So. 49ers vs Patriots for the SB

[Reality 3,121]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I'm looking at the combined schedules sh#t-for-brains.  You keep cherry picking.  

It's like you don't know how to read or comprehend basic sentences.  Maybe you need to step away from the keyboard for a while.  Let's say, 3 weeks?  Great!

 

I don't think you know what cherry picking means.... You may want to consider your own advice. 

[shorepatrol 1,871]

Chiefs looking to take the lead going into half without Mahomey. Huh. 

[Gladiators 2,031]

5 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

The azz rape the Niners are putting on EVERY team they've played is a pretty good indication of STFU until you come and get some. 11/24 

Again, I think the 49ers are for real, but 9-0 against the now 1-7 Redskins isn’t an azz raping. 24-20 against the Steelers isn’t an azz raping either...

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

3 minutes ago, Reality said:

I don't think you know what cherry picking means.... You may want to consider your own advice. 

You may want to step away.  You keep trying to change the stats that were initially presented to make it look like it's something it's not.

I keep talking combined schedule, you keep talking about 2 teams.  Eventually you braggarts get your comeuppance.  You'll get that when you start playing contenders and not bottom-dwellers.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

2 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

Chiefs looking to take the lead going into half without Mahomey. Huh. 

It's crazy, I know.   They still have Kelce, Hill, Watkins, McCoy, Hardman - the Chiefs are for real.  But proves my point even further about contenders vs bottom-dwellers.

[shorepatrol 1,871]

1 minute ago, Gladiators said:

Again, I think the 49ers are for real, but 9-0 against the now 1-7 Redskins isn’t an azz raping. 24-20 against the Steelers isn’t an azz raping either...

Shut out win in slop and overcoming 5 TO's. Ya , I'm gonna go with azz whippings. 

[Gladiators 2,031]

Just now, shorepatrol said:

Shut out win in slop and overcoming 5 TO's. Ya , I'm gonna go with azz whippings. 

That’s fine. We have different definitions.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

Just now, shorepatrol said:

Shut out win in slop and overcoming 5 TO's. Ya , I'm gonna go with azz whippings. 

You're entitled to your opinion, but no one's looking at the 49ers as SuperBowl winners quite yet.  The schedule they've played has made them look better than they possibly are.

[shorepatrol 1,871]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You're entitled to your opinion, but no one's looking at the 49ers as SuperBowl winners quite yet.  The schedule they've played has made them look better than they possibly are.

You'll still be saying that when they're in the NFCCG.  Second half better go better for the pack

[Bier Meister 1,748]

10-3 @ chi (3-4)

21-16 vs min (6-2)

27-16 vs den (2-6)

27-34 vs phil (4-4)

34-24 @ dal (4-3)

23-22 vs det (3-3-1)

42-24 vs oak (3-4)

14-14 @ kc (5-2; vs moore)

 

gb's defense has been decent and their wrs have been injured.  squeezing by.....

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

3 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

You'll still be saying that when they're in the NFCCG.  Second half better go better for the pack

Actually, you'll have no idea what I'll say.  I'm not AGAINST the 49ers.  I like them.  I'm glad they're doing well.  What I do have is a problem with braggarts acting like they've already won the NFCCG and the SuperBowl when the competition they played up until today was comprised of nothing but creampuffs.  HTH.

You guys need to slow your roll because the 49ers need to be tested with contenders, not bottom-dwellers, before we can declare anything substantive.

[Reality 3,121]

1 minute ago, Bier Meister said:

10-3 @ chi (3-4)

21-16 vs min (6-2)

27-16 vs den (2-6)

27-34 vs phil (4-4)

34-24 @ dal (4-3)

23-22 vs det (3-3-1)

42-24 vs oak (3-4)

14-14 @ kc (5-2; vs moore)

 

gb's defense has been decent and their wrs have been injured.  squeezing by.....

Not exactly murderers row but, that was my point... People that have 2 brain cells to rub together already gathered that though.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

Just now, Reality said:

Not exactly murderers row but, that was my point... People that have 2 brain cells to rub together already gathered that though.

No one knows what your point was other than "THE 49ERS HAVE ALREADY WON THE SUPERBOWL!  THEY'RE DOMINATING!"

[Gladiators 2,031]

Not as nice as Bier’s

 

Bucs 2-5

Bengals 0-8

Steelers 2-4 (no rapistberger)

Browns 2-5

Rams 5-3

Redskins 1-7

Panthers 4-3

[Reality 3,121]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

No one knows what your point was other than "THE 49ERS HAVE ALREADY WON THE SUPERBOWL!  THEY'RE DOMINATING!"

Do me a favor, quote me saying what you posted above. Thanks in advance.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

3 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

Not as nice as Bier’s

 

Bucs 2-5

Bengals 0-8

Steelers 2-4 (no rapistberger)

Browns 2-5

Rams 5-3

Redskins 1-7

Panthers 4-3

Which was MY point exactly.  16-35 opponent record of SF vs a 30-28 combined opponent record of GB. 

I'm not saying GB has already won the Superbowl, either. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

2 minutes ago, Reality said:

Do me a favor, quote me saying what you posted above. Thanks in advance.

You seem like a smart guy.  Figure it out.  I mean, we've only been arguing about for the last hour.

[Reality 3,121]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You seem like a smart guy.  Figure it out.  I mean, we've only been arguing about for the last hour.

That's what I figured. You can't because it's not possible, I haven't said anything of the sort. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

That's what I figured. You can't because it's not possible, I haven't said anything of the sort. 

Jesus, you're kind of dense.  You really need to step away.  Maybe have your mom come downstairs and read the posts so she can explain it to you short sentences.  Or maybe she could draw it out for you in crayon if that makes it easier.

[Reality 3,121]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Jesus, you're kind of dense.  You really need to step away.  Maybe have your mom come downstairs and read the posts so she can explain it to you short sentences.  Or maybe she could draw it out for you in crayon if that makes it easier.

So, you post something I didn't say and attribute it to me but, when called on it you can't produce.. And I'm the one with an issue?

Jesus man, like seriously, this is bordering on psychotic behavior...

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

5 minutes ago, Reality said:

So, you post something I didn't say and attribute it to me but, when called on it you can't produce.. And I'm the one with an issue?

Jesus man, like seriously, this is bordering on psychotic behavior...

Did I say you actually said that?  Or was it more of an "implication" based upon ALL of your posts in here so far.  Let's see my post again: 

"No one knows what your point was other than "THE 49ERS HAVE ALREADY WON THE SUPERBOWL!  THEY'RE DOMINATING!""

Hmmm...."No one knows what your point was" should be your first clue.  I think smart people probably had this figured out already.  What did your mom say?  Was she able to help you understand?

 

[Reality 3,121]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Did I say you actually said that?  Or was it more of an "implication" based upon ALL of your posts in here so far.  Let's see my post again: 

"No one knows what your point was other than "THE 49ERS HAVE ALREADY WON THE SUPERBOWL!  THEY'RE DOMINATING!""

Hmmm...."No one knows what your point was" should be your first clue.  I think smart people probably had this figured out already.  What did your mom say?  Was she able to help you understand?

 

So, you made sh!t up, got called on it, and can't produce. Yes, I was already aware.

I'll consider you dealt with from here on out.

 

[Bier Meister 1,748]

16 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

Not as nice as Bier’s

 

31-17 Bucs 2-5 

41-17 Bengals 0-8

24-20 Steelers 2-4 (no rapistberger)

31-3 Browns 2-5

20-7 Rams 5-3

9-0 Redskins 1-7

51-13 Panthers 4-3

49ers are a young team still putting things together. they have a dominating defense that will occasionally give up a big play or two. today's play came from the lead candidate for mvp when bosa was out. otherwise handled a good panther team with a 4 game win streak and a qb who typically takes care of the ball (no ints until today (3) and 7 sacks).if they go .500 for the remainder of the season they will be about 12-4.  A fine turn around from last years 4-12.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

2 minutes ago, Bier Meister said:

49ers are a young team still putting things together. they have a dominating defense that will occasionally give up a big play or two. today's play came from the lead candidate for mvp when bosa was out. otherwise handled a good panther team with a 4 game win streak and a qb who typically takes care of the ball (no ints until today (3) and 7 sacks).if they go .500 for the remainder of the season they will be about 12-4.  A fine turn around from last years 4-12.

Yep!  I even have Kittle, Gould and the SF Defense on my FF roster.  I think the 49ers are a fine team.

[Gladiators 2,031]

2 minutes ago, Bier Meister said:

49ers are a young team still putting things together. they have a dominating defense that will occasionally give up a big play or two. today's play came from the lead candidate for mvp when bosa was out. otherwise handled a good panther team with a 4 game win streak and a qb who typically takes care of the ball (no ints until today (3) and 7 sacks).if they go .500 for the remainder of the season they will be about 12-4.  A fine turn around from last years 4-12.

Good info. I like the fact that they’re going under the radar and don’t have a bunch of big names. I’d be totally fine with a Pats vs 49ers SB with the 49ers azz raping (shore’s term) them.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

@Reality

I owe you an apology.  I had you mixed up with @shorepatrol.  I see you actually wanted this thread delete already on the first page.  I have no beef with you or the 49ers.  I would root for the 49ers if they made it to the SuperBowl. 

My only beef was, like you, the bragging about Superbowls not even 1/2 way in the season and wanted to point out how silly that was.

I only want peace between us. 

[Bier Meister 1,748]

5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yep!  I even have Kittle, Gould and the SF Defense on my FF roster.  I think the 49ers are a fine team.

I do not think it is a fluke, but two things will happen:

1) things will get tougher for them with a more challenging schedule.

2) they will get better as they play together more and get healthy. they just rushed for 230 yards without 2 high tier guards and FB.  the passing game is functional but will become better.

 

very realistic contender for SB.  NFC is tough, especially NFCW

[shorepatrol 1,871]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

@Reality

I owe you an apology.  I had you mixed up with @shorepatrol.  I see you actually wanted this thread delete already on the first page.  I have no beef with you or the 49ers.  I would root for the 49ers if they made it to the SuperBowl. 

My only beef was, like you, the bragging about Superbowls not even 1/2 way in the season and wanted to point out how silly that was.

I only want peace between us. 

No bragging. I predicted the Niners vs Pats in SB. 

[drobeski 3,061]

I'll take the Pat's beating the 9ers by 6

[Reality 3,121]

10 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

@Reality

I owe you an apology.  I had you mixed up with @shorepatrol.  I see you actually wanted this thread delete already on the first page.  I have no beef with you or the 49ers.  I would root for the 49ers if they made it to the SuperBowl. 

My only beef was, like you, the bragging about Superbowls not even 1/2 way in the season and wanted to point out how silly that was.

I only want peace between us. 

I'm good with that.

[Mr. Hand 482]

On 10/22/2019 at 12:00 AM, IGotWorms said:

That’s too kind—they don’t have sh1t. A couple serviceable running backs. A washed up tight end. Some wide receivers who maybe shouldn’t even be in the league.

Great job

Did you see what Aaron Jones did again last night? Serviceable.....LMAO

[IGotWorms 4,062]

3 minutes ago, Mr. Hand said:

Did you see what Aaron Jones did again last night? Serviceable.....LMAO

Yeah I was off on that one

 That said you have to be concerned about their lack of pass catchers going forward, no? What’s going to happen when they have to actually pass downfield?

[Mr. Hand 482]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Yeah I was off on that one

 That said you have to be concerned about their lack of pass catchers going forward, no? What’s going to happen when they have to actually pass downfield?

What? Rodgers has thrown for 734 yards with 8TDs the last two weeks without Adams. You are off on this one as well LMAO

[IGotWorms 4,062]

12 minutes ago, Mr. Hand said:

What? Rodgers has thrown for 734 yards with 8TDs the last two weeks without Adams. You are off on this one as well LMAO

That’s mostly Jones too. His best receiver right now is Jake focking Kumerow. 48 yards, wow. Look they’re definitely a great team playing lights out right now, I’m talking when push comes to shove in the playoffs. I’m assuming Davante will be back? And that’ll definitely be big. But not much behind him as far as pass catchers go. We’re talking about whether they can win the super bowl here, not whether they’re a good team that’s currently playing very well

[Mr. Hand 482]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

That’s mostly Jones too. His best receiver right now is Jake focking Kumerow. 48 yards, wow. Look they’re definitely a great team playing lights out right now, I’m talking when push comes to shove in the playoffs. I’m assuming Davante will be back? And that’ll definitely be big. But not much behind him as far as pass catchers go. We’re talking about whether they can win the super bowl here, not whether they’re a good team that’s currently playing very well

https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2019/10/21/packers-wr-marquez-valdes-scantling-leads-nfl-in-catches-over-40-yards/

[IGotWorms 4,062]

Just now, Mr. Hand said:

https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2019/10/21/packers-wr-marquez-valdes-scantling-leads-nfl-in-catches-over-40-yards/

If you’re going to get through the playoffs and win the super bowl on long bombs, good luck. You’re going against good teams that aren’t too likely to break down in coverage. I mean other than the Ravens with Flacco has anyone done that in recent history?

 Look there’s no point in arguing. I’m identifying it as a flaw that could keep them from winning a title. If I’m going to be proven wrong it’ll be in December and January.

[Mr. Hand 482]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

If you’re going to get through the playoffs and win the super bowl on long bombs, good luck. You’re going against good teams that aren’t too likely to break down in coverage. I mean other than the Ravens with Flacco has anyone done that in recent history?

 Look there’s no point in arguing. I’m identifying it as a flaw that could keep them from winning a title. If I’m going to be proven wrong it’ll be in December and January.

But they aren't winning  on long bombs. They are winning with long sustained drives, a better defense and a better running game. The receivers have stepped up and Adams will be back soon.

[IGotWorms 4,062]

Just now, Mr. Hand said:

But they aren't winning  on long bombs. They are winning with long sustained drives, a better defense and a better running game. The receivers have stepped up and Adams will be back soon.

Yes I know. Good job. There’s still have the season and playoffs left but maybe they’ll they’ll this up til February. That’s what you apparently believe and perhaps you’re right. 

[nospk 230]

We all know that the Hackers only beat the Lions because they got a freebie from the refs 

[Mr. Hand 482]

8 minutes ago, nospk said:

We all know that the Hackers only beat the Lions because they got a freebie from the refs 

or the fact the Lions failed in the red zone several times and had to kick field goals. Oh, and the rushing touchdown they had where the back didn't cross the goal line.