Jump to content
Cdub100

Coronavirus - Doomsday

Recommended Posts

VAX UP KIDS! 

MOMMY AND DADDY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT WE'RE PUTTING IN YOUR LITTLE BODIES, BUT HEY, THE GOVERNMENT SAYS YOU'LL BE FINE. 

YOU SHOULD ALL BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

India didn’t use the mRNA vaccines

Wrong retard, as always. You are simply a fountain of misinformation and easily one of the dumbest asshats on the planet. Also, that doesn't mean they didn't get the pfizer or moderna jabs elsewhere since they are pilots. You're a total loser and always will be.

https://scrip.pharmaintelligence.informa.com/SC146651/Watch-Out-Pfizer-Moderna--Indias-First-mRNA-Vaccine-Is-Here

Excess death are exploding worldwide and 'they' cannot figure out why, but they do know why. 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2023/08/11/more-americans-dying-than-before-pandemic-covid-deaths/70542423007/

https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-archive/2023/june/100000-excess-deaths-cardiovascular-disease

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, League Champion said:

But at least she didn't get COVID 

 

 

She was in the Olympics 23 years ago, she’s no longer a “top tier athlete”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, lod001 said:

Wrong retard, as always. You are simply a fountain of misinformation and easily one of the dumbest asshats on the planet. Also, that doesn't mean they didn't get the pfizer or moderna jabs elsewhere since they are pilots. You're a total loser and always will be.

https://scrip.pharmaintelligence.informa.com/SC146651/Watch-Out-Pfizer-Moderna--Indias-First-mRNA-Vaccine-Is-Here

Excess death are exploding worldwide and 'they' cannot figure out why, but they do know why. 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2023/08/11/more-americans-dying-than-before-pandemic-covid-deaths/70542423007/

https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-archive/2023/june/100000-excess-deaths-cardiovascular-disease

You post an article about how India didn’t authorize an mRNA vaccine until June 2022, and you think that is proving me wrong?  Lol

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

She was in the Olympics 23 years ago, she’s no longer a “top tier athlete”

Oh. So that's why she died. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Oh. So that's why she died. 

I have no idea why she died and neither do you.  Simply pointing out she was not currently an athlete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I have no idea why she died and neither do you.  Simply pointing out she was not currently an athlete

The shots tend to lead you to not knowing how they died. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

The shots tend to lead you to not knowing how they died. :doh:

Too bad we don’t even know if she was vaccinated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

The shots tend to lead you to not knowing how they died. :doh:

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Anti-science, anti-vaxx morons are my favorite cultist.

Stupid phuking morons...SMH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Too bad we don’t even know if she was vaccinated

You would have heard if she didn't. The shaming was relentless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Anti-science, anti-vaxx morons are my favorite cultist.

Stupid phuking morons...SMH

Why are you liberals so stupid to think that anti chinese flu shots are anti vaxx? It's not a vaxx dumbass.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

You would have heard if she didn't. The shaming was relentless.

Why would you have heard?  99% of the world had no clue who she was before she died.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Wade Garrett said:

Anti-science, anti-vaxx morons are my favorite cultist.

Stupid phuking morons...SMH

Like 2 Genders? You're a good little Sheep Boyo. Keep doing what they tell you and you'll be just fine. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, TimHauck said:

You post an article about how India didn’t authorize an mRNA vaccine until June 2022, and you think that is proving me wrong?  Lol

Once again, you have nothing. June 2022 was a year ago asshat. That means, since the mrna can kill instantly, it had 12 months of being in their bodies in India (not including the low IQ losers in India that ran to find a pfizer or moderna dose). I prove you wrong as usual. Gawd, you are so stupid. At this point the jab has turned your formerly completely smooth brain into just a blob. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, lod001 said:

Once again, you have nothing. June 2022 was a year ago asshat. That means, since the mrna can kill instantly, it had 12 months of being in their bodies in India (not including the low IQ losers in India that ran to find a pfizer or moderna dose). I prove you wrong as usual. Gawd, you are so stupid. At this point the jab has turned your formerly completely smooth brain into just a blob. 

9% of their total vaccine doses (of all brands) given have been since this vaccine was authorized according to ourworldindata.  And even that consists of a small fraction from this brand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/12/2023 at 9:30 PM, Baker Boy said:

wrong again
 

If any FDA-approved drug like hydroxychloroquine (or ivermectin) proved effective against COVID, pharmaceutical companies would no longer be legally allowed to fast-track their billion-dollar vaccines to market under Emergency Use Authorization.

He's ALWAYS wrong. Being the retard that he is, he of course, doesn't think ivermectin works for covid, even though it's been proven over and over again.

Another study showing it works.

Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Peru: 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p<0.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted

Objective. We aimed to identify mortality trends associated with COVID-19 deaths in Peru during April through November 2020, when mass treatments with ivermectin (IVM), a drug of Nobel Prize-honored distinction, were autonomously deployed at different times and to different extents in Peru’s 25 states under a national policy that authorized these treatments.

Conclusion. Mass treatments with IVM, a drug safely used in 3.7 billion doses worldwide since 1987, most likely caused these reductions in deaths during the time periods in which it was deployed. 
 

https://www.scstatehouse.gov/CommitteeInfo/SenateMedicalAffairsCommittee/Dryad Data -- Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Peru_ 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p_0.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted.pdf

Lame-Tard Hack will come up with another lame excuse for why he claims that it's not a valid study. His lame excuse have gotten weaker as the months go by and the hole he has dug himself is miles deep. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, TimHauck said:

9% of their total vaccine doses (of all brands) given have been since this vaccine was authorized according to ourworldindata.  And even that consists of a small fraction from this brand.

But are your Kids vaccinated? You never really answered the question. X

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, League Champion said:

But are your Kids vaccinated? You never really answered the question. X

I said no the first time you asked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, lod001 said:

He's ALWAYS wrong. Being the retard that he is, he of course, doesn't think ivermectin works for covid, even though it's been proven over and over again.

Another study showing it works.

Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Peru: 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p<0.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted

Objective. We aimed to identify mortality trends associated with COVID-19 deaths in Peru during April through November 2020, when mass treatments with ivermectin (IVM), a drug of Nobel Prize-honored distinction, were autonomously deployed at different times and to different extents in Peru’s 25 states under a national policy that authorized these treatments.

Conclusion. Mass treatments with IVM, a drug safely used in 3.7 billion doses worldwide since 1987, most likely caused these reductions in deaths during the time periods in which it was deployed. 
 

https://www.scstatehouse.gov/CommitteeInfo/SenateMedicalAffairsCommittee/Dryad Data -- Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Peru_ 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p_0.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted.pdf

Lame-Tard Hack will come up with another lame excuse for why he claims that it's not a valid study. His lame excuse have gotten weaker as the months go by and the hole he has dug himself is miles deep. 

Ivermectin was approved in Peru in May 2020.

The fact that Peru did horribly and had widespread use of ivermectin may be some of the best evidence we have that even if ivermectin did anything helpful (it didn’t), it wasn’t nearly enough to “prevent the EUA of the vaccines.”  So thanks lod, for helping prove my point!

Serious question, why do you believe every garbage study with huge conflicts of interest that you don’t even read from “Vigilant Fox,” “Chief Nerd,” “jikkyleaks” and whoever else, but don’t believe any of the piles of much larger and better studies showing how effective the vaccines have been against hospitalization and death?

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Serious question, why do you believe every garbage study

Like the usefulness of vaccines, masks, hand sanitizers, the 6' rule, quarantine, all that BS?

C'mon, It was all BS. Don't pick and choose. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, League Champion said:

Like the usefulness of vaccines, masks, hand sanitizers, the 6' rule, quarantine, all that BS?

C'mon, It was all BS. Don't pick and choose. 

There are tons of well done vaccine studies showing their effectiveness especially against death.  Not on the other stuff.  I’m not picking and choosing, I’ve actually read many of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, lod001 said:

He's ALWAYS wrong. Being the retard that he is, he of course, doesn't think ivermectin works for covid, even though it's been proven over and over again.

Another study showing it works.

Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Peru: 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p<0.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted

Objective. We aimed to identify mortality trends associated with COVID-19 deaths in Peru during April through November 2020, when mass treatments with ivermectin (IVM), a drug of Nobel Prize-honored distinction, were autonomously deployed at different times and to different extents in Peru’s 25 states under a national policy that authorized these treatments.

Conclusion. Mass treatments with IVM, a drug safely used in 3.7 billion doses worldwide since 1987, most likely caused these reductions in deaths during the time periods in which it was deployed. 
 

https://www.scstatehouse.gov/CommitteeInfo/SenateMedicalAffairsCommittee/Dryad Data -- Ivermectin for COVID-19 in Peru_ 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths, p_0.002 for effect by state, then 13-fold increase after ivermectin use restricted.pdf

Lame-Tard Hack will come up with another lame excuse for why he claims that it's not a valid study. His lame excuse have gotten weaker as the months go by and the hole he has dug himself is miles deep. 

If you want commentary on that actual “study,” the biggest thing that stands out to to me is that their metric for “success” was the % decline from the peak of deaths.  Which is pretty ridiculous, because it doesn’t contextualize how high the peaks were, and they could have been using ivermectin before the peak which did nothing to help prevent the peak from getting as high as it did in the first place.  This sounds like a paper @Casual Observer would write, he’s obsessed with calling out that things that go up usually come down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

If you want commentary on that actual “study,” the biggest thing that stands out to to me is that their metric for “success” was the % decline from the peak of deaths.  Which is pretty ridiculous, because it doesn’t contextualize how high the peaks were, and they could have been using ivermectin before the peak which did nothing to help prevent the peak from getting as high as it did in the first place.  This sounds like a paper @Casual Observer would write, he’s obsessed with calling out that things that go up usually come down.

TimCrack pretty much is the guy on the debate team that was allowed on the team because he's a retard. Charity. Cringeworthy. 

Give it up. You are embarrassing yourself corky. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

TimCrack pretty much is the guy on the debate team that was allowed on the team because he's a retard. Charity. Cringeworthy. 

Give it up. You are embarrassing yourself corky. 

Feel free to point out what you disagree with about my comment.  Did you read the study?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Feel free to point out what you disagree with about my comment.  Did you read the study?

582 pages of you being wrong. At one point you just became another stain on mdcack's wonderwoman underoos. No need to point out how wrong you are anymore. It's just a given. You are a focking retard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

582 pages of you being wrong. At one point you just became another stain on mdcack's wonderwoman underoos. No need to point out how wrong you are anymore. It's just a given. You are a focking retard.

Pathetic, even for you.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Pathetic, even for you.   

Good one corky. Just keep doing what you are told to do. Be a good liberal sheep. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was full of schit from the beginning. Citing Tweeter postings and spinning out of control to the point where he decides when the CDC was right or wrong. He's a hypocritical clown, and a pedophile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Good one corky. Just keep doing what ypu are told to do. Be a good liberal sheep. 

I don’t though.  I actually follow the evidence, regardless of what the CDC says. Funny that this racist dooshbag that once claimed to be black somehow thinks that makes me a hypocrite.

7 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

He was full of schit from the beginning. Citing Tweeter postings and spinning out of control to the point where he decides when the CDC was right or wrong. He's a hypocritical clown, and a pedophile.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×