reports. What exactly did they say, Sport? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted August 14, 2013 You docking troll. You got your head buried in the sand. You've done this before, so why bother? Educate yourself rusty. Sorry about your wife, but . Not surprised. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 14, 2013 You docking troll. You got your head buried in the sand. You've done this before, so why bother? Educate yourself rusty. Sorry about your wife, but . Not surprised. So you have no fukking clue what the "FBI reports" said. Par for the course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 14, 2013 What exactly did they say, Sport? Bump. This isn't one of your threads where you whine about having to give your mom a sponge bath. This one requires facts.......thought......debate....... I guess you are in over your head. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted August 14, 2013 I guess some people never saw Richard Clarke and Condoleeza Rice's respective testimony before the 9/11 Commission. You probably should--it's enlightening stuff Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 15, 2013 I guess some people never saw Richard Clarke and Condoleeza Rice's respective testimony before the 9/11 Commission. You probably should--it's enlightening stuff Would love to see it. Got a link? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 15, 2013 I guess I need to help Worms out, since he isn't big on backing up his diatribes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,368 Posted August 15, 2013 Still a fine question today Yes, because what is the administration hiding? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 15, 2013 Yes, because what is the administration hiding? Apparently, the fact they were running surface to air missiles to terrorists. Can't imagine why they would try to cover that up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 15, 2013 Apparently, the fact they were running surface to air missiles to terrorists. Can't imagine why they would try to cover that up. Interesting use of that word. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 15, 2013 Interesting use of that word. Why? Cuz it gets you butthurt that your Hero got nailed in another arms running scam to bad guys? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 16, 2013 Why? Cuz it gets you butthurt that your Hero got nailed in another arms running scam to bad guys? Because your speculative opinion is not actually a fact. No butthurt needed to point out that you have no clue as usual. HTH. BTW...who is my hero in this? Just wondering. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted August 16, 2013 The Battle of Waterloo was fought on Sunday, 18 June 1815, near Waterloo in present-day Belgium, then part of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands. An Imperial French army under the command of Emperor Napoleon was defeated by the armies of the Seventh Coalition, comprising an Anglo-allied army under the command of the Duke of Wellington combined with a Prussian army under the command ofGebhard von Blücher. It was the culminating battle of the Waterloo Campaign and Napoleon's last. The defeat at Waterloo ended his rule as Emperor of the French, marking the end of his Hundred Days return from exile. Upon Napoleon's return to power in 1815, many states that had opposed him formed the Seventh Coalition and began to mobilise armies. Two large forces under Wellington and Blücher assembled close to the north-eastern border of France. Napoleon chose to attack in the hope of destroying them before they could join in a coordinated invasion of France with other members of the coalition. The decisive engagement of this three-day Waterloo Campaign (16–19 June 1815) occurred at the Battle of Waterloo. According to Wellington, the battle was "the nearest-run thing you ever saw in your life".[6] Napoleon delayed giving battle until noon on 18 June to allow the ground to dry. Wellington's army, positioned across the Brussels road on the Mont-Saint-Jean escarpment, withstood repeated attacks by the French, until, in the evening, the Prussians arrived in force and broke through Napoleon's right flank. At that moment, Wellington's Anglo-allied army counter-attacked and drove the French army in disorder from the field. Pursuing coalition forces entered France and restored King Louis XVIII to the French throne. Napoleon abdicated, surrendered to the British, and was exiled to Saint Helena, where he died in 1821. Nope, nothing like Waterloo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 16, 2013 Because your speculative opinion is not actually a fact. I guess the dude driving the truck with 400 surface to air missiles took a wrong turn in Albuquerque and ended up in Benghazi. Happens all the time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 16, 2013 I guess the dude driving the truck with 400 surface to air missiles took a wrong turn in Albuquerque and ended up in Benghazi. Happens all the time. So other than the claim of some attorney...you have a link or proof that our government gave up 400 surface to air missles to terrorists in some sort of deal as you claimed was a fact? Cue another snarky comment...no link...no proof. Perhaps I will bump this often as you seem to like to do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 16, 2013 You tell em snuff. Obama and Hillary already got the dude responsible for bengazi. That rotten video making jerkface is rotting in prison as ge should be. How dare he slander the prophet Hilary is a bag full of justice serving awsomeness ...i can't wait for 2016 ..she's the best. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 16, 2013 You tell em snuff. Obama and Hillary already got the dude responsible for bengazi. That rotten video making jerkface is rotting in prison as ge should be. How dare he slander the prophet Hilary is a bag full of justice serving awsomeness ...i can't wait for 2016 ..she's the best. Glad you have nothing to add except things I have not come close to defending. Keep up the effort chump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 16, 2013 You tell em snuff. Obama and Hillary already got the dude responsible for bengazi. That rotten video making jerkface is rotting in prison as ge should be. How dare he slander the prophet Hilary is a bag full of justice serving awsomeness ...i can't wait for 2016 ..she's the best. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 16, 2013 so...nothing rp? just what everyone thought...(well, not everyone...the rest of your blind hacks dont care...) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted August 16, 2013 Hilary is a bag full of justice serving awsomeness ...i can't wait for 2016 ..she's the best. Meh. You couldn't wait for 2012, either. That didn't work out so well for you. Oh, and you couldn't wait for the Masters. Or the US Open....or the British Open....or the PGA......You're not on a very good run these days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 16, 2013 Meh. You couldn't wait for 2012, either. That didn't work out so well for you. Oh, and you couldn't wait for the Masters. Or the US Open....or the British Open....or the PGA......You're not on a very good run these days. Wooohoooo hillary 2016 !!!! Muslims and bulldykes rejoice !!!! Wooot!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 16, 2013 And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously...and that multiple people bash you for being a hypocrite. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites