Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Magnificent Bastard

Most overrated head coaches NFL

Recommended Posts

Hmmmm MCCarthy riding Rodgers coat tails? What say you slow nuff? That's your people saying that.

He sad he wonders.

He does not talk about McCarthy in several GC threads and venture to the main board to troll about him too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He sad he wonders.

He does not talk about McCarthy in several GC threads and venture to the main board to troll about him too.

Ya, to be clear I'm not saying McCarthy is a crap coach. I just wonder how successful he'd be without Rodgers. I am curious of the coach/QB dynamic in general.

 

While only having one Super Bowl appearance, they've been one of the most successful franchises in the league since TT and MM got there. I don't think there is some magic formula to win it all. I think you just have to work to build a consistent winner that gets to the playoffs every year, and hope for a couple breaks along the way. This is exactly what GB does and I'm happy with it. I think it's pretty normal to wonder how good the team would be without an elite talent at QB. Also, it's easy to downplay the role McCarthy may have played in Rodgers becoming an elite QB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree on Dungy, but didn't Gruden take two different teams to the SB?

No. He got the Raiders to the AFC championship and lost the tuck rule game to the Pats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm gonna' go with more of an "All Time" list and I'll give you 2 lists, one for most overrated, one for most deserving of their accolades.

 

Most Overrated (in random order)

Jerry Glanville

Mike Ditka

Mike Shannahan

Norv Turner

Tony Dungy

Jeff Fisher

John Gruden

Dan Reeves

 

Most Deserving of Accolades (in random order)

Vince Lombardi

Tom Landry

Bill Parcells

John Madden

Bill Belichick

Bill Walsh

Don Shula

Chuck Knoll

Paul Brown

Don Coryell

 

:dunno: I'm sure it's debatable - lot's of older coaches I don't really know enough about to evaluate and I'm probably missing some off both lists. but these are the ones in my brain now/today.

I think Madden was a bit overrated. He took over a great team. They were like 12-2 each the previous 2 seasons and had been to a super bowl. Then he couldn't even get that great team to a super bowl. He finally won a super bowl and didn't do too much more after that. He did not coach very long at all. He was the equivalent of a bill cowher. Tom Flores took over the Raiders after Madden left with a 9-7 record. And in short order won 2 Super Bowls. Madden's Raiders were a tough but dirty team. The Steelers were just as tough as the Raiders but were more disciplined and better coached than Madden's Raiders.

 

The fact is that Al Davis was the brains of the Raiders in those years. Davis looked foolish at the end of his reign but he was a great football guy before senility set in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Madden was unlucky that he had to contend with the Steelers in their prime. Good, not great. The Immaculate reception didn't help matters. Bad break.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ya, to be clear I'm not saying McCarthy is a crap coach. I just wonder how successful he'd be without Rodgers. I am curious of the coach/QB dynamic in general.

 

While only having one Super Bowl appearance, they've been one of the most successful franchises in the league since TT and MM got there. I don't think there is some magic formula to win it all. I think you just have to work to build a consistent winner that gets to the playoffs every year, and hope for a couple breaks along the way. This is exactly what GB does and I'm happy with it. I think it's pretty normal to wonder how good the team would be without an elite talent at QB. Also, it's easy to downplay the role McCarthy may have played in Rodgers becoming an elite QB.

Yeah, a fair thing to wonder. Is BB that great without Brady?

And I think both coaches played a role in the development of their qbs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a Packer fan, I wonder how good Thompson and McCarthy really are. A great QB can single-handedly make a team playoff caliber every year. Just look at Ken Whisenhunt with and without Kurt Warner. I wonder how many crap coaches stay on because of great QBs and how many good coaches get fired because they're forced to lead a team with guys like Weeden, Manziel, Gabbert, Ponder etc.

Maybe that is true, but to me the O-line is just as important, if not more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. He got the Raiders to the AFC championship and lost the tuck rule game to the Pats.

Was that the Gannon era? That's the team I was thinking about. Regardless, he was a Patriot * away from two SBs with two teams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing Madden had to contend with was that through the mid 70's the team with the best record didn't necessarily get a home game in the playoffs. They rotated them. The immaculate reception game would have been played in Oakland under today's rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing Madden had to contend with was that through the mid 70's the team with the best record didn't necessarily get a home game in the playoffs. They rotated them. The immaculate reception game would have been played in Oakland under today's rules.

 

Really? I didn't know that. How did the rotation go? I forget how many divisions there were and how many teams made the playoffs back then. :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Really? I didn't know that. How did the rotation go? I forget how many divisions there were and how many teams made the playoffs back then. :cheers:

It was just rotated on a yearly basis through the divisions. There were 3 divisions in each conference and one wild card. When the Dolphins had their undefeated season they had to go on the road and play the Sfeelers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing Madden had to contend with was that through the mid 70's the team with the best record didn't necessarily get a home game in the playoffs. They rotated them. The immaculate reception game would have been played in Oakland under today's rules.

The Steelers had a better record than the Raiders in the year of the Immaculate reception. That was the same year that the Dolphins went undefeated. The Raiders never Played a playoff game in Pittsburgh in a year they had a better record than the steelers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Steelers had a better record than the Raiders in the year of the Immaculate reception. That was the same year that the Dolphins went undefeated. The Raiders never Played a playoff game in Pittsburgh in a year they had a better record than the steelers.

I guess I mixed it up with the Dolphins having to play the steelers in Pitt whe they were undefeated. My bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The big thing about Gibbs was he won all different ways with 3 different QB's. He coached in probably the best division of all time, against 2 HOF coaches. The detraction is he won 2 of his titles during strike years. But yeah, his teams were always sharp and ready to play. Won 3 out of the 4 Super Bowls he went to, with lots of different rosters. Yes, he was great.

It didn't hurt having John Riggins,that dude was a beast,his run in Super Bowl XVII was :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, a fair thing to wonder. Is BB that great without Brady?

 

BB was great in NY,Parcells was lucky to have him as a DC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BB was great in NY,Parcells was lucky to have him as a DC

True - but he wasn't a HC in NY... In the actual HC role - he was a miserable failure in Cleveland. And not just for a year or two, he had 5 full seasons - more than enough time to show what you actually are. His 1 winning season there? He followed it up with yet another 5-11 performance.

 

Did he all of the sudden find the "secret" in NE, or did Tom Brady arrive? I'm not taking a shot at him - I'm really not, but I do think it's a fair topic open for debate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True - but he wasn't a HC in NY... In the actual HC role - he was a miserable failure in Cleveland. And not just for a year or two, he had 5 full seasons - more than enough time to show what you actually are. His 1 winning season there? He followed it up with yet another 5-11 performance.

 

Did he all of the sudden find the "secret" in NE, or did Tom Brady arrive? I'm not taking a shot at him - I'm really not, but I do think it's a fair topic open for debate.

Oh there's no doubt that Brady has helped BB reach the pinnacle of coaching but couldn't we more than not find player/coach combinations throughout history we could say that about i.e. my comment about Parcells/BB and MB pointing out LT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh there's no doubt that Brady has helped BB reach the pinnacle of coaching but couldn't we more than not find player/coach combinations throughout history we could say that about i.e. my comment about Parcells/BB and MB pointing out LT.

You could - but the NE example is exceptionally glaring... BB had 5 full years to show what he was in Cleveland - was a disaster. Then all of the sudden Brady shows up - Belichick not only turns it around, he instantly becomes a coaching juggernaut, reeling off 11, 12, 14 win seasons on a regular basis... That's almost the equivalent of a 15 handicap in golf all of the sudden showing up the next season playing to a 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True - but he wasn't a HC in NY... In the actual HC role - he was a miserable failure in Cleveland. And not just for a year or two, he had 5 full seasons - more than enough time to show what you actually are. His 1 winning season there? He followed it up with yet another 5-11 performance.

 

Did he all of the sudden find the "secret" in NE, or did Tom Brady arrive? I'm not taking a shot at him - I'm really not, but I do think it's a fair topic open for debate.

If you look at BB's Cleveland tenure in just the W and L's, it might not tell the whole story. Just when he had gotten the ship right and turned in an 11-5 season in 94, Modell decided to announce he was moving the team in the middle of the season in 95. We will never know if they were on their way to something, but the arrow was pointing up before it was ruined by Modell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at BB's Cleveland tenure in just the W and L's, it might not tell the whole story. Just when he had gotten the ship right and turned in an 11-5 season in 94, Modell decided to announce he was moving the team in the middle of the season in 95. We will never know if they were on their way to something, but the arrow was pointing up before it was ruined by Modell.

Good points.... The flip side to that is, barring a catastrophic injury to your Qb - does a team as talented 11-5 all of the sudden do a 180 and fall to 5-11 all bcoz the owner pissed them off? I don't know - maybe. Seems hard to fathom though - talent is talent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points.... The flip side to that is, barring a catastrophic injury to your Qb - does a team as talented 11-5 all of the sudden do a 180 and fall to 5-11 all bcoz the owner pissed them off? I don't know - maybe. Seems hard to fathom though - talent is talent.

I don't know. But those are some hard circumstances to overcome. You can plan for an injury, but what went on there is like nothing else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BB was great in NY,Parcells was lucky to have him as a DC

As a DC...but as a head coach?

McCarthy made Aaron Brooks offenses look good in NO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good points.... The flip side to that is, barring a catastrophic injury to your Qb - does a team as talented 11-5 all of the sudden do a 180 and fall to 5-11 all bcoz the owner pissed them off? I don't know - maybe. Seems hard to fathom though - talent is talent.

Speaking of 11-5 any coach that can get that record out of Matt Cassel must be doing something right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that I think about it, BB had the greatest defensive player in history when he was coming up, and he's had one of, if not the, greatest QB's of all time. Nice. I still think he's a hell of a coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking of 11-5 any coach that can get that record out of Matt Cassel must be doing something right.

After seeing him here, ha - you have a damn good point. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody mentioned Marvin Lewis yet? I believe he has 13 seasons with the Bengals, 0-6 in the postseason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that I think about it, BB had the greatest defensive player in history when he was coming up, and he's had one of, if not the, greatest QB's of all time. Nice. I still think he's a hell of a coach.

 

I think he is too...and I think the coaches have a lot to do with the success of some players.

 

Not that Brady or Rodgers or anyone with the talent would not be really good anyway...I think the right coach takes them to the next level and gets the most out of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think he is too...and I think the coaches have a lot to do with the success of some players.

 

Not that Brady or Rodgers or anyone with the talent would not be really good anyway...I think the right coach takes them to the next level and gets the most out of them.

Then that's why Pagano has to go. Not getting to the next level. I get that his GM and owner are idiots, but still. What's going on there is inexcusable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then that's why Pagano has to go. Not getting to the next level. I get that his GM and owner are idiots, but still. What's going on there is inexcusable.

 

No doubt...he has talent at QB...though, hamstrung a bit by having a GM who ignores the glaring needs and keeping his franchise player upright.

 

Im sure they wished they would have just kept Arians.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It didn't hurt having John Riggins,that dude was a beast,his run in Super Bowl XVII was :thumbsup:

Riggens only played on one of his super bowl winning teams. I believe Gibbs' Redskins are the only great team whose biggest star was the offensive line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(it woulda been nice if you guys included the teams they coached....)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(it woulda been nice if you guys included the teams they coached....)

Everybody else here knows football

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everybody else here knows football

 

:(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Riggens only played on one of his super bowl winning teams. I believe Gibbs' Redskins are the only great team whose biggest star was the offensive line.

yeah that was why I referred to that Super Bowl and agreed The Hogs were :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×