So. 49ers vs Patriots for the SB

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

1 hour ago, iam90sbaby said:

By 3 away by 14 at the home

No way. GB gets the edge in that matchup.  NO is good, no doubt.  But they ain't GB good. 

GB by 3 away and by 7 at home in GB.

[Reality 3,121]

1 hour ago, Bier Meister said:

I like the addition of sanders

Great get, exactly what this team needed this season.

[listen2me 23 1,948]

I like Sanders.  If it helps Jimmy out and they get some where it is worth it.

Otherwise it is a pretty good haul for a 33 year old in March who is looking for a contract after the year.  Who has "some" injury concerns.  

He will be focused however since he is looking for 1 last contract.

[Bier Meister 1,748]

3 hours ago, nzoner said:

Just saw that news,of course as a Pettis owner I'm not overly thrilled but then again for as much as they've thrown the ball it really hasn't mattered to this point.

i am not not sure any of the current 49er wrs are consistently ff relevant.  someone may have a decent game here and there, but Jimmy spreads it around. even kittle is down this season.

[nzoner 939]

6 minutes ago, Bier Meister said:

i am not not sure any of the current 49er wrs are consistently ff relevant.  someone may have a decent game here and there, but Jimmy spreads it around. even kittle is down this season.

So far the only consistent FF numbers out of the 49er's this season is from the D.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,433]

Pats also signing Justin Bethel to improve the special teams.

[shorepatrol 1,871]

55 minutes ago, Patriotsfatboy1 said:

Pats also signing Justin Bethel to improve the special teams.

And they are playing Balt next week. Focking BB

[shorepatrol 1,871]

I like adding Sanders. SB winning vet that has speed and can get open. 

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,433]

23 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

And they are playing Balt next week. Focking BB

I think the big thing is that Bethel is 2x All Pro.

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

4 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

No way. GB gets the edge in that matchup.  NO is good, no doubt.  But they ain't GB good. 

GB by 3 away and by 7 at home in GB.

Assuming we are talking a playoff game in January, give me the saints in the dome, pats if it's at Lambeau. 

[shorepatrol 1,871]

57 minutes ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

Assuming we are talking a playoff game in January, give me the saints in the dome, pats if it's at Lambeau. 

I'd rather play GB in GB than the Saints in NO. 

[shorepatrol 1,871]

[IGotWorms 4,062]

Prescient 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

I will say this game goes a long way for the 49ers in making them a true legit team.  The Panthers aren't that great, but at least they aren't the creampuffs they've played up until today.  I know the SF DEF is legit, I'm just not necessarily sold on the offense.

Let's see how GB plays tonight before I render a final verdict.

 

[shorepatrol 1,871]

9 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I will say this game goes a long way for the 49ers in making them a true legit team.  The Panthers aren't that great, but at least they aren't the creampuffs they've played up until today.  I know the SF DEF is legit, I'm just not necessarily sold on the offense.

Let's see how GB plays tonight before I render a final verdict.

 

They should blow out KC with no Mahomey 

[Reality 3,121]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I will say this game goes a long way for the 49ers in making them a true legit team.  The Panthers aren't that great, but at least they aren't the creampuffs they've played up until today.  I know the SF DEF is legit, I'm just not necessarily sold on the offense.

Let's see how GB plays tonight before I render a final verdict.

 

Coming in to tonight, GB has played exactly 2 teams with a winning record to this point in the season, one of them is Dallas... So... Not sure I'd be talking smack about schedules.

GB has also played 5 of their first 7 games at home..

We'll let y'all know when and if we consider you fellas true contenders or not. Sound good?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

9 minutes ago, Reality said:

Coming in to tonight, GB has played exactly 2 teams with a winning record to this point in the season, one of them is Dallas... So... Not sure I'd be talking smack about schedules.

GB has also played 5 of their first 7 games at home..

We'll let y'all know when and if we consider you fellas true contenders or not. Sound good?

Huh?  Green Bay's opponents not including tonight's games are a combined 22-23 or 23-22 (can't remember).  The 49ers AND Patriots (also not including today's games) opponents were a combined 11-31.  The very definition of "creampuff schedule".

You need to rethink your post because the numbers don't support it at all.

[Reality 3,121]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Huh?  Green Bay's opponents not including tonight's games are a combined 22-23 or 23-22 (can't remember).  The 49ers AND Patriots (also not including today's games) opponents were a combined 11-31.  The very definition of "creampuff schedule".

You need to rethink your post because the numbers don't favor you at all.

Kind of a dumb stat considering the 9ers just beat Carolina, you know, a winning team. The 9ers have beat the Rams as well, that's 9 wins alone...

You should learn to add. Debating really isn't your strong suit, you should consider sitting these discussions out. 

[shorepatrol 1,871]

2 minutes ago, Reality said:

Kind of a dumb stat considering the 9ers just beat Carolina

50 FOCKING 1 - 13. The game wasn't even that close. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

6 minutes ago, Reality said:

Kind of a dumb stat considering the 9ers just beat Carolina, you know, a winning team. The 9ers have beat the Rams as well, that's 9 wins alone...

You should learn to add. Debating really isn't your strong suit, you should consider sitting these discussions out. 

I think you need to go back re-read what I posted.  I think you're hiding stats to make it look like the 49ers have played the best teams in the NFL when, in fact, they haven't.  The FACT remains that the Patriots AND 49ers have played a schedule (up to but not including today) of opponents whose combined games are 11-31 thereabouts.  You can't sugar coat that so stop trying.  I know YOU think it's a dumb stat because it exposes the truth about the strength of the teams the 49ers have actually played, which isn't very flattering.  So you're coming up with something - ANYTHING - to throw up a smoke screen and pretend the 49ers were rolling over contenders. They weren't.  They were beating creampuffs for the last 7 weeks.

Also, I even acknowledged in my previous post that the Panthers were the first team the 49ers played that were halfway decent (but not fantastic).  

[shorepatrol 1,871]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

 

 

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

 

Also, I even acknowledged in my previous post that the Panthers were the first team the 49ers played that were halfway decent (but not fantastic).  

 

I thought you were waiting for the Rams to beat our azz too. Keep dismissing pookie 

[Reality 3,121]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I think you need to go back re-read what I posted.  I think you're hiding stats to make it look like the 49ers have played the best teams..

You have horrible reading comprehension skills, nowhere did I ever say the 9ers have played the best teams. I was pointing out that GB schedule hasn't been great either, so, you probably shouldn't use schedules when making a case against SF...

This is a waste of my time..

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

4 minutes ago, Reality said:

You have horrible reading comprehension skills, nowhere did I ever say the 9ers have played the best teams. I was pointing out that GB schedule hasn't been great either, so, you probably shouldn't use schedules when making a case against SF...

This is a waste of my time..

You're right it's a waste of time - for me.  I'd have better success arguing with Forrest Gump - he appears to be smarter than you.

The GB schedule at the very least is TWICE as hard as the 49ers.  HTH.

Let's save the gloating and grandstanding that the 49ers have already won the superbowl until. y'know, they actually do.

[shorepatrol 1,871]

Just now, Reality said:

You have horrible reading comprehension skills, nowhere did I ever say the 9ers have played the best teams. I was pointing out that GB schedule hasn't been great either, so, you probably shouldn't use schedules when making a case against SF...

This is a waste of my time..

GB has beat better teams. That's not up for discussion with me. Niners have DOMINATED every team they've played including Pitt with those focking 5 TO's. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

3 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

I thought you were waiting for the Rams to beat our azz too. Keep dismissing pookie 

Huh?  What?  I suppose it's possible I did, but I don't remember. 

And I don't know who "pookie" is.

[shorepatrol 1,871]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You're right it's a waste of time - for me.  I'd have better success arguing with Forrest Gump - he appears to be smarter than you.

The GB schedule at the very least is TWICE as hard as the 49ers.  HTH.

Let's save the gloating and grandstanding that the 49ers have already won the superbowl if they actually do.

11/24 buddy. Can't wait

[Gladiators 2,031]

Just now, shorepatrol said:

GB has beat better teams. That's not up for discussion with me. Niners have DOMINATED every team they've played including Pitt with those focking 5 TO's. 

Agreed.

I’m happy to see the 49ers doing well. I’m not a fan, but it’s nice to see another team step up in the NFC.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

Just now, shorepatrol said:

11/24 buddy. Can't wait

Me neither.  It's going to be a great battle! 

[shorepatrol 1,871]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Me neither.  It's going to be a great battle! 

EH 

[Reality 3,121]

6 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

GB has beat better teams. That's not up for discussion with me. Niners have DOMINATED every team they've played including Pitt with those focking 5 TO's. 

There's no question which team has been more dominant. 

GB has their hands full with a Mahomes'less KC team... Yeeeeeeeesh.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

2 minutes ago, Reality said:

There's no question which team has been more dominant. 

GB has their hands full with a Mahomes'less KC team... Yeeeeeeeesh.

Well, that's the WHOLE point of this discussion, isn't it?  While you're team has been playing creampuffs up until now, GB has been playing contenders.

OF COURSE you're going to look dominant when you play creampuffs.  When you brag about being so DOMINANT, you have to look who you've played which is why you shouldn't be so arrogant.  Your schedule doesn't match your bragging.

[shorepatrol 1,871]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

There's no question which team has been more dominant. 

GB has their hands full with a Mahomes'less KC team... Yeeeeeeeesh.

I'm betting on it. 

[Reality 3,121]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Well, that's the WHOLE point of this discussion, isn't it?  While you're team has been playing creampuffs up until now, GB has been playing contenders.

OF COURSE you're going to look dominant when you play creampuffs.  When you brag about being so DOMINANT, you have to look who you've played which is why you shouldn't be so arrogant.

GB has played 2 teams with a winning record coming as of right this moment, the exact same amount as SF....

I'm having a discussion with a retard..

[shorepatrol 1,871]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Well, that's the WHOLE point of this discussion, isn't it?  While you're team has been playing creampuffs up until now, GB has been playing contenders.

OF COURSE you're going to look dominant when you play creampuffs.  When you brag about being so DOMINANT, you have to look who you've played which is why you shouldn't be so arrogant.  Your schedule doesn't match your bragging.

The azz rape the Niners are putting on EVERY team they've played is a pretty good indication of STFU until you come and get some. 11/24 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

2 minutes ago, Reality said:

GB has played 2 teams with a winning record coming in to today, the exact same amount as SF....

I'm having a discussion with a retard..

You keep repeating this nonsense. I'm looking at the ENTIRE schedule of teams they've played so far and you keep cherry picking.

Look at the entire schedule, moron, and stop bragging about how the 49ers have already won the Superbowl.  The 49ers schedule betrays your bragging.

It's like your a child.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

1 minute ago, shorepatrol said:

The azz rape the Niners are putting on EVERY team they've played is a pretty good indication of STFU until you come and get some. 11/24 

AZZ raping creampuffs?  yeah, okay. 

[Reality 3,121]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

You keep repeating this nonsense. I'm looking at the ENTIRE schedule of teams they've played so far and you keep cherry picking.

Look at the entire schedule, moron, and stop bragging about how the 49ers have already won the Superbowl.  The 49ers schedule betrays your bragging.

2 teams with winning records isn't cherry picking you focking moron, it's facts.

[shorepatrol 1,871]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

AZZ raping creampuffs?  yeah, okay. 

11/24

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

Just now, shorepatrol said:

11/24

Yeah, it will be a great game! 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

2 teams with winning records isn't cherry picking you focking moron, it's facts.

I'm looking at the combined schedules sh#t-for-brains.  You keep cherry picking.  

It's like you don't know how to read or comprehend basic sentences.  Maybe you need to step away from the keyboard for a while.  Let's say, 3 weeks?  Great!