Flyfreak 84 Posted March 13, 2015 Bah, if they can't afford DeMarco, they sure as heck can't afford AP. the point is they could have afforded murray, but didn't want him jones wants ap and will overpay for him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted March 13, 2015 Your team gave 12mil to a guy who beats his mom and we need class. Lol You finally come out of hiding and the first thing you say is this? Go back in the closet - you are still clueless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted March 13, 2015 the point is they could have afforded murray, but didn't want him jones wants ap and will overpay for him This is so far from the truth, it doesn't even register... Stephen is in charge now. Stephen and Will McClay are running the show now here - and they are not paying AP, or any rb, that kind of money - boner or not. As Mike Fisher put it this morning: "Jerry is now the (still-powerful) Queen of England. Stephen (assisted by McClay/Garrett) is the Cowboys Prime Minister." I think Dallas is set (and very comfortable) setting their sites on drafting a rb - adding a back up veteran maybe to compliment them. I'd love to see Gurley or even Tevin Coleman here - and totally agree with the philosophy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,410 Posted March 13, 2015 After years of handing out bloated contracts to their own players and free agents I think it great the Cowboys decided to draw a line in the sand on their best player and locker room guy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted March 13, 2015 After years of handing out bloated contracts to their own players and free agents I think it great the Cowboys decided to draw a line in the sand on their best player and locker room guy. Me too! But this isn't exactly ground breaking news - it already happened with D. Ware, arguably the face of the franchise. It seems to be a building trend, a refreshing building trend - and I'm happy as hell to see it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted March 13, 2015 This is an interesting topic, but let's shelve this for another day/thread and stay on the DeMarco Murray subject. Thanks guys. sorry--will get back on topic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
typhus 13 Posted March 14, 2015 It still baffles me that the Eagles paid $8M to a running back that's going to be splitting carries with Matthews and Sproles. I can't believe they wouldn't just draft another RB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted March 14, 2015 It still baffles me that the Eagles paid $8M to a running back that's going to be splitting carries with Matthews and Sproles. I can't believe they wouldn't just draft another RB. Dumb move by Kelly imo. I was waiting to see how his other moves turned out in case he had some great master plan but this one was just stupid. Trade shady because he costs too much and then go out and sign the top guy on the market, after paying a decent amount for another one of the better free agent running backs out there? Makes no sense. And the guy is injury prone and coming off a season where he touched the ball damn near 500 times including the playoffs. I don't know what Kelly was thinking - maybe he thought the opportunity was too good to pass up even if it wasn't his original plan to go after Murray. But I have a feeling he will regret that choice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted March 14, 2015 It still baffles me that the Eagles paid $8M to a running back that's going to be splitting carries with Matthews and Sproles. I can't believe they wouldn't just draft another RB. this is where chip looks less like a guru and more like a tinkerer. murray's salary is $8.4M. mathews is just shy of $4M. IIRC, sproles' number bumps to $3M in 2015. so that's $15M/year for the position group, when the ostensible point of dumping mccoy was to free up cap space. granted, gaining murray hurts the cowboys, so that's some added value. but it just seems like short sighted flailing rather than coherent teambuilding. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyfreak 84 Posted March 14, 2015 the main point of all the rb moves by chip was to get rid of a player who he didn't like and bring in ones that fit his offense Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,264 Posted March 15, 2015 the main point of all the rb moves by chip was to get rid of a player who he didn't like and bring in ones that fit his offense There were plenty of cheap free agents who would have been fine in his system. Roy helu would have been good for that system imo. Pierre thomas would have been good also. Running backs do not matter at all in relation to championships. As long as the offense has a good scheme and there is a competent rb on the roster, the running game will be fine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyfreak 84 Posted March 15, 2015 There were plenty of cheap free agents who would have been fine in his system. Roy helu would have been good for that system imo. Pierre thomas would have been good also. Running backs do not matter at all in relation to championships. As long as the offense has a good scheme and there is a competent rb on the roster, the running game will be fine. meh, murray will take the birds to the super bowl Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphster 274 Posted March 15, 2015 There were plenty of cheap free agents who would have been fine in his system. Roy helu would have been good for that system imo. Pierre thomas would have been good also. Running backs do not matter at all in relation to championships. As long as the offense has a good scheme and there is a competent rb on the roster, the running game will be fine. Helu and PT would reprise Sproles' role, so it's clear they needed power backs. Why they needed TWO, and why they paid so much for em both is questionable. I think Chip is going very ground focused this year - meaning something like 65/35 run/pass - so he wanted the two power backs in order to always have one fresh. It will be really interesting to see how this works out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyfreak 84 Posted March 15, 2015 Helu and PT would reprise Sproles' role, so it's clear they needed power backs. Why they needed TWO, and why they paid so much for em both is questionable. I think Chip is going very ground focused this year - meaning something like 65/35 run/pass - so he wanted the two power backs in order to always have one fresh. It will be really interesting to see how this works out. i think he'll trade mathews Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted March 15, 2015 This is so far from the truth, it doesn't even register... Stephen is in charge now. Stephen and Will McClay are running the show now here - and they are not paying AP, or any rb, that kind of money - boner or not. As Mike Fisher put it this morning: "Jerry is now the (still-powerful) Queen of England. Stephen (assisted by McClay/Garrett) is the Cowboys Prime Minister." I think Dallas is set (and very comfortable) setting their sites on drafting a rb - adding a back up veteran maybe to compliment them. I'd love to see Gurley or even Tevin Coleman here - and totally agree with the philosophy. So... they are spending a first on a RB? That's the latest on the airwaves, Gurley, Gordon, or maybe even the Nebraska kid may not be there in the second round. Don't understand why they'd not pay $6 mill for a RB yet spend an invaluable first rounder on one. I personally would've liked to see them triple down and go OT in the first to get Free's replacement, yet they would've needed Murray to do that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted March 15, 2015 i think he'll trade mathews Anybody that really wants him could've just signed him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyfreak 84 Posted March 15, 2015 Anybody that really wants him could've just signed him later in the season when someone needs a rb and mathews has built his value back up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted March 15, 2015 meh, murray will take the birds to the super bowl if he can put in a full season for only the 3rd time since graduating high school. and if mathews can stay healthy enough to maintain the timeshare. and if bradford's and alonso's ACLs hold up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted March 15, 2015 later in the season when someone needs a rb and mathews has built his value back up that's fantasy football talk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyfreak 84 Posted March 15, 2015 if he can put in a full season for only the 3rd time since graduating high school. and if mathews can stay healthy enough to maintain the timeshare. and if bradford's and alonso's ACLs hold up. and if maclin didn't leave and if sanchez controls his ass and if cooper stops being a racist and if Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted March 15, 2015 if he can put in a full season for only the 3rd time since graduating high school. and if mathews can stay healthy enough to maintain the timeshare. and if bradford's and alonso's ACLs hold up. I still think they're all trade bait, though the Chipster put on a convincing performance on the worth of Bradford. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted March 15, 2015 why would any team trade for a contract that they weren't willing to offer the player while he was a free agent? "we wouldn't pay that much for the guy, so he went to philly. now we're going to pay the same amount to the same guy, and give philly some of our players and draft picks and stuff, too." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,264 Posted March 15, 2015 Helu and PT would reprise Sproles' role, so it's clear they needed power backs. Why they needed TWO, and why they paid so much for em both is questionable. I think Chip is going very ground focused this year - meaning something like 65/35 run/pass - so he wanted the two power backs in order to always have one fresh. It will be really interesting to see how this works out. PT is not a power back, but helu might be able to fill that role. He was 215 pounds coming out of college. Maybe helu isnt the prototypical power back, but he has great catching ability which makes him a valuable multifaceted option. Not saying murray isnt. I just think the two examples i gave were two rbs who would work fine in that system for a lot less money. Maybe chip wins a SB and the reason is because of the rb, proving everyone wrong. I personally think he has ruined the eagles, even though his perception around the league may have saved him from signing old man Gore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,264 Posted March 15, 2015 and if maclin didn't leave and if sanchez controls his ass and if cooper stops being a racist and if Is sanchez having a hard time controlling his ass around other men? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted March 15, 2015 why would any team trade for a contract that they weren't willing to offer the player while he was a free agent? "we wouldn't pay that much for the guy, so he went to philly. now we're going to pay the same amount to the same guy, and give philly some of our players and draft picks and stuff, too." Who do you think DeMarco was talking about when he said "other teams offered him more money..." Yep. Oakland. As for Bradford and Matthews, who knows? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyfreak 84 Posted March 15, 2015 Is sanchez having a hard time controlling his ass around other men? i hope so Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted March 15, 2015 You finally come out of hiding and the first thing you say is this? Go back in the closet - you are still clueless. Work is keeping busy, glad you missed me. Also, fock off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted March 15, 2015 Dumb move by Kelly imo. I was waiting to see how his other moves turned out in case he had some great master plan but this one was just stupid. Trade shady because he costs too much and then go out and sign the top guy on the market, after paying a decent amount for another one of the better free agent running backs out there? Makes no sense. And the guy is injury prone and coming off a season where he touched the ball damn near 500 times including the playoffs. I don't know what Kelly was thinking - maybe he thought the opportunity was too good to pass up even if it wasn't his original plan to go after Murray. But I have a feeling he will regret that choice I think Chip panicked when Gore changed his mind. But the Eagles got a very good RB, and a solid backup to spell him. All while cutting the legs off of the division winner. I like the move. Demarco got 500 touches last year and stayed relatively healthy. Why can't he stay healthy this year with 300 touches? Also, Shady has 600+ more career touches than Demarco. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flyfreak 84 Posted March 15, 2015 Also, Shady has 600+ more career touches than Demarco. good point Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted March 15, 2015 Also, Shady has 600+ more career touches than Demarco. that's a double-edged argument. the reason mccoy has so many more touches is that he has been robust enough to play for entire seasons. so it's difficult to conclude that the more injury-prone back is going to be more durable (which is kinda what the touch argument is all about). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted March 16, 2015 Eagles Green, on 15 Mar 2015 - 1:53 PM, said: Work is keeping busy, glad you missed me. Also, fock off. Do you shut it down after an Eagles win? Bcoz that's the only time you seem to have for posting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted March 16, 2015 Do you shut it down after an Eagles win? Bcoz that's the only time you seem to have for posting. Bullchit. I'm always here when the Cowboys lose too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted March 16, 2015 Bullchit. I'm always here when the Cowboys lose too Ha, I will tip my hat for that one. Well played sir. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted March 16, 2015 Funny you say that, as I'm selling Greg Hardy like a mother on the Raider boards. Can't believe his approval is about 50/50 now with my fellow fans. Hard to believe even Raider fans have morals.M. Fisher is reporting that Dallas is in negotiations with Hardy's people right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted March 16, 2015 M. Fisher is reporting that Dallas is in negotiations with Hardy's people right now. The classiest team just gets classier by the day. Ray Rice? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted March 16, 2015 The classiest team just gets classier by the day. Ray Rice? I'll let you know when we build our stadium jail - prolly won't be as nice as yours though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphster 274 Posted March 16, 2015 get a room you two Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted March 16, 2015 get a room you two Nah, he's not my type. I don't bang Mexicans, they give me diarrhea Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted March 16, 2015 Nah, he's not my type. I don't bang Mexicans, they give me diarrheaOkay - this made me laugh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted March 16, 2015 M. Fisher is reporting that Dallas is in negotiations with Hardy's people right now. i don't like this idea at all. yeah, the guy can play. but that's a bridge too far as far as character is concerned. hell--i wanted randle gone after the underwear incident. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites